Can anyone other anons confirm something for me? I saw a video saying how using Google Trends, you can see how disasters such as Bondi Beach or related events were seen searched primarily in Israel days before or in advance to the tragedy occurring. I was messing around with it with I decided to put my name in it, followed by assassination, it rendered an immediate 100 results in the past 24 hours. I noticed this was in only 'Worldwide', so after changing the location to Israel is said the same exact thing. I have never posted anything any of my social medias anti-Israel nor do I really speak of them. Does anyone else get the same result? I dont have a very common last name, and I tried the the same thing with both randomly generated named and names of people I knew personally. The randomly generated names resulted nothing while the names of people I knew IRL over the years rendered the same result as mine, specifically in Israel. There's actually no way for this to make sense, unless everyone is getting searched up under this search result. Please post results to let me know if me and my loved ones are fucked or if this is something stranger than anticipated.
>>41694597what did you do bro?
I think its just a bug anon, I tried my name alone, gave me a 100 from BC in july, then nothing when I tried whole world because program would default to canada only for some fucking reason, then finally it shown me 100 from Cuba but it marked it as Norway on the map lmao.
>>41694597
>>41694597Poor bait. But I'll explain this for retards.Google trends doesn't show results in your time zone. Also that is a % of "interest", not total hits. It's always on a scale of 0-100. If there is one search over a period of time then the day that one search occurred will show 100.
>>41694987Pic related.Anyone concerned about the Israel part, OP obviously used a VPN server in Israel.
>>41694597saar google has the full workings! it transparently results for accurate, saar
>>41694597Name based gangstalking anon, happens to me all the time since a few years ago.
>>41695544Gross, a namefag
>>41694597Timezones anon. Basically it's already tomorrow in another part of the world so they already know the news before we do.
>>41694987okay but thats my point, i have a very uncommon name, who is searching this up and why in a different part of the world from mine? where is the interest coming from and is your name rendering the same reults?
