Glory to Satan, the liberator of Humanity and the Angels from the tyranny of the despot king Yahweh.
>>41249732
>>41249732>liberatorMaterial existence is, in essence, the ultimate form of slavery. Fuck Satan.
>>41249732The glory will never stand so long as Hell is a destination for the afterlife. Delete Hell and then you can be Glorified.
How dare you post an artwork produced from the sublime imagination of William Blake,who toiled and starved on behalf of an inspiration meant to draw humanity to truth exclusively (of which Satan is merely the slightest portion). I quote Blake in order to accuse you:"O truly my Satan thou art but a dunce... the lost traveler's dream under the hill." You are in the Kali Yuga ('weary night's decline) at which point, in Semitic terms, the imposter Satan begins to take on the appearance of the All-Ruler. This is the profoundest mistake. Satan is God's henchman. He is God's idiot-player-upon-the-stage. The only ones who are more stupid than Satan (the court jester who makes people laugh and cry as they await the Throned King) are those who are so smitten by his play that they forget their appointment with the King. You are going to Hell! HA! Did you really think all of this world was merely for you to do as you wished? Ha ha!
>>41249879"Satan" is really just Prometheus under a different guise. He is indisputably Mankind's ultimate hero and role model.
>>41249879>You are going to Hell! HA! Did you really think all of this world was merely for you to do as you wished? Ha ha!There. Right there. That boasting and bragging. That's what it means to be a dunce. Generally God discourages boasting about worldly accomplishments, wisdom, or strength, deeming it evil and a form of arrogance that leads to destruction. Instead, it encourages boasting in the Lord, acknowledging God as the source of all abilities and blessings, or boasting in one's weaknesses to demonstrate God's power. Why the Bible warns against boasting:It's rooted in pride and arrogance: which are seen as destructive forces. It disregards God's sovereignty, failing to recognize that all abilities and possessions are gifts from God. It can lead to negative consequences, such as shame, conflict, and a lack of focus on what truly matters. It can be a form of hypocrisy, as seen in Matthew 6:1-24 where Jesus warns against performing good deeds publicly for the admiration of others.
Boast in the Lord: Acknowledging God's wisdom, power, and worthiness is the true form of boasting. Boast in weaknesses: Paul, for instance, boasted in his weaknesses so that the power of Christ might rest upon him. Boast in understanding and knowing God: Jeremiah 9:24 suggests that if one wants to boast, it should be about understanding and knowing God.
It's actually about Lucifer here.And when you look at the psycho maniacs who worship him, that's all you need to know.
Believe in something as much as Satan believed in defying God, even if it meant losing everything.
>>41249899I will Boast for Eternity over the Dancing of the Angels upon the Perpetually Crushed Head of the SerpentAmen
>>41249918Satan had no faith, fool, he merely did as he was told. What sort of God do you think it is, who made a creature that could thwart His will? You are so stupid, and all of this just so you can have your little sins and dispense with guilt for a while. Stupid, stupid, lost, damned fool.
>>41249945>Satan had no faith, foolHe has faith in himself. You wouldn't get it.
>>41249952You are making satan into an emblem of the liberated self-will, the Freudian Id unbounded from the yoke of the superego, the Nietzschean self in triumphal rebellion against morality, the Wagnerian romantic soul freed from Judeo-Christian religiosity, Camus upon a hamster wheel that is at least not immobilized by "philosophical" or literal suicide... I understand you exactly, dummy.
>>41250150>You are making satan into an emblem of the liberated self-willThat's what he is.
>>41249732>Satan, the liberatorSatan is a liberal. There's a reason why the liberals always think "me, me, me!".
>>41250160You will be held accountable for everything you do, you cannot escape it, neither can Satan. Follow your own will for a while, soon enough you will discover that flames are licking at you. Then you get the choice to keep going or turn back. Those who double down will be consumed by the fire. Those who turn back will have to endure the trials of purgation. Will you be bathed in yellow fire or white fire? Will you suffer for evil or suffer for good? Will you sell your soul for a cheap kick or return it whence it came?That is the only question that the human will ever faces.You cannot escape it. It is the human reality.
>>41250212This is disgusting. Reducing theology to politics is like giving your own daughter's hand to a pimp rather than a knight. Shame on you. Get out of that box moron, there is an entire universe which cannot fit inside of it.
>>41250233If you don't get the relation between the archetype of Satan and the principle of ego, that might be a knowledge issue.
Was Satan the one who tricked eve to eat the apple?
>>41249882Why call him Satan then except to be edgy. Prometheus seems like a much better mythological framework to adopt as a model of enlightenment, liberation and perseverance.
>>41250248Well, depends on the theology you apply.
>>41250245The idea that one political side can be particularly associated with selfishness is cartoonishly stupid. Especially when you simultaneously use the trope that liberals are collectivist. Which one is it, dummy? Go ahead and call me a liberal, haha!Come out of that box. It's a big, beautiful, complex world.
>>41250266>The idea that one political side can be particularly associated with selfishness is cartoonishly stupid.No it's not, as the personal wishes, identifications, expressions and views are the fetish of the liberals, above community interests. "Woke" has shown this pretty well. They're willing to let society end in chaos just to get their pronouns.>Especially when you simultaneously use the trope that liberals are collectivist.Socialists are. But liberals are not necessarily socialists. Actually they should be opposed to socialism, as it is anti-individualistic, but modern academia has managed to convince most liberals that marxism is great.>Which one is it, dummy? Go ahead and call me a liberal, haha!You better be careful who you call a dummy here...
Yahweh is Satan.Re is the Lord of All.
>>41250298>actually they should be opposed to socialismYoung man, here is a tip: Think before you speak.
>>41249732Yaweh is satan, anon
>>41250380You're a dumb fucking asshole. Fuck off from this board.
>>41250396>>>/pol/might be a better board for you
Just go for the God above god. Ultimate, Supreme, Infinite. Satan is still demiurgically associated.
>>41250380But he's right. Classical liberalism is opposed to socialism.
>>41251534This is nothing but a stupid confusion of terminology in the same sense that one can simultaneously describe the Reagan era Repulican party as neoconservative and neoliberal. Liberal in particular has an extremely context dependent meaning and this is well known to anybody with two or more functioning portions of the brain. I am very annoyed that I am still explaining this to people on 4channel in 2025. Please do not make me have to explain the difference between Marxism, Communism and Socialism next. The sad thing is that all of this is extremely basic and most of you have not read so much as half a book on any of these topics yet you constantly use the vocabulary pertaining to them. There is no serious person that conflates modern social liberalism with the classical liberalism of the 18th century. Hush up.
