[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/x/ - Paranormal


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_1979.jpg (131 KB, 756x524)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
Is seeing auras something that only women can do? Can men learn to do it too?
>>
>>41197917
Go on a cold reading course or something along those lines, like entering the police force and training for interrogation tasks. At the end of the day that is the actual skill.
>>
If it's possible at all why haven't there been blind tests where multiple people claiming the ability view a line of people then independently give their answers, and there should be majority parallel of a certain aura color per person
>>
>>41198045
Aura Reading is just an autistic way to explain how to read people.
>>
>>41198106
People act like they’re literally seeing something though
>>
>>41198395
People act like they can do a lot of crazy shit, but that doesn't mean it's true
>>
>>41198106
So why haven't they cold red people as the same aura color in a hypothetical test? I don't care how they do it, I want to see independent majority agreed upon color colors, solely by looking at a person in a line up.
>>
>>41198516
>color colors
Aura colors, fuck phones
>>
>>41198395
Because they're seeing something. Body language, emotional and dialogue reactions on top of whatever instinctual bullshit that just doesn't register on a more conscious level.
>>
Every blind test has failed and never been able to replicate seeing the same signals. If it’s so varied from person to person doing the “aura” reading that they can’t come to a single blanket consensus reliably, then are they really seeing anything significant, or just making up things individually based on personal biases and imagination? The concept of cold reading to the extent of reliably deciding someone’s personality (such as aura claims) is incredibly wobbly. This kind of cold reading depends on confirmation bias of the participant via speech, and even with that, two people reading into a person’s micro expressions can come to very different conclusions. Aura reading is bogus.
>>
>Itt newfags that can't psybeam
>>
>>41197917
I never saw auras irl, just in dreaming scenarios where they were literal booming colorful auras.
Irl it’s just a hazy “imprint” of this weird green-blueish dark light, like the swirling waves one can see in a dark room meditating. No clue what that is. Also focusing on physical matter, with the eyes, completely nullifies this sight.

As for why results differ: my guess is that is because we exist and perceive these psionic phenomena as individuals. Subjectively. Each of our inner realities is different and unique therefore our interpretations and senses are different. This isn’t material concrete consensus reality stuff. It’s de WARP
>>
There were two or three times when people saw my aura or something there. One acted like he wanted to fight the others in shock.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.