Spirituality is so focused on femininity that I wonder why male gods even exist.
I wonder why male nipples even exist.
Act Utilitarianism is a phenomenological matter. Mens biology inures them to Act Utilitarianism. Women's inures them to Rule Utilitarianism. The space inbetween teaches us something other than utilitarianism. To know the gods. We must know them through ourselves.
>>41623162>forgetting gods of war even exist>forgetting gods of agriculture exist>forgetting saturn and marsspirituality has always been both masculine and feminine, ywnbaw btw
>>41623162Gynolatry is the laziest form of spirituality. No one has a good excuse to practice it in our current state. It is only practiced by willfuly ignorant savages who are afraid of soul evolution. So they try to conflate earthly fetishes with "divinity". They only indulge in materialist impulses without realizing it and their spiritual practice suffers exponentially. They mistakenly worship only what their physical eyes are attracted to.Compare this to the vast transcendental metaphysics of modern religion.And no before you say it, that is not how you interpret the "divine feminine/masculine". Lurk moar.
>>41623162If it doesn’t embody both genders then it can’t be called a god
>>41623162 Basically, male gods are the ones of war, crafts, and kingly power. That's the general trend, not a hard rule. It's not that they aren't spiritual, but they're often more worldly and down-to-earth. The real magic, deep spirituality, and the most hardcore practices come from the cults of female deities. Women are just more spiritually attuned than the average man—their connection is more sensual and emotional, extending even to the psychic realm.
You have been brainwashed You can thanks the frankfurt school, jews, and cultural marxism (they're the same thing)Strong and masculine gods are the reason humans survived the cold and the cruelty of nature, and the reason the bronze age was so kino
There are no goddesses.
>>41623162Only midwits believe thisWhere do you get your info, tiktok? Bluesky?Read a book (pre-1900) before talking gay shit
>>41624781>Strong and masculine gods are the reason humans survived the cold and the cruelty of nature, and the reason the bronze age was so kinoGranted, but it is utterly distinct from the spiritual. I have no stake in the warrior's worldview, not being a warrior myself. True spirituality has, from its inception, evolved in fundamental opposition to the prevailing wisdom of this world.
>>41623162 The priestess GF dream is real, bros. The heart wants what it wants.
Tranny thread
>>41624813>Granted, but it is utterly distinct from the spiritualhow much pot do you smoke
>>41624974 Here's the thing. Warriors were their own separate caste. On the social ladder, they were above the peasants, merchants, and craftsmen, but still below the priestly class. It's a generalization, but historically accurate. Real, deep spiritual wisdom, the sacred kind, wasn't found in that hierarchy. It was found outside of it: in hermit life, brutal austerities, and hardcore mystic practices. Paths closed off to anyone bound by duty and social roles. Conventional wisdom is often just worldly bullshit, completely separate from actual spiritual wisdom.
>>41623162It's because spirituality is treated as an alternative to mainstream religion. mainstream religion (especially abrahamic religion which is dominant in the western world) is generally patriarchal. so that's why.
>>41624738lol
>>41623871>why
>>41623162I'm above such matters. To be aware of the limitations of "gender" puts you in a position above their influence.
>>41625197>Warriors were their own separate casteso ur saying u cannot be a warrior without being apart of a social hierarchy? seems a little silly
>>41625445 You're judging this with a modern mindset. Hierarchy was far more tangible in the past than it is today. To step outside your prescribed role wasn't just unusual; it was an act of defiance against the social order itself. Today, that structure still exists, but it's more diffuse and less openly enforced. So yes, you can't be a warrior without being a part of social hierarchy.
>>41623162To love and serve the other.
>>41624963yep
>>41624005But the creator made cellular reproduction and sexual reproduction. It is just mixing of genes. You trannies just want to justify your existence without realizing embracing your inner-beast and realizing that is peak comfiness.>IM JUST A STUPID MONKEY WITH THE DNA OF FALLEN ANGELS IN ITthat is all you are.>>41624963Trannys are the OG incels that went around the internet calling everyone that. When tards on pol said>but i have a familythey came up with a new word, CHUD. Gnosticism was their comfort until you take a closer look>SAY THE PRONOUNS>CALL ME A WOMENyep they are rule makers.
>>41625737 Metaphysically speaking, reincarnation is determined by the state of consciousness, not by the idea that a male devotee of female deities somehow assumes a feminine nature. That notion is false. For the correct framework, one should look to Jungian psychology and the concept of the Anima, defined as the innate feminine image within the male psyche, which acts as the mediator to the unconscious. Jung got it right.
>>41625791And how does one choose which gender to reincarnate in the afterlife?
>>41625852 You don't choose your next incarnation like a product off a shelf. It's determined by your karma and your state of consciousness. In the classical reincarnation model, you're not even guaranteed a human rebirth.
>>41623905This/Thread
>>41623905Pretty much and it explains the state of thia boardLazy gooners and trannies
>>41626995 It's just a convenient cope. You can reject it all you want, that doesn't make you right. And I'm not a tranny.
>>41623162she needs that seed, bro. she needs that spark.https://www.bitchute.com/video/biSY2OEAuOVz
>>41625791If you worship God as having an inherent female form and you believe in non-duality you are 100% creating mental impressions that you are a woman because you're identifying your true self with that female God.
>>41623162Jesus, The Father and the Holy Spirit are all malei see nothing feminine about them so im not sure to which spirituality you are referring to, since there is no other form of spirituality other than the trinity itself.
>>41627690 You do not understand what you are talking about. Non-duality precludes such creation; therefore, I create nothing. I am neither a woman nor a man. My path is different. I worship the Goddess because I know precisely what I am doing and why.
>>41628027The whole basis of Shaktism is emphasizing and worshipping the creative force of the absolute and anthropomorphizing it as a female Goddess so not sure if you understand your own path
>>41628195 The Goddess is the Absolute; there is no other. What you refer to as the Absolute is the masculine principle of pure transcendent consciousness. This principle possesses no power of its own beyond observing and reflecting all that is, within all that is. It is not separate from the Goddess but is an inseparable aspect of Her own being.
>>41627690>monist gives the game away that he just thinks he's god and all the nondual, traitless bullshit is exactly that
>>41625771You're a retarded faggot you can still reproduce and even present your inner beast while transitioning sexually. You fundamentally misunderstand trans people and are obviously falling for the culture war bullshit
>>41628270I never said the absolute was seperate from it's power and you're still just anthopomorphizing it as a female Goddess using the Shiva-Shakti duality as justification for calling God a woman while you yourself admit rejecting that duality. You can just admit the obvious which is that you want to think of God as a woman because worshipping women is your nature and that helps you to worship God
>>41624974That dude looks like his legs are as scrawny as his arms
>>41628463I don't just think I'm God but rather everything in existence. However that doesn't mean I think my limited illusory ego identity and personal experience of reality reigns supreme, not in the slightest.
>>41628490Back to the excuse, then.It is HILARIOUS how much the notion that the Supreme has some female is upsetting you.>NOOOO THE GOD I AM GOING TO BE IS MALE!!!!!!!!!!
>>41628506False dichotomy, it's the formless source of all forms and polarities therefore it's one some sense both and in another sense neither.
>>41628515So female
>>41628519And male and neither and both, yeah.
>>41628528So exactly what they already said.The Goddess is the Absolute; there is no other. What you refer to as the Absolute is the masculine principle of pure transcendent consciousness. This principle possesses no power of its own beyond observing and reflecting all that is, within all that is. It is not separate from the Goddess but is an inseparable aspect of Her own being.
>>41628538No, because that's arbitrarily fixing a single gender to the absolute by referring to it as a Goddess
>>41628553>NOOO MUST BE MALE!!!Such a joke.
>>41628569>>41628553You are booth wrong the suprême one is not female or male goddess or god but something that cannot be understand by words
>>41623162No, spirituality is not inherently feminine, it's just that coomer degenerate art and titillation rotted your brain.
>>41628569See >>41628515
>>41628613>>41628569Why does everyone ITT keep assuming a formless God that transcends the gender duality itself is a male? It's not that hard a concept to grasp
Is not male or female the suprême god is neutral
>>41628644No it has to be a Goddess with pretty feet or the coomers can't into bhakti
>>41628476>anthopomorphizing it as a female GoddessBecause that is Her nature—not in an earthly sense, but as the fundamental metaphysical reality. The Goddess is the non-dual Absolute, and that Absolute is inherently feminine.>Shiva-Shakti duality as justificationYou invoke a Shiva-Shakti duality that does not exist in the highest realization. The masculine principle of pure consciousness is not a separate god; it is a latent modality within the Goddess, the still ground from which Her dynamic being arises.>God a womanThere is no male God. This is the non-negotiable truth. The profound irony is that you discourse on non-duality, yet the concept of a God who is not masculine appears to be the very limit of your understanding.
>>41628729>coomer goddess imageProving my point about your motivations.>Absolute is inherently feminineHow so? You can't justify this claim besides repeating the tantric assertion that power is a feminine principle and pure consciousness is masculine principle>You invoke a Shiva-Shakti dualityNo, you are the one continually invoking it.See here:>The masculine principle of pure consciousnessThat's you invoking the Shiva-Shakta duality once again, which you have to do, because it is the only philosophical justification for your premise that the absolute possesses an inherent feminine nature
there was a time when women were worshipped as the main goddess. we lived in mudhuts, and we didnt bother recording anything then, it was a suffocating matriarchy. we did not realise sex created babies, we thought women were the sole creator. these fertility cults were very degenerate.then the male god came about through the indo europeans, who had the conquering spirit. We built civilisation, we now have buildings that touch the sky.obviously, true god is beyond the concept of gender itself. but we say he's male. why? because god's involvement with us, his hand reaching out to guide us, is conceived as a paternal figure. the maternal is loving, and nurturing, but the paternal is how you GROW. this is why the male god ultimately won out at the end, and people who conceive god from masculine end up doing better in life
>>41628777>coomer goddess imageDoes She scare you? I mean, you are the one reacting to an image.>How so? You can't justify this claimThe claim was justified the moment samadhi was achieved. Tantra is a path of direct experience. I do not have to justify anything. I experience it, and then I state it as fact.>That's you invoking the Shiva-Shakta duality once againThere is no duality. You cannot cage non-duality in words or concepts. Our language is not made for this. You are the one who introduced a Shiva-Shakti duality that does not exist. I was merely using the masculine-feminine analogy to illustrate that pure consciousness cannot exist apart from the Goddess.
>>41628777>digitschecked, retards like >>41628845 can't help but to project earthly desires into concepts and realms that transcend them.
>>41628845>guy with coomer goddess saved on his phone claims to have achieved samadhi/x/ is well and truly dead
>>41628852 There is no male sky daddy. Stay mad.
>>41628729>Because that is Her nature—not in an earthly sense, but as the fundamental metaphysical reality. The Goddess is the non-dual Absolute, and that Absolute is inherently feminine.You have it backwards - which is understandable due to inversion in society. The One (the grand architect of reality) is pure masculinity - the singular, unmoved mover. In reality, men and women are aspects of the feminine chaotic principle acting in the divine will of the One masculine. That's why they call him God the father, son
>>41623162>spiritually >femininity Anon, no such thing. Women can't be truly honest and truly spiritual . Only men. >all women lie
>>41623905This, and what I said below: >>41629134
>>41623162god i wish i were female
>>41629151Me too.
>>41629235if spirituality is feminine how do i absorb enough of it to turn into a woman
>>41625531>To step outside your prescribed role wasn't just unusualpeasants were often drafted to serve in medieval Europe. a warrior and solider isnt a class thats always needed until times of war. ur view of the social caste system is very eastern/indian. were u a hindu?
>why do male gods exist.*shrug*I was just chosen to be justice, but am malebut some how all images of that angel aRE FWEMALE AND LITERALLY SPIT IN MY EYEall i know is tht being a pagan deity gets you mocked by woman and troons alot and teased by homos and robots.every image has some kind of mockery oing on in it.and it often involes woman domnating me, which btw never happens.who also deny you.very werid.also troon like larping as you dispite you never being a troon or a woman or adroyonousits the same reason you ask OP why i was born liking woman when i';m the only deity that does.and that is part of the highest eholoen of deities yet not even worthy of a postive mentionwith only greek and smaeria lore being the only correct lowre about me. the reast is lies or simply talking about someone unrelated lol.i was nevr in love with a domnating redhead haha.that's such a huge lie even i have to call it out.idk in most of my lore woman have treated me like literal rubbish teitnot even proud or even mention relation ship. owwnah just for get us males even have titles we are clearly irrelant to woman, maybe they lesibains lolyet won't do it to a woman. werid.thank the gods i cutt my wings off then.yikes. the world of the gods is so cringe anyway.most of them being an example of what not to be as a human bean.
>>41628862You are aware that the one transcends the masculine and feminine and is neither a goddess nor a god but transcendent and indescribable, also there are no women in heaven, everything is neutral and without characteristics in the higher planes
>>41628862There is no goddess or god but something that trancend boot tu true god cannot be explain bu human word it is no a goddess or à god
>>41623162Anon your mistake here is thinking in terms of monotheism.
>>41624963Yeh.>>41625388Back to /lgbt/ with you.
>>41631320 The Goddess is not a woman in an earthly sense. I've already described the masculine aspect of Her nature. I won't do the same for the non-dual, feminine Absolute itself.>everything is neutral and without characteristics in the higher planesWhat you describe is the classic error of elevating static consciousness above the dynamic power that gives it life and expression. Such a view is not transcendence, but a refined dualism that fears the creative pulse of existence itself. That inert consciousness is contained within the Goddess as an inseparable dimension of Her being. Your prejudice is nothing new.
>>41631434 The one is conpletely neutral à not truly désirable by word its not femenine masculine not à goddess or à godd is something in betwent but is not femenine or masculine the one trancend absuletely all féminité and masculine and is formeless and inherenly neutral definityvely not à goddes or god
>>41631434Most people cannot understand transcendence to duality, and have to instead attempt to understand only through complete removal.To them, the Absolute must be nothing at all, instead of the glorious, all-encompassing infinitude She is.
>>41632481Its they them not she the one trancend all féminité and masculine the one is not à goddess or à god
