>Reminder that NASA is officially an intelligence agency>>>41571841>Trackers:https://theskylive.com/3dsolarsystem?objs=c2025n1https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=C%2F2025%20N1&view=VOP>Lightcurvehttps://cobs.si/comet/2643/1.Retrograde orbit aligns within 5° of the ecliptic; probability 0.2%2.July–Nov 2025: showed a true sunward jet (anti-tail), not a geometric illusion3.Nucleus mass ≈106× 1I/Oumuamua and 103× 2I/Borisov, moving faster than both; probability <0.1%4.Arrival timing placed it within tens of millions of km of Mars, Venus, Jupiter and hidden from Earth at perihelion; probability 0.005%5.Gas plume: far more Ni than Fe (industrial-like Ni alloys) + Ni/CN ratio orders of magnitude above all comets incl. 2I/Borisov; probability <1%6.Gas plume: only 4% water by mass (vs water-rich comets)7.Extreme negative polarization, unprecedented; probability <1%8.Arrival within 9° of the “Wow!” signal; probability 0.6%9.Near perihelion: brightened faster than any comet and was bluer than the Sun10.Sunward + anti-solar jets demand unrealistically large surface area to absorb enough sunlight for sublimation11.Non-gravitational acceleration near perihelion implies ≥13% mass loss, yet imagery shows no breakup12.Tightly collimated jets hold orientation across ~106 km in multiple solar directions despite measured rotation13.Perihelion tuned trajectory to pass within 0.5% of Jupiter's Hill Radius>Oddities:The IAA SETI post-detection protocols just updated first time in 15 years: arxiv.org/pdf/2510.14506Many UAP's have been sighted since 3i detection - https://apokalypsis.net/ - ufobattler.com/ - nuforc.org/map/NASA caught manipulating data on its Solar Observatory website.FAA updated its air traffic control handbook to include UAP reportingChina Academy of Sciences changes name of Aeronautics Dept. to "School of Interstellar Navigation"US announces "Genesis Project" with 90-270 day timeline
#128: >>41565952https://www.youtube.com/@DiegoSanAraujohttps://www.youtube.com/@DobsonianPowerhttps://www.youtube.com/@TheAngryAstronauthttps://www.youtube.com/@GaleriaDoMeteoritohttps://www.youtube.com/@StefanBurnshttps://www.youtube.com/@JohnLenardWalsonhttps://www.youtube.com/@CristinaGhttps://www.youtube.com/@RaysAstrophotographyhttps://www.youtube.com/@ChucksAstrophotographyAvi Loeb: https://avi-loeb.medium.com/Original NASA livestream:https://www.youtube.com/live/A5SUq2eDXg [unlisted]
Did you have trouble posting this?
>>41573407>applying a new interstellar classification.What classification would that be?
>>41573473An exercise huh? Reminds me of covid
>planetary defense
Be advised: previous bread baked too good for op, the everpresent and correct fagggot.OP wants this one well bleached, crusts trimmed and cut into cute shapes to satisfy the tism.Real men would finish the nice wheat they got in the previous thread first
two immediate mad glowposts in both threads.Good OP, thanks.
>>41573482No.By the way, once this thread expires make sure to add this occurrence to the OP if I'm not here to do so.Basically the UN has scheduled a training exercise to treat 3I/A as planetary threat through the IAWN. This scheduled exercise ended as of yesterday, 11/27/2025. This is also notable since the object was considered in a new type for the organization, since all prior objects had been long period comets or other local objects.News of the IANW's decision is not new but the conclusion of its exercise is notable since it implies further actions will be taken either as a direct reaction to observations or as a long term protocol for objects like 3I/A.It sems like this is a direct response to the trajectory of 3I/a. We have noted from the start that 3I/A's course is uniquely and astonishingly capable of putting it into a variety of orbits. The most threatening of them is into the inner solar system. We knew this from the moment 3I/A's trajectory was accurately plotted and so did the UN. Whether it follows this course or not, the UN's decision is completely unprecedented considering the organization has previously only targeted emergent objects like 2023 DZ2 (with the exception of Apophis.)We should assume all strategic military and civilian assets have been focused on 3I/A and will continue to be.
>>41573474>it's already archivedrip st. germaine
>>41573519what evidence shows a retargeting of "all strategic military and civilian assets"?i severely doubt the permanent SC council members have stopped their dick measuring contests in hot theaters for mutual focus on 3I/A if the UN maintains strategic military assets capable of heliospheric force projection - IF there is a dark fleet - that seems like an entirely tangential point to the subject of 3I/A>school of interstellar navigationthe chinese have their own space station and are going to colonize the system>UAP reporting overhaulCI on UAP is so deep that its hard to tell if this is real or meant to bait out UAP believers for future psywar purposes>Genesis ProjectQRD for those not in the know?
A lot of interesting stuff here.Here's the PDC's (planetary defense conference) publication on all of its 2025 strategic activity:https://iaaspace.org/wp-content/uploads/iaa/Scientific%20Activity/conf/pdc2025/pdc2025report.pdfHere is the total simulated asteroid impact response and assessment calculation for a 2025 planetary impact:https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/pd/cs/pdc25/Here is a simulation of the impact using NASA's orbit visualization. This is noteworthy since it shows visually that impacts can happen with very high angles of orbital incidence.https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/orbits/custom/pdc25.htmlI will continue to unpack information in these documents; I urge anons to do the same.
>>41573542It's a UN-led planetary defense exercise. If NATO holds a defense exercise they employ all of their member nations and simulate an invasion, requiring wartime utilization of strategic assets like satellites. The UN can access all major powers' resources.
They used AI in their strategic level analysis. Again proving why we included the Genesis Project in the OP; AI will play a role in everything from now on, including how our planet reacts to interstellar objects.
>>41573495It's the interstellar classification. All previous objects were local or cometary but they are using an "interstellar" label not a "comet" label.
>>41573591Thanks for the clarification, I'm still in a haze
>>41573542>CI on UAP is so deep that its hard to tell if this is real or meant to bait out UAP believers for future psywar purposesI hear you. Still, it's worth noting how 3I/A is mentioned in relation to the entire UAP narrative. It's information and I don't like assuming people are dumb so they can draw their own conclusions.>Genesis ProjectHow do you even explain AI in its current late 2025 form? I think most people know what it's capable of if they use it in a professional capacity and understand the consequence of a federal effort to advance AI. It's a big deal. AI is enabling geopolitical level force projection. It's a military and political asset and if Genesis bears fruit it will be much more; perhaps a civilizational or evolutionary accelerant.
>>41573473this is it folks. enjoy what you consider normal times while you can.
I'm ready to move on
>>41573512>OP wants this one well bleached, crusts trimmed and cut into cute shapes to satisfy the tism.>>41573637
man all these abandoning breads is fucking with me just let them play out you tards t. schizoid
It's just a rock. Nothing ever happens.
>>41573662They can't because they simply must control the narrative
>>41573566Again, the UN SC member states are never going to do this - they all take turns shitting on the UN when they arent using it for proxy purposes.When was the last time the UN successfully requisitioned a strategic asset from a great power by force to use for such purposes?>>41573621Read up on Genesis, missed the news while on break. This is the ideal use of AI but the sad thing is the chinese have been doing this scale of deep research / innovation lead generation with AI for 4-5 years now, I wouldnt bet on Genesis overcoming the hunan inertia of its operators.Feds are slow, lazy, and stupid (midwit), unless Genesis cannbe queried by univeristy students, startups, or paid access by businesses I doubt we will see civilizational impact anytime soon...not to mention the almost assured censorship of the 'secret sciences' or emergent phenomena relating to any blackboxed federal programs. I just got hard thinking about a predictive model trained on UAP sighting data - the AI knows where they are by knowing where they arent, even if it wont know why. Fun project will have to find dataset thoughI do think 3I/A is suspicious, and the uptick in UAP events sells something - but it could well be that UAP of various types are agitated the same way birds are agitated by a storm over the horizon, rather than being associated with the object...
>>41573681i was gonna say its for sure some faggot glow op to keep doing this
>>41573678>>41573681
>>41573678A rock they wont give a clear picture for. But yea unlike the schizos in here want it will fly by and do nothing
>>41573688>Feds are slow, lazy, and stupid (midwit), unless Manhattan cannbe queried by univeristy students, startups, or paid access by businesses I doubt we will see civilizational impact anytime soon...not to mention the almost assured censorship of the 'secret sciences' or emergent phenomena relating to any blackboxed federal programs.>I just got hard thinking about a predictive model trained on UAP sighting data - the atom knows where they are by knowing where they arent, even if it wont know why. Fun project will have to find dataset thoughThe comparisons are being made for a reason. If the point is truly to bring a federally developed AI to the forefront of global power as the terminology denotes, the impact will be massive. Yes, China will have a response that's true. But the effects of competition will compound, not negate echother.Just like... The atom did.
>>41573693Crying on 4chan is frowned upon
>>41573688>When was the last time the UN successfully requisitioned a strategic asset from a great power by force to use for such purposes?Look up UNOSAT and UNOOSA. The UN regularly requisitions space assets and has standard protocols for doing so.
OP is a faggot who can't comprehend other anons having informational agency.
>>41573749>informational agencyThat's a meaningless phrase. You're radioactive.
>>41573717Interesting...I did double-check and under chapVII art43 member states do have to acquiesce to the security council.I would love to see this play out.>>41573704I like the comparison of AI to atomic technology, good point.
>>41573678Its much worse anon.it isn't a rock, but still nothing will happen.
>>41573512Just a tip for the future shill, anyone who uses 'real man™' is somebody gaslighting another to do something that goes against his own interests.
