Cultures around all the world had men using more large, robe like and windy clothes, tunics, toga, capes, etc.Who benefits from pushing the modern pants everywhere? What are the implications of this?
>>41730831People benefit from not having to gird their loins every time they need to do something difficult?
in order to disconnect people of all races from their magic potential and aura
>>41730831it's just gay men that want to wear dresses making up excuses to do that
wlecome to www.owmyballs.comduring medieval times, men wore wool leggings/sotckings under a tabard or tunic.jeans are a psyop, just like shaving beard hair.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNAMbRt5eI8&list=PL_lz2lcwaFWaxVz6Ld76iRlRPA0XQkQ_X
You alllllways have to ask questions, don't you Goy?
>>41730831Probably to crush you guyses balls to make you retarded. I'm not even joking. There's no way that that doesn't mess up your balls. I'm sure the cloth leggings weren't as restrictive.
>>41731324Wait, I mean the reasons why it changed. The tunics and robes are probably healthier for the balls and don't mess them up. Even bras are actually really bad for breasts and the restrictive nature can cause cancer to come more easily and loss of elasticity.
>>41731324>Hose (leggings) were 2 separate garments and were attached to the linen underwear, which were very loose. In Early medieval. Late medieval, the hose became one garmet, with both legs joined together, tighter in the crotch.
>Lmao what is that, a chainmail skirt? What are you, a fag?
>He's wearing a metal skirt to protect his balls, like a fag! Why don't you just wear cuisses like everyone else, queer?
>>41730831>>41731324Balls need to be slightly colder than body temperature to produce sperm and testosterone. When your balls get too hot they sag to get further from your body so they can lose some heat and get to the optimal temperature. TPTB wants you to wear pants so you can cook your balls away from the optimal sperm and testosterone production. This is the conspiracy behind pants. The most masculine thing you can do is wear dresses and skirts.
>>41730831i'd say pants are more difficult to make then a simply large square textile that you wrap around your body which can also double as blankets etc, you can't really use pants for much else other than pants.. apply this logic to ancient cultures and it seems pretty reasonable. however, when suddenly anything open bottomed like kilts, tunics, robes, became associated with women only or being feminine i really don't know.. it's pretty retarded, they are extremely practical and unless it's a frilly dress or otherwise intentionally effiminate i don't really understand the lack of nuance.this nigga made some damn good pointshttps://youtu.be/pBM7rnMLDcI
>>41731579
