How likely is it that the content that is given to the public is AI or demon generated?I am talking films, shows, books, videos, news, and more being released to us without prior knowledge of it being AI or demon produced.I just have this feeling with alot of the content now that the stuff being pumped out is off and not really being made by actors, especially in Regards to porn and many YouTube videos.I have a feeling it has been going on for a while though, and the AI being released now is a slowdrip way to disclosure this fact. It also makes since that if this is a simulation, that most if not all of the content you consume was vomited up by the sim and not by real people.The demon angle is less talked about, but just as valid imo.What do you guys make of this possibility?Thanks in advance as always!
>>41727388Legit predictive programming. Only difference is they ate being open with Tilly. There could be tons of actors and singers that are totally artifical abd their work AI or imp generated.
>>41727395*are *andAnyways, you anons had any run inside that you know of?
Selfbump
>>41727366Hey, i'm the poster of the post in your printscreen. "AI produced" tends to be the same as "Daemon produced"; Daemon Intellect uses AI tools to generate media. A lot of stuff online and on the TV comes from "The Black in Green" mentioned in the Liber Falxifer book series; a type of Daemon Intellect physically located in different Plant Species. The "/ng/ threads" on here is a hot-spot for "Black in Green posting" btw; a lot of said threads is "imagery generated with said methods".
>>41727366elsagate was the start w/ people appeasing an algo but re hollywood and media either only white men can make good content or yeah its all demons and AI. slightly related but i don't think olivia rodrigo is a real person
>>41727681Black in Green chapter of Liber Falxifer 2; https://archive.org/details/liber-falxifer-ii-the-book-of-anamlaqayin/page/122/mode/2up
>>41727685Said chapter has a list of 72 example Black in Green with Sigils to work with. "Bruce Willis" is "Walnut" btw as an example. Walnut is also behind a lot of "Pixar animation" like "Wall-e" and "Finding Nemo"; you can recognize said work as "related to Bruce Willis". The videogame Roblox is also by Walnut; you can sense Bruce Willis involvement there as well.
>AI or demon generated?>believing in demons>believing they are interchangeable with AI>believing they “generate” contentKys Christard, your bullshit is shitting up this board and everyone who isn’t in your little cult is getting sick of it.
>>41727682>don't think olivia rodrigo is a real person Most people on the TV are "spirits"; "fictional characters living fictional lives". Vast majority of celebrities lives presented in media is "fictional entertainment media" for real; ie "not real world events happening in physical reality". ie "upkeeping appearances until full disclosure is allowed directly in mainstream media". In reality "general media production takes place in what's described in The Matrix". Actors are a type of "Actor Model Spirits"; making huge hollywood cash to the House that they are part of. When you work with spiritual stuff you can "generate an actor career"; an "actor-imp with similar look to yourself to join media productions with". Porn for example is produced this way. If you're good looking and have cool porn ideas you can join the scene with a "lookalike character" and generate a career. Entertainment media literally prints money if you manage to spiritually generate popular careers; the people owning popular actors ("actor model spirits") in hollywood are likely "lower to middle-class irl" right now; until "The Great Harvest" hits.
>>41727716Actors being "owned" by a person outside the screen was described in some Liam Neeson film; where he lives as "a clone in a clone lab who is owned by a person in the outside world" who needs the guy for some organ transplants.
>>41727366finally a post i can sink my teeth into. i respect your kindness. and bravery, migger. it's all true and doesn't need explaininjust add 1 plus 5and hope for y
>>41727743Death Grips?
>>41727762getgetgetgwt
>>41727716>until full disclosure is allowed directly in mainstream mediaSo they plan on disclosing this? When? Why?
>>41728058Of course; when "Eden" is over you'll get more "direct accurate information"; ie "wikipedia and shit can then directly list more accurate information about how reality works". Right now there's certain types of "information filters"; ie "people on the TV can 'hint' about being non-real people; but it's hard to directly discuss the subject; the subject would happen through a type of Anology with subtext".
