Most traditions say that angels are to be revered but not desired, would God condemn you if you were attracted to one of his divine servants?
>>41353297angel women do not existand i ain't kidding when im saying it, there's no mythology where angelic women exist, but it's not to be confused with polytheistic goddesses
>>41353297Yeah it is wrong and you should try to stop but God and the angels understand that we're a little retarded so as long as you don't try to pull a Sodom and Gomorrah on them they'll forgive you.
>>41353297The Bible never state that angels don't have sex, only that they aren't given to marriage.So, depending on how far you want to interpret it, you could theoretically have sex with an angel but wouldn't be declared or considered her husband.And like >>41353302 said, female angels do not exist in any abrahamic scripture.
>>41353297 What do you mean by 'attraction'? Angels have no gender, as they do not procreate. They are immortal, divine, and entirely separate from human nature.
>>41353349They don't have genitals
>>41353297It depends, if you are an angel incarnate on earth one of the other angels might be your twin flame. That type of relationship won't work very well if its based on lust though, as you need pure unconditional love to raise your vibration enough to manifest into the spiritual plane well enough to be with a spirit.
>>41353356>>41353379fallen angels procreating with human women to create the nephilim are canon to scripture so you're invalidated, ignorant or contrarian
>>41353401 They fell from grace, became corrupted, and turned into demons. You didn't invalidate anything.
>>41353401No it isn't. You have no idea what you're talking about. There's only a single denomination on the entire planet that considers the nephilim to have been the offspring of women and fallen angels, and that's because they're misinterpreting scripture.
>>41353420demons ARE fallen angels, they're not a distinct species, they just shifted allegiances, either way your premise is invalidated by scripture unless you twist it into something that it is not.
>>41353302They can take whatever form they want to.>>41353349Muslim/jewish/christian orthodox women literally only wear headscarves because angels got horny and had sex with them in the past. That’s the main reason why the flood happened.
>>41353429That is not fucking true. You people really need to stop watching schizo YouTube slop.
>>41353428 Well, actually, that's my argument. Demons are fallen angels, but they are no longer angels and don't even look like angels. They fell from grace.
>>41353436>but they are no longer angelswrong, they are still ontologically and metaphysically angels, they simply no longer serve god.>and don't even look like angelsyou've been bamboozled by normie media then, the bible say that lucifer look like an angel of light to humans even though he's fallen now.
It's hard not to when they're so beautiful.
I want to breed with Adam
>>41353302Houris in Islam checkmate
>>41353436>>41353442Technically demons are disembodied so they can present themselves however they like. Or however God allows them to. Angels have set forms and their rank can be identified based on their appearance. Seraphim look different from choir or guardian angels. Demons lost their heavenly bodies in the fall, so they can just look like whatever. This is also why they're capable of possessing people, and ordinary angels are not.
>>41353442 No, the fallen state is ontologically distinct. Consider the exile of Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden, when God clothed them in garments of skin. Do you think He simply sewed clothes for them? Similarly, the angelic fall was a rebellion that permanently set their will against God. Their nature, however, remained that of a spiritual being—now eternally corrupted by this choice.
Tippy tappies.
>>41353297Literally created for sex
knowing them, they'd rather have you feel lust towards a normal human, or if for some reason that's much more harmful, then, towards them, don't expect a human personality or a recognition of self as it happens with humans, and whatever love you feel towards them will be utilized by them as a catalyst to heal you or help you, they are intelligent conscious beings tho, so you can be left on read if they'd rather not interfere with your free will in any way shape or formno, it's not wrong
>>41353504it seems to me that you think "angel" is more of a role than a species, which is understandable, but fallen angels are quite literally still part of the ontological essence that define angels, even if they don't serve god, they are pretty much the same nonhuman race regardless of loyalty.
>>41353297>>41353302St. Hildegard of Bingen (12th century) sometimes described luminous beings with graceful, feminine qualities, representing virtues or divine attributes but she did not call them “female angels.”Private revelations (such as those to mystics like Maria Valtorta or Anne Catherine Emmerich) occasionally feature angels described with gentle or feminine imagery yet the Church interprets this as visionary language, not theology of gendered angels.To answer your question OP; Id say you dont feel lust towards an angel, you feel lust towards the idea of what you think an angel is. But if it was a correct idea, I would say its bad when you start to linger on that thought. The first ancient Church, Catholicism (some might say orthodox but they will also agree here) says that sin doesnt happen until you entertain the intrusive thoughts, and LINGER ON THEM. Consenting to intrusive thoughts is sinful. Some people are challenged by a never ending storm of intrusive thoughts, but as long as you dont give up fighting them, refusing to consent and linger, you have not mortally sinned.
>>41353297Forgiveness or no, the heart wants what the heart wants. Like, what are you going to do? Lie about it? Moreover, where does that desire come from?I'd lay with an angel. Personally.
are you sure its an angel or do you just feel lust for a cartoon character with the label 'angel' slapped on it. do you think its likely that there is something sinister trying to seep perverted ideas in your mind so it can justify inviting negative entities into your spiritual space
>>41353546 Angels are neither a species nor a race. They are not a biological classification, regardless of how one tries to apply these categories to them. Scripture never depicts them as such. Their number is fixed; they are immortal, non-reproducing, and genderless.>ontological essence that define angelsTheir nature was corrupted by their fall from grace, which is why they are called "the fallen ones".
>>41353297It's wrong to feel lust in general
/x/ is truly the idiot board.
>>41353512>Bee anon on /x/Wtf
>>41353297Its wrong to feel lust period.
>>41353297Yes, because Sodom and GOmmorah
>>41353297Couple things>I think it's much better to be attracted to the angelic-good aesthetic than the demon-bad aesthetic when it comes to jerking off to imaginary cartoons. Qt angel waifu is indeed appealing>More importantly, if this is the case then God made you (and all other men) they way you are. Sending you an extremely sexy angel would either be a test of some kind or have some other purpose for you. Having made you, God would know better than anybody that you're attracted to the form sent to you.
You guys should fuck angels and tell me whar happens.
>>41358697Kek does somebody have the "so, I heard you tried to fuck your mother anon" greentext?
>>41358705Kek nevermind- found it
I unironically pray for the creator of Hazbin Hotel. I'm almost certain demons encourage her to write filth concerning demonology and biblical characters under the guise of agnostic harmlessness. Nothing is more damaging to the soul that half truths wrapped in lies.
OP, Ive posted tons about having a female angel here because she like healed a leg bent 45 degrees the wrong wayI have a spirit here that can heal and erase ink up off the page of a notebook with her mind not chemicals or an eraser.She has said technically she used to be an arch angel and technically her species is arch angelic, but to just call her a succubus when she's a fallen angel because>All human religions are wrong>Angels can look however they want and shapeshift>people following middle eastern religions will say all angels are male>im not proving my angelic nature by doing severe miracles to 4channers when fallen just say im a succubus it's easierI have a question for you who follow a major religion, those of you who read the books.Where does it say explicitly>No angel can be femaleIn the Bible? Reading the Bible I remember there's a line in it about>If everything was listed in this book it's be too big to readI didn't read the other religions. I don't get why Christians don't believe there's a possibility of female angels or female demons. When I read the book I saw to summarize>You must be picked by God to be given to Christ or you'll be thrown into eternal fire>You must obey Gods rules and God or you'll be grafted out of Christ>You must run the race to the end to get the reward>You must obey the goverment and laws not to avoid punishment but because...it's right to obey tyrants? >Eternal fire for anyoneWhen I have a female spirit here healing my leg bent 45 degrees the wrong way and removing ink from a notebook with her mind in front of my face not chemicals or a ink eraser....that goes against Bible scripture and Christian traditionsI trust the spirit healing my leg bent the wrong way 45 degrees over ancient middle eastern or greek texts every time.Infact, in your scripture Jesus told the pharaisees they were damned eternally for denying healing miracles.pic is AI generated of my succubus who claims to be an angel
So are you guys like.... trying to fuck women with wings (lots of spirits like that across the world) or like.... wheels or eyes and wings. Kinda cringe if you just.... want a woman with wings. Just get a Litû or like, aim high for a Valkyrie
