one of the indian ones

>>41694603
No one ever thought of this

>>41694603
The True Creator who created the soul.

>>41694603
Tathagata

>>41694616
Wouldn't count on it.

>>41694603
Trust in love that there is a God but blind faith is dangerous and leads to death in many instances.
Nature already spelled it out for you.
Are you going to cuck out and give up on love?

>>41694603
brahman, beyond all names and forms

>>41694686
You believe this because?

>>41694686
>beyond all names
>immediately assigns a name "brahman"
How are you even able to solve captcha is beyond my understanding.

call op a fag or else your mother dies in her sleep tonight

Well, if there's only one, they all must be talking about the same thing.

>>41694711
You don't need to threaten anyone anon

>>41694693
you could call it tao or brahman, its the pure consciousness that is everything and is you

>>41694605
ALL OF THE INDIAN ONES, and all other ones for that matter

>>41694724
There's only One True Creator, man. It's none of the Indian ones.

>>41694727
WRONG. The correct answer was Vishnu. Thanks for playing the existence game.

>>41694731
Wrong, Sanskrit is the not The First Language. Vishnu is from a prior era and was never The True Creator.

>>41694732
the gods before vishnu and shiva fucking sucked and was not knowledgable to the true brahman

File: lord-vishnus-24-avataras.jpg (324 KB, 1200x1200)

324 KB JPG

>>41694732
Just look at this nigga, he obviously created everything. Your robe guy doesn't have the aura.

>>41694737
They probably gave you their real names, but no, they're not part of the Divine Council.
>>41694739
Robe guy? I'm not an Abrahamic.

>>41694603
The uncaused cause of all causes.
The Supreme Person.
The All-Attractive.
The one who has all opulences to an infinite degree.
God is not limited to one form, one name.
God is CERTAINLY not so limited as to have none.

>>41694742
The True Creator only has one name. I can tell by the way you type you're an Abrahamic and don't know The True Creator at all.

>>41694746
nigga if ur not Abrahamic or dharmic, what the fuck are you, taoist?

>>41694749
I'm a Pagan Gnostic. But not the type of Pagan that believes in many "deities" for lack of a better term.

File: Lord Nityananda nitai-pada.jpg (425 KB, 1280x1024)

425 KB JPG

>>41694746
>The True Creator only has one name.
You have a very limited conception, and the True Creator is not bound by your rules.
>I can tell by the way you type you're an Abrahamic
Hardly, but now that you have a false assumption there is no possibility of making you see truth.

>>41694755
>You have a very limited conception, and the True Creator is not bound by your rules
Whose rules? You're just wrong.
You have an Abrahamic virus in your mind then.

File: avataras.gif (75 KB, 1100x800)

75 KB GIF

>>41694761
>Whose rules?
Exactly. Where did you come up with this rule:
>The True Creator only has one name.
The only way this is true is that God has a unique relationship with each living being, and as such each living being will have a unique "true name" for God.
>Abrahamic virus
Like I said. You arent welcome to understanding because you have made this a point to win an argument over.

>>41694773
why are you a Vaishnavite and not a Shaivite or Shakaite?

>>41694773
Where did you come up with "the rule" that he has more than one name? It's not true and will never be true. What you're describing is an automaton, a non-conscious entity that follows the whims of man. No.
>Like I said. You arent welcome to understanding because you have made this a point to win an argument over
It's not an "argument," I don't care if you believe me.

>>41694776
Because Balarama is God.
>>41694781
>Where did you come up with "the rule" that he has more than one name?
That is my question to you.
I am explicitly denying the claim made here
>>41694746
>The True Creator only has one name.
I did not make this claim. Whoever did was wrong.
Was it you, or did you jump into a conversation without understanding what was being said?

>>41694787
Animism was the first so it probably is the truest

>>41694790
>Because Balarama is God.
huh?

>>41694790
>That is my question to you.
>I am explicitly denying the claim made here
You just literally claimed he has more than one name. I countered it and said no, that's not true. Meaning I don't believe that or you. I'm just trying to say that your "argument" that he doesn't succumb to the rules of man, can be said of you as well. Except your idea of The Creator is a book. You idolize that book and do not want a real relationship with The True Creator.

File: Lord Balarama is Lord San(...).png (882 KB, 602x602)

882 KB PNG

>>41694795
That is why I am not a Shaivite or Shaktist.
I actually feel a lot of kinship and mentoring from Lord Shiva as we both have Lord Baladeva as our worshipful deities.

>>41694791
That would mean that everything you consume is killed in one form or another.

>>41694797
>I countered it and said no, that's not true.
And you are wrong.
>he doesn't succumb to the rules of man
and you are the one that tried to put a rule on God here:
>>41694746
>The True Creator only has one name.
I never said God has only one name, nor did I say God has many names.
I said God is not limited to only one name.
To say God is not limited to only one name is NOT saying god bound to having many names.

>>41694804
the people who believed in animism and still hunt and ate anyway

>>41694603
the one made up by the jews OBVIOUSLY

>>41694807
>And you are wrong
Prove me wrong. Type the First Language ever spoken to show you have a relationship with The True Creator.
>God is not limited to one form, one name.
You literally said that, bud, don't backtrack now.
Except he doesn't give his name to people who idolize books.
>To say God is not limited to only one name is NOT saying god bound to having many names
He has One Name. I'm sorry, but all your "gods" are false.
>>41694808
True, you can always do proper penance with animals, Idk if plants are the same, but I imagine they are.

>>41694807
Your nameless ambiguous god is a cheap cop out to avoid having an opinion and to avoid being wrong. Your god is a no aura having dumb bitch.

>>41694822
>Prove me wrong.
Prove yourself right.
> to show you have a relationship
You are extremely ignorant if you think anyone doesnt.
> to show you have a relationship
Quote me, liar.
>He has One Name.
Where do you get that rule?
>all your "gods"
There is only one God.
You have no clue what you are talking about.
>>41694831
>nameless
I have given several names.
You sound like God has let you know His name as well.
Let me quote myself again since you have no ability to read.
>>41694742
>God is CERTAINLY not so limited as to have none.

>>41694822
>You literally said that, bud
>>41694836
>Quote me, liar.

>>41694603
Deus sive natura; the one and only

>>41694836
>Prove yourself right
I don't have a relationship with The True Creator, I wouldn't be online if I did.
>You are extremely ignorant if you think anyone doesnt
You're acting as if he works through your Pantheon of 'deities', he doesn't have to and never would.
>Where do you get that rule?
Personal experience.
>There is only one God
Yeah, and he's not known by most Indians.
>>41694839
I literally copypasted his fucking quote.

>>41694846
>I wouldn't be online if I did.
So by your own conception your demand was irrational and impossible. you are dishonest.
>he works through your Pantheon of 'deities'
I dont have a pantheon of deities.
>he doesn't have to
There is no "have to" with God.
>never would.
this is you once again trying to put a limit on God. What rule denies God this option? If you have no relationship (wrong), then by what authority do you claim to know God's whims?
>Personal experience.
As I said, everyone has a unique relationship with God, even if you are too blind to see it and say you dont.
>he's not known by most Indians.
We can post hands and eyes, if you want to go first.
>>41694846
>I literally copypasted his fucking quote.
One that says God is not limited, and NEVER says God is bound to have many.
I never said God has mmany nammes.
YOU said God only has one.
YOU are trying to put limits on God.
Not me.

>>41694860
It's not impossible, I know The First Language when I see it, that would have been enough. You can't provide that. That is one of the Proofs that you serve The True Creator and have a relationship with him. You don't always have to live The Way for that to be possible, hence not impossible, there are some who know his name. You're not one of them.
>I dont have a pantheon of deities
Oh, so you're a Monotheist in an Indian cult?
>There is no "have to" with God
You actually believe that too.
>this is you once again trying to put a limit on God. What rule denies God this option? If you have no relationship (wrong), then by what authority do you claim to know God's whims?
Because I know him. And he knows me better than I know myself.
>As I said, everyone has a unique relationship with God, even if you are too blind to see it and say you dont
"God's" not an automaton. There are some he doesn't reveal himself to. Actually, lots. I've heard his voice audibly. Can you say the same?
>We can post hands and eyes, if you want to go first
I'm not an Indian, but I am brown. The fact you think skin color matters means you worship a Creator that doesn't think that's stupid. Funny how it works, that.
>YOU are trying to put limits on God
You're the one trying to turn him into an automaton.

>>41694873
>you're a Monotheist in an Indian cult?
Hinduism includes monotheism, polytheism, monism, atheism, animism, and many other philosophies within it.
I follow Visishtadvaita.
There is only one Supreme Person.
>Because I know him.
>I don't have a relationship with The True Creator
You cant even be consistent with your lies.
Not bothering with the rest of your drivel.

>>41694879
>You cant even be consistent with your lies
Knowing him and having a relationship don't always mesh. I say that because I'm not living The Way, not because I don't know shit about who I want to serve, are you dense?
>There is only one Supreme Person
And he has no Sanskrit name, I'm sorry, but that's just The Truth.

>>41694884
>Knowing him and having a relationship don't always mesh.
Wrong.
you dont have a clue.
>more attempts to limit God

>>41694886
You don't even know what the fuck the term "putting limits on the Creator" means. You're just trying to make it look like you understand The Way. You don't, so don't try unless it is revealed to you personally. What it means is pigeon-holing him into a view that was taught to you by someone else and saying he's not capable or able to do anything. You're turning him into an automaton that works through "gods" that murder and kill other beings. The True Creator abhors war and violence. I know this because he's the one that told me not to join The US Military. You can sit there and act like all the violence in the Gita is "metaphors" to cope, but know that your "god" is false. He's only The True Creator in so much as he's created indirectly. Basically through the Creative potential of The True Creator, he is him, but not in Personhood. The Father of the Hindu Pantheon isn't him either.

>>41694886
>>41694902
Also before you say what I am doing right now is against the rules too, I know that, they're my rules for me and I cannot follow them wholeheartedly because I'm not a virgin.

>>41694902
>You don't even know what the fuck the term "putting limits on the Creator" means.
lol. I'm the one that brought it to the conversation.
You have no clue. Not engaging with your drivel.

>>41694910
>I'm the one that brought it to the conversation
Because that's the only form of The Way you know, and you misinterpret it on purpose. I understand you're trying to be inclusive and not divisive to "beings" in the Divine places by recognizing they exist regardless of whether you're Monotheist, but you're really not serving The True Creator, I understand this is being critical, but understand that if you are brought into a life where you face a lot of adversity, know it was because you served a Hindu deity in a past life. That's my hangup though, not The True Creator's.

>>41694912
>you misinterpret it
It's my communication. I am not interpreting anything.

>>41694917
You actually believe this too. The Way is written on your heart, bro, that's the root of it. But you're missing a lot of the context. I'ma go watch the Hogwarts Legacy walkthrough. Been a pleasure.

>>41694922
Run along, child.

>>41694924
Dude, if I ever am incarnated as an Indian, I'm going to starve to death.

>>41694926
Yes, I can see how easily you give up on things.
And I thought you were leaving.
Was that a lie?

>>41694929
There's nothing to "give up on." Like I said, I don't actually care if you believe a single word I say. You'll forget I said it anyway, they always do.

>>41694930
No, you care what I say, which is why you keep flouncing but wont leave, and why what you say holds no relevance.
You'll whine at me some more, but I will show you detachment and leave for the next two hours.

>>41694603
none.

File: Emblem_-_Oculus_Non_Vidit.jpg (206 KB, 595x715)

206 KB JPG

>>41694941
>but then how do they exist?!
they don't
>but you do believe in a God
yes, but I don't believe in gods
>?
For me, the thing that is worshiped (God) exists because I choose to worship nothing, but I still follow something transcendental over all: truth, essence, light, and the unmoved mover.
It is not a mythological god, as gods do not exist.
>?!
I believe it is the one that made the thing from nothingness. It is the one that makes the whole from nothingness. Before the nothingness, it was here.
Welcome to the basics of monotheism! (Or, more generally, classical theology.)
Eternity is not a god, but it can be The God.

File: Bible Prophecy + confirmi(...).png (169 KB, 1874x822)

169 KB PNG

>>18241474
Every religion other than Bible-believing Christianity are man-made and, pointless, they are just "religious" ideas, not historical realities. They have man as authority instead of the infallible word of God. The Bible is from God, so it makes no sense to ignore it and go to the teachings of corruptible men instead.

Isaiah 41:21-24: "Produce your cause, saith the LORD; bring forth your strong reasons, saith the King of Jacob. Let them bring them forth, and shew us what shall happen: let them shew the former things, what they be, that we may consider them, and know the latter end of them; or declare us things for to come. Shew the things that are to come here- after, that we may know that ye are gods: yea, do good, or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together. Behold, ye are of nothing, and your work of nought: an abomination is he that chooseth you."

"If you and your Moslem (and Catholic and Hindu and Buddhist) friends cannot meet THOSE requirements which God gave you in His Book (see Mal. 3:16), then for heaven's sake, don't go around bragging about some fornicating polygamist or some wine-headed politician or cross-legged yogi who as (and is) no more a genuine "prophet" than Goldilocks and the Three Bears (Ezek. 4:9-10)."


www.youtube.com/shorts/qzHWrQ2DHhQ (How to Prove the Power of Christ in 60 Seconds)
https://truthischrist.com/seven/
www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCsPy4CY6hI
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ919YomJjM
www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcvFX5uIRb4
www.youtube.com/watch?v=yS78mFJcvhQ

A man is saved in this age by grace through faith (Eph. 2:8-9) in the one, final, effectual sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ (Heb. 10:8-12) dying in his place as a substitutionary offering for sin (Rom. 5:1-10). If he has received the Lord Jesus by faith (John 1:12) in his heart, that sinner is SAVED, and is saved, once for all; finally and forever.

1 Corinthians 15:1-4

File: God wrote the Bible.png (487 KB, 740x599)

487 KB PNG

Proof that the Bible is the word of God:
fcbaptist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bible-proof.pdf
https://truthischrist.com/seven/

1 Corin 15:3-4: “For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VRT2FFXntc

1 John 5:7: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."

Romans 3:23: “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;”
Jesus Christ is God who has come in the flesh from heaven. He died as a sinless sacrifice for the sins of the whole world to save you from eternal hell, the punishment for your sin. He was buried, then resurrected and then ascended to heaven. John 3:16: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” John 10:28: "And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand." Rom 10:9: “That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."
God wants to forgive you, but you have a choice: Do you choose the righteousness of God by receiving Christ? Your own righteousness can NEVER justify you or keep you saved because of your sin. Rom 5:9: “Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.” Salvation is by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, in His finished blood atonement. The gift of salvation can't be earned. Confess The Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in prayer, that you trust in Him and believe He atoned for your sins on the cross.

Eph. 2:8-9: “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.”