If you expect just 7% returns per year (S&P500 averages about 10% long term), you will get to your first quadrillion by year 348 - by investing just $100/month. By year 447, your fortune has grown to your first quintillion.Anyone else spend a lot of time thinking about this? I've used very conservative estimates here. There simply is no way we are not ruled by one or several humanoid creatures that have longevity on lock like that arctic shark that lives for 800 years.
>>41627189This just shows that these returns won’t be sustained over a long period of time
>>41627264Not really. They'd convert as much as possible into anything of value whatsoever. Loyalty, land, rights, a thousand other things. They'd be able to trust armies of highly capable people to be custodians of parts of their wealth. Most of the billionaires are their mercenaries
>>41627281That’s not how the economy works though there isn’t infinite stuff, if you had this much money that would just mean money was effectively worthless.Like sure you invested $100 but what about someone who invested $100,000? You’d still be 1000x poorer than them regardless of how big your number gets. Your position and buying power within the economy wouldn’t change.
>>41627310You only need enough to your own comfort and to buy enough loyalty to implement your goals. These creatures aren't in an investment competition, they just want planetary control and underground virgin blood based theme parks.
>>41627189Your model relies on a 7% a year return from a modern stock market which started in 1957. There has been no such stock market in history that has been reliable before the modern era. Some variations have existed over centuries - but they all disappeared and they certainly did not give 7% interest a year. Many would have ended up with nothing.False model.
>>41627189this is why the world is ruled by old money families and why the democrats mostly attack intergenerational wealth for the average person.
>I ran some numbers and nothing ever happens Lmao
But eventually you’re investing in blood.
>>41630792and that's a good thing
>>41627189Not only are you wrong on your economics, your idea doesnt require a vampire, it just requires a family trust.
