Hypothetically, if history were to change, how would we know it? To that point, how do we know it hasn't already?
>>41231581we would probably have threads over how minor easily mistaken variations in spelling a word are proof we are living in a simulation
>>41231594why would any incongruencies even be noticed? history was changed and so everything is as it was regardless
>>41231604Well, you haven't described the mechanism of change, so why wouldn't any incongruencies be noticeable? e.g. I have the sentence, "He walked straight up to the guy and said, 'I'm straight, but could I suck your dick for a twenty?'" But then I decide to use a function to replace all instances of "straight" with "right." Now it reads, "He walked right up to the guy and said, 'I'm right, but could I suck your dick for a twenty?'" If we only ever saw the second sentence, we could infer the existence of the first version and the existence of a replace all function.
>>41231922
>>41231581The Mandela effect is exactly that
>>41231581You wouldn’t know. Some people don’t shift clean. Mind’s not in your brain (thoughts, memories, language) all pulled from somewhere else.Reality changes, but the info feed doesn’t always update. That’s why some remember things “wrong.” It’s just right for their old layer.One person can trigger a shift. Enough pain, energy, it happens. Souls swap too. The “you” here is just a meat puppet. The real you runs it from outside. And that “you” ain’t always the same.Sounds schizo? ok, I am not taking my meds.In 2014 I should’ve died. My girl back then did real occult shit, no chaos magick LARP. Said she shifted my consciousness to another reality so I’d live.I wasn’t supposed to make it. Yet I’m here.
>>41232417One of the few things I know changed: back then 2014, LGBT and woke discourse was already everywhere. Same level as 2022 here.Unis, social media, TV, school books, it was all over. Way more militant. Back then I didn’t care, I was young, didn’t give a shit. But it was there. Constant.Maybe since 2012 it explodes.No other obvious changes I can point to. Just that one. But it’s clear as fuck. That reality was way ahead on the woke stuff.Took me years to realize it.
>>41231922checked>Well, you haven't described the mechanism of change, so why wouldn't any incongruencies be noticeable?I know this from that girlfriend:Because the mechanism doesn’t rewrite everything. It’s not clean. Consciousness isn’t local, it’s streamed. Like a signal.Reality layers stack. Some people jump clean, others glitch mid-transfer. And if the shift isn’t global, if it’s triggered by ritual, trauma, high-energy collapse... then only the target moves. Everyone else is just “native” to that layer.You wouldn’t notice incongruencies unless your feed doesn’t match the new mesh. Then you get fragments.
>>41232500>Like a signal.And the signal’s not processed the same by everyone. Skull shape acts like a resonance chamber. Bone, cartilage, nasal cavity, fat densitym it all tweaks the filter. Different populations pick up slightly different data.Not about race, even within the same group, skull geometry varies. Those tiny physical differences change how the broadcast gets interpreted.Micro-changes in perception macro-changes in culture. Over time, societies diverge, even if they’re standing in the same “reality.”
>>41231594Language doesn’t change. Because it comes from the signal too. There’s a kind of primal proto-language, raw signal code. What we do here is pick words and wrap them around it. The signal’s two-way: we feed back how we use it, and it adapts. But it’s still the same core stream.Shifts don’t rewrite language. They change density. They change how we receive. A type‑1 skull might interpret signal X as Y in one layer, but as Z in another. The feed stays the same. The skull tunes the output.That’s why the world can look totally different and still feel “normal.” It’s all in the reception.
>>41232538Why doesn’t it change? Because words are magical. Words and sexual acts can bend the grid, mod reality itself. The sounds, the intent, the resonance, they’re levers. You speak or you join, and the pattern shifts. That’s why rituals use both.
>>41232544checked
>>41232511I'm wondering, would trepenating my skull help it be receptive to all frequencies at once? Or is it always limited somehow?
>>41232791>I'm wondering, would trepenating my skull help it be receptive to all frequencies at once? Or is it always limited somehow?Nah, trepanning won’t do shit. It’s not like there are “multiple stations” and you need to drill a hole to tune them all. There’s only one frequency.What changes is how you interpret it, skull geometry, tissue, micro‑stuff. Super subtle.The signal itself isn’t limited. Everyone’s already on it. What you get is the part of the feed that matches the pieces of “soul” you’re running. You want another person’s feed? You’d have to be them, have their soul‑puzzle parts.You’re already getting the one broadcast meant for you.
>>41232791Stuff you can do to get a cleaner read on the signal? The boring basics actually matter: exercise, diet, meditation, building muscle. All that changes micro‑resonance and gives you clearer thoughts.The signal’s still singular. It’s not just words, it’s images, feelings, archetypes, like a super‑broadcast. Think of a single fiber‑optic line: one beam of light, but your device pulls out text, video, games, whatever.You don’t get to hack it. You get what matches the pieces of soul you’re carrying. And that’s why certain soul‑types cluster in certain peoples or cultures, not race stuff, Julius Evola was close to understand this, just condensation of compatible shards. Sometimes you’re sent into a totally different group because there’s a job there only that shard can do. That’s the “correction” work.The soul itself is pure "information", no physical trait interferes with the signal. It’s the avatar‑body that distorts it. Work on the body and habits and you refine the interpretation. But the feed you’re receiving is the same singular stream; only your tuning changes.
>>41231581To us nothing would change if someone changed something going back in time chances are it would make another timeline. Probably the mandela effect is some type of connection with these other timelines that are close to our own. We connect with our other versions of ourselves mentally and end up with some memories mixed and it makes dejavus and mandela effects.
>>41232901>timelinesthat isall timelines, all reincarnations, all lives are happening now. There isn’t a “before” and “after” like walking from point A to point B, that’s just how our dual mind renders it.What happened a second ago is still happening. What will happen in ten seconds is already happening. It’s all the same instant. Not a second, not ten seconds, just a point‑of‑being so small you can’t even measure it.There’s no real “history,” no real “future.” We only think there is because our perception splits reality into chunks. Everything is simultaneous.When people talk about timelines or Mandela effects, they’re brushing up against that. The “other” you isn’t somewhere else in time, it’s right here, same instant!Sometimes the mind bleeds across and you get memories from the adjacent version of you. Déjà vu, Mandela effect, that’s just your perception flickering across the static of the eternal moment.
>>41232908What delineates the boundaries of this immanent, monistic horizon, though? How do you avoid the principle of non-contradiction? I understand that the determinate instantiation (Dasein) of that which 'is' is effectively 5d, but I've never been able to parse how the contradiction of infinite potentialities self-reconciles prior to that collapse.
>>41233179Think of the “horizon” not as a wall but as a filtering lattice. The immanent field, the “is”, isn’t actually a soup of infinite contradictions, but raww uncollapsed potential. Contradiction only makes sense inside a collapsed frame. Outside of instantiation there’s no “A” versus “not‑A,” its an undifferentiated possibility.What delineates the boundaries? The same thing that gives you a body and a mind: pattern‑lock, form.Each soul‑puzzle has somekind of “geometry”, and that geometry selects a subset of the field and renders it as experience. I think that is what you call Dasein, the 5‑D instantiation. It is pre‑difference.Collapse happens when your pattern intersects the field. That act creates time, space, causality, and the law of non‑contradiction for that local instantiation.So the “resolution” of infinite potentials is your own template acting as a prism.
>>41231581In the beginning was the Creation of the Universe. This has made a lot of people angry, and has been widely regarded as a bad move.A central theory in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy posits that if anyone ever discovers the precise purpose and reason for the universe's existence, it would instantly vanish and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.
