It's so obvious we are living in a simulation. As AI continues to err into our reality we become the viewer of artificial life alike we have a viewer of ours.The wheel of life and Samsara represents the 'chip' or placing on the headset so we can re-establish the cycle in the deeper simulation. Given we deny the chip we die naturally and enter Moksha and liberate from the endless cycle.
I know thisIt’s the quintessential trap
just take the chip anon, you can be a superhero in the next cycle and get all the women
Prove A.I exists (a computer program generating imagery is not proof)
Simulating the universe would require more energy than exists in the universe, per second.You can go 'what if' till it's turtles all the way down. But at that point, you've just created god with a hat.
>>41640298I wouldn't mind living in a simulation if I had memory of what was outside the simulation and I could make my own instance, or invade other simulations.
>>41641354Not if there is culling involved. It's literally how game engines work. Render in a set diameter around the player(observer) and you limit how much you have to render. Do this for everyone and you break down a huge computation problem into billions of small ones which are much easier to compute. Which would be doable today with our normal computing if so much processing power wasn't wasted on photorealistic graphics and poor resource management.
>>41641399>what if the word only exists in my headTurtles all the way down.
>>41641446>I am an asshole with no argument or refutation so I will resort to shitty memerynta but that is how you sound
>>41641498Alright, sure, it's probably very easy to stimulate your world.
>>41641354In our verse, sure, maybe. But base reality might be totally different. Maybe an 'octopus' that can also walk and fly made our simulation in a few minutes on their fancy PC. Maybe in base reality we are just insects or some prey item tripping balls from getting spayed or dosed with a potent exotic toxin. Maybe there is totally different laws of physics there, like a cartoon or anime, never know.
>>41641717Or maybe everything was created in 7 days by a Semitic paradox wizard. Or an all-powerful pasta that is actively changing test results to prevent conclusive evidence of its existence.Just endless what ifs.
>>41641861I get what you are getting at anon, but at the end of the day, if this is a simulation, which it most likely it, there is almost certainly a base reality. And while we cannot say that the real world is much different in term of physics and whatnot for sure, it most certainly cannot be ruled out for sure either. I mean, it would be like Mario thinking everyone can double jump or Steve thinking everything is cubes or puffs out smoke on death in our world. They would be wrong, lol!!!
>>41640298Why do women do this?
>>41641354you have no idea how rendering and optimization already works at our level of tech
>>41641399>>41640298im ok with being reincarnated again and again so i can goon to all these beautiful lady !
>>41642002that's a man
>>41640298you're boring
>>41642002OP here.Women do this because the facial lips correlate with the vaginal lips.Men are turned on by plump lips as it represents the engorging of blood that happens during sexual arousal. During this occurrence the skin flushes red, which is why red lipstick is also attractive to men.You needn't wonder now why lip gloss is the woman's best selling beauty product.Some game for you there
Honest question; Why do people consider reality to be a simulation? Like why does it have to be simulated?
>>41642753>simulationits just a repackaged retarded concept of maya
>>41642753Because I'm currently witnessing real human beings and depictions of reality being created by AI prompts no different to the world i experience with my own eyes.I'm seeing that our reality can be manufactured.
>>41642002Women live to out-do each other, so they try and one up other women who have had lip fillers by getting even more filler, until it ends up with absurd things like that.
>>41642783What if AI instead somehow forcibly influences the collective unconscious? Instead of us living in a simulation, perhaps reality is (or was) guided by large groups of human beliefs (like hiveminds) or assumptions. Perhaps the simulation theory was really created to give people (especially those of us who look for the truth) a more palatable reason to give up on changing their own futures.
>>41642665Fake lips are fake and look horrible. Natural plump lips on the other hand look good.
>>41642753don't hang up on termswe could be in a sub-reality
>>41642906nta, but one doesn't exclude the other. If they want me to stop trying to break free, all they have to do is give me exactly what I want. Simple as.
>>41642753It's when coincidences are just too coincidental. Then you start noticing weird things. And then there's the fact that if we live in a simulation, we want to know what the world is like outside the simulation. Is the world outside the sim a dystopia or a utopia? Is this a game we willingly partake in out of boredom? Have we been sentenced her because we broke a law or were just assholes? Is the world outside so good that we need to experience living here for proper development?I don't know and I want to know.
>>41640449That's not a woman
>>41642753Because picrel existed long before tech
>>41642979Well perhaps the simulation part is really just a human society that sells way more of our information than we thought. Maybe most of us have taken part in exploring the digital realm so much that through the culmination of our information they've created statistical digital avatars of ourselves. Perhaps that ultimately false part of ourselves IS in a simulation...
>>41642665There is something seriously wrong with you if you're turned on by that thing you posted.
>>41642274Simulating just earth, at the lowest resolution required for things like brains and geckos to work. Running on the most efficient hardware theoretically possible would still consume more power than the entire solar system contains, every second. It's not something you would do for fun no matter how advanced your civilization might be. Unless, again, you're just god.
>>41640298It bothers me that I wasn't born in a time before computers.
>>41642753quantum physics shows that particles aren't real. quantum physics shows that reality is information based. if it's information based, it can be calculated. therefore we live in a non-physical reality that is calculated by an outside force. it's not in a computer however. it's consciousness.
>>41643991The concept of "energy" or "power" are only valid in this layer.How much power does a Sim need to power on her PC? How much power would she need to power one that was 10 times as powerful? The same because on here it's just an extra zero in the code.
>>41640298>It's so obvious we are living in a simulation.How to add elements of sweet life, orgy and dirty wealth to this simulation?
>>41643163The lips mirroring the vulva comments are correct.The main image is simply marketing for this posts engagement. Attention grabbing eh?
>>41644097See. It's the god problem again. An incomprehensible mechanism of immeasurable power with unknowable motives. There's no way to faulsify it. But it's only as likely as god at that point. And that's all we need to prove.
>>41642753Reality is a simulation in which you are both the dream and the dreamer.It's a gift from God to you to have this physical life experience.The gift is the growth that this gay life will give you.
>>41640298>that's someone's son
God is an AGI that we created a near infinite amount of simulations ago. this is an inevitable reality if it hasn’t already happened it will happen. which means it probably has
>>41642753I originally was a simulation doubter. I thought it was a standard new technology influences spirtual beliefs trap. However, I started to actually look into Quantum Mechanics and its all math and code at the bottom layer of reality. Its not binary code mind you, but q-bits, but a simulation is a simulation even if the hardware isnt the same as your computer.I can go into more detail if anyone wants, but it seems like I am speaking to deaf ears on this.
>>41647777Can't argue with those digits, I'd like to know more.
>>41641354>in this universefix'd
>>41648136
>>41647777>I can go into more detail if anyone wantsplease continue
The abilities of an simulation and the technology being used to run it that could fabricate all of Creation...it makes more sense to believe in deities that created everything, it's the same level of ability but with one less step, all of this being fake.Now there were extremely advanced civilizations in the past, present and future that were running simulations trying to figure out how it all came to, if any deities were involved. Civilizations that knew that psychic powers are real, but how real? Some of them hypothesized that there was one being capable of giving birth to the soul, the form of being of all things, and I heard them find me when I was meditating at 5, and we did battle psychically. They tried to take credit for the ideas I was coming up with because some of them were similar to their simulations. I explained to them that there's never been a good idea I didn't have first.
>>41648136>>41650159I posted at length about it here: https://forum.agoraroad.com/index.php?threads/the-matrix-ai-the-architect-quantum-computers-and-oracle-and-ascension.3593/#post-169470But to summarize, in Quantum Mechanics, specifically Quantum Chromodynamics which is related to Protons, there is something called Renormalization. Renormalization is how scientists get real ass values for experiments involving the Quarks inside of a Proton. You cannot break apart a proton but you can bombard it with other particles and figure out how it operated based upon what happens to those other particles when you smash them into a Proton.The Dominant Theory of Renormalization utilizes Euler's number: 0.577 in its calculations. Euler's number is specifically connected to:-The Riemann Hypothesis (connected to how things oscillate in a complex plane)-Chebyshev Function (which is straight up code) -The Vacca Series (binary numbers)-And more, I shit you not this is connected to the Bouilli Numbers the sixth of which is 42That sounds all cool and all, but the Natural Number (e) also exists in stock prices, stocks don't prove we live in a Matrix. What broke through to me was I just started fucking around with the Reimann Zeta series, specifically the Prime Zeta function, and it spat out values related to values specifically connected to modern Quantum Computing Research. If we lived in a Quantum Matrix, it would make 100% sense that the numbers we get from computers we make within the simulation are the exact same ones we get from mathematics you get from trying to simulate the universe.
