>anon do some channeling: IT IS A LARP! >youtube influencer (such as pic related) do some channeling: IT IS HABBENING! >anon do some remote viewing: IT IS A GLOWIE! >youtube influencer do some remote viewing: this is what the glowies dont want you to see! >anon get information from projection: SOURCE? >youtube influencer get information from projection: teh Galatic Federation is coming to save us! Board the ships! Why are npcs like this? Why for a npc everything must come from a book, or from some authoritative figure? Why the npc cant see that the information inside a book also came from investigation, and that the author probably was also called a larper when he discovered it?
People who believe baseless claims by anons are retards and people who believe baseless claims by grifters on youtube are also retards.
>>41637445...until they use a BOOK as a base for their claims, then they cease to be retards no?
>>41637467A book gives a little more credence to your claim than a youtube video or a 4chan comment yes.
>>41637467No? I've never seen any reason to believe that any of that shit wasn't a grift no matter what form it takes.
>>41637418>it was only a coincidence >it was only a coincidence >it was only a coincidence
>>41637522No, it doesn't, there are thousands of books containing lies.
>>41637418There are legit channelers like Jane Roberts and Paul Selig. I don't know about this guy.
>>41638428So? Books are still old, high effort and well researched. For occult shit your claim/belief/practice will more likely be gobbled up if it’s found in an old book, the older the better. Same reason why people collect occult books and not 4chan comments.
>>41641213>implying anons on /x/ dont collect 4chan comments
