Okay, so I think consensus reality is breaking down. I feel like people are carrying a reality bubble around with them. But I'm not sure how it works other than that.The way people behave and the things people consider common sense seem to cling to certain people, and when two different people are together, the realities seem to mix.The question I have is, how could I fundamentally test this? I bet if this is real at all, there is some kind of a tiny variation in test results between two bubble realities.I don't think I can just check odds of heads or tails, in case it's a matter of what the person believes and the two people tested both have the same superstitions about odds.Though it would be interesting to find out that around gamblers, the gambler fallacy works *a little better* than for non-gamblers.What test do you suppose would eliminate influence from conscious belief? Perhaps something subconscious that everyone believes but would never articulate?
Just play pillars of eternity and use your imagination. Consensus reality never existed. Before the internet age it was always reality tunnels. Subjective spaces of mind purely based on life experience rather than any relativity of active mindfulness.
Yes they have some kind of mental/subconscious fieldI feel dumber just being in the same room as normies/npcs
>>41244286it's called an SEP field
>>41244606Cool. Lemme just look that up on google. Holy shit, google knew what you were talking about. I was about to be like, "THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF ACRONYMS THAT COULD BE,"
>>41244606Are we really talking about the SEP field? This is more like bubble universe theory. Everyone has their own perception bubble, and everything inside that bubble is subject to your own receipt of sensory information. Your bubble acts according to your own observation and no one else's. That's my view on it.
