Why are they *never* mentioned in any religion? You get told that most angels and archangels are either masculine or genderless, but there's never been the description of female angels, why is that? The divine can't be feminine?
>>41739114because most abrahamic religions were patriarchal, people assumed that masculinity equals authority, and they associated that with god and his angels.>The divine can't be feminine?female divine entities absolutely exist, but they are only found in non-abrahamic religions.
>>41739114There's angelic daimones that are female in many religions. For example the retinue of Aphrodite includes nereids.
>>41739114People used to recognize the corruption inherent in women back then, that's why they refused to link it to angelic beings.Only feminism has distorted that truth nowadays.
>>41739114Angels dont have reproductive organs no need to have two genders.
>>41739137nephilim say otherwise
>>41739114I'll tell you the blunt truth: angelic women find our men too disgusting and base to be worth engaging with.
>>41739139they made separate bodies or possessed people
>>41739144this, we're literally a species of monkey that shit and fart and piss, any self-respecting angel would never want to have sexual intercourse with us
>>41739114>Why are they *never* mentioned in any religion?Who said never?>[The] mystery of marriage [is] great, because [without] it the world would [not exist]; because [the] structure of [the world …], but the structure [… the marriage]. Think about the [intimate …] defiled, because it has […] power. Its image exists in a [defilement].>The impure spirits take male and female [forms]. The males are those that are intimate with the souls which dwell in a female form, and the females are those that mingle with those in a male form through disobedience. No one will be able to escape being bound by them without receiving a male power and a female one – the groom and the bride – in the image of the bridal chamber. When the foolish females see a male sitting alone, they jump on him, play with him, and defile him. In the same way, when the foolish males see a beautiful female sitting alone, they seduce and coerce her, wanting to defile her. But if they see the husband and his wife sitting together, the females can't go inside the husband, nor the males inside the wife. That's what it's like when the image unites with the angel; no one will be able to dare to go inside the [male] or the female.The text of the Gospel of Philip is fragmentary, but the part that is recoverable is very clear. There are human souls, which are images of God. There are impure spirits, who wish to enter into human vessels and be intimate with the souls inside. There are then also the Angels of God (from elsewhere, the pure Spirit), who instead become intimate with the souls in human vessels. There are female angels for souls that dwell in a male body, to provide the groom with a bride such that they may be One Flesh.I am pretty sure that this notion is where Islam derived their concept of Houri, as in, "there is a divine spouse you meet in heaven," but it got driven out of mainstream Christianity since Valentinus.
>>41739126Right, the whole concept of angels comes from Graeco-Roman religion, as messengers of the Gods. They come in all shapes and forms, but even the classic image of an angel, as a human form with bird wings, is Greek. Nike for example is specifically depicted that way.They don't have an Abrahmic origin.
>>41739137Being non corporeal doesn't mean they lack gender. Spirits of all kinds have very clearly seen genders, it's not an attribute exclusive of corporeality.
>>41739217If you cant name a female angel from the source the bible this thread is just cope theories.
>>41739227NTA but what is Wisdom's (Proverbs 8)'s specific ontology?
>>41739227>Muh bibleMessengers of the Gods predate the compilation of that book, anon.Also imagine being so protestant minded that if something is not in the Bible then it must not be real.
>>41739231>>41739241triggered the anime trannies .
>>41739250
>>41739250I accept your surrender.
as an aside, some condemn trannies for invading niche gaming spaces, I condemn trannies for invading niche mythological, religious, and occult spaces
>>41739114Zechariah 5:9>Then lifted I up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came out two women, and the wind was in their wings; for they had wings like the wings of a stork: and they lifted up the ephah between the earth and the heaven.Revelation 12:14And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent.Perhaps there was no female angels but some human women were "promoted" to angel status?
All of these questions come down into whether you believe spirits have any gender like we doMore often than not, we project human traits into beings who do not have them at all
>>41739114who cares, supernatural beings are fiction, you get to interpret them however you want, if you want them to be sexy and lustful, go for it.
>>41739114angels are hermaphrodites
>>41739310But for example, there's qualities of Venus that make Venus feminine, it isn't all in your head.For example, I can draw two pictures, a sword and a cup. One of them has a clearly masculine character. Even though it's all ink and paper, not even an actual sword.
>>41739556>proving the other anon right projecting humans views onto inhuman entities Anime ruined you trannies
I love the concept of an anon standing in front of the Temple of Venus in the late Roman Republic and screaming "you idiot weeaboos!"
>>41739595>tranny stands in front of temple of venus>I AM A WOMAN>guards, the galli have gone crazy again, please escort zher to the cybele temple and out of the public immediately
>>41739128Amen
>>41739587You'd have to be an utter autist not to see the obvious masculine qualities of a sword.
>>41739640Amon-Ra aka Baal-Hammon?
>>41739821aka balla RA aka lil amun ra da gawd
>>41739122the abrahamic religions stole their wisdom from the female cults and covered up the tracks of their crime.https://rumble.com/v70hp20-the-bitch-is-back-let-the-sunshine-in.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_v
>>41739114Not to the Abrahamics in general, and the Right Christcuck ignoramuses in particular! You need to find a religion that believes that there is a divine feminine, like Gnosticism or [Neo-] Paganism.
>>41739207Angels and divines with wings were Mesopotamian, which is where the Jews got it from which, in turn, was where the Christians got it from.
>>41739227ANNDD, Right Christcuckery is just full of huge cope theories!
>>41740005aeons aren't angels
