Does anyone else remember this? Whatever happened to this guy? Some recaps for those unaware: Brett Stuart was a remote viewer who discovered that there is a kind of “fence” or “grid” around the planet that acts as a barrier preventing souls from leaving the cycle properly. At death there is a process: some particles become charged, an emission occurs from the being, and that alignment / angle of exit is important (they mention “45° angle” as a crucial exit vector) in their model. The remote-viewing team concluded that for most people, fear at death or mis-alignment prevents access to the “highway” (or channel) of soul liberation. The video posits that the earth (and perhaps its soul-traffic) is being used in some energetic/harvest sense — i.e., souls reincarnate, the cycle repeats, and it feeds into a system.
Link: https://youtu.be/XxDq0o30yhs?si=71eEOG_uCxNJPjmY
>>41502497Yes, earth is a loosh farm for archons. What are we supposed to do about it? 99.9% of humanity will think you're crazy for suggesting it, and will just fall back on their religions that were designed to keep them in mental prisons. The Gnostics were on the right track and the orthodox christcucks fucking killed them for it.
>>41505851how can one prove the existence of archons?
>>41505872I don't know. I'm using it in a general way though. Basically whoever is harvesting us / this planet's energy.
>>41502497>Whatever happened to this guy?he's an odd case, after this video originally appeared he pulled it and retreated to focus more on the 'financial aspects' of remote viewing. then, maybe a year or two ago, he appeared again and did several more projects with a new group to view other esoteric targets.it seems as though he then pulled these videos from youtube as well, and now there are only tutorial videos on the main channel for that site. it's a bit peculiar, one can say what they will about Courtney Brown and the 'eccentric' people at Farsight (who also subscribe to the 'soul trap' theory) but as far as i know they don't post things, remove them, then disappear/reappear repeatedly. if they're nuts, at least they're consistent.
>>41506006>>Whatever happened to this guy?His moksha video was very depressing for a lot of people. He said he was getting emails from lots of people wanting to an hero...so he took it down.One of his more interesting videos was about personal ascension iirc. There is a place on earth...if you can find it (it is invisible to most people -some cave in a mountain)... there is an ancient being there or tech that will give you knowledge of all previous reincarnations and transform you into some kinda 5d soul outside of the control of archons or whatever. Been a few years since i watched it. let's form a team and find the cavehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frzmcszbimg&t=1s
>>41506084>His moksha video was very depressing for a lot of people. He said he was getting emails from lots of people wanting to an hero...so he took it down.i thought i recalled him saying that too but i didn't want to make the claim if my memory was faulty.and yes, that video and the others were what i was referencing with his other esoteric targets. what we really need is other, independent/reliable viewers to also blind view this target. otherwise, we just have to trust what Stuart and his team are saying. i'm not making the claim he is untrustworthy, but i am saying that it is incredibly difficult to validate and corroborate his results.
>>41505872>lives in energy farm for tyrants>pays taxes to certified predatorsI'm not sure what you were expecting anon, it's not an abstract thing
>>41502497>remote viewer who discovered that there is a kind of “fence” or “grid” around the planetYeah RVing that kind of stuff isn't necessarily going to give good results. Could also be an inaccurate result. You can't assume 100% accuracy.
just another prison planet larp
>>41506141i do wish people researching the RVing topic would realize this - mcmoneagle said himself that unless you can actually physically confirm the target and gather feedback to corroborate what the viewers write down, it's almost impossible to use the information reliably.what most viewers do to counter-act this is that they work in groups, and when several individuals in the group arrive at similar conclusions and data points it becomes more difficult to dismiss. however, we then have to trust that these viewers are being genuine and truthful when they claim everyone in the group is blind, whereas with real targets anyone can look at the viewers information and compare it to the target.then where does that leave us when analyzing and researching these topics? unfortunately, we have to file it into the interesting and noteworthy category, and shelve it until we can actually confirm it. one cannot and should not base their entire worldview and lifestyle on information gathered from RVing esoteric and unconfirmable targets.
