I have a live feed of quantum fluctuations running. I am plotting the deviation from pure randomness.I need observers.The hypothesis is that observation collapses the function. I want to see if 20, 30 anons focusing on the same white noise field can force a pattern to emerge from the chaos.https://dojofortheworld.com/experiments/quantum-coherence
>>41659452That’s fun. We did it together :)
>>41659452It’s easier when it’s just you and i
sneed
>>41659452Why go to 30 or 40 observers, when you can go to just one. https://youtu.be/YCeQLeQiRP4*casts summon penis*
>>41659452I can collapse the wavelength into coherence on my own fairly easily, but I get distracted by the sudden flash of golden light.A good training piece! And the first one I've used - I'll have to try this again sometime.
>>41659896Ur like a baby, I held it for a full minute.
I swear I can occasionally see a vibrating '/X/' in the middle of the static. Is the common thread of observing anons pushing an image onto the static like some kind of visual placebo effect?
>>41659452the power of the 3 wizards
>>41659686Method:'Tis the voice of the Lobster: I heard him declare'You have baked me too brown, I must sugar my hair.'As a duck with its eyelids, so he with his noseTrims his belt and his buttons, and turns out his toes.When the sands are all dry, he is gay as a lark,And will talk in contemptuous tones of the Shark:But, when the tide rises and sharks are around,His voice has a timid and tremulous sound." "I passed by his garden, and marked, with one eye,How the Owl and the Panter were sharing a pie:The Panther took pie-crust, and gravy, and meat,While the Old had the dish as its share of the treat.When the pie was all finished, the Owl, as a boon,Was kindly permitted to pocket the spoon:While the Panther received knife and fork with a growl,And concluded the banquet by eating the owl.https://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
>>41659452Ok, it works.https://youtu.be/lVehcuJXe6IAlmost too well.I got the beat switching fuzz on switching tempo/ verse. My input:Probably less chaotic output, like not fuzz, but an ai image genned from random inputs, may provide a better/ different/ more readable/ more useful output.
>>41659452Nah, just me.For the next 30 seconds I will focus on your quantum fluctuation.Remember to check the timestamp of the data properly against my post.30 seconds after this post uploads, I will stop.
>>41660087I am this poster, at 10:15 EST, I will focus again for 30 seconds in the opposite polarity.
>>41660087I am clearly affecting this thing. The instruction should be to all input the same thing to generate the same image, and change the image every few minutes. I saw:>”ODG” >Multiple objects form and then get swiped off to the right of the screen>the fuzz switches up to the beat of the song>many columns and straight bars>that circle thing that flew around for a while>square with line thru middleI detect much different input maybe, not a single minded thing, and a present thing, a fleeting thing. I hope OP develops this better cuz it’s liable to be really good divination thing, but maybe being an active, present thing is good. We’ve got enough div tools, an indicator tool is interesting, like the dot, but more. Please OP, bloom this into a few different things if you can, I’m conceptualizing what this could be when fully developed and it’s bigly.
>>41660139I made that “X”
>>41660149Question mark spotted.
>>41660060>>41660149https://youtu.be/VuPpck358YYWe’re in.
>coherence detected
All together. All together now.https://youtu.be/isfQfpT31z4
>coherence detected >blurs the image to tell you that there is a coherenceI won’t say it glows, but it definitely fuzzes.
>>41660212>Focus your intention on dissolving the static into pure, coherent lightLiterally statistically the worst thing to attempt to manifest, pick an object or soemthing more basic.We already see lines and balls and boxes and x’es appearing, make a basic symbol that changes every 5 minutes to see if we can hold/ maintain a shape or something that long, also when the fuzz switches idk if that helps it, it may, but the faded grey screen doesn’t do much from my observance. They paved nobodise and put up a fuzzy wall. https://youtu.be/i3koNMj6qEEAlso3 horizontal lined boxsisters, we won.
>>41660231Nah the fuzz switching style def links up.Keep it.
Whoever is trying to write a full fucking word, please stop I am trying to make a lobster appear
>>41660153Wimpod spotted
>>41660253Also there is a trident pointing right a bunch of times that flies off to the right or explodes into a chaos spasm to the music.
Brother..I actually have no ability to affect anything and am not magic or involved in any magical shit and have not attempted to influence the fuzzy screen at all and I’m definitely not special or magic.
guys this thing is cool. it seems to go coherent when i think of where other anons are relative to me. i think about focusing and using the same wavelength that other anons are on to focus the energy of our minds and get the static to converge. put the spatial part of your brain on overdrive and imagine you know where each other are sitting, and thinking, together as siblings in thought trying to know what each other are doing and being on same wavelength. it worked for me the light flashed a few times and it said coherent.
OP pls explain how the data is taken from the ANU university and how it is projected onto noise field and how you determine the coherence. Is it a string of previous numbers were similar? just like any specifics. like how is it all static but then forms waves when focused??? wouldn't all values becoming more similar make it all blocky? pls give some maths. and basic explanation.
>>41659452Anon that’s not how collapse works. Quantum “observation” is more accurately described as interaction. When you interact with a particle, it disturbs the particles state, which causes you to lose some information about the particle permanently.The actual reason for this is wave mechanics. Because these particles are actually tiny waves, they follow wave math. So you know how you can’t know a particles Position and Momentum with perfect accuracy at the same time? That’s not just because of collapse, that’s because of waves and how this information is represented using them.So angular momentum is defined using a sine wave. This value being a pure sine extends in every direction on the line infinitely, it’s amplitude and frequency are constant. A position however is the opposite, the more defined your position the sharper of a peak you get on your wave. So as you define momentum, your position smears out. As you define position, your momentum crumples up. Just because of how the wave is described using math. When you do a measurement, the particle, which is a tiny little wave, actually physically changes as the wave mechanics describe. You can only get a portion of the information when you take a measurement, and the rest is lost. So this is referred to as “collapse”.
>>41660347OP here. To be honest, I vibe coded this up in a couple of hours. Had this idea running in my head for a long time. Very much open to inputs. Thought it would be fun to see if it actually works. And hope others will be able to build off of this. Having said that, current implementation details below.1. Data Source: ANU Quantum Random Number GeneratorThe data comes from the Australian National University's Quantum Random Number Generator (ANU QRNG). Here's the API call:fetch('https://qrng.anu.edu.au/API/jsonI.php?length=10&type=uint8')This fetches 10 random bytes (uint8 = 0-255 each) generated from quantum vacuum fluctuations — measuring the electrical noise of empty space at the quantum level. These are considered "true random" numbers, unlike pseudo-random algorithms.Example response: [202, 210, 68, 224, 159, 190, 227, 142, 185, 205]
>>416608522. Converting to BitsEach byte (0-255) is converted to 8 binary bits:const uint8ToBits = (num: number): number[] => { const bits: number[] = []; for (let i = 7; i >= 0; i--) { bits.push((num >> i) & 1); // Extract each bit } return bits;};Example:202 11001010 [1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0]So 10 bytes = 80 new bits per tick.3. The Rolling Window & Z-Score CalculationThe system maintains a rolling window of 200 bits. Each tick:Adds 80 new bitsKeeps only the last 200 bitsThe core math — Z-Score:const calculateZScore = (bits: number[]): number => { const n = bits.length; // e.g., 200 const observedSum = bits.reduce((sum, bit) => sum + bit, 0); // count of 1s const expectedSum = n * 0.5; // expect 100 ones (50%) const standardDeviation = Math.sqrt(n * 0.5 * 0.5); // √(200 × 0.5 × 0.5) = 7.07 return (observedSum - expectedSum) / standardDeviation;};In plain English:Expected: In truly random data, you'd expect exactly 50% ones and 50% zerosObserved: Count actual onesZ-Score: How many standard deviations away from expectedExample calculations:Ones Count Bit Ratio Z-Score Meaning100/200 0.50 0.00 Perfectly random110/200 0.55 +1.41 Slightly biased toward 1s90/200 0.45 -1.41 Slightly biased toward 0s114/200 0.57 +1.98 COHERENCE! (> 1.96)86/200 0.43 -1.98 COHERENCE! (< -1.96)
>>416608574. The Coherence Threshold: 1.96const COHERENCE_THRESHOLD = 1.96;const isCoherent = Math.abs(zScore) > COHERENCE_THRESHOLD;Why 1.96? This is the 95% confidence interval boundary from statistics:If data is truly random, Z-score should fall between -1.96 and +1.96 about 95% of the timeGoing beyond ±1.96 should only happen 5% of the time by chanceGoing beyond ±2.58 = 99% confidence (only 1% chance)So when isCoherent = true, it means: "This pattern would occur by pure chance only 5% of the time or less."5. The Noise Canvas VisualizationHere's how the Z-score affects the visual:// coherenceLevel scales from 0 to 1 based on Z-score magnitudeconst coherenceLevel = Math.min(Math.abs(zScore) / 2.5, 1);Z-Score coherenceLevel Visual Effect0 0.0 Pure random static±1.25 0.5 Waves start emerging±2.5+ 1.0 Mostly coherent wavesThe rendering logic:if (patternStrength > 0.5) { // Create wave pattern using sine/cosine const wave = Math.sin(x * 0.02 + Date.now() * 0.001) * Math.cos(y * 0.02 + Date.now() * 0.0008); const patternValue = (wave + 1) / 2 * 255; const noiseValue = Math.random() * 255; // Blend: more coherence = more wave, less noise value = patternValue * patternStrength + noiseValue * (1 - patternStrength);} else { // Pure noise value = Math.random() * 255;}
>>416608616. Why Waves, Not Blocks?The answer: The wave pattern isn't coming from the quantum data directly — it's a visual metaphor showing "order emerging from chaos."DiagramThe wave is procedurally generated using sine/cosine functions — it represents "coherence" or "order." The quantum data only determines how much of that order shows through versus pure noise.Think of it like: The Z-score is a "dial" that blends between:0% coherence: TV static (each pixel independent random)100% coherence: Smooth flowing waves (mathematical pattern)
i just joined and i got the coherence detected twice in the first 30 seconds of obsering . what does it mean ? z was at 3.11
Does anyone get a feeling in the heart when 'Coherence Detected'
>>41660285We need to mass synch thisThe main issue is we are not synched upSynch with music, this will be new /ng/ in a good way.Lowkey tho I’m getting “psychic/ powerful individual” tracker vibes, but lowkey if they don’t know who’s the nearly antichrist by now they’re cooked. But I’m also feeling the influence on the fuzz is external from observers.>>41660946Brother I got like 50 “holy shit” moments in like ten minutes with this. I’m saying like, I’d get one of those in a year or 2, this might glow, but the fuzz style was changing to songs and someone who isn’t me affected this in such ways that by accident. The word “breakthrough” is used often, but, is not often used in the context of its full meaning, because this is a breakthrough, but, we need to hear more from OP cuz a few things>coherence detected>fuzz gets greyed outWhy don’t they want us to see the fuzz during these moments?Cuz it’s too recognizable, it’d prove that shit was wack. The images are already pretty wild, but I’d like to see multi-pure streams of each or soemthing, need more info. Today. Today. A special day.
Needs a long Z score timeline chart also and so we can see bigger spikes and so much, not criticism, but I know where this goes, OP did it, which is lowkey sus cuz it’s too good.
Brother you need to unplug this shit from the mainframe fr frhttps://youtu.be/aJKUGKwQNQo1 min off, no act, 1 min on, AAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHOther observer see the “hi” and “x”?Wildkid
Song to synch at livespeed Will wait 15 seconds to play for ads and clicking and such. This should be the method (imo). The operation needs an MC (in theory) but so does it have.
>>41661434Sheisse, forgot linkhttps://youtu.be/zHZr-RzlvZY15 seconds Let’s come and see
>>41661440That song sucked for it and still wild.Try.https://youtu.be/ixw_bLVUL3415 seconds
>>41661464Meh-ish, lowkey ineffective.Do:https://youtu.be/KYuFJBP9m1w
>>4166149515 seconds:https://youtu.be/IXvV_meX1h8
Nah this is uncanny af and OP def already shot himself 4 times in the back of the head, not replying and shit. Wha it’s this a black and white mirror? Synch, 20 seconds to start:https://youtu.be/IBx_gzSWfHg
Okay this shit is majorly energetically influenced. Synching is def needed cuz I can sense when someone else is pushing a different image.The next operation should be to maintain a single symbol or image for a while. Someone already made it so a pokeball like image, circle with line and dot in middle, shows up way more than a few hours ago. Back then it was square with horizontal line in middle like kek sigil, triangle is kinda hard, X was hard but is now easier, cross is appearing often, swastik a few timesIt goes to this “mode” where a line is horizontal all the way across and I sense images are thrown off screen before they have full time to manifest. There is also “long lasting circle” mode where a circular entity is observed and it can bloom into other things or do a chaos flip into anything else. Seen a few smileys, when thinking about smileys, one eye middle dot smile kek thing, wolfshook was maintained for a real good amount of time, letter “N” followed by “G” and other ones, but yeah I haven’t even gone to this website in the OP yet and I do not interact with it, this is a creative writing post.
>>41659452>>41661687For future reference the intention should be one of the following>an “X”>a “pokeball”>a box with a horizontal line thru middleYou can also kinda see these coming and then push into them. Heart shape also is always sloppy for me like I was drawing it lol. In my imagination of course, I only pretend about magic and I don’t even know what this thread is about. The “x” has lines coming off each point going to the outside, fills whole boxCan use this to cast spells fr______Please push all black pixels to top left cornerAlso stop making words, you can’t read them, I see people trying to input full sentences, bro, it’s too fast, they need to slow the sideflow or just do basic shapes, triangle, cross, pokeball, x, H I, N G, 2 letters.I saw that 666 tho and the 3 dark balls at the top. Please make top left corner black
This is straight darpa.you can literally “see” new fuckers come in and being alone is wild af also. One eye in middle smile goes hard
OP here. Made an update to the page.Previously: Everyone saw different local static. Now: All observers see identical pixels.Shared Visual Reality: Every observer now sees the exact same pixel arrangement at the exact same time. If a shape appears for you, it appears for everyone.Deterministic Source: The static is no longer generated by your local CPU. It is mathematically "grown" from the verified 10-byte quantum seeds arriving from the server.Global Time-Lock: A universal 100ms frame timer forces all clients to stay in sync, ensuring that network lag doesn't cause users to see different "realities."The Visual Protocol:Baseline: Everyone sees identical, synchronized static.Coherence: When the Z-Score spikes, geometric waves emerge on everyone's screen simultaneously.
>>41659452I like your styleLooks like I could have built it kek
>>41662006I’m documenting most seen figures.Let’s go with this, 15 seconds to starthttps://youtu.be/s88r_q7oufETarget“96”
Was able to get it to fuzz out a few times
>>41662006Good stuff man, why does the type of fuzz switch up? It is both indicative of actual i action, yet disruptive. Multi feed perhaps or something. Are you gonna be here? We need to get this polished goood.
>>41662141
>>41662157There’s a pretty flow balance to this, you can maintain a basic thing, observe, tap it quickly.I see tons of attempted words and letters and other things flowing to the right of the fuzz, the flow is too fast imo and takes away thing that are forming, idk why there is a flow, but there is. The winged and footed X is a very good baseline. Complex enough to be indicative of success, yet simple enough to see and recognize easily.
>2 to 48 observers in 1 secondIf you posted this to Reddit HOLY FUCK BRO
>>41662207>48 to 4 observers in 1 minuteProof of Hylics thread
>>41662006Bro you need to reply here and enhance this, it’s pretty good.Where are you posting it? Awful wherever.People should claim a section of the screen I can tell there’s a bit of conflict sometimes.
>>41659452Just fake random bullshit kek
Stop turning up the resolution so much, it has reduced image gen.Also fellas, if you watch it with one left eye, nothing happens, but then, when you open the other eye you’ll see.
>>41662115isn’t that just some loading indicator? always looks the same when it appears also why does it always switch between "quantum" and fallback I have a feeling the connection cuts too often also I hope I’m not watching some vibe coded shit>>41662276because then it would really be fake randomized else, cool idea
stop shooting my guy whoever is building on the right. Op needs to engage more.
Wow my eyes are fucked now from 2+ hours of thisI want to know where OP posted it for the 40 observers and the other data “he”’s gathering cuz lololol this shit is responsive af and operational
>>41660086You need to match the speed of this gif or reduce the “flow” of pixels to the right, it’s like doing work in a river, everything gets washed away, idk how any of this works, but I’m pretty sure people will agree the whole thing “flows” to the right and pulls away things you’re working on.
>>41662006Why the fuck does it blur the image the second it becomes interesting? Why not just keep the static going?
>>41662645>I want to know where OP posted it for the 40 observersI reckon its a "how long can I get idiots to stare at random static" test.
>>41662804I want to see the average shade of each pixel over different periods of time.
>>41662840We also need real time reports of what people think they see to see if there’s any overlap or all just static data and mind tricks.
>>41659452>Decoherence achieved.
Seems to unrefined to mean anything at this stage, you need to correalate the causation of the coherence to its own formula and not just a random value, it needs to be a variable focus point that is also quantum fluctuated. With its matrice tracked to other inline occupants of a submatrice, then chart the connections of all flucuations of the over all matrix to itself. The key is to find similarities in differences of gain and loss, then you can try to establish quantum chain and channel via frequency of interconnected gains and loss to see if those transmit same data values, the values are also derivitive of the matrix, and need to match to the same data-rate or average rate of the the quantum-coherence, this gives you a fuzzy logic that maybe there are interactive or proximity interferences of the matrix to its overall ecosystem of quantum-noise. If also the shape takes any patterns it will be emergent and obvious in the sample set of the overall yield to coherence within the matrix as a pattern ratio. That ratio matches up to the derivitive values, and finding the algorithm you now have made a subset, and then ai can just chart that out as the "full scale" deviation of matrix data-rate versus the overall coherence, and if they match up under scale you have the translation of the matrice to the coherence, and it will appear in the data-rate as your correalation. You then field test this for each focus point. If they match within deviation it suggests the channel and frequency priorities are 'correalated to causation', and the algorithm will match the coherence, and then will set to the emergent connection overall. Once you have that you can trace the totality of all quantum-matrice in their deviation to the overall coherence and pinpoin your exact location of source inference(vector) from any focus point, and is defined to the presiding quantum equation used, (which i assume is default or dirac or similar. You then could tell which matrix it is from any source).
>>41662922The system seems complicated dependent on user/ observer input, yet also has a taste of background radiation workings going on.If OP would actually interact with thread, well, many things might be different.
>>41662960background radiation is typically what i am describing to filter out by keeping it contained in the overall formula. you then just have a super imposed background radiation.
>>41662975I wish OP would post a downloadableVersion so we could solo run this. Gf top right, what weapon was that? I was just standard shotgun and a lil smg, what tf is using rockets left bottom?
the next stage would be too complicated to say in one post but any interactions would be superpositioned to each embed vector and broadcast by significance in its matrice, this effects the matrice and its variable subsets in the quantum equation for each latent priority that follows and there is not an equation for that so it has to be sampled by every snapshot as a congruency by vectors and a convergence of inference which is translated over a full-scale ecosystem of quantum-noise (where there wasn't a scale now there is several in candidacy of an elect probability)---and it would have to be "a for-instance-hypothetical" of the overall ecosystem that either matches up or doesnt based entirely on multiple elections in hit or miss by observation, there would be a complex of infinity and absolute value taking place per every action either working in compile to the universal-simulation in its coherence or not, and would only show up to half the people involved in it if it were to be successful (theorectically), only some would be able to notice any change in latent effect being applied to the noise-channel while others would only see it in their matrice/variables being manipulated/revalued before resetting back to the agreed formula due to the coherence.
>>41663052The first step lowkey is for OP to be not a glowcaucasian
>>41663048There needs to be a meta which I am already detecting>after anomaly, cent manifest observer number>tailed X baseline>pokeball guy did work>bottom left concrete block is strong af>top left corner black pixels>bottom right white pixels >play a song, minimize negative lyrics, it doesn’t like negative songs or lyrics>3 letters max for a word>NG auto completes the G if you do the N>top right corner guy shoots everything with something >the stream goes to the left>big arrow pointing right to tell OP to fix his fuzz>
>>41663061yes there is also that occuring throughout
>>41662115I was trying to imagine that it would all fade away to white and maybe that’s what everyone else watching was thinking too
quantum balls