Seeing how we all know that the moon landings were faked, I do have one last question about it. Where were the apollo astronauts during those 3 days? I mean, did they hop into a skylab-type craft or were they just orbiting the command module those 3 days? And if so, has there ever been logs of an amateur astronomer taking notes of a craft orbiting the earth while they were supposed to be in the moon?
>>41365235NASA should neverbe trusted. Theyre literally ran by satan (T Minus)
>>41365235>>41365251
>>41365235>uranus
>>41365235Why do I care where they were and why should you? The real question is what they are hiding. Our spaceship moon?
>>41365235You got footage of the astronauts walking onto the rocket?
>>41365235Why are you going through these insane hoops instead of accepting that they went to the moon
>>41366555Checked. Soviets would have been all over the US if it was faked.
>>41365235Theory is they were in orbit doing stuff like this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IE7XIsRzbs&
normalfags in this thread who say THE ROOSIANS WOULD HAVE TOLD US!!a) a high ranking russian did say it was fake. Dmitry Rogozin was head of roscosmos and he said t was fake. b) the soviet union was created by western bankers, who financed Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) the ruling class in russia is no less kosher than the ruing class in amerimuttiac) in 1973 russia and nasa had a space mission together caller Apollo-Soyuz. do you suppose that enemies have space missions together if they want each other's death?d) Rosevelt (rosenfelt) saved russia from the germans in ww2 so they are eternally endebted to amerimutts, the soviet union would be dead if it weren't for the eternal anglo saving them.e) russia had trade partnerships with western countries, that kept their economy going. why would they poop on their only source of income ?f) Anthony Sutton showed in his book "the best enemy money can buy" that russia and america were on good diplomatic relations. they were giving free technology to the soviet government, the antagonism was just a facade to get the useful amerimutt soldiers to die in wars for regime change in asia, and south america. The supposed animosity was only for plebs and normalfags to believe, the rulers of both countries were having cocktails together. https://odysee.com/@thisworldworks:1/33333:d5bg) Putin was shown by AI engineers that when the apollo pictures are analyzed by Google's image analysis AI, it resulted that the images are superimposed composite photography. they are made of multiple pictures spliced. the shadows are not from the same source of light. and this is the amerimutt AI program. not russian made. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/607d58394868f60eb777f8ce/t/66ddeb7ca1c0c64bc6a39b77/1725819781254/Bart+Sibrel+-+A.I.+Moon+Photos+Fake+%28090824%29.pdfnow, of course the normalfags will say BUT IF PUTIN KNOWS ITS FAKE WHY DIDN'T HE TEL US?because he's a "young global leader" as admitted by Claus Schwab
>>41365235I think they filmed it here.
>>41366555Because you're gay.
>>41367505they had 3 sites with craters to practice driving the dune buggy. what do they need 3 for? one is enough. normalfags will say that they needed 3 because there are variable factors that need to be accounted for each simulation, different crates and stuff. but one site would be enough for driving experience.
>THE ROOSIANS WOULD HAVE TO BE IN ON IT !duuh, the WERE, normalfag!do you think that's somehow an argument?
>>41367486Good info about the AI analysis
>>41365235>Seeing how we all know that the moon landings were fakednobody thinks they were faked, stop being a retard.
>>41367821>nobody thinks they were faked, stop being a retard.Gaslight 3000 bot weighs in. lmao
>>41366787Maybe they got something behind the scenes in return like when nukes were quietly removed from turkey
>>41365235Are you even aware of how many people worked on the Apollo 11 mission?
>>41367913CIA Agent Williamson here, do you have any arguments that the landings were faked that ARENT "i dont like this picture/video"?
SPACE FAKESHOW ME DA CURVEMOON LANDING FAKE>OP doesn't think we know he's a gov. tard agent sent to distract us from true conspiracies.
>>41367983>CIA Agent Williamson here, do you have any arguments that the landings were faked that ARENT "i dont like this picture/video"?Do you have any arguments that it actually happened other than it was on TV and NASA said so? Oh yeah, of course. Reflectors and rocks. lol
>>41368001>do you have any arguments besides all those i will now ignore? like this and that and this and that? HUH?!?!the flatties arent sending their best, huh.I guess thats why CIA always wins.
>>41368001NTA but you pretty much just set yourself up for failure. I have no idea why you think mocking retroreflectors and samples of moon rocks is some sort of a ridiculous claim. Those are very good pieces of proof that you can't refute which is why you tried and failed to mock it just now lol. You're either a poor troll or a retard.
>>41367934>Are you even aware of how many people worked on the Apollo 11 mission?I'll bet a lot of money one or more of your relatives were among the tens of thousands. Right? lol These "debates" are scripts by now. All the same bullshit by all the same dip shits.
>>41368015>NTA but you pretty much just set yourself up for failure. I have no idea why you think mocking retroreflectors and samples of moon rocks is some sort of a ridiculous claim. Those are very good pieces of proof that you can't refute which is why you tried and failed to mock it just now lol. You're either a poor troll or a retard.Neither prove landings by human beings on the moon. If you weren't a disinfo agent or fan boi dumb fuck, you would admit that. But you won't. Because it's not on the script.
>>41368016Calm down faggot we're not there yet. Jumping to conclusions like that only shows me how poor and bad faith your argument is. There were over 400,000 people who worked on the Apollo program. Thousands of engineers, flight controllers, etc. that's a lot of people to keep quiet. How does this conspiracy work out in your head? How do you keep over 400,000 individuals silent about this?
>>41368019>well ok we got tons of stuff FROM the moon, we put tons of stuff ON the moon, but im a contrarian retard and people never went on the moon! NUH UH! you sound retarded, sweetie.
>>41368008>the flatties arent sending their best, huh.>I guess thats why CIA always wins.The tax payer money spent to train you was wasted. You're a failed human being. If you walked into traffic or ate a round, not one single person on this planet would be worse off.
>>41368024>How do you keep over 400,000 individuals silent about this?the same way they think flat earth is being kept hidden - all those millions of ship crewmen and airmen are obviously lying, and not even one of these sea-men and airmen spilled the beans. XD
>>41368019Yes they do you can't just dismiss it because you have nothing to refute it lmfao. Call me a disinfo shill all you want if you had the information that proves the moon landing was faked you would have posted instead of declaring with no proof that the moon landing was a hoax.
>>41368027>you sound retarded, sweetie.You sound desperate, dip shit.
>>41368031you sound upset.CIA wins again.
>>41368035>yes we got stuff back from the moon! and we put stuff on the moon!>but not people! nuh uh! not that one!whoa, why not?
>>41365235Top 10 reasons NASA is a complete fraud: https://youtu.be/m7ZpvLu_tFEhttps://youtu.be/0514L2QwOBEhttps://youtu.be/lKg-yn86zp4https://youtu.be/p-BFmn2S_jUhttps://youtu.be/BVJgObFHLY4https://youtu.be/ru5fdfovkGIhttps://youtu.be/74KRZt5oJMEhttps://youtu.be/tdwy-hxS-tshttps://youtu.be/UAx5cl9VpTEhttps://youtu.be/JlFnJPFjcc0https://youtu.be/XetG30_YOeohttps://youtu.be/ziVLbEoQ4Schttps://youtu.be/7H_1ZbuA9HIhttps://youtu.be/UbYtkrTquXEhttps://youtu.be/1WHIr-IFqAohttps://youtu.be/WcqKUhU0WDchttps://youtu.be/wPrDg0CtWnkhttps://youtu.be/hoGTBdu7dMchttps://youtu.be/mcLwr86emdshttps://youtu.be/U_bJYXS9p4Ahttps://youtu.be/JOqc63Pp9OAhttps://youtu.be/X-w8acuxF6whttps://youtu.be/nGLJ5XJP3uEhttps://youtu.be/olbyJDou4qQhttps://youtu.be/0Q18iSz6mushttps://youtu.be/aFFM3YJAs4Qhttps://youtu.be/Stft_t48Hxchttps://youtu.be/QWa7lTxhrKIhttps://youtu.be/Zc_J2k4Cdp8https://youtu.be/DdLLamniSyghttps://youtu.be/udjk_FB80kMhttps://youtu.be/4nKIN_eHYxwhttps://youtu.be/fDBRhxryfZMhttps://youtu.be/-rmDj1MJyaYhttps://youtu.be/Kv9-JuLRpg0https://youtu.be/7Eeo-82Eac8https://youtu.be/0Vv62PFFsNUhttps://youtu.be/CDG4oiCx_ishttps://youtu.be/wz68Q2Nz05Ahttps://youtu.be/WffliCP2dU0https://youtu.be/uUuTAflN1rUhttps://youtu.be/lkmY_4PKMlYhttps://youtu.be/McdMMmclGVchttps://youtu.be/Cm7fBZq-8T4https://youtu.be/4SlRsbQ3nfMhttps://youtu.be/Z36Ns7KUYHwhttps://youtu.be/XhIwZuPGfsshttps://youtu.be/CATklVkPEMwhttps://youtu.be/eJK1gLHbOxAhttps://youtu.be/WXaXnAvEpB8https://youtu.be/gWnFMWqDRQEhttps://youtu.be/EvnrD49RmAYhttps://youtu.be/3wU8_jT61eEhttps://youtu.be/lMhheDWThxEhttps://youtu.be/hG_sv5SWi3Y?t=507https://youtu.be/UOLLMkAHHQI?t=2477https://youtu.be/d_h5tupEdn8https://youtu.be/jDKfJROVHJEhttps://youtu.be/maBf0H3UNJIhttps://youtu.be/Jm7nBn7RxhUhttps://youtu.be/BEV2SAL8z5ghttps://youtu.be/Qse5Jc8jgSkhttps://youtu.be/zMAa5Ir7IHU
>>41368050>randomly click on one of these links>music from the matrix>you see, it came to me in a dream, that everything is actually fake
>>41368036>you sound upset.I'm amused. You're so desperate to defend a lie. I'm content with the truth. You're not even really human at this point. Just an asset devoted to servicing a power that hates you.
>>41368061Don't ever reply to me again unless you have watched every single video on that list.
>>41368064subhuman reptilian CIA glowie here.>yes we got stuff back from the moon! and we put stuff on the moon!>but not people! nuh uh! not that one!whoa, why not?
>>41368080>Don't ever reply to me again unless you have watched every single video on that list.ok i just did, i feel dumber by having to suffer through all that stupidity, whats next?
>>41368080>Don't ever reply to me again unless you have watched every single video on that list.Don't bother with this loser. Let him earn his $.31/post. lol
>>41367821Prepare to be amazed :https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q1KHlrOKuLR1
>>41368104>watch this stupid dogshit and watch that stupid fucking shit and watch this fucking nonsenselol
>>41368092yeah its hilarious, do flatties actually expect people to watch all that fucking shit?
>>41366555>Why are you going through these insane hoops instead of accepting that they went to the moonSeriously, retarded faggots. So what if no other power on the planet has been able to send human beings farther than low earth orbit (200-300 miles) in the 6 decades since. That's just the way space and political will works. We did it. It was on TV. Nixon talked to those guys on the oval office telephone. It all happened and it was glorious! The most incredible technological feat in the entire history of mankind. That's why destroyed the technology that got us there (6 times), and haven't been back in 6 decades. You stupid flat earth faggots.
>>41368024>There were over 400,000 people who worked on the Apollo program. Only a small number would have been part of the faking aspect, Operation Slam Dunk as reported by a whistle blower. See Bart Sibrel videos and the documentary American Moon.
>>41368115American Moon is praised even by moon believers. It's top notch, probably the best "conspiracy" documentary ever.
>>41368015>>41368034>RocksRocks from the moon come to earth all the time in the form of meteorites. A year before apollo 11, Wernher von Braun and his NASA team went on an expedition to the Antarctic to gather moon meteorites for research. You can gather moon rocks right here without having to go to the moon. Even then, a Dutch museum found that one of the donated moon rocks was from here on Earth, so most of the samples aren't even actual moon rocks.>RetroreflectorsAn article from National Geographic December 1966 p.876, years before Apollo 11, revealed that "Four years ago, a ruby laser considerablysmaller than those now available shot a serlesni pulses at the moon, 240,000 miles away.The beams illuminated a spot less than twomiles in diameter and were reflected back toearth with enough strength to be measured.by ultrasensitive electronic equipment."So you don't even need retroreflectors to get a laser reflection from the moon. Your proofs are asinine.Sources:https://www.cuttersguide.com/pdf/National-Geographic/1966-12.pdfhttps://www.nytimes.com/1967/01/04/archives/us-space-experts-to-study-antarctica-for-lunar-lessons.html>>41368085read above. We can all tell you're Mossad.
>>41368024They just machine'd ordered parts, only a small team was needed for the actual operation. If a CNC machinist makes bolts for an oil platform, does that mean the machinist knows the intricacies of the oil platform's operation and how it all works? No, not even the structural engineers know the ins and outs of the platform as they're divided by teams. That's for the directive team to know. Same thing in Apollo. Also it is an asinine statement to say that just because x amount of people worked on something, that one of them would spill the beans. That is retarded as there are hundreds of thousands of people with security clearance every day that have been in major operations throughout the world with very problematic unethical secrets that have NOT spilled the beans, because they would be raped by CIA and have a financial incentive not to. And even then, a LOT of Apollo directives have spilled the beans over the years and have said it was an outright lie, they've just been shunned as demented and ignored by the media.
>>41368140ok i read all that stupid shit above, now what? it doesnt disprove anything. >you are mossadyes thats right, agent Goldsteinberg here, ive been found out, shalom.what makes you stupid goyim think its impossible to land on the moon?
>>41368024>, that's a lot of people to keep quietlolCome back when your training has advanced a little.
>>41368212>It doesn't disprove anythingIt disproves your retarded thought that moon rocks can only come from the moon, and that you can only use retroreflectors to get a laser reflection from the moon. Do not try to weasel yourself out of being corrected, retarded jew. >what makes you stupid goyim think its impossible to land on the moon?Apollo didn't do it, simple as. As for whether it's possible or not, you would have to ask your reptilian avianoid jew friends for that. You'll probably just be landing on a hologram spacecraft. Also kill yourself Shlomo bastard.
>>41368230>It disproves your retarded thought that moon rocks can only come from the moonno it doesnt, its a bunch of shit you just made up. >muh reflectorsyou didnt understand that either. the signal is different if it bounces back from the reflector, compared to just reflecting off the moon. >Apollo didn't do it, simple asof course they did. >As for whether it's possible or notit is possible, and thats why they did it. because they could. stupid goyim lose again.
>>41368255>the signal is different if it bounces back from the reflector, compared to just reflecting off the moon.Talk about stupid shit you just made up...lmao
>>41365235i used to have a friend like you. he was so retarded he literally thought it was impossible for his wife to cheat on him while she was cheating on him. i couldnt bring him out of his delusions about everything and just stopped being friends with him. just think about that for a second
>>41368140yes, you CAN get a return from the lunar surface. thats not the issue. the problem is that its less accurate and takes longer to make a measurement than when the retroreflectors are used, because the reflected photons come from a much wider area and are therefore from all kinds of different distances/altitudes because the moon isn't flat. the accuracy of the laser ranging method has increased dramatically with the use of the retros. >Even then, a Dutch museum found that one of the donated moon rocks was from here on Earth, so most of the samples aren't even actual moon rocks.totally and utterly wrong. you should be ashamed of even mentioning this since it was never claimed to be a moon rock. no other moonrock sample gift was ever handed out loose like that. they all looked like picrel.
>>41368265wait wait wait, are you saying the strenght of the reflected laser is the same if you bounce it back off a mirror, compared to the "naked" surface of the moon?its the same?XD
>>41368255>>It disproves your retarded thought that moon rocks can only come from the moonThis obfuscating piece of shit won't concede that moon rocks/regolith has been retrieved from the moon by unmanned craft. In fact, it was done by the Soviets well ahead of the Apollo program. Therefore, having rocks from the moon on earth does mean that men landed on the moon and collected them. It's a simple, indisputable statement. That's why the obfuscating piece of filth won't deal with it. lmao. This clueless fuck is so over his head. Expect his supervisor to get a sub in here soon.
>>41368255>no it doesnt, its a bunch of shit you just made up.Source: Popular Science no. 5, May 1967 p.114https://books.google.tt/books?id=kCEDAAAAMBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=antarctica&f=falseNASA gathered moon rocks from antarctica before Apollo 11. >the signal is different if it bounces back from the reflector, compared to just reflecting off the moon.According to what? Your ass? See picrel, there is no intensity difference to speak of.>of course they did.No, they didn't. I am only giving you the baby refutations really. >>41368266Nice slidepost, has nothing to do with the argument at hand. You did try Moshe Tinberg. >>41368272It literally doesn't make a difference as the input is photons received per minute. Even then, some retroreflectors "put" on the moon haven't worked until they were "found" aka. they just found a nice little spot on the moon that reflects light a bit better. >>41368290You talk like a hebrew ESL, you weirdo. Speak clearer faggot.
>>41368290>it was done by the Soviets well ahead of the Apollo program.about 300grams....after 1970. also, the first lunar meteorite wasn't even found until the 1980s. so your dates are wrong.
>>41368320>the first lunar meteorite wasn't even found until the 1980s. so your dates are wrong according to my stinky penetrated cavernous asshole of course!
>>41368320>so your dates are wrong.lol Obfuscating POS. What a joke.
>>41368318that source proves them right, and you wrong, you fucking moron.
>>41368318>You talk like a hebrew ESL, you weirdo. Speak clearer faggot.lol You're so out of your depth, Moishe.
"And what guy, given the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to spend some time in a reduced gravity environment, isn’t going to want to see how high he can jump? Or how far he can jump? Hitting a golf ball? Who the hell wants to see that? How about tossing a football for a 200-yard touchdown pass? Or how about the boys dazzling the viewing audience with some otherworldly acrobatics?And yes, Neil and the guys did exhibit some playfulness at times while allegedly walking on the Moon, but doesn’t it seem a bit odd that they failed to do anything that couldn’t be faked simply by changing the tape speed? When I attended college, I knew a guy on the volleyball team who had a 32” vertical leap right here on Earth. So when I see guys jumping maybe 12”, if that, in a 1/6 gravity environment with no air resistance, I’m not really all that impressed.Am I the only one, by the way, who finds it odd that people would move in slow motion on the Moon? Why would a reduced gravitational pull cause everything to move much more slowly? Given the fact that they were much lighter on their feet and not subject to air and wind resistance, shouldn’t the astronauts have been able to move quicker on the Moon than here on Earth? Was slow motion the only thing NASA could come up with to give the video footage an otherworldly feel?Needless to say, if what has been proposed here is indeed how the ‘Moon landing’ footage in the public domain was created, then the highly incriminating original footage – which would have looked like any other footage shot here on Earth, except for the silly costumes and props – would have had to have been destroyed. Perhaps it’s not surprising then that NASA now takes the position that the original footage has been missing since “sometime in the late 1970s.”" - Dave McGowan
>>41368318>According to what?facts. go shine a fucking laser pointer at your wall, and then shine it at a mirror. >whoayeah no shit.
>>41368350So that's why they took 11 days to find the retroreflector?>BUT ITS LE SMALL OBJECTI don't care, you have the coordinates and you're still getting it wrong. It just means that they had to find a sufficiently reflective spot on the moon's surface to shine their little laser and say "IT WAS LE RETROREFLECTORS WE PLACED". Like I have proven, you don't need retroreflectors to reflect back. The one from Apollo does not exist, simple as.
>>41368350>facts.>go shine a fucking laser pointer at your wall, and then shine it at a mirror.>>whoa>yeah no shit. Now stand 240,000 miles away and try it. lolDip shit.
>>41368318>It literally doesn't make a difference as the input is photons received per minute.you have no clue what you're talking about. the good thing is that anyone can go read about the subject and know this for sure.>per minutelol. lmao even. > they just found a nice little spot on the moon that reflects light a bit better. you're just making things up now.educate yourself and stop lying so muchhttp://tmurphy.physics.ucsd.edu/apollo/highlights.html
>>41368372ok i just did.it reflects way better of the mirror.looks like im right, again.DIPSHIT
>>41368366you have proven nothing other than the fact they actually have mirrors set up on the moon, because the signal reflects differently than it would from a naked surface of the moon.awww geez.
>>41368396>ok i just did.boy, you ain't worth two squirts of piss at your job. You should be ashamed of yourself.
https://rumble.com/v422dd8-operation-slam-dunk-fake-moon-landing-story.html
>>41368389>>41368404>University NASA sponsored study whose only retroreflectors that "yield" the highest results are from NASA "equipment".AHAHAHA. Glowies are not sending their best.And somehow Soviet tech despite being equivalent in technology to American tech cannot make their retroreflectors (which are probably real) work as well. Read picrel. Again, a laser over that distance spreads out and quality of photons wheter the surface is mirror reflective or reflective does not even matter as it would still reflect given the equipment. Source: https://www.cuttersguide.com/pdf/National-Geographic/1966-12.pdf p.876
>>41368417>>41368437wait wait wait, are you saying the strenght of the reflected laser is the same if you bounce it back off a mirror, compared to the "naked" surface of the moon?its the same?XD>1966>some national geographic article about a soviet thing having problemswhoa
>>41368437it doesn't say any of that >muh nasa muh nasatiresome retard.
>>41368437>And somehow Soviet tech despite being equivalent in technology to American tech cannot make their retroreflectors (which are probably real) work as well.Wait. Wait! The Soviets put reflectors on the moon?!!! Well that proves that the Soviets have landed men on the moon. Right?Moishe, who appeared out of thin shit almost immediately after this topic was posted, is about to be benched and replaced with someone more competent. He sucks.
>>41368437>american mirrors on the moon were better than soviet mirrors on the moonso they BOTH landed on the moon and put the mirrors there?thats fantastic, thanks!
>>41368437>wheter the surface is mirror reflective or reflective does not even matter as it would still reflect given the equipment.what you're refusing to understand is that the photons returned from the bare lunar surface will be reflecting from all kinds of different distances due to the nature of the lunar surface. this makes millimeter accuracy impossible. every paper you care to read that mentions the history of LLR will mention the great improvement caused by the use of the Apollo retros.read something more useful than an old article from a popsci publication and educate yourselfhttps://tmurphy.physics.ucsd.edu/apollo/doc/Bender.pdfAlso, read picrel, which actually says something which supports my statements, unlike yours.
>>41368455>Well that proves that the Soviets have landed men on the moon. Right?>>41368479nobody says that. but the retros are there, which seems to be what you've been denying.
>>41368496>nobody says that.nobody says what?
>>41368453>are you saying the strength of the reflected laser is the same if you bounce it back off a mirror, compared to the "naked" surface of the moon?its the same?It's not me saying it, it's your precious science as well. A laser over that distance and retroreflectors being small objects, you barely get any reflection at all as the laser spreads out hundreds of meters in diameter. What? You think lasers point exactly at the diameter of the retroreflector and just that spot? You are fucking stupid if you think so. There is no retroreflector, and if there was, it wouldn't make a single difference as the object is too small to matter. >>41368455Moishe running out of steam I see. >>41368473Holy shit your jewish tactics are so obvious bro lmao. It's not hard to fake a study when you're the one funding that university's astronomy department, retardo. >>41368479You didn't get the memo Copperstein, read above. Denounce the Talmud right now, bet you won't. >>41368493>Another UCSD study sponsored by NASA. Do you know how easy it is to fake a study? Especially if you have hundreds of millions of dollars in funding from them. How come no other university outside of the US with its astronomy equipment have been able to peer review this experiment? Because they can't, simple as. There are no apollo retroreflectors, probably only russian ones if ever because those happened only by unmanned spacecraft.
>>41368498that the presence of the retros proves manned lunar landings. they simply dont, at least not to the extreme kinds of skepticism offered by moonlandings deniers. thats why they are not offered as such by anyone who has interacted with such people much.
>>41368511>>41368512answer this very simple question with a YES or a NO:>wait wait wait, are you saying the strenght of the reflected laser is the same if you bounce it back off a mirror, compared to the "naked" surface of the moon?its the same?YESorNO. >the presence of man made things on the moon doesnt prove we put things on the moonLMAO>uh uh uh you are a jew! denounce! of course!i denounce the talmud and the torah, israel is a fake satanic state, its all palestinian land.now YOUR TURN!lets see YOU denounce the talmud and the torah!
>>41368530There are no mirrors there in the first place, and if there was, it wouldn't make a difference because it's a small object 200,000 miles away. You can still reflect things on the moon, because there are certain patches of the moon where it's higher in reflectivity than other parts, which make the illusion of there being a retroreflector. And the only studies that prove these so-called retros exist are just NASA-sponsored studies involving millions of dollars.I denounce the talmud, torah, the state of isreal and all jews. Fuck jews, fuck you, jew.
>>41368530>NO.im saying no. obviously no. its the aggressive moonhoaxer that is screeching otherwise.>>41368511>it's your precious science as well.no its not. they are saying the retros make a big difference.>muh the sources i dont like are fake.
>>41368544>the sources i dont like are fake.
>>41368530>>the presence of man made things on the moon doesnt prove we put things on the moonlol Arguing with yourself now, Moishe? Tap out already.
>>41368542>there are no mirrorsof course they are there, thats exactly what you can prove by shooting a laser over there at the moon : ) >uh uh uh uh no! because uhhh... the uhhh... moon has uhhh.... different uhh... reflection places?!?! uhhh... yeah! thats it!LMAO
>>41368557rabbi moishe from tel aviv here, you can easily prove there is man made stuff on the moon, who told you otherwise? shalom greetings from holy israel.
>>41368562>MOON SURFACE CANNOT HAVE DIFFERENCES IN REFLECTIVITY GOO GOO GAA GAA, THEY JUST CANT GOYIM, RETROREFLECTORS ARE LE REAL REEEEAyy lmao
>>41368566>rabbi moishe from tel aviv here, you can easily prove there is man made stuff on the moon, who told you otherwise?>shalom greetings from holy israel.Is there someone arguing that there are no man made things on the moon? I don't see anyone here arguing that. But you already know that you squid ink squirting, obfuscating little dip shit. The issue is men on the moon. There haven't been any. And all your desperate obfuscation won't change that fact.Low earth orbit is the best we can do with humans. And we still have a very difficult time with that. No human being has traveled to or landed on the moon. The TV lied. Your government lied. People paid by your government (like you) continue to lie. It's pathetic but it is what it is.
>>41368572who told you it does? >>41368610>Low earth orbit is the best we can do with humans.of course not, who told you that?
>>41368622>of course not, who told you that?Great argument. lol Just tap out. You're in way over your head.
>>41368629>thinks its impossible to go to the moon>probably thinks the earth is flat>thinks other people are in over their headlol. what a schizo retard
>>41368657>>thinks its impossible to go to the moon>>probably thinks the earth is flat>>thinks other people are in over their headIt's pretty obvious you're way out of your depth here. You belong on the bench.
>>41368629>please tap out and stop asking me where i got that stupid shit from!!nah man, im not tapping out. who told you all that fuckin' shit?was it a dumbass youtube clip with no sources?>Low earth orbit is the best we can do with humans.who told you that? why do you think so?
>>41368670its pretty obvious you belong in the oven, cotton field or gay bar.
>>41368681>who told you that? why do you think so?Because the TV claimed in 1969 that humans traveled further than low earth orbit -- 240,000 miles further. Lol. 56 years after that claim, no human has ever come close to doing such a thing. 300 miles is as far as we've been able to send humans in the 56 years since we allegedly sent them 6 separate times 240,000 miles and back.That's not how technology works. US presidents have been promising to go back every 4 years or so since 1969. The money keeps flowing to NASA and yet...we can't even get people back from a space station in low earth orbit let alone send people to the moon. lol10 more years...lol It didn't happen in 1969. It ain't happening anytime soon if ever. Every decade that passes exposes more and more the absurdity of the original claim. It's pathetic at this point. Just stop.
>>41368719>its pretty obvious you belong in the oven, cotton field or gay bar.I belong right where I am. Calling out incompetent liars like you.
>>41368723just answer the simple question: >Low earth orbit is the best we can do with humans.who told you that? why do you think so?WHY do you think its the best they can do?why cant they go further? is there some magical barrier preventing us from doing it? gandalf? vader? voldemort?
>>41368731delusional retard
To understand the extent of the cover up, watch movie Forces Occultes. It outlines how worldwide the secrecy conspiracy is. Stuff like 1984 makes so much more sense once you've seen Forces Occultes
>>41368121i guess you underestimate how expensive it is to send people to the moon
>>41368752Starship Troopers is better.
>>41368761ok shill, nobody asked you
>>41367486if the soviets weren't enemies in the space race, why fake a moon landing then?
>>41368770To fool the american populace? NASA needs funding from public taxpayers. These things are rituals, so it probably programmed the psyche of the populace to be more subservient also
>>41368777>Low earth orbit is the best we can do with humans.who told you that? why do you think so?WHY do you think its the best they can do?why cant they go further?is there some magical barrier preventing us from doing it?gandalf? vader? voldemort?
>>41368783Watch the movie Forces Occultes on odysee or rumble , and all of this stuff will make so much more sense. You'll understand HxH and Phantom Troupe so much more, and 1984 suddenly isn't "crazy theory" movie as it once was. It makes you realize that we already live in 1984 setting
>>41368794>go watch a retarded movie from 1940how bout fuck off.
>>41368748>delusional retardbelieves men went to the moon and returned safely 6 separate times almost 60 years ago, and that we could still do it if we wanted to...we just don't want to... although to this very minute, we struggle returning people from orbit 200 miles from earth. Calls people delusional. lmao
>>41368804>movie exposing freemasons is a no-go for glowie whos family is held gunpointlike clockwork
>>41368783>who told you that?What an odd question. How odd to ask it over and over again even though it's been answered. It's almost like you're just an obfuscating little dip shit.
>>41368806imagine being such a snarky idiot. fuck, what a state to be in.>struggleno. nobody does. you're just stupid.
>>41368783>is there some magical barrier preventing us from doing it?^^^^^Look at this smooth brain mother fucker working from a script. LMFAO
>>41368807>>41368814>da freemahsongslmao>Low earth orbit is the best we can do with humans.who told you that? why do you think so?WHY do you think its the best they can do?why cant they go further?is there some magical barrier preventing us from doing it?gandalf? vader? voldemort?try to answer without blaming some meme masons using satanic rituals. >it's been answered.whoa really?where?
>>41368834just admit you think there's a dome.
>>41368827>imagine being such a snarky idiot. fuck, what a state to be in.Stay calm, friend. Don't try to think. Just follow the script. LMFAO
>>41368806>almost 60 years agoThe more the years pass without going back and with all the leaps in tech, the more people doubt the moon landing. I'm wondering if they'll downplay the 60th anniversary? What if it gets to 70 or 75 years? Who will still believe? And eventually all the people who "saw it on TV" will be gone.
>>41368834maybe you should stop wasting our time and just admit you think there's a magical fucking jewish talmud-dome over your head preventing us from going further than low orbit.
>>41368854People bought the idea that going outside to protest during pandemic is verboten, but if you're protesting against police or joining antifa/BLM riots then you can protest during pandemic, there aren't that many real humans on this planet rest are just automatons without soul.
>>41368839all your arguments are retarded. its sad because you really seem to think they aren't retarded. its also kind of worrying that you aren't worried about that. the whole thing is really really bad. how did you become like this?
>>41368854we are going to space all the time, lol, there's like a dozen satellites we put on Mars orbit.
>>41368869>we are going to space all the time, lol, there's like a dozen satellites we put on Mars orbit.Smooth brain, people on this forum understand the difference between manned and unmanned space flight. Trying to blur the line between them doesn't work here. But by all means...keep following the script. It all pays the same, right? LMFAO
>>41368867>all your arguments are retarded. its sad because you really seem to think they aren't retarded. its also kind of worrying that you aren't worried about that. the whole thing is really really bad. how did you become like this?I'm touched by your concern, smoothy. But you never have to worry. Just stick to the script. That's why they gave it to you.
>>41368891soooo we can send unmanned stuff far away? to the moon and mars?but not humans?whoa, why not?who told you that?
>>41368908>soooo we can send unmanned stuff far away? to the moon and mars?>but not humans?>whoa, why not?Why hasn't anyone on earth done it in the over FIFTY SIX years since the US first claimed to have done it? LMAO Smoothy, you're pathetic.
>>41368900the only script being followed is your repetition of retarded moonhoax talking points you picked up from stupid memes on the internet.
>>41368936>the only script being followed is your repetition of retarded moonhoax talking points you picked up from stupid memes on the internet.Answer the question, Smoothy.
>>41368941the only question you're asking is 'am i retarded'. the answer is definitely yes. no doubt about it.
>>41368944>the only question you're asking is 'am i retarded'. the answer is definitely yes. no doubt about it.lol Let me help you out, smoothy. Surely, the script includes replies like "lack of funding/political will"; "more bang for the research buck from unmanned flight"; "much more risk averse public" etc., etc.Just pick one of those and pepper it with some "retards" and "faggots" and "dometards" or whateverthefuck... It all pays the same. Are you really to lazy to even follow a fucking script?! Shame.
>>41368975the answer is still 'yes', you are in fact highly retarded.
>>41369002>do your own research>watches 50 hours of other retards >thinks he got the truthlol. dear me. hahaha
>>41368944Smoothy, the US claims to have sent multiple human beings to the moon (240,000 miles from earth) and returned them safely to earth on 6 separate occasions. They claim that they first did this in July of 1969. That was over FIFTY SIX YEARS ago. Why has no power on Earth -- State or private -- been able to come anywhere close to replicating this manned space flight? Why? (claimed) 240,000 miles almost 60 years ago to 300 miles now. Surely, you see the glaring problem? Please explain it.
>>41368999Smoothy can't answer the question. Poor Smoothy.
>>41369025>theres been no commercial supersonic aircraft for 20 years!!111>supersonic passenger aircraft was fake!!11>theres been no faster aircraft since the x-15 back in the early 1960s!!11>that was fake too!!!yes, you are retarded. i dont know why but its just the way it is. maybe just quit trying to understand things that are beyond you. have a little humility and admit it to yourself.
>>41369037commercial aircraft? What? LolOh smoothy...you should have went with the "more bang for research buck with unmanned missions" You suck at this.
>>41368999>the answer is still 'yes', you are in fact highly retarded.Is "highly retarded" better or worse than just plain retarded?I'm guessing worse.
>>41368923its a very simple question, just answer it:soooo we can send unmanned stuff far away? to the moon and mars?but not humans?whoa, why not?who told you that?
>GUYS ITS BEEN ***THIS MANY DAYS*** SINCE THE LAST TIME I WAS IN PARIS!>SO THIS MEANS PARIS ISNT REAL!>PARIS IS FAKE YOU........... YOU..... SMOOTHBRAIN!i dunno but you guys but im convinced.Paris doesnt exist.
normalfags: WHY WOULD THEY DO IT??a) this is a motive-fallacy, we can't read their mind to know. if a police detective finds a dead body in the woods with it's ears missing, will he say "WHY WOULD THE KILLER CUT THE EARS? IT MAKES NO SENSE, I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE MOTIVE SO THIS MUST NOT BE A MURDER!" this is how dumb you sound, just because the detective doesn't know the motive, that in no way refutes the evidence of murderermaybe the killer has an ear fetish, maybe it he's a gangster sending the ears in an envelope to his enemies.a) a possible reason might be: to promote patriotism during the Vietnam war, to make normies believe in the infallibility of scientists and to create trust in s0ience, to mentally prime the public into believing that traversing space is realistic and doable so they will believe in alien invasion during the blue beam, to create trust in the government, or just good old flexing on the plebs, telling the masses "see, this is what we can do, what will civilian timmy gon do?"
>>41368770nasa is an intelligence agency, but was only recently admitted as such. so space exploration is the plausible justification for funding them, they can excuse the outrageous money they get from taxpaypigs by offering them some entertainment in exchange and it makes for a cool cover story. secret societies use philanthropy as a cover story, the vatican and smallhats use religion as a cover story. smart mfs at the top never present their true motive to normalfags in public, because that would ruin the whole enterprise
>>41369314
>>41369150Nah. You even fucked this up, smoothy. If you had been to Paris and hadn't been back in x years, the corollary conclusion isn't that Paris doesn't exist. It's rather that you never went to Paris in the first place. But because among other things, Paris isn't 240,000 miles away through a vacuum of space, we know that you're too stupid to actually think through an argument. Nobody is claiming that the moon doesn't exist, dumbfuck, were claiming that there is no solid evidence that men landed there and returned ffifty plus years ago.Again, you're obviously a third teamer totally fucking things up. As humorous as I find it, I also feel a bit sorry for you now.
>>41369150>>GUYS ITS BEEN ***THIS MANY DAYS*** SINCE THE LAST TIME I WAS IN PARIS!>>SO THIS MEANS PARIS ISNT REAL!>>PARIS IS FAKE YOU........... YOU..... SMOOTHBRAIN!See how badly you bollixed this when you tried to go off script? lolStay on script, dummy.
>>41368770the chinese sent people in space since 2003. (allegedly)they were not at war with anybody at that time. human spaceflight has no economic or military return on investment. nothing is gained from it. the only reason to do it is to flex and promote patriotism. it doesn't need to be wartime for a propaganda campaign.
>>41369345you're weird, i don't even know which side you're arguing for.
>>41365235Chico Xavier - July 28, 1971:"Because if we don't enter into a conflict of immense proportions, then on the Moon it is possible for humanity to build glass cities, greenhouse cities, where scientists can establish support points for observing our galaxy. These cities are not scientific dreams; these cities, naturally with great sacrifice from Earth's humanity, can be built, and probably, let's say, nitrogen and oxygen will be obtained, as well as aluminum plants, glass formations, and plastic materials on the Moon itself for the construction of these strongholds of Earth science, and water will probably be supplied by the lunar soil itself. And then we will have the possibility of contact with other communities in our galaxy. Then we will definitively end the warlike period in the evolution of Earth's peoples, because we will understand that we are part of a universal family. Jesus himself, whom we revere as our Lord and Master, said: "In my Father's house there are many mansions."https://youtube.com/shorts/yvQgN1fmxJE
>>41367486>rosenfeltMy grandma once let her power level slip when she referred to FDR as "that jew rosenfeld." I miss you Gramma! You were the best!
>>41369002>do your own researchYou mean watch someone else’s YouTube videos? Ok, lolcow.
This thread sucks. No images You guys want the truth? The footage is fake. Grissom, White And Chappie went. They were cooked by the radiation in the Van Allen belts. The rest is fake. That's the big secret. Their corpses are still there. /thread
>>41370645>you're weird, i don't even know which side you're arguing for.That's because you're not very intelligent. It's no great crime but it's also not my fault.
>>41365235>we all know that the moon landings were fakedThey spread that lie so that no one would ask why we never went back
Wow, thread got slow after I dropped the truth
>>41371902>the van meme beltsXD
>>41367486>Rosevelt (rosenfelt) saved russia from the germans in ww2I'm with you on all of your post. But this one is bullshit. And all of the sides were Zio-sponsored.
