>>41333881https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVn2slBndOA
Yes I amYou can't convince me that I am not real because I understand that if I wasn't real I would not be experiencing this question at all. You might not be real and an hallucination, but regardless of what you are, I am 100% real.
A real person wouldn’t unironically respond to this thread.
>>41334114Well, I just didWhat makes your claim false and you incorrect
>>41333881there is no reality
>>41333962You're experiencing me in the same way you're experiencing you, so if you insist on your own reality then I don't see how you can come to the conclusion that there's a possibility I'm unreal.>I'm not experiencing your sense of experience. The sense of experience is the minimum criterion for reality.I don't think there's a meaningful difference in the way you experience having a sense of experience and experiencing in general. You're experiencing the sense of experience, just the same as you're experiencing me. If your experience of me isn't enough to satisfy you of my realness, why is your experience of your sense of experience enough to satisfy you of your own realness?>>41334114Therefore we can conclude you're either unreal or that your response to this thread is ironic.
>>41334371MehI don't wanna go further into this. Into won't take us anywhere. I just disagree deeply
>he still believes that his current Veil is real
>>41333881This kind of philosophy is kinda pointless.It's like a mathematician saying 2+2=4.Philosophers thousands of years ago already considered the "you are not real" philosophy. Why don't you try reading all of the existing philosophy and then come up with something new that nobody has thought of yet already? At this point you are just saying 2+2=4. Sure, whatever man, but, like... people already thought of that idea already. Also, if you think about it for more than like five seconds you'll realize that actually sounds kind of retarded. What do you mean we're not real? That sounds kind of retarded if you actually let that thought sink in that we are not real. Of course we are fucking real it's the most basic fucking thing.Again, philosophers already solved this hundreds of years ago. "I doubt, therefore I think, therefore I am." Is the answer to OP's question.It means, because OP said "You are not real" he himself is real, because he had to think in order to say that, and if he thought, he is real. And in order for me to reply I am also real, because I need to think to reply, and if I think, then I am also real too.Also this isn't even /x/ related this is more appropriate for another board like /lit/ or /his/ or something maybe, more apt there than it is here.Lol.
I love you
>>41333881Real enough
>>41334731Just wait until you start experiencing paranormal events on a daily basis. The reality of yourself and others will seem less abstract and more like an immediately practical question in order to determine how you should behave.
>>41333881You are meI am you
>>41335003So what?
>>41333881Shit. You right.
>>41333881So your message goes out to no one thus proving you to be a schizo.
>>41333881I'm aware, thx
>>41333881True. So how did I get in your mind? Are you aware of how long I've been in here? Well, don't worry. I know things, but won't tell anyone.
>>41333881New rule if you can't give the how and why your reasoning is automatically invalid.
>>41333881I know.
>>41333881i wish you were correct op i really do .
>>41333881I guess you can prove that?
bump
I keep it real, dawg.
>>41333881You're not real
