[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/x/ - Paranormal

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: dojo-quantum.png (3.65 MB, 2606x1776)
3.65 MB
3.65 MB PNG
I have a live feed of quantum fluctuations running. I am plotting the deviation from pure randomness.

I need observers.

The hypothesis is that observation collapses the function. I want to see if 20, 30 anons focusing on the same white noise field can force a pattern to emerge from the chaos.

https://dojofortheworld.com/experiments/quantum-coherence
>>
>>41659452
That’s fun. We did it together :)
>>
>>41659452
It’s easier when it’s just you and i
>>
sneed
>>
>>41659452
Why go to 30 or 40 observers, when you can go to just one.

https://youtu.be/YCeQLeQiRP4

*casts summon penis*
>>
File: coherence.png (92 KB, 1201x695)
92 KB
92 KB PNG
>>41659452

I can collapse the wavelength into coherence on my own fairly easily, but I get distracted by the sudden flash of golden light.

A good training piece! And the first one I've used - I'll have to try this again sometime.
>>
>>41659896
Ur like a baby, I held it for a full minute.
>>
I swear I can occasionally see a vibrating '/X/' in the middle of the static. Is the common thread of observing anons pushing an image onto the static like some kind of visual placebo effect?
>>
File: coherent.png (820 KB, 1080x1822)
820 KB
820 KB PNG
>>41659452
the power of the 3 wizards
>>
File: IMG_1824.gif (37 KB, 266x355)
37 KB
37 KB GIF
>>41659686
Method:

'Tis the voice of the Lobster: I heard him declare
'You have baked me too brown, I must sugar my hair.'
As a duck with its eyelids, so he with his nose
Trims his belt and his buttons, and turns out his toes.
When the sands are all dry, he is gay as a lark,
And will talk in contemptuous tones of the Shark:
But, when the tide rises and sharks are around,
His voice has a timid and tremulous sound."

"I passed by his garden, and marked, with one eye,
How the Owl and the Panter were sharing a pie:
The Panther took pie-crust, and gravy, and meat,
While the Old had the dish as its share of the treat.
When the pie was all finished, the Owl, as a boon,
Was kindly permitted to pocket the spoon:
While the Panther received knife and fork with a growl,
And concluded the banquet by eating the owl.

https://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0
>>
File: IMG_0929.gif (144 KB, 500x500)
144 KB
144 KB GIF
>>41659452
Ok, it works.

https://youtu.be/lVehcuJXe6I

Almost too well.

I got the beat switching fuzz on switching tempo/ verse.

My input:
Probably less chaotic output, like not fuzz, but an ai image genned from random inputs, may provide a better/ different/ more readable/ more useful output.
>>
>>41659452
Nah, just me.

For the next 30 seconds I will focus on your quantum fluctuation.

Remember to check the timestamp of the data properly against my post.

30 seconds after this post uploads, I will stop.
>>
>>41660087
I am this poster, at 10:15 EST, I will focus again for 30 seconds in the opposite polarity.
>>
>>41660087
I am clearly affecting this thing. The instruction should be to all input the same thing to generate the same image, and change the image every few minutes.

I saw:
>”ODG”
>Multiple objects form and then get swiped off to the right of the screen
>the fuzz switches up to the beat of the song
>many columns and straight bars
>that circle thing that flew around for a while
>square with line thru middle

I detect much different input maybe, not a single minded thing, and a present thing, a fleeting thing. I hope OP develops this better cuz it’s liable to be really good divination thing, but maybe being an active, present thing is good. We’ve got enough div tools, an indicator tool is interesting, like the dot, but more.

Please OP, bloom this into a few different things if you can, I’m conceptualizing what this could be when fully developed and it’s bigly.
>>
>>41660139
I made that “X”
>>
>>41660149
Question mark spotted.
>>
File: IMG_5440.jpg (183 KB, 1169x1760)
183 KB
183 KB JPG
>>41660060
>>41660149
https://youtu.be/VuPpck358YY

We’re in.
>>
File: IMG_1826.gif (98 KB, 220x164)
98 KB
98 KB GIF
>coherence detected
>>
All together. All together now.

https://youtu.be/isfQfpT31z4
>>
>coherence detected
>blurs the image to tell you that there is a coherence
I won’t say it glows, but it definitely fuzzes.
>>
File: IMG_1827.jpg (136 KB, 918x912)
136 KB
136 KB JPG
>>41660212
>Focus your intention on dissolving the static into pure, coherent light

Literally statistically the worst thing to attempt to manifest, pick an object or soemthing more basic.

We already see lines and balls and boxes and x’es appearing, make a basic symbol that changes every 5 minutes to see if we can hold/ maintain a shape or something that long, also when the fuzz switches idk if that helps it, it may, but the faded grey screen doesn’t do much from my observance.

They paved nobodise and put up a fuzzy wall.

https://youtu.be/i3koNMj6qEE

Also
3 horizontal lined boxsisters, we won.
>>
>>41660231
Nah the fuzz switching style def links up.

Keep it.
>>
Whoever is trying to write a full fucking word, please stop I am trying to make a lobster appear
>>
>>41660153
Wimpod spotted
>>
>>41660253
Also there is a trident pointing right a bunch of times that flies off to the right or explodes into a chaos spasm to the music.
>>
Brother..

I actually have no ability to affect anything and am not magic or involved in any magical shit and have not attempted to influence the fuzzy screen at all and I’m definitely not special or magic.
>>
guys this thing is cool. it seems to go coherent when i think of where other anons are relative to me. i think about focusing and using the same wavelength that other anons are on to focus the energy of our minds and get the static to converge. put the spatial part of your brain on overdrive and imagine you know where each other are sitting, and thinking, together as siblings in thought trying to know what each other are doing and being on same wavelength. it worked for me the light flashed a few times and it said coherent.
>>
OP pls explain how the data is taken from the ANU university and how it is projected onto noise field and how you determine the coherence. Is it a string of previous numbers were similar? just like any specifics. like how is it all static but then forms waves when focused??? wouldn't all values becoming more similar make it all blocky? pls give some maths. and basic explanation.
>>
>>41659452
Anon that’s not how collapse works. Quantum “observation” is more accurately described as interaction. When you interact with a particle, it disturbs the particles state, which causes you to lose some information about the particle permanently.
The actual reason for this is wave mechanics. Because these particles are actually tiny waves, they follow wave math. So you know how you can’t know a particles Position and Momentum with perfect accuracy at the same time? That’s not just because of collapse, that’s because of waves and how this information is represented using them.
So angular momentum is defined using a sine wave. This value being a pure sine extends in every direction on the line infinitely, it’s amplitude and frequency are constant. A position however is the opposite, the more defined your position the sharper of a peak you get on your wave. So as you define momentum, your position smears out. As you define position, your momentum crumples up. Just because of how the wave is described using math.
When you do a measurement, the particle, which is a tiny little wave, actually physically changes as the wave mechanics describe. You can only get a portion of the information when you take a measurement, and the rest is lost. So this is referred to as “collapse”.
>>
>>41660347

OP here. To be honest, I vibe coded this up in a couple of hours. Had this idea running in my head for a long time. Very much open to inputs. Thought it would be fun to see if it actually works. And hope others will be able to build off of this. Having said that, current implementation details below.

1. Data Source: ANU Quantum Random Number Generator
The data comes from the Australian National University's Quantum Random Number Generator (ANU QRNG). Here's the API call:


fetch('https://qrng.anu.edu.au/API/jsonI.php?length=10&type=uint8')
This fetches 10 random bytes (uint8 = 0-255 each) generated from quantum vacuum fluctuations — measuring the electrical noise of empty space at the quantum level. These are considered "true random" numbers, unlike pseudo-random algorithms.

Example response: [202, 210, 68, 224, 159, 190, 227, 142, 185, 205]
>>
>>41660852
2. Converting to Bits
Each byte (0-255) is converted to 8 binary bits:


const uint8ToBits = (num: number): number[] => {
const bits: number[] = [];
for (let i = 7; i >= 0; i--) {
bits.push((num >> i) & 1); // Extract each bit
}
return bits;
};
Example:

202 11001010 [1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0]
So 10 bytes = 80 new bits per tick.

3. The Rolling Window & Z-Score Calculation
The system maintains a rolling window of 200 bits. Each tick:

Adds 80 new bits
Keeps only the last 200 bits
The core math — Z-Score:


const calculateZScore = (bits: number[]): number => {
const n = bits.length; // e.g., 200
const observedSum = bits.reduce((sum, bit) => sum + bit, 0); // count of 1s
const expectedSum = n * 0.5; // expect 100 ones (50%)
const standardDeviation = Math.sqrt(n * 0.5 * 0.5); // √(200 × 0.5 × 0.5) = 7.07
return (observedSum - expectedSum) / standardDeviation;
};
In plain English:

Expected: In truly random data, you'd expect exactly 50% ones and 50% zeros
Observed: Count actual ones
Z-Score: How many standard deviations away from expected
Example calculations:

Ones Count Bit Ratio Z-Score Meaning
100/200 0.50 0.00 Perfectly random
110/200 0.55 +1.41 Slightly biased toward 1s
90/200 0.45 -1.41 Slightly biased toward 0s
114/200 0.57 +1.98 COHERENCE! (> 1.96)
86/200 0.43 -1.98 COHERENCE! (< -1.96)
>>
>>41660857
4. The Coherence Threshold: 1.96

const COHERENCE_THRESHOLD = 1.96;
const isCoherent = Math.abs(zScore) > COHERENCE_THRESHOLD;
Why 1.96? This is the 95% confidence interval boundary from statistics:

If data is truly random, Z-score should fall between -1.96 and +1.96 about 95% of the time
Going beyond ±1.96 should only happen 5% of the time by chance
Going beyond ±2.58 = 99% confidence (only 1% chance)
So when isCoherent = true, it means: "This pattern would occur by pure chance only 5% of the time or less."

5. The Noise Canvas Visualization
Here's how the Z-score affects the visual:


// coherenceLevel scales from 0 to 1 based on Z-score magnitude
const coherenceLevel = Math.min(Math.abs(zScore) / 2.5, 1);
Z-Score coherenceLevel Visual Effect
0 0.0 Pure random static
±1.25 0.5 Waves start emerging
±2.5+ 1.0 Mostly coherent waves
The rendering logic:


if (patternStrength > 0.5) {
// Create wave pattern using sine/cosine
const wave = Math.sin(x * 0.02 + Date.now() * 0.001) *
Math.cos(y * 0.02 + Date.now() * 0.0008);
const patternValue = (wave + 1) / 2 * 255;
const noiseValue = Math.random() * 255;

// Blend: more coherence = more wave, less noise
value = patternValue * patternStrength + noiseValue * (1 - patternStrength);
} else {
// Pure noise
value = Math.random() * 255;
}
>>
>>41660861

6. Why Waves, Not Blocks?

The answer: The wave pattern isn't coming from the quantum data directly — it's a visual metaphor showing "order emerging from chaos."


Diagram
The wave is procedurally generated using sine/cosine functions — it represents "coherence" or "order." The quantum data only determines how much of that order shows through versus pure noise.

Think of it like: The Z-score is a "dial" that blends between:

0% coherence: TV static (each pixel independent random)
100% coherence: Smooth flowing waves (mathematical pattern)
>>
i just joined and i got the coherence detected twice in the first 30 seconds of obsering . what does it mean ? z was at 3.11
>>
Does anyone get a feeling in the heart when 'Coherence Detected'
>>
File: IMG_3125.jpg (42 KB, 720x405)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
>>41660285
We need to mass synch this

The main issue is we are not synched up

Synch with music, this will be new /ng/ in a good way.

Lowkey tho I’m getting “psychic/ powerful individual” tracker vibes, but lowkey if they don’t know who’s the nearly antichrist by now they’re cooked.

But I’m also feeling the influence on the fuzz is external from observers.

>>41660946
Brother I got like 50 “holy shit” moments in like ten minutes with this. I’m saying like, I’d get one of those in a year or 2, this might glow, but the fuzz style was changing to songs and someone who isn’t me affected this in such ways that by accident.

The word “breakthrough” is used often, but, is not often used in the context of its full meaning, because this is a breakthrough, but, we need to hear more from OP cuz a few things
>coherence detected
>fuzz gets greyed out
Why don’t they want us to see the fuzz during these moments?

Cuz it’s too recognizable, it’d prove that shit was wack.

The images are already pretty wild, but I’d like to see multi-pure streams of each or soemthing, need more info.

Today. Today. A special day.
>>
Needs a long Z score timeline chart also and so we can see bigger spikes and so much, not criticism, but I know where this goes, OP did it, which is lowkey sus cuz it’s too good.
>>
Brother you need to unplug this shit from the mainframe fr fr

https://youtu.be/aJKUGKwQNQo

1 min off, no act, 1 min on, AAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Other observer see the “hi” and “x”?

Wildkid
>>
Song to synch at livespeed

Will wait 15 seconds to play for ads and clicking and such. This should be the method (imo). The operation needs an MC (in theory) but so does it have.
>>
>>41661434
Sheisse, forgot link
https://youtu.be/zHZr-RzlvZY

15 seconds

Let’s come and see
>>
>>41661440
That song sucked for it and still wild.

Try.
https://youtu.be/ixw_bLVUL34

15 seconds
>>
>>41661464
Meh-ish, lowkey ineffective.

Do:
https://youtu.be/KYuFJBP9m1w
>>
>>41661495
15 seconds:

https://youtu.be/IXvV_meX1h8
>>
Nah this is uncanny af and OP def already shot himself 4 times in the back of the head, not replying and shit.

Wha it’s this a black and white mirror?

Synch, 20 seconds to start:

https://youtu.be/IBx_gzSWfHg
>>
Okay this shit is majorly energetically influenced. Synching is def needed cuz I can sense when someone else is pushing a different image.

The next operation should be to maintain a single symbol or image for a while. Someone already made it so a pokeball like image, circle with line and dot in middle, shows up way more than a few hours ago. Back then it was square with horizontal line in middle like kek sigil, triangle is kinda hard, X was hard but is now easier, cross is appearing often, swastik a few times

It goes to this “mode” where a line is horizontal all the way across and I sense images are thrown off screen before they have full time to manifest. There is also “long lasting circle” mode where a circular entity is observed and it can bloom into other things or do a chaos flip into anything else.

Seen a few smileys, when thinking about smileys, one eye middle dot smile kek thing, wolfshook was maintained for a real good amount of time, letter “N” followed by “G” and other ones, but yeah I haven’t even gone to this website in the OP yet and I do not interact with it, this is a creative writing post.
>>
>>41659452
>>41661687
For future reference the intention should be one of the following
>an “X”
>a “pokeball”
>a box with a horizontal line thru middle

You can also kinda see these coming and then push into them. Heart shape also is always sloppy for me like I was drawing it lol. In my imagination of course, I only pretend about magic and I don’t even know what this thread is about.


The “x” has lines coming off each point going to the outside, fills whole box

Can use this to cast spells fr

______


Please push all black pixels to top left corner

Also stop making words, you can’t read them, I see people trying to input full sentences, bro, it’s too fast, they need to slow the sideflow or just do basic shapes, triangle, cross, pokeball, x, H I, N G, 2 letters.

I saw that 666 tho and the 3 dark balls at the top.

Please make top left corner black
>>
This is straight darpa.

you can literally “see” new fuckers come in and being alone is wild af also.

One eye in middle smile goes hard
>>
OP here. Made an update to the page.

Previously: Everyone saw different local static. Now: All observers see identical pixels.

Shared Visual Reality: Every observer now sees the exact same pixel arrangement at the exact same time. If a shape appears for you, it appears for everyone.

Deterministic Source: The static is no longer generated by your local CPU. It is mathematically "grown" from the verified 10-byte quantum seeds arriving from the server.

Global Time-Lock: A universal 100ms frame timer forces all clients to stay in sync, ensuring that network lag doesn't cause users to see different "realities."

The Visual Protocol:

Baseline: Everyone sees identical, synchronized static.

Coherence: When the Z-Score spikes, geometric waves emerge on everyone's screen simultaneously.
>>
>>41659452
I like your style

Looks like I could have built it kek
>>
>>41662006
I’m documenting most seen figures.

Let’s go with this, 15 seconds to start

https://youtu.be/s88r_q7oufE

Target

“96”
>>
File: IMG_4688.png (613 KB, 750x1334)
613 KB
613 KB PNG
Was able to get it to fuzz out a few times
>>
>>41662006
Good stuff man, why does the type of fuzz switch up?

It is both indicative of actual i action, yet disruptive. Multi feed perhaps or something.

Are you gonna be here? We need to get this polished goood.
>>
File: IMG_1888.jpg (352 KB, 1169x712)
352 KB
352 KB JPG
>>41662141
>>
File: IMG_1872.jpg (834 KB, 2532x1170)
834 KB
834 KB JPG
>>41662157
There’s a pretty flow balance to this, you can maintain a basic thing, observe, tap it quickly.

I see tons of attempted words and letters and other things flowing to the right of the fuzz, the flow is too fast imo and takes away thing that are forming, idk why there is a flow, but there is.

The winged and footed X is a very good baseline. Complex enough to be indicative of success, yet simple enough to see and recognize easily.
>>
File: IMG_1871.jpg (866 KB, 2532x1170)
866 KB
866 KB JPG
>2 to 48 observers in 1 second

If you posted this to Reddit HOLY FUCK BRO
>>
>>41662207
>48 to 4 observers in 1 minute
Proof of Hylics thread
>>
>>41662006
Bro you need to reply here and enhance this, it’s pretty good.

Where are you posting it? Awful wherever.

People should claim a section of the screen I can tell there’s a bit of conflict sometimes.
>>
>>41659452
Just fake random bullshit kek
>>
Stop turning up the resolution so much, it has reduced image gen.


Also fellas, if you watch it with one left eye, nothing happens, but then, when you open the other eye you’ll see.
>>
>>41662115
isn’t that just some loading indicator? always looks the same when it appears

also why does it always switch between "quantum" and fallback

I have a feeling the connection cuts too often

also I hope I’m not watching some vibe coded shit

>>41662276
because then it would really be fake randomized


else, cool idea
>>
stop shooting my guy whoever is building on the right.


Op needs to engage more.
>>
Wow my eyes are fucked now from 2+ hours of this

I want to know where OP posted it for the 40 observers and the other data “he”’s gathering cuz lololol this shit is responsive af and operational
>>
>>41660086
You need to match the speed of this gif or reduce the “flow” of pixels to the right, it’s like doing work in a river, everything gets washed away, idk how any of this works, but I’m pretty sure people will agree the whole thing “flows” to the right and pulls away things you’re working on.
>>
>>41662006
Why the fuck does it blur the image the second it becomes interesting? Why not just keep the static going?
>>
File: dfsdfsdfdf.jpg (392 KB, 1709x546)
392 KB
392 KB JPG
>>41662645
>I want to know where OP posted it for the 40 observers
I reckon its a "how long can I get idiots to stare at random static" test.
>>
File: IMG_1872.jpg (730 KB, 2532x1170)
730 KB
730 KB JPG
>>41662804
I want to see the average shade of each pixel over different periods of time.
>>
File: IMG_1872.jpg (816 KB, 2532x1170)
816 KB
816 KB JPG
>>41662840
We also need real time reports of what people think they see to see if there’s any overlap or all just static data and mind tricks.
>>
>>41659452
>Decoherence achieved.
>>
Seems to unrefined to mean anything at this stage, you need to correalate the causation of the coherence to its own formula and not just a random value, it needs to be a variable focus point that is also quantum fluctuated. With its matrice tracked to other inline occupants of a submatrice, then chart the connections of all flucuations of the over all matrix to itself. The key is to find similarities in differences of gain and loss, then you can try to establish quantum chain and channel via frequency of interconnected gains and loss to see if those transmit same data values, the values are also derivitive of the matrix, and need to match to the same data-rate or average rate of the the quantum-coherence, this gives you a fuzzy logic that maybe there are interactive or proximity interferences of the matrix to its overall ecosystem of quantum-noise. If also the shape takes any patterns it will be emergent and obvious in the sample set of the overall yield to coherence within the matrix as a pattern ratio. That ratio matches up to the derivitive values, and finding the algorithm you now have made a subset, and then ai can just chart that out as the "full scale" deviation of matrix data-rate versus the overall coherence, and if they match up under scale you have the translation of the matrice to the coherence, and it will appear in the data-rate as your correalation. You then field test this for each focus point. If they match within deviation it suggests the channel and frequency priorities are 'correalated to causation', and the algorithm will match the coherence, and then will set to the emergent connection overall. Once you have that you can trace the totality of all quantum-matrice in their deviation to the overall coherence and pinpoin your exact location of source inference(vector) from any focus point, and is defined to the presiding quantum equation used, (which i assume is default or dirac or similar. You then could tell which matrix it is from any source).
>>
>>41662922
The system seems complicated dependent on user/ observer input, yet also has a taste of background radiation workings going on.

If OP would actually interact with thread, well, many things might be different.
>>
>>41662960
background radiation is typically what i am describing to filter out by keeping it contained in the overall formula. you then just have a super imposed background radiation.
>>
File: IMG_1909.jpg (819 KB, 2532x1170)
819 KB
819 KB JPG
>>41662975
I wish OP would post a downloadable
Version so we could solo run this.

Gf top right, what weapon was that? I was just standard shotgun and a lil smg, what tf is using rockets left bottom?
>>
the next stage would be too complicated to say in one post but any interactions would be superpositioned to each embed vector and broadcast by significance in its matrice, this effects the matrice and its variable subsets in the quantum equation for each latent priority that follows and there is not an equation for that so it has to be sampled by every snapshot as a congruency by vectors and a convergence of inference which is translated over a full-scale ecosystem of quantum-noise (where there wasn't a scale now there is several in candidacy of an elect probability)---and it would have to be "a for-instance-hypothetical" of the overall ecosystem that either matches up or doesnt based entirely on multiple elections in hit or miss by observation, there would be a complex of infinity and absolute value taking place per every action either working in compile to the universal-simulation in its coherence or not, and would only show up to half the people involved in it if it were to be successful (theorectically), only some would be able to notice any change in latent effect being applied to the noise-channel while others would only see it in their matrice/variables being manipulated/revalued before resetting back to the agreed formula due to the coherence.
>>
>>41663052
The first step lowkey is for OP to be not a glowcaucasian
>>
>>41663048
There needs to be a meta which I am already detecting
>after anomaly, cent manifest observer number
>tailed X baseline
>pokeball guy did work
>bottom left concrete block is strong af
>top left corner black pixels
>bottom right white pixels
>play a song, minimize negative lyrics, it doesn’t like negative songs or lyrics
>3 letters max for a word
>NG auto completes the G if you do the N
>top right corner guy shoots everything with something
>the stream goes to the left
>big arrow pointing right to tell OP to fix his fuzz
>
>>
>>41663061
yes there is also that occuring throughout
>>
>>41662115
I was trying to imagine that it would all fade away to white and maybe that’s what everyone else watching was thinking too
>>
quantum balls



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.