Warning: shills are the most eager to storm this threadNot a debate because earth geometry isnt up for debate.We talk about how earth is measured and utilized flat by everyone since the beginning without exception.We talk about how space is a violation of natural lawTry to minimize schizo topics such as mudflood, melted buildings, and aether
well guys the globie angry defense squad hasn't arrive so i'll post what i got.
“It is known that the horizon at sea, whatever distance it may extend to the right and left of the observer on land, always appears as a straight line. The following experiment has been tried in various parts of the country. At Brighton, on a rising ground near the race course, two poles were fixed in the earth six yards apart, and directly opposite the sea. Between these poles a line was tightly stretched parallel to the horizon. From the center of the line the view embraced not less than 20 miles on each side making a distance of 40 miles. A vessel was observed sailing directly westwards; the line cut the rigging a little above the bulwarks, which it did for several hours or until the vessel had sailed the whole distance of 40 miles. The ship coming into view from the east would have to ascend an inclined plane for 20 miles until it arrived at the center of the arc, whence it would have to descend for the same distance. The square of 20 miles multiplied by 8 inches gives 266 feet as the amount the vessel would be below the line at the beginning and at the end of the 40 miles.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (20)
First polar expeditions talking about setting suns.
>>41734293Interesting. This log also seems to be taking place around the time (New years/January) when it shouldn't set at all according to Google.
>>41734348well its not that the earth is flat its just an extremely processed 1d bit string that got deep friedamen.
My question is why bother keeping a secret like this? Who benefits from people thinking the earth is round instead of flat, and how so? It's the question no flat earth retard has ever properly answered.>Inb4; religionThe shape of the earth makes zero difference to believers of any faith. They've accepted the round earth, they were fine with flat earth, I'm sure they'd continue all the same if the earth were square. It's not even something worth mentioning as a manipulation tactic.
>>41734226Just posting my questions from previous threads.
>>41734429This one might be interesting for you>>41734271
>>41734435Aaaaand that's the last one. Hoping to get some answers this time, in the last thread I didn't get anything after almost two days and over 500 replies.
>>41734375The globe earth concept didnt become mainstream up until about 100 years agoThey try to tell us that they "always knew it was round" when that isnt the caseYou can find interviews where old people recollect having been taught flat earth in their educationThere was no skepticism of the moon landing initially because there was no internet at the time. All the information was fed through newspapers radios and TVs
>>41735000Well I guess I'll take some of that back. Moon landing skepticism goes further back
>>41735019>AI overview
>>41735000>You can find interviews where old people recollect having been taught flat earth in their educationI can show you where school boards decided pi=3.Saying education is bullshit means nothing.In fact, isn't that a flerfer point? That all education is a lie?But now that there is MAYBE ( I notice you don't/can't provide these interviews) some part of education that agrees with you, it is definite and valid and trustworthy.
>>41734226https://www.unz.com/anepigone/flatism-is-racist/
>>41735104Is there a problem for using AI in this context and why?
>>41735000This doesn't answer my question. Who benefits from a round earth conspiracy, and how? Without making the religious argument. It's the cornerstone of literally any conspiracy. There's always a purpose, and someone always benefits. Who and how?
>>41735448If you conclude what I just said, It wasn't mainstream up until about 100 years ago. Its not easy to pinpoint the exact institutional foundations. Rockefellers, freemasons, jesuits, etc.Instead of demanding flat earthers to have the burden for your "proof" you should be asking yourself WHY did they do this? Its not something I'll lose sleep over, because Im not worried. You can lose sleep over it all you want. Earth sill remains a flat planeIts easy to spot a government lie when the government has admitted to lying about it. "See, the government admitted they lied!" But you know what fuck that I dont care what they admitted or didnt admit to. I know for CERTAIN 100% they are lying about this one issue, and more certain than the other ones they "admitted to"Especially when NASA has to treat the earth as flat and stationary in their models. Thats a slap to everyone's face. You should be spending your time asking why NASA is doing all that. Instead of demanding flat earthers the burden of this silly nonsense youre asking.Im probably wasting my time talking to a total shill but whatevs. You still will say "Im not answering your question". Maybe you just need more insight
Flat earth is the short bus version of creationism.
>>41735521>Instead of demanding flat earthers to have the burden for your "proof" you should be asking yourself WHY did they do this?You cannot have a more explicit and blatant example of begging the question.This anon killed their childhood pet and fucked the jagged neck.Did this happen?You shouldn't be asking if it happened or not.You should just be asking WHY his mother told him to do it.
>>41735521>You still will say "Im not answering your question".Yes I will because you're not. Twice you've responded and still can't tell me who exactly is benefitting from a round earth model. It's the same thing that happens whenever this question is asked of flat earth retards, they can never answer this and instead just skirt around the question instead. It's not even a hard question, just tell me who benefits and how, that's all. You can insist all you want that it's flat, but the all important question is why lie about that in the first place? If there's no good reason to cover up such a thing, then why spend all the resources doing it?>Instead of demanding flat earthers to have the burden for your "proof" you should be asking yourself WHY did they do this? Burden of proof lies on those making the claim. Flat earth retards are fully responsible for proving the earth is flat, and in this case answering a simple question regarding the validity of such a claim. Additionally, I'm already asking you WHY? You can't just throw the question back at me like that and pretend it's an answer. This is exactly that skirting around and avoiding the question I'm talking about.
