With disinfo, is the general framework to use an approach of layers/rings?I noticed this with M-Mat-his. He published an article about how Paul McCartney is a twin (which I think is true) but then seemed to bizarrely misinterpret modern photos of which twin was which. It felt like he is just another protection against the truth, but he's like the final protection when you're like 90% there. I've been waiting to see if he thought Bondi was a Mossad op and he hasn't, which again makes me think he is just pinging easy targets to make it seem like he's telling the truth, but where it counts he doesn't.It seems like the first ring/layer is stuff like rational wiki or /r/skeptic: catch people that are just starting to question things, but tell them that actually the people who really question things are all frauds.But the key idea is that it progresses deeper, always trying to demoralize people at each layer of questioning.
