>>41643547Simulation theory is for low IQ retards like Elon Musk
>>41643547It's a hologram
>>41643580Wouldn't a holographic reality imply some sort of simulated reality?
no. we do not live in a simulation. we live in a fish tank.
>>41643547Yes, it is quite possible that this is an imitation-simulation of life, and not life itself.Its low quality shows that it is a cheap fake.
>>41643547It's God's ephemeral dreamscape that prepares the soul for immortal glory. Align with the God in your heart.
>>41643603>he only beats me because he loves me!
>>41643623He is (you).
>>41643547Everything can be simplified to be a Turing machine
>>41643567What if he is right?
>>41643646He played himself!
>>41643719Found the low IQ retard
>>41643547Sims 3 mama says I'm special edition 13 o clock somewhere
>>41643547The chance that we're the topmost simulation that is just starting to create the next layer is the same as the chance of being the base reality that runs all other simulations.The argument of layers upon layers of simulation falls flat because if that was the case we'd be almost guaranteed to be perceiving a reality that is simulating other realities that is simulating other realities.We're not even simulating the next layer, being the base reality is most likely.
>>41643876Found the Agent Smith.
>>41643547No, just you, or me. The rest don’t “live” anywhere.
>>41644337We are a couple of years away of having hyperealistic simulations, wouldn't that change the odds?
>>41643547NoAnd there is no "we"
>>41644436Matrix is just a movie broIts just fiction
Computers can't simulate sextillions of stars accurately with the (computer having the) mass of a single planet.
>>41644747No, because it's a hypothetical scenario.It's as if I build a hypothetical scenario where I draw a card from a deck, and you want to know what are the chances that I drew the queen of spades.Or a real deck of cards you can guess the chances, on the hypothetical one it can be anything because it could be a deck without a queen of spades or only queens of spades, but that doesn't make the chances fifty.People being born in the future witnessing hyperealistic simulations can calculate different odds, but that only changes what happens if they bet for being in a simulation or against it, whether they win or lose, but not the chances themselves of being in one.
>>41643547Yes and God is the one simulating it. Look at the simulation theory from the mind of a religious person. It is the same thing really. Cast out of Heaven and sent to Earth -> Cast out of reality and sent into a Simulation.
>>41644764>go back to looking at the woman in the red dress goyim
>>41644785How do you know?
>>41643547Yes
>>41643547Why would anyone make a simulation this shitty and boring?
>>41644785What's being simulated is the experiential content of perception. Not anything physical.
>>41643547This world is a prison for some one, and there are groups trying to them whomever that is there and there are groups trying to free whomever is held here.
>>41644990this, and it makes me gangstalking even more confusing because how are AIs or governments or even simulation operators THAT interested in a world like this where all that happens is you shop at corporate chains, consume screen, age, and then die, after maybe birthing out another victim
>>41643567Simulation theory is the most likely theory of the universe. It overtakes Einsteins field theory and even quantum mechanics and string theory.This changes a lot of things. Most importantly, it means we have a creator. So scientifically, God exists.
>>41644785This is the dumbest fucking take you could possibly have. "We can't do it with our tech and understanding, therefore, it's impossible".Whoever is simulating our universe comes from a reality that you cannot perceive yourself. It's like taking an NPC from an NES game and putting them into crysis. That reality would absolutely destroy their minds.Saying shit like "Durr the universe is too big to simulate" is some low IQ shit. The universe only looks big because that's all you know. if you grew up in a single room your entire life and heard stories of New York City you would say shit like "No way there is a world with multiple rooms and buildings. My world is so huge and complex as is".
>>41643547A simulation of WHAT?
>>41645277a universe
>>41645372So the "real world" is the same as this, and thus the question is meaningless.
>>41643547It doesnt matter
>>41645277The content of human experience.
>>41645423Same answer, really, just with an extra step.
>>41645451If you're saying the physical world doesn't exist, I agree. Most people naively consider the world of space and time as existing independently of mind, but this is an illusion. The only real world is the virtual world of God's mind.
>>41645518>doesn't existOf course it exists.If "physical world" doesnt exist, then what we are in is NOT a simulation of a universe, or of a human experiencing one.
>>41645541There is no world outside the mind. All there is are experiences, thoughts, feelings, emotions, etc. There is no physical structure that causes those states of mind. Rather, those states of mind create the illusion of something external.
>>41645589>There is no world outside the mind.Then there is no basis to call the world a simulation. There is no "real world" it is supposed to be simulating.This is what world IS.This is what "universe" IS.This is what "human experience" IS.There is no simulation.
>>41645591>Then there is no basis to call the world a simulation. There is no "real world" it is supposed to be simulating.It is simulating a fictional world, one which falsely appears to exist outside the mind.
>>41645392Is probably different, at least bigger
>>41643547Yes, we're in a simulation of our mind's creation. We are only exposed to the matter that our mind and body presents to us. Our minds will fill in the blanks with anything it can daydream up. Only through knowledge can one begin to steer the ship properly.
>>41643547No, that doesn't make any sense. A simulation of what? No one who asks this question ever specifies that. Why wouldn't it just be the thing that it's supposedly a simulation of? It's such a dumb, nonsensical question.
>>41645259A simulation of what? It would have to be a simulation of something, otherwise, by definition, it's not a simulation.
>>41645980If it's different then it isn't a simulation.
>>41646138>A simulation of what?Of an external world that doesn't exist.
>>41643547>Do we live in a simulation?They told youhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHZl2naX1Xk
>>41646208Then it's not a simulation. You can't simulate something that doesn't exist.
>>41646232Of course you can. Video games and movies do it every day.
>>41646252This
>>41645589Somehow, this clicked. Holy shit. Thanks anon. I’ve heard this type of stuff said before but you made it actually work.
>>41643547It's actually not a simulation but rather a similartion. It's similar to another planet: the planet Earf.
>>41645589>There is no world outside the mind.What creates the mind then?
>>41646342Consciousness>What creates consciousness?Being>What creates being?Existence>What creates existence?The primordial void existing>What create the primordial void?It's not created, it's nothing...
>>41646419Define consciousness
>>41646430Consciousness is the experiential principle, if you experience then you have consciousnessIf we take Being as a pure principle then:>Being experiencing being Being Is what 'creates' consciousness
>>41645598>a fictional world,So what is a nonfictional external physical reality?Where or how does that exist?
>>41646442>Being experiencing being Being
>>41646419Ok that doesn't make any sense. If consciousness is fundamental, it has to emerge from somewhere or something, a source, the creator, the simulator or whatever.
>>41646458I just explained to you where it emerged from
No. We live in a shrimpulation.
>>41646458You are aware because there is a possibility of you being not aware.1 vs 0
>>41643547it is a simulation, look into it as - imagine you are the world which is Earth and you created Tetris which is completly different world, so the Tetris simulation cannot even imagine who created the Tetris simulation and even how it looks. Funny to think in this exmple the other way around - imagine the Tetris world created Earth and as a joke even put Tetris in it. Here comes the rabbit whole - you do not know why you live, you will always have to eat, abd if get the cherry you get perks, like more luck for some time.
>>41643547No, you only die in one.
>>41646626>imagine you are the world which is Earth and you created Tetris which is completly different world, so the Tetris simulationAgain, using this as your model of understanding means in order for this place to be Tetris, THERE HAS TO BE A REAL, EXTERNAL, PHYSICAL WORLD.Otherwise, there is no Earth where you can make Tetris.
>>41646252Correct, but any simulation - even with changes - is dependent upon there being an ACTUAL.You CANT have a simulation of reality, without there being a reality.So to say this is a simulation of externality is to say there is a REAL externality.It may change some parameters, but we only know they are changed because there is a reality.
>>41643547Simulation is just a word. It’s only useful insofar as it provides a metaphorical framework for the nature reality.To illustrate my point, I’m inventing a new word: “hwilbox.” I define it as a tree comprised of closed boxes. Now I’ll put forth that we live in a hwilbox. Isn’t that profound?!
>>41643547Yes, but not in the way you think.
Every artificial reality must exist in a higher natural reality which existence can't be explained by anything external to it.Thus artificial realitys might exist, or they might not, but the fact remains that every artificial reality requires the existence of a natural base-reality, and thus every artificial reality inherits this quality of being natural in essence.
>>41643593*a simulated fish tank
>>41646448>So what is a nonfictional external physical reality?No such thing. The very idea is an illusion of the mind.
>>41645259What is prime reality then?
>>41647933>Correct, but any simulation - even with changes - is dependent upon there being an ACTUAL.Yes, and the actual world is pure mind.>You CANT have a simulation of reality, without there being a reality.Reality is not external or physical. That is the illusion being simulated.>So to say this is a simulation of externality is to say there is a REAL externality.False. There is no external reality outside the mind. There is only consciousness and its imagined contents.
>>41643547Why the fuck are you asking this on /x/? The way to establish the truth is science. Go ask this question on >>>/sci/
>>41648143>Every artificial reality must exist in a higher natural reality which existence can't be explained by anything external to it.Yes, and that base reality is unconditioned divine consciousness, beyond all notions of time, space, and multiplicity.>Thus artificial realitys might exist, or they might notAll manifest realities are artificial since they are imagined into being by mind.
>>41648498>The way to establish the truth is science.No, science is the way to establish observable expectations *within the simulation*. It says nothing about true reality.
>>41647961Pure wisdom.
>>41648498Umm no sweetie science already knows the truth, the science is settled.
Bump
>>41643547Yes. Simulation is just another word for reality. The Mandela Effects should have been your first clue.
>>41648134In what way then?
>>41645231because you can escape and they know it? what kind of braindead logic do you have where you didn't think of that
>>41648494>the actual world is pure mind.Then you cannot call this experience of externality a simulation. It IS externality. This is ACTUAL.>That is the illusion being simulated.It is neither illusion nor simulation unless there is a "real" external reality.> There is no external reality outside the mind.Which means this is neither simulation nor illusion.Those terms have no meaning without there being an actual, external, physical reality with which to compare.This IS physical, externasl reality.This is what is IS.This is not a simulation, it isnt simulating anything.
>>41651080Anon, reality is just a word for what this place is, and it is a simulation. We can't exist otherwise.We not exactly like the sentient Moriarty in "The Ship in the Bottle" because we have souls in these meaty vessels are forced to use while here, although we are awfully close to Moriarty's existence.
**'reI don't know if there ever was a "real" reality that isn't a simulation and I highly doubt it. This is what always has been. Heck, I saw a Mandela Effect in the early 1980s before the term was even coined of thought of.
>>41651095>reality is just a word for what this place isAgreed, there is nothing else that is "reality.">it is a simulationIt isnt. It simulates nothing. It is actual, as there is nothing else to call actual in its stead.>this is a dog>that's not a "real dog"!>okay, what is a "real dog"?>there is no "real dog">...then this is a dog
>>41651112>>it is a simulation>It isnt. It simulates nothingThat's where you're wrong, kiddo.-t. reincarnated and saw myself as an older man before I was even sent down to go inside my mom's fetus she made for me.
>>41646988yes, there is, but again in this scenario, it may be physical as you say, or why not spiritual, as Tetris physically is only 1s and 0s, on the screen is the representation. point was - the other world may be only light, hence enlighted - you become next level - you become light
>>41643547Maybe an angelic dream simulation. You could be in a coma right now. Or I could be. A dream simulation regulated by angels, circumscribed by God. There is one guy who came out of a decade+ long coma knowing fluent Mandarin, there are other cases of this too I think.
>>41651095>souls in these meaty vesselsYawn.actually touch grass, or go in the woods somewhere. the soul inside us is a product of nature all around us
If you’ve ever manually woken yourself up from a dream, you had to first realize you were dreaming. When I do this I open my eyelids with my fingers pulling them open. Then I wake up. Through this, I’m absolutely convinced there’s a way to do this while AWAKE. To ascend to a higher realm/dimension. We are 100% in a simulation.
>>41651357>Yawn.>actually touch grass, or go in the woods somewhere*yawn* Did so much of that I got Lyme disease (and got cured).We each have souls, anon. You've always been you, but most get a memory wipe. I got some antidote to it.
