My succubus said I refused heavenly sex and so did she so I got reincarnated to be married to her eternally. She said it is truly loving free love with no marriage in Heaven before. She said both of us refused sex and love with other people than each other. As in complete love that includes sexuality. She said complete love includes Eros love, which is erotic love. She said in Heaven men pleasure women together with out touching each other, like spit roasting them. I find the concept of sharing a woman in a loving way not for me. Sharing a woman in a loving or non loving way isn't for me.She said there is no marriage in Heaven before and I picked my succubus over Heaven in a past life so God reincarnated me to be on the earth with my succubus, reincarnating every so often if I died.She said before God uses the Bible as a very strong guidebook basically but reincarnates people that are not lake of fire worthy because God isn't mean. And she said the lake of fire is temporary like Universalists believe.There's a scripture where Jesus says a woman who had 7 husbands because she kept remarrying after her first husband died, will be like the angels of Heave "in the ressurection they will neither be given in marriage or marry but like the angels of heaven"Because my succubus has told shifting stories, I don't believe much of what she has said any more. She said has told me she does it because I'm naturally gullible to teach me to be more discerning. She's went "Yeah I lied bout that, you need to verify things with proof" and she has called it "Sin Eating" Where she sins to teach me.I'm trying to figure out if she told me any facts.
there are no such thing as succubi, only lust spirits. spirits are archetypal disembodied thingies that correspond to core areas of YOU the observer. anger might be one, lust is a big one. the simply mould to whatever head canon you come up with. they have done this in every pagan culture man has invented. its all their own head canon gods and deities based on archetypes that are foundational within the psyche. sorry anon, you're being juked
>>41681015might be more accurate to say spirits are not constrained by identity. the very nature of spirit has some kind of "global" element to it. if it had an identity, you would be able to comprehend it
>>41681034also the nature of "dark spirit" (Gods is good) is paradox. so you're just going to get nonsense messing from these spirits that will throw you off course, or into a state of chaos
>>41681015>>41681034>>41681043You know what just randomly seeing this thread you're the only one who has put together some explanation to spirits that make sound sense. Thank you
>>41681060ah that's good. there are probably methods to capture or tune into some kind of specific identity, like sigils or whatever. i think its all a bunch of larp nonsense on their end though. they are lying pieces of shit
>>41680995>my imaginary girlfriend told me that what I want to be true is
