Still my favorite cryptid, I believe the love giants were also Sasquatches.
>>41703873>love giantsI meant love-lock cave giants, I’m sleep deprived.
I think the Ebu Gogo is more interesting as it's more likely to be a real thing: for bigfoot, no evidence of large apes in North America prior to humanity's arrival - for the Ebu Gogo, it might be surviving Homo Floresiensis
>>41704091>, no evidence of large apes in North America prior to humanity's arrival That brings the question, which time line do you think registers the first large apes in the Americas? Most say it was the end of the younger dryas 12 000 years ago or so, but cave paintings in southern Brazil have been carbon dated to 44 000 years which is where that measurement technique tops out so no one knows how long ago they were made. All that said, today is no different from when that photo came out and has always looked like fake bullshit. So while the existence of great apes / sasquach sound very plausible given various evidence, this looks like a dude in a cheap suit made to sow disinformation.
>>41704121we know humans were in the Americas by at least 21-23K years ago (the white sands foot prints); the natives could have been here earlier, we just don't have definitive evidence of that. The date you mentioned for the cave paintings in Brazil is disputed (some stuff in the cave was dated to that, but it appears the paintings and other undisputed "man-made" artefacts are much younger, about 12k years old).That said, the possibility of a non-human great ape in the Americas is non-zero, we just have no evidence to support that claim.As to the thought of the thing in OP's pic being a man in a suit, I have a question for you: why a suit with such large tits? if you're wondering what I'm talking about, either watch the video its from or find a better pic.I am skeptical of bigfoot, but I do wonder...why the tits?
>>41704192there's 2 bigfoot in the patterson-gimlin film
>>41704091>>41704121>>41704192Native Americans refer to Sasquatch as a tribe of people not apes, if you look at most of the blurry photos including this still of the Patterson films you can see a face more resembling that of a human rather than a ape. David Paulides, YES THAT GRIFTER agues that the Sasquatch in this still has HER hair up in a bun or pony tail.
>>41704121Patty is a female, what kind’a proves you wrong is that in the original footage if you pay close attention iirc the breast bounce.
>>41703873Just totally a coincidence that he purchased an ape suit shortly before making the film....Bigfooties will believe anything
https://youtu.be/oPlRr_OfxZI?si=_sNxzeDSksaPsVkM
>>41704624What you said has been debunked, ALSO for literal hundreds of generations native Americans have talked about Sasquatch. Roger NOR Patterson created this phenomenon, they only caught it on camera.I think roger was the one that said that about the suit but bob came out and said he was lying, it was either one or the other. Check out >>41704192, they have a point, that wasn’t a man in a suit just a very hairy primitive woman.https://youtu.be/jTgALwdNPW4?si=tCFgLnQQg7V7hxED
>>41703873Ho Ho Ho! Merry Christmas you gullible retards.
>>41703873people who know next to nothing of the subject will always chime in very confidently to their non-existence with barely a sliver of intelligence to back it up, only platitudes. it's not that strange, the very idea of bigfoot is naturally ridiculous and have been drummed up even more by thoughts control to immediately illicit a connotation with the deranged backwoods hillbilly voodoo style retardation.they'll often be slightly mad or ticked off usually (not understanding the extent they've been primed to do so) and bring up only one or two inaccurate factoids about gymlan or some other little etological tidbit or similar myopic cherry picked from the litter.it's 99% of the time just this one tiny thing they bring up and throw out the whole topic alltogether.
>>41704703I never understood it, you can see the muscles on the female Sasquatch and body silhouette clearly to know it’s not a suit. They all say the same thing wheres the bones! Wheres the poop! As I said earlier in the thread Native Americans treat the Sasquatch as another tribe of people. And people tend to have culture and burial customs, tribes and I mean quite a few describe Sasquatch as man eaters, they could eat each other after death or perhaps they have something akin to that of a elephants graveyard and we just have to find it. Likely a cavern somewhere, people know how to hide and move around, they likely do what we do and bury our poop, or simply go in a river. Theres a decent amount of river sightings of them iirc. Our failure to find them is due to us treating them as apes.
>>41704703https://youtu.be/7ZDdrEw0n14?si=NLUk0mnG5L2QUGqX
>>41704612>why would they put huge tits on itWhat do you mean? You wouldn't? Are you gay?
>>41704824?? How does this prove your point??
