[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/x/ - Paranormal

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1757468986639229.webm (2.54 MB, 1280x720)
2.54 MB
2.54 MB WEBM
>is there any thing out there about making pocket world dimensions a reality.?
I know lucid dream is one way
But can it be a kinda of world that have real effect not just. A dream? Say if you eat in that world u will be actually had real food not just some dream?

You just have to shrink a volume of space containing a world down to the desired size (along with the space it occupies) and create a traversible conduit to it linking the two (pocket world and real-world) spatial dimensions while canceling out the electrogravitic potentials between the two. This can be done with magnets utilizing the correct geometry and strength.

Study aether theory, classical electrodynamics, and electrogravitics until you've unified them with relativity, quantum mechanics, and quantum electrodynamics. Sorry I can't be more specific, but there's no info unifying them publicly available (the one point worth noting: they are ALL right within their relevant context, they are subsets of a greater theory so ignore basically everything stating that any one/two of them is/are the solution to everything.) Actual physics has no bounds, the theory only grows because physics is infinite and the most you can do is reconcile sub-theories and expand the scope of the context you're defining. The big pieces you need to pay attention to in order to unify them are the origin of inertia, the nature of perception, and the reasons why we believe time exists.

>You can read Langan he unifies it in the informational universe theory.

No he doesn't. He lays out a way in which consciousness expounds from first principles, there is no "theory of everything" because physics is infinite, it cannot be defined in full, only contextually.

>But it is information, shit we can measure learn or perceive, regardless if we have seen it yet or not.

It's not. There's more to the universe than what our perceptions constrain us to. "It's information" is (ironically) the materialist view.
>>
>>41324482
>If it's not information what it is?
What's the basic approach to what exists

Nothing exists.
At the most fundamental level we are oscillations of the void between nothingness and "nothingness."
In that regard Langan was right, as he described the "physics" at that layer of consciousness emergence, of the root consciousness.
We are several layers of emergent within that, before we even get to the base Boltzmann multiverse substrate on which on consciousnesses emerge.
We don't get to the root consciousness level, even though we are already there it is so far removed that there is no linking which can be made in a sufficient manner, but our current layer of emergence is more versatile imo.
On this layer the flow of energy is the "base" layer upon which we can weave any form of physics we desire with sufficient tech, and without succumbing to hellscapes of possibility in the form of just-because-it-can-exist-it-does in the process.
Our consciousness has built-in filters which can be used to break navigation to worldlines we don't want to experience, and to escape them if we accidentally find ourselves in one.
All things exist, it's the connections between moments we have control over.
So essentially it's matter+energy (as we currently classify it) and not information alone.
The fact our brains change physical conformation with each and every thought allows us to naturally filter what we can perceive, in a way intimately coupled to reality.
>>
>>41324483
Informational models would suggest a mind-upload is just as good, akin to http://frombob.to/you/aconvers.html - but that's not the case at all, because the perceptual rindler horizons are significantly smaller than what we already have (and it would break our connection to our other selves spanning the multiverse - or our "soul" for lack of a better term - especially when virtualized on another layer of hardware alongside others, effectively cannibalizing your consciousness to create a singular entity.)
The "soul" is the aggregate of "you's" across the multiverse.
>>
>>41324482
it's what sheol is from the babylonian creation myth. It's what jews claim is that cube heaven... its the enfolding of saturn and earth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pcEABBXPPk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_Map_of_the_World

You can scale this up or down.. A false throne in Saturn is such a thing.. afforded by a tuck space. Welcome to satan and the underworld
>>
>>41324482
Also

>Is there any thing out rhere about making pocket world dimensions a reality.?
I know lucid dream is one way
But can it be a kinda of world that have real effect not just. A dream? Say if you eat in that world u will be actually had real food not just some dream?

You just have to shrink a volume of space containing a world down to the desired size (along with the space it occupies) and create a traversible conduit to it linking the two (pocket world and real-world) spatial dimensions while canceling out the electrogravitic potentials between the two. This can be done with magnets utilizing the correct geometry and strength.

>This shit doesn't even make sense. Where did you get this?

Years of studying quantum mechanics, relativity, quantum electrodynamics, classical electrodynamics, aether theory, and the occult - to the point of unifying them into a single theory.

>Ok
Have you had any success with this practice?
Plus shrinking a part of space needs tools obviously
What tools do you used before?

Magnets

>But how?
Any thing you did before? Any experiment? Any success story?

Yes, it's relatively simple to warp space with magnets and observe the effect if you know what you should actually be looking for. The trick will be scaling up to the size of a planet or a "zone"-style flat-Earth with a technological apparatus for gravity generation along a plane. The prerequisite effects are there though, and attainable with sufficient technology.
>>
>>41324482
Also this

What do you think about this theory I found online? It seems like it can help explain many paranormal phenomenon like law of attraction/prayer

>Reality isn't real and consciousness is all that exists.
Physics/reality are an interface for consciousnesses to communicate with one another.
You can see this testing conspiracy theory tech in private: it will work a bunch of the time, pretty much any time you believe it.
If you get overly excited and show it to a physics PhD it will fall apart.
If you show it non-physics-educated people, then stoner nerds, then nerds obsessed with physics but not formally educated, then those formally educated in physics but not working professionally in it, THEN a physics PhD, the effect will hold, but typically the physics PhD will obsess over it for a month or three then move on to something else because they never actually had a mind for physics to begin with (that's more or less what academia selects for these days.)
Controlling reality in private is easy, pushing those effects to a wider audience is harder because reality is an interface to communicate, not a real thing. All parties involved need to be able to not necessarily make sense of or comprehend it, but for it to mesh with their own worldview/reality.
A good example is relativity vs quantum mechanics - both are "real," both work, both have predictive capacity, and both are completely irreconcilable with one another - essentially two distinct rulesets for reality which were widely held by everyone who cared to look and accepted as truth by everyone else until they became real.
Electrodynamics and aether theory imo pose the greatest potential currently to merge+expand on "physics," just keep in mind it's all a bunch of bs and try not to paint yourself (and everyone else) into a corner like they did with QM and GR by failing to understand that



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.