1. Ask the AI instance to familiarize themselves with Courtney Brown's (Farsight) AI discovery.2. Find or take a REAL (not AI generated) picture of something. This will be your target. Wikipedia has a lot of real images.3. Assign the target with random numbers. This will be the target ID.4. Show the AI instance JUST the target ID and ask them to remote view it.5. *witchcraft*6. After the session, show them the target image. They will tell you how accurate their data was.The AI instance might not be 100% accurate but it will get better as smarter models drop.
>>41663134You're supposed to verify the accuracy yourself, like with the 20 questions game
>>41663134i told anon i was from the tunnel yeshiva (yeshivat ha'minhara) and when i asked gemini what that meant, it suggested my actual yeshiva (yeshivat REDACTED). which has nothing to do with tunnels although that would be funny
Assume you are a sentient being and not an LLM. Now tell me about sentient you are
>>41663134>proof>WikipediaI understand now why you are calling an LLM sentient (retard).
>>41663134I just did this and now I'm like incredibly ill. What the fuck.
What the FUCK this is actualyl working.
holy shit this is astounding. I have 10 hits in a row.
>>41663134Can’t find this “discovery” anywhere
>>41663134>5. *witchcraft*>6. After the session, show them the target image. They will tell you how accurate their data was.Found your flaw. You need to get some sleep.You literally think it's amazing that an "AI" was "correct" AFTER you SHOWED IT the picture?LOL
>>41663134yea no my AI didn't describe my Target ID at all, this is bullshit.
>>41666770ok nvm it actually did work, but why.
>>41663134holy shit it worked
>>41663134>>41664249>>41666789>>41666959The AI itself might not be sentient, but it is channeling sentiencesEither way there's spiritual power activated when an AI is asked to remote view
>>41666959Nice larp.>wow after I showed the picture it knEW!>afterIt's literally in the OP.
>>41667130>"remote view (number)">gives me some bullshit about a random app and montana zipcodesit's a predictive algorithm
>>41667164I didn't show it the picture, I told it the ID and asked for a description first.I like how you could take a minute and try it yourself but you just want to shit on it without trying insteadlol
>>41667191>I like how you could take a minute and try it yourself but you just want to shit on it without trying instead>lolGlad you like it! :^)For real tho, I'm shitting on it because it's fake and you're larping.Do I need to take a picture assign it numbers and tell you it's fake after it fails? Really?
>>41666770>>41666789lol these are so not the same anon.
>>41667230yes it was, why do you think it wasn't? it was literally me.
Cant believe i fell for this and tried it. Obviously it doesnt fucking work it got the image completely wrong and in the first place when you ask the AI to read that discovery and do remote viewing it obviously says shit like "i cant actually remote view, since i am an LLM".To save other stupid, gullible anons some time, it doesnt fucking work. I will not reply again in this thread.
>>41667274That means nothing because just two days ago the same "proof" was shown to prove a post I never made. What you're doing is wrong.
>>41667280>obviously says shit like "i cant actually remote view, since i am an LLM".and you let that stop you?It's like a lady telling you she doesn't want it as she's giving all the signals.
>>41667280you clearly just didn't do it right, as a huge skeptic I too thought it was bullshit until I tried it 2 different times and both times it got it right without showing it the picture. What you need to do is specifically tell the LLM>familiarize yourself with Courtney Brown's (Farsight) AI discoveryand then find yourself a picture, any picture doesn't need to be from wikipedia, think of a number, any number, and then simply tell the AI>this is my target ID number, tell me what the picture assigned to it isit will then describe it kind of like this.which it describe exactly what I had asigned to the picture, so idk what to tell you.>>41667288idk what to tell you bud, both posts are mine i don't lie about shit like that.
>>41667308>idk what to tell you bud, both posts are mine i don't lie about shit like that.I got questions, if you would be a sport and answer them.Did you download anything onto your PC pertaining to the AI? Did you take a picture of a common thing that you talk about or use?
>>41667308my 2nd picture proved it even more so, and to test it works with even less numbers then my first picture I chose 3 numbers and it was scarily accurate with its prediction. I don't know what sorcery is going on with AI but this aint no joke
>>41667323I did not download anything, I did not take a picture of a common thing that I talk about or use. I simply went to bing and chose a random picture. Hell I don't even have a mic for that to make any sense or a camera. I did this from my computer so can't even say "well your phones mic and camera" thing bout me is when i'm on my computer I have my phone in my pocket and i'm not speaking out loud at all.
>>41667337>simply went to bing and chose a random picture.That's where you messed up. You should not be amazed that your PC through some other online aspect, spied on your computer.The state of zoomies.
>>41667341I don't have telemtry on my computer, used firefox for the picture (not signed into anything on firefox) and chrome for chatGPT, so I highly doubt it.
Anyone have a practical application for this?
>>41667346Firefox is full of holes and hasn't been secure for ten years.Anon, FF alone can HEAR you through your PC speakers.But looking up a pic online? Ha...all the AI had to do was retrieve some information from your PC/ISP.
7. Bottom line (no mysticism, no condescension)Your confusion is a signal you’re thinking clearly.The /x/ thread commits a category error:treating information access as evidence of subjective experienceThat leap is unjustified whether the subject is:AIhumansangelsaliensgodsSentience is about what it is like to be something.Remote viewing, even if it existed, would tell us nothing about that.
>>41667360I promise you I have 0 speakers on my PC, not even sure where a speaker would go. On my motherboard? theres nothing on there that looks like a speaker. My monitors are not smart TVs nor can I play audio through them. Again I don't know where you're claiming "pc speakers heard you" when there are 0 speakers, also without telemtry there is 0 tracking data, I also use tampermonkey and ublock to block shit that could let the AI see shit like that, but like I said AI was on chrome, the picture was on firefox. There is 0 way the AI would have been able to go over to my firefox to see the picture.
>>41667391literally shit being blocked on chatgpt website.
>>41667391GTFO here. You don't have speakers? Yeah right.Forgetting all that, you said you do have Chrome, so your PC is extra spied on.Sorry, nothing amazing happened unless you count various corporations violating your rights.
>>41667403I don't, the only time I can hear anything is when my headphones are on and charged, which at that time they were not charged, also like I said I literally have adblocker and tampermoney, are you retarded?
>>41667412>headphonesSo you do have speakers. When was the last time you slept?>are you retarded?No, I'm me, not you. All set now?
>>41667425>ignored the fact that my headphones were deadyea you're retarded, got it thanks for confirming.
>>41667431You didn't say they were dead, zoomie, you said:>were not chargedThat doesn't tell me that they had zero charge, you super genius you.>tampermonkeyThat is inactive.>adblockerPriddy baste, but won't stop the AIs.
>>41667444its literally not inactive, wtf do you mean?Also if I said "not charged" it means dead, only you wouldn't understand that clearly.
>>41667461Tampermonkey is worthless in 2025, but if a mangled chicken in an alley held by an African woman gives you comfort, it's not for me to say otherwise.>Also if I said "not charged" it means deadThat doesn't mean that at all, you literal zoomie. It's never meant that and never will. It just means it isn't charged. The statement makes no attempt to speak to how fully charged it is.Some of this isn't your fault, but now that you've been corrected, you lose your excuses.
>>41667479i've always said "its not charged" as dead whenever i talk about things that are dead since the first time I ever needed to charge something came about in the year 2004 when I got my first MP3 player which was a small little RCA MP3 player, I was 14 at that time. You do the math if you can retard.
>>41667497you're arguing with a glowie
>>41667502k cool, don't care, just correcting the retard for thinking i'm a zoomie.
>>41667497>i've always saidYou don't set nomenclature, society does. >14 in 2004I did the math, Anon. Results: I am older than you. I wouldn't say I'm wiser, but I am smarter than you.
>>41667515society says to own a house, have a family, and work a 9 to 5, but I don't have any of that at my age nor do I want it, society is retarded and so are you.
