Use AI slop to recreate dreams
>>41485055incredibly stupid idea. just take a pen and sketch your dream, or don't.
>>41485055
>>41485076Hellooooo Reddit
>>41485055:p
>>41485055>dreaming of centre parks
>>41485055Nah, I'm good>>41485101How the fuck do normies manage to find this board, and worse than that, feel comfortable enough to post?
>>41485055https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OHQRo3Uz_VQ
>>41485943common dream for Brits
>>41485055Why is AI so similar to dreams or to how I saw the world as a child? Why are these AI photos and videos more beautiful and deeper than reality? There's a mystical quality to these generated spaces, as if time has frozen.
>>41486069either AI is built using the premise as our brains, or we are actually AI
>>41486069>>41487925a few years ago when ai was more primitive a big issue was generating fingers, ai would always screw up fingers on human characters. In lucid dreaming one of the reality checks is to look at your hands because you often times have weird fingers in dreams, too many fingers or they look weird and distorted.
>>41485955>>41485076>just pick up le pencilluddites lost and got anally gaped
>>41485055>Use AI slop to recreate dreams
>>41486664>bunker
>>41485076I drew one of my dreams and then AI sloppified it. It's kind of silly
>>41485958they think steve urkle is a role model of what a man should be and can only make money by taking advantage of others trust and ignorance.
>>41494864ok bro, just keep relying on your benevolent techno-master's software output and hope for the best long-term
>>41496788post the original drawing
>>41495198Just let the third world junk shops steal them. What's the problem here? You pour out your soul and they profit from it.
I remember the promise of the internet vs how it's turned out. AI is already so shit, can't imagine how all the side effects will compound over 20 years
>>41485055>hypnopompiaHave a stock photo of glowing hexagons. >>41496893>What's the problem here? You pour out your soul and they profit from it.If you're going to do that, at least include some form of hypervirulent memetic hazard or mental contagion. Make sure whatever they steal must be paid in some form, even if it includes their sanity.
>>41485955/x/ is absolutely full of q-boomers. The kind that find /pol/ too intense (menopausal women and low test old men).
>>41497018>glowing hexagonsI see glowing green geometric shapes when I wake up in the middle of an OBE.>>41497126>he doesn't know about the dream hotelsI guess you don't know about the mall, the shower dimension or the underground parking either.
>>41485076Its ironic seeing art encouraged on here when /ic/ nearly ruined my spirit for drawing back in 2018Do people really prefer "mid" art over ai now? I dont trust it, yiu people are like vile animals with criticism, ai sucks but posting art online is a fucking trap
>>41485094>>41485055I often find myself in hotels like this, even before the whole liminality thing blew up. Some environments in my dreams are so comfy.
>>41496864>long-termwe're knee-deep in the transcendental mudflood at the end of time family
Some kind of murder mystery dream involving a school girl victim, an old school at night, and Darth Vader. Just a typical amalgamation dream.
>>41485055reminds me of the outdoor fountain area of mall world.
Where do you generate AI video for free? Sora is free only for images
>>41498724Bing image creator has free vid prompts
>>41497120Kino
>>41498724Sora shoukd just make hentai
>>41491392A lot of dream checks are easy to bypass for experienced lucid dreamers. I've been aware for over 20 years now. I can see my reflection in the mirror, have normal body, have awareness of environment changing and can change it myself or force myself awake. I can even decide what to dream about.
>>41498706>Vader: A-a-am I late for the test? W-where is everyone? Did I miss the test??
>>41498467People are so obviously bandwagoning on the AI hate. It's so obvious.There's an immense crab mentality to dissuade people from doing anything. They hated the thing before that, and the one before that. Some people had fun harmlessly typing a prompt; like in the Guitar Hero "stop having fun!" comic, you suddenly pretend you always cared about real art. If people were doing art, they'd invent a reason to dissuade others from doing *that*. As they have. It's empty, vapid actions of the npc.
>>41498467>Do people really prefer "mid" art over ai now?This place doesn't welcome OC and genuine personal expression, and mediocre art is mediocre art, but mediocre art made by a human at least reflects some humanity, some experience, some expression rooted in human existence, some attempt to share something personal with other people. And with a little luck and persistence, mediocre art can lead to great art that resonates with other people eventually.AI art is just a hollow fac-simile, perhaps superfluously interesting for a minute, glitzy and immediate, but disposable and forgotten after the next prompt output.>>41503600AI art is the perfect tool for NPC's. No effort, no thinking, no time required. I'm pretty sure all the images in this thread are way off from what the people experienced in their minds during their dreams. Someone with a pencil has a better shot of truly capturing what their dream was really like than with AI.
>>41485055>>41485943Vaporwave vibes>we had us a dream, and we let it get away>Captcha: WAY28K
>>41503724Does it matter though? If it is "artsy" for you, if you find something beautiful in it and you resonate with it, that's what art is for. Heck even furniture is nowadays industrially manufactured and devoid of any soul but you can still find some beauty or harmony in a piece here and there and let it uplift your soul every time you look at it. Or is that wrong just because it is not handmade?
>>41504144yes it matters. you're only considering art like a commodity whose goal is only being pretty and ignoring the vital goals of self-expression and genuine exchanges of perspectives between people.and i'll be honest with you, i've owned some comfy ikea sofas in my days, but the only piece of furniture I've ever owned and genuinely found beautiful and inspiring was an antique piece from the early 1900's with some wood carving. handcrafted, yeah. sorry.
I remember flying over Madagascar and looking at Reunion and Mauritius, but AI generated it really lame. I could feel the sun and the wind and it was pure bliss.
>>41504250>but AI generated it really lame.you don't say? shocker
>>41504243yeah you're a bit too elitist. Art is what you make it, it is deeply personal which is why it is so complex and difficult to find the same interpretation for something amongst people. I get what you are saying about all the deeper layers and purposes of it. But unfortunately, to some people, it's just that - a pretty thing you like to look at and, maybe, it lifts your mood. That's the first and simplest layer of art that maybe everyone regardless of their personality, spirituality, values in life etc. can resonate with.In this sense, AI slop can fulfill it to a certain extent. You see handcraft, experience, effort and humanity in a handmade item, another person might see the beauty of algorithm, processing of data (which is the equivalent of knowledge and experience for AI), prompt crafting shit etc. Idk. I'm personally not that much into AI art but I won't dismiss it without a second thought. If I see something pretty or that speaks to me, I won't block that feeling just because "oh no it's AI" but yeah, I agree that it will have something special to it if it's something historical
>>41485076here's the deal: stop using wojacks and I will stop using ai
>>41504376AI is inherently an ''elitist'' tool. you don't own the software that produces AI output, you don't control the software that produces AI output, you probably don't even fully understand the software that produces AI output (I sure don't), but I guarantee you somebody somewhere does, and sooner or later they'll use their control and leverage over these tools for their own ends, while perhaps a good portion of the younger generation's skills in self-expression and various artforms will have atrophied. my stance is fundamentally anti-elitist, but there's no getting around the fact that good art requires a lot of time and effort, and some talent as well unfortunately. AND patience, consideration and imagination (to fill in the inevitable blanks) on the part of the audience as well.>another person might see the beauty of algorithm, processing of data (which is the equivalent of knowledge and experience for AI), prompt crafting shit etc.really? this just reads like someone justifying their stockholm syndrome to me.obviously, I understand nobody is going to spend 20 hours+ to paint an impressionistic masterpiece to illustrate dreams for the benefit of a few random internet users on a short-lived thread, but none of the images ITT give me any hint whatsoever as to what kind of people and sensibilities are behind these images, like a simple pencil doodle would and fundamentally I'm here to attemtpt to connect with other people.if you don't mind being perpetually mediated by uncaring, unfeeling softwares and algorithms, then the future will be peachy.
>>41504541deal
>>41503724You are running with the idea of art that you have in your head, probably because you actually found something beautiful in art and can perceive this humanity, experience and expression you talk about. But try to understand that the majority of people out there have no connection to art, they only see a picture as a cool picture and that's it, they don't try to find a deeper meaning. If it's a gigamecha with a thousand rockets attached to it that's cool for some and they don't give a shit about who made it. They just simply see it, they say "cool" and forget it in a few seconds or at best send it to a friend and talk over it for a few seconds and again, forget it about. Unfortunately AI is a thing now and it's not going away, you can still make art yourself and there will probably be an audience for human made art for a long time but in a few years I think the world will be drowned in AI slop art and there is no stopping it now
>>41485055No fuck you devil
