so was he a mason too? (nietzsche)
>>41731697https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zTuz103PL4The symbolism here says Yes I think
>>41731697https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tl-LA4VaLgA
>>41731697I literaly have no idea who this man was.
>>41731697No. Like saying everyone who ever drew, published, parodied, or posted the triangle eye guy was an Illuminati
>>41731697I used to think that this was just a trendy pose that every person that wanted to seem sophisticated used. Nowadays people shill him everywhere constantly and I can see what kikes meant when they were talking about "Promoting nihilism among the goyim" in their protocols. Right wing cattle laps his shit up like no normgroid ever could.
>>41732648Nietzsche did not promote nihilism. He proposed a remedy for it.Kierkegaard proposed to fake it, Schopenhauer I believe is the nihilist grump that only cared about his dogs. Nietzsche was about being bold in the face of it. 'Since there's no god, bear it yourself.' something to that nature.Yes the modern powers-that-be have promoted a fatalistic nihilism with their big bang and hard determinism shit, but it wasn't exclusively Jewish. It was specifically Sabbatean Frankists and Sabbatean Dönmeh working in tandem with other societies of secrets.
>>41732709midwit kino
>>41732722If you've read more of Schopenhauer or something, let's hear it.
>>41732462This is dumb. pi is literally defined as the amount that c over d is
>>41731697Maybe he was pretending to be Napoleon? He was a very popular figure among young men back in the mid 19th century. Plus, neech is 17 or so in this picture, larping as Napoleon is right up his alley at this point in time.>>41732709Schopenhauer was not a nihilist, in my view, even if he was a massive pessimist and Misanthrope. He still believed in the will, and art. Nietzsche's definition of nihilism is somewhat idiosyncratic anyway.
>>41732975>He still believed in the willOkay. His pessimism and misanthropy turn me away from him so I never looked too deeply at him. His "will" and Nietzsche's any different on any metrics?
>>41732869Incorrect. For ANY circle of ANY dimensions, c/d has the same value, which is pi. It is a fundamental geometric constant.
>>41733068All circles are the same by definition. There is only one kind of circle. They only vary in dimensions as you said and c and d both increase proportionately to each other so pi doesn't change.
>>41733068on a linear 2d plain
>>41732975>>41732996>Maybe he was pretending to be Napoleon? The pose comes from François Nivelon's Rudiments of Genteel Behavior (1737)
