Oh no no no no christcuck bros???? WE WERE DUPED!!!
>>41178735yeah no, this faggot is pushing unbased / speculative theories about descartes and kant. just a functional schizo.
>>41178785What are his Cartesian and Kantian theories? I could tell you whether he knows what he is talking about or is a delusional magician
>>41178735Lol God with extra steps and nuanced; not really God, stuff.Edomite hands typed this
>>41178798ie descartes was supposedly a jesuit spy, infiltrating rosecruitians, and was tasked with creating a philosophical framework that omited human psy abilities.which is just dumb and baseless.not shitting on psy abilities, but cmon man...
>>411787351. We invented Christianity to control you.2. Please do not believe in Christianity.So, which one is it then?If they invented Christianity and it's not real, why are they against it? Why does it make them seethe?
>>41178857reverse psychology
>>41178847That's kind of a mind-breaking thesis, but if I knew his interpretations of the philosophers I'd be able to tell whether he is a quack. I've seen some Rosicrucians wield some enormous power so with what I've been thru I wouldn't immediately doubt it. Are you saying he was a Rosicrucian or he was infiltrating the Rosicrucians? I will look into this and if the thread is still up will tell you what I think
>>41178847Meanwhile Descartes was pushing for the training of Samadhi in order to get to past Saturn mentally. I can't help but laugh at these e-celeb midwits and their subwit dicksuckers.
>>41178888>Are you saying he was a Rosicrucian or he was infiltrating the Rosicrucians?im not saying it, the dude on jesse michaels show, jason jorjani is the one pushing it, specifically that he was a jesuit spy. infiltrating rosicruicians. while offering no proof.im calling it unfounded baseless claims, until proven otherwise.looking into it as well.
>>41178926>Meanwhile Descartes was pushing for the training of Samadhireally, how so and where does he mention it specifically? or is that just your interpretation?
>>41178735>pope is a xeno traitordamn the orthobros were correct all along huh
>>41178950Read Rules for the Direction of the Mind & Meditations on First Philosophy. As well as the initiated texts on concentration and visualization. Finally put two and two together.
>>41178735This is exactly what the elites plan to tell the masses when ayys disclose themselves
Ok I read a little. There is a tension between the thesis that Promtheus brings tech reason and the thesis that the AEon brings Magick and psi. I think you're better off just reading Crowley
No they did not, humans just are fucking stupid pseudo superstitious retards and they took the message they tried to give us wrong and just ran with it
>>41178984Also he wants to revive Indo-Europeanism (Aryanism) but he veers off from and does not revive the language of Dharma. That is the whole problem with Prometheus, the use of technology without the guidance of Dharma, and causes a lot of problems for me and TIs and everyone else. My thesis would be Dharmic Fire. Also his idea of Prometheus, that society can be ordered Rationally using technology, is stuck in the AEon of Pisces. So we need a Dharmic Fire of the New AEon, and this has esoteric promise because the AEon is the Element Fire.
>>41178979>Finally put two and two together.that's a vague statement. you need to clearly specify how you interpret him supposedly pushing >the training of Samadhi in order to get to past Saturn mentally.?!
I've already said too much unto the profane. I keep my gems to myself.
>>41179026
>>41178984I think the two are synonymous.The rationale should be that the body (or bodies) is the technology.The only problem with this current administration, in my opinion, is that the bad kids are allowed to run off and do whatever they want in the material focused paradigm with material focused technology while the rest of us are expected to adhere to some rules while they completely act above what could be considered god authority.
>>41179120Can you connect this to the body without organs? Body as technology is very good kudos
>>41179155I don't understand the question
>>41179192I thought maybe you knew Deleuze because your take was very robust. The body without organs is from a book called Anti-Oedipus
>>41179200I'm not familiar with the literature, but yeah I think viewing the bodies as the technology is best case scenario and honestly the truth
