i've had this question for a long time already, but didn't know how to put it into a /x/ post that fits.what does femineity mean in spiritualism? is it motherly love? and also important, what is the true meaning of the female archetype (the perfect loving female) and is society trying to corrupt it with things like feminism?other question i want an answer to, what are the implications of femineity in a person in a spiritual frame? for example, is it bad for a man to be feminine? not in the way gay people are, but more similar to for example a femboy, or just a boy that has long hair or likes dressing in unisex clothes. liking flowers, etc. i am not talking about religion but in the general understanding of this in spiritual circles. i once heard that a perfect man embodies both feminine and masculine psychological traits (no idea what it means exactly but there it is)pic a bit rel.
>>41631961>not in the way gay people are, but more similar to for example a femboy, or just a boy that has long hair or likes dressing in unisex clothes. liking flowers, etc.So gay??
>>41631965>So gay??when i said "gay", i meant the parody of gay people everyone has this idea of. femboys instead are feminine but a lot of them are straight and behave somewhat differently. like, more leaning to cute instead of loud.
>>41631961Femininity in spirit is the anima, and it includes motherly love, since the anima cares.
>>41632029>Femininity in spirit is the anima, and it includes motherly love, since the anima cares.Does empathy in general has something to do with this? Specially people that feel a lot of empathy.
>>41631961the female extracts what is most valuable in the male. some men extract what's most valuable from a female, but this is very rare.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MPHyR92MQic
>>41632060what is that video about?
>>41631980>like, more leaning to cute instead of loud.I am not trying to offend but that sounds even more gay. > i once heard that a perfect man embodies both feminine and masculine psychological traitsSoft-bellied, cowardly, domesticated modern men already lean heavily toward the feminine.The stuff about balancing the masculine and feminine all comes from more brutal times. It means to temper your masculinity so you don't become a savage degenerate who goes around pillaging and raping.If you are not a violent criminal, there is no need to balance your masculinity with femininity, and it will actively harm you both psychologically and spiritually in the long run.
>>41632117>I am not trying to offend but that sounds even more gay.i am not sying is not gay i am trying to say that it is a different kind of "behavior" and as for the balance thing. i want to hear your opinion on that. what happens is that i heard it from, a video with a minecraft gameplay in the background. i would sent a link but youtube search is so absolute crap i think i lost it forever. the points he made were interesting but about the thing you said that is "modern times" that promote balancing masculine and feminine is false. not because it is not said but because what society promotes is basically destroying one thing for the other. very far from what one would call balance.who is the guy in your pic?
Woman:absorbing/consuming vs man:projecting/expelling
>>41631961>other question i want an answer to, what are the implications of femineity in a person in a spiritual frame? for example, is it bad for a man to be feminine?This has no bear in spiritual matters. If someone is gay and feels good about it, then let him be. The O9A has devised specific rituals for gay men, which means gays would have a different liturgy, but this has no difference in the end result, only in the method applied. But as for the anima, the gay dont have it. Instead he have an animus, which is a masculine version of the anima. This means gayness might be genetic or a natural psychic disposition of some men. The armchair platonists, for instance, says that there are only male spirits in heaven, complete with dicks and body hair. This just means they have an animus, instead of an anima, but didnt discovered it yet.
>>41632157>who is the guy in your pic?A roman helmet with face-mask in the image of the god mars. >basically destroying one thing for the other. very far from what one would call balance.What I am saying is that today in modern times men are already very feminized so they are already very 'balanced'. Adding more feminity to the mix would be harmful. You might need to balance yourself with some feminine traits if you are a cartel psycho or mercenary, but if you are the average modern male living a comfortable materialistic life then you should concern yourself with becoming more masculine, not more feminine.
>>41632203If you think gays are O9A shit go back faggot
>>41632203>The armchair platonists, for instance, says that there are only male spirits in heaven, complete with dicks and body hair. This just means they have an animus, instead of an anima, but didnt discovered it yet.THIS IS EVEN GAYER THAN ANYTHING ELSE POSTED IN THIS THREAD
>>41632224I never said that, retard. I said there is a version of the Codex Saerus for gay men. >>41632237Yes, every armchair platonist is a closet faggot, how could you tell?
>>41632223>A roman helmet with face-mask in the image of the god mars.i like it tell me where to get more of that style>Adding more feminity to the mix would be harmfulwhat does "feminity" mean for you then. and masculinity for that matter.
>>41632264Psy oped most subverted group there is because they pose real danger to chosen faggot lovers
>>41632174Care to elaborate?
>>41631961Feminine is nurturing and passiveness. Masculine is destructive and active. Both energies are needed to create and for life. Just because you have feminine energy inside of you doesn't mean you are a troon. It just means only that, you got more feminine energy. Changing your identity like that is just ego affirming which is poison.
>>41631961>what does femineity mean in spiritualism?Shakti, the fundamental divine force of the cosmos, is female.
>>41632694>Shakti, the fundamental divine force of the cosmos, is female.is controversial, but what if god is female?
>>41632833I would say the being/force that created this world, with a male/female duality, is beyond that. Or it's 2 gods, like Shiva and Shakti.
>>41632849i was scrolling on youtube once and on one of those rare gem esoteric/religion study channels that have less views than a male streamer and saw that apparently yahweh had a wife or something like that
>>41632282>what does "feminity" mean for you then. and masculinity for that matter.Well, I basically see it as the yielding force. Formable, malleable, nurturing etc.Without a drop of it we would be beasts tearing out eachothers throats. But femininity unchecked breeds dependency, hesitation, and a cloying pacifismMasculinity is an unyielding storm, the raw drive to conquer, protect, and endure. It's the hunter's eye, the warrior's grip, the unapologetic claim on power and territory.At least that's how I see it on the most simple and primal level.
For some reason hylics believe that having a strong anima/shakti means you are a troon, whereas being a gymfag or armchair scholar who glorifies the male form means you are straight. I will never understand them.
>>41633179>>41632833>>41632849I'm really sick of this "Is god a man or woman hurr durr" discussion on this board lately but it needs to be said that no religion actually concieves of God as a male outside of the lowest forms of religion (hindu/greek/pagan mythology). God in Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Sikhism, Vedanta, Baha'i, Zoroastrianism, Hermeticism, Haitian Voodoo, etc. etc. has no gender. He's often called "the father" and is referred to by male pronouns but theologically no serious religion actually considers him a male (or female).
You have to keep in my mind that all spiritual/religious traditions are ultra incellic and obsessed with women. Once farming became widespread and humanity began living a post hunter gatherer existence the evil of wealth sprung into life. Now one could hoard wealth keep it in their family line instead of the community. This meant that women needed to be tightly leashed since they ultimately controlled the ability to pass on wealth to your descendants. This is why every single religious and spiritual tradition is obsessed with sex and specifically the nature of women in regards to sex. If a woman fucks another man and gets pregnant suddenly your entire life's work is at risk. Women are fundamentally a threat to the paradigm of wealth and the 'civilizations' built upon it that we continue to exist in to this day. Every spiritual sexual tradition is a part of this lineage. Even modern retarded semen retainers. Any answer to this topic is spoiled by that heritage.
>>41633209>He's often called "the father" and is referred to by male pronouns but theologically no serious religion actually considers him a male (or female).ngl I always thought of God as male but actually saw him/her as agender. I don't think a being that literally exists beyond this universe would have a specific gender. But is also worth noting that the bible says "God made man in his image", and that phrase is still being interpreted.The unique thing we have to wonder is how this applies to Jesus, the holy spirit and angels in general. Are they also agender or something like that?
>>41633217So you are against civilization and for living in huts like african savages. I get it. However, many of these african tribes practices female genital mutilation, so that the female dont feel pleasure and hence wont cheat her husband. So your point is not valid.
>>41633236The earliest evidence we have of FGM is in ancient Egypt you retard. 'African Tribes' are civilizations. They aren't hunter gatherers.
>>41633229First of all Genesis never really says God but rather Elohim (which is plural and refers to the children of El). And it says the Elohim made Adam (not 'man') in THEIR image. There's a few ways to interpret that. But genesis consistently uses plural language for example Yahweh (referred to as Yahweh Elohim, which stands out from how the rest of the text that usually just says Elohim) says "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil." (Genesis 3:22)
>>41633271>for example Yahweh (referred to as Yahweh Elohim, which stands out from how the rest of the text that usually just says Elohim) says "if he eats of the tree of life he will be like US" (Genesis 3:22)care to elaborate more on this part?
>>41633281i was talking to you but post got del
>>41633217you underplay the riskit's not just your entire life's work, but also every ancestor's as well.Letting yourself get cucked is a betrayal of your entire bloodline.And no, you can't just 'let everyone have everything they need' because all that leads to is lazy entitled niggers ruining everything that reproduce more than they can feed themselves.
>>41633209 In Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, god is male. He has always been depicted or assumed to be male. Followers do not refer to god as "it." Modern assertions that god is "genderless" are a form of coping and have nothing to do with what these faiths have historically believed. They believe in a personal god, and that person is male. Abrahamic religions have always been inherently anti-woman and patriarchal.
>>41635746In a lot of languages the gender neutral pronoun is the one used for males and in english our gender neutral prounouns either sound plural or don't imply personhood, so calling 'them' 'it' would be weird.
Is there anything behind the name "alana"? Just noticed Alana's did a number on my friend and my brother and I have an alana show up in my life.
>>41633154>But femininity unchecked breeds dependency, hesitation, and a cloying pacifismWhere does being cold fall into?
I feel like we could talk more about stuff like >>41633217 It feels weird that spiritualism is so deeply correlated to femineity.
>>41637339 Not weird at all. The real mindfuck is when unrelated anons from across the globe arrive at the same truth independently. You haven't walked that path yet. That anon knows nothing. Not yet, anyway.
>>41633273>cannibals are civilizationsWrong, they are remnants of unrecorded civilizations, which descended to a primitive state. As such, there is no more civilization there, only primitive customs. Your point is still wrong. Obsession with the female and wealth is not related to the civilization stage, but to the culture stage which precedes it.
>>41637339I feel like you are a bot or a samefag.
