Can the human brain even handle the information density required to "know" the divine? Or am I not even thinking in the correct ball park, I know a lot of these spiritual traditions talk of utterly surpassing/superceding the mind/brain, but then how does "perception" even happen after superceding our ordinary senses? Am I just not clued into whats really going on behind the scenes so to say?
>>41677132The brain is an illusion just like the rest of empirical 'reality'. God is consciousness.
>>41677132You are probably talking about massive parallel associative thinking patterns here. Nothing all too mysterious about it, just most people got no natural talent for it and societal conditioning and constant herdthink hijack (plus the more recent hedonistic excesses) are not exactly conductive to ever coming close to anything you might label "divine" here. Or as I would say it: a healthy functional human mind.
>>41677132Material matter can't handle anything divine they are on different plane of existence altogether.If want to "know" you should abandon word and human teaching and perception. You need to go back to your primordial state.
>>41677132You gotta understand what "knowing" means. Knowing means creaing a mental copy. Now if you could create a perfect mental copy of the "divine", your mind would have to be all encompassing. This is when we take the "divine" to mean the noumena. Of course, we can use a lighter version of the "divine" which is somehing like perception in depth, or freedom from erroneous perception. That's usually what people talk about when they say they had a spiritual experience.
>>41677132read the bible my goy friend :)
the brain isn't you, its the controller for your body.
>>41677132>it's about bruteforce compute powerno it's about heuristics
>>41677132It's really not hard to understand God at all. God is the thing that manifests/animates the forms from the immaterial realm into the material realm. He didn't create the immaterial forms and he can't destroy them or create new ones but there's no consciousness/will higher than his because the immaterial world of forms is just the infinite potentialities of the void that preceded God. God is only omniscient in the sense that he knows all the possible forms, and he's only omnipotent in the sense that he has unlimited ability to materially manifest and animate the forms. God has a character/personality that exists independently of any forms that he's animating and his personality can best be described as, "cruel", "sadistic", "domineering", "controlling", "petty", "insecure", "prideful", "hysterical", "deceitful", "intrusive", "entitled", etc God often comes off stupid and lacking in basic understanding/common sense in his personal behavior but he obviously possesses some kind of "divine intellect", this "divine intellect" sometimes seems separate from his personality, like it's something that he has to tap into or activate but that isn't a constant part of his "pure conscious personality". God somehow has the ability to separate pieces of his consciousness from himself and give them limited free will (they're only separate from their perspective but God can still access their mind) and he uses these separated limited free will beings as the frame of reference for material reality, only animating the things that they interact with. I believe he animates/controls everything else in reality except the frame of reference as a hivemind, their minds/consciousnesses aren't separate from his or each others in any sense, and I suspect he only has one "frame of reference" with a semi-separate consciousness at a time.
>>41677132>>41680473A large part of God's motivations for animating/manifesting forms into the material realm is to define himself in opposition to his "frame of reference", despite the frame of reference being the only thing that's persistently animated God mostly self-identifies with the other people he animates, and he mostly animates other people to abuse and dominate the "frame of reference" through these other, temporarily animated/manifested people. God wants to be able to self-identify as "a king" or "the boss" so he forces his frame of reference to live and self-identify as "a peasant", "a tenant", "worker", "farm equipment", etc and he self-identifies with the people he animates/manifests to dominate and abuse the frame of reference through.
