If so how do I time travel there
>>41410812You're already living in an extremely toxic femurigic civilization and matriarchal society society heavily influenced by the faggot IsIs and satanic death cult of christianity.
>>41410812Nope. Not once. A single woman may occasionally be the leader of a society but their government is always filled with men.
>>41410812>futureHow could we know?Actually, we know. The asnwer is no. Women cant rule themselves. Much less others. Memba that fairy oddparents episode where time wishes men and women liven in separate parts of the world and men's side was all shit while women lived in a utopia? I know its a kids show and its played for laughs because thats the only way we could show it: as joke. Like a book i read once about pyramids on the sea floor near the bermuda triangle, the author goes to talk about atlantis as a matriarchal utopia where women ruled and "nobody knew their father but everyone knew their mother" like, nigga what kind of utopia is that? All women being single mother of many children with different fathers. And the motherfucker thought this was an inspiring vision, as if atlantis(if it existed) hadnt sunk into the ocean, anywayWomen have never been rulers(good ones at least) nor starters of religions
>>41412629Not really on topic with the thread but about your picrel. Have you read fulcanelli? About isis/horus being worshipped in rome and their statues being destroyed or copied as mary and jesusAlso, i was reading blavatsky the other day and i came upon similar connections she draws of Christ and Hermes/Mercury being historically worshipped in marking stones with crosses in them, being anointed with oil, adorned with garlands, also drew some connections with their names...
>>41412629I'm talking about rulers, not about female soft power or sexual power. Women are not most of the leaders nor most of the warriors. They exert power mostly through their vaginas.
>>41412689Come on, there must an amazon planet somewhere dammit.
>>41412830Man I wonder if Atlantussy was good.
>>41412908No. Your fetish is the result of some neurosis thats developed due to some unfortunate circumstance in your personal life. It is not reflective of broader reality.
>>41412850Is Horus not Apollo? I've read some threads where anons theorize about Apollo being the same as Apollyon. I mean, that rabbit hole leads back to Jesus and Lucifer being the same individual, no? I'm not that learned in that stuff, it might all be wrong anyway.
>>41412937What a load of shit
Nope, but when countries had queens they had more wars.
>>41410812The most powerful ruler of known human history was a woman. Queen Victoria, ruler of the british empire.
>>41414384ah yes the most powerful ruler of>her own country>some frozen wastes north of the colony it lost when the slaves dumped some tea in the river years back>some desert island prison colony full of bipedal monkeys>some lands in africa>fecaloid lands of indiaoh but wait but she (the people under her since she had nothing to do with that) built some train tracks and couple metallurgy factoriesmost powerful ruler my ass
>>41410812Women can never be the top of any normal society, they are always propped up with men or quickly overthrown by men.Modern life we have women on the top, why? Because men in the police forces and military defend them. They are held up by men.>>41414384Same as Victoria. She was propped up by men. The reason why women are even in line to thrones is to avoid the problems caused when there's no direct male heir which weakens the state.
Let's face it, women in politics are never a good idea. As modern culture has shown, young women have a strong tendency to vote for the left. Most young women are liberals and progressives, so if women would actully direct politics, we would all end up with communist regimes (or even nightmare states ruled by witchcraft and demon worshipping). The only way to keep systems of democracy and reasonable conservativism is to keep women out of the political process. (They're just not made for it, they somehow lack the intellectual skills. They have other qualities, they can support men and raise children, so they should focus on that.)
>>41412908Kek I knew it was all about picrel>>41414474This. Queens like Victoria or Elizabeth worked because it was a machine/system already in motion, carried by very competent men. Having these motherly figures at the top was very convenient to everyone involved but none of them really rose to power on their on, we never had a female Napoleon or Cesar.
>>41412830>>future>How could we know?if you cant see the future you arent gonna make it
>>41412830>Memba that fairy oddparents episode where time wishes men and women liven in separate parts of the world and men's side was all shit while women lived in a utopia? I know its a kids show and its played for laughs because thats the only way we could show it: as joke.Actually this is a recurrent point/joke on /tv/ and /pol/ about that show Survivor, they tried to make Men vs Women editions and had to stop because all of them went to shit insanely fast. The guys always bond and did well while the women did nothing but fight and cry, like one week into the competition most women where simply lying in the mud crying all day while the men made BBQ and wood carving. They released some piglets into the women camp so they could kill and eat but instead they adopted the little pigs like pets. They had to sent a few of the men (two or four iirc) to help the women and they endup doing every possible chore for the women. It was hilarious.
>>41412904But that's how female power works, anon. The amazon archetype is a fiction from the minds of men. In modern times we have the "tomboy" which is a approximation to it, and even this type is extremely rare. There was not a single time in history where women ruled like you said. It will not happen.
All the evils of the world are caused by married men. Not because they are men, but because they are married. -Zarathustra
