https://xcancel.com/cirnosad/status/2006430253682667671>Korobochka (コロボ) >@cirnosad>4h>... Now I ask you, after reading this, do you really think I am not capable of telling a nuclear explosion apart from a depot explosion? (Rhetorical question).
>>41747247so was donetskhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27iG6UbaQVM
>>41747247I feel too stupid for thiswas sci too dogmatic? >>>16882878
bright like the sun
>>41747245posted 1 second aparthighly sus
>aaaaand there are suddenly multiple threads about it jannies why?
well at least you're not spamming /k/ anymore
>>41747247>do you really think I am not capable of telling a nuclear explosion apart from a depot explosion?Yes.Is this about the AI video that kept getting spammed?
>>41748554It’s not AI
I don’t think it’s even possible to delineate a nuclear vs non-nuclear explosion just from a video. The mushroom cloud forms from any sufficiently large explosion. But there would be tens of thousands of independent reports verifying the radiation, which don’t seem to exist.
how many measurements have been taken?
>>41747247Somehow no country noticed a nuke went off. Not Russia, not China, not a single country or organization.
>>41750693they have they just hush about itit wouldn't be the first time
>>41750708>they just hush about itI'm sure Russia and their allies would cover up being nuked by a foreign power. They're really shy.
>>41750727they lie about 9/11 too, or covid or the moon landingdo you think they are fighting against each other? they send people to the slaughter, that's all. there's no progress on the battlefield.
>>41750744>Russia consented to being nuked and actively covered it upgood luck with that theory
>>41747274with donetsk in 2015 it was very obvious a nuke, since they've changed the story of what that detonation was multiple times
>>41750766>the west is importing indians and muslims>the east is importing indians and muslims>they shop at the same european tailors>drive the same cars>wear the same suits>medvedev has a hard on for apple products
>>41750801So this ammo depot was destroyed for apple products. Okay
>>41750824you don't want to get iti think the truth scares you
>>41750744>there's no progress on the battlefield.>look at any map and there's a steady increase in battlefield progress, slow due to the nature of the war but notable regardless>but, strangely, the more progress there is, the more people insist there's no progressso sleepy...
>>41750838what's the most used OS in russia?
>>41750838compare that to the invasion of iraqin ukraine they are fighting a trench warfare to grind down soldiers and gather data for their ai drones, it's learning how to killmobile armies with tanks and airforce would have overrun kiev in a month if they wanted to
>>41750869Drones render the previously-modern way of warfare extremely difficult. See the failed attempt to deal with Houthis, which ended with the US navy retreating, and the failed attempt to coup Iran, which ended with a truce with the same country meant to be couped.Those two aren't particularly shocking, embarrassing, or planned failures, and they're brought up as samples. They're a result of that modern doctrines require vast adjustment to the new battlefield realities. No army in the world can currently do much about endless 500-dollar FPV drones. If the US attempted a land invasion of Venezuela right now, and Venezuela had invested into drones and had a halfway willing to fight army, the US would get massively bogged down. Because the US has no functional drone countermeasures. And, no, 'just bomb everything' is not a great countermeasure - you still need to push your infantry forward, and they'd get chewed up by drone fire, their vehicles would get wiped, and the US army is not going to be casualty-indifferent in current political conditions. This is not a claim that the US army is weak, it's just exactly as lacking in modern war experience and solutions as every other country in the world, except Russia, Ukraine and North Korea.
>>41750429Prove it.
>>41751254as if anything would change your mind
>>41751289So you cant, and wont even try.The vid is AI.How about a vid from another spot of the same thing? The vid showed another person filming, let's see their footage.It doesnt exist, because the explosion never happened.
>>41751351how about you prove it's AI
>>41751357You are presenting the vid as real.The burden is on you.I just gave you a way, show the explosion from another vid.
