[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/x/ - Paranormal


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Tl;dr Its not a globe and not a flat disk, the ships do not disappear below the horizon, as leading scientists told us for years. They were not held accountable at all, and yet they swore by their claims.


Lets first ask them how much did they hallucinate the ships dropped and did it make them reconsider their belief?

The camera lens is their fucking worst nightmare. Not holding the liars accountable for that until answers are spilled, is a psyop to cover up THE LIE THAT THEY TOLD US ALL. Stop talking about ridiculous theories, stop making all these 'I know it all' theories. The only thing we know is WHATEVER WE ARE LIVING ON, it is SEVERELY DIFFERENT from what they KEEP TELLING US.

There are dozens of impossible experiments that show objects FAR BENEATH the 'horizon' still in full view. And what is the most dominant counter argument? Naaaah, it should not be THAT FAR BELOW THE HORIZON.

1st of all:

1. We need to STOP crafting supposed theories and simply focus on THIS ONE OBSERVABLE FACT.

They said the ships disappear, 'RESPECTABLE INDIVIDUALS', SCIENTISTS IN HIGH PLACES, SAID THAT THE SHIPS DISAPPEAR.

WE HAVE DISPROVEN THEM.

so let's first, hold them accountable. Hey, mr mrs masonic nigger fuckface scientist, kinda a massive fuck up there? So how FAR BELOW THE HORIZON did you HALLUCINATE THE SHIP TO GO?

Did you imagine it's how fsr below the horizon exsctly? At what distance what drop did you hallucinate and publicly state to be true?

Small steps. Small steps kills the psyop. Just focus on 1 thing they can never do. Just the 1 fuck up of theirs. They cannot disprove it. They show the 24 hour sun to flatearthers who forget the curvature does not exist.

Its not a globe and not a flat disk. Get a fucking grip you morons. They have more answers and have told us nothing but lies.
>>
>>41750871
On Flearth we see all the ships on the ocean at the same time, am I rite?
>>
File: 1000039648.jpg (130 KB, 1080x687)
130 KB
130 KB JPG
>>41750871
There is an answer that is quite obvious but also terrifying - for the wrong reasons, mind you. Reptilians are terrified of us - and we nearly drove them to extinction before we even had agriculture. They psychologically manipulate us precisely because we are a barbaric and incredibly dangerous sleeping giant. We use our great intellect for horrifically destructive reasons. Here's a secret: we're smarter than them, they're only ahead of us by the virtue that they had a multi-million year head start - one that we heavily eroded well within a million years.

We are so incredibly dangerous - apex predators that can adapt to virtually any climate, learn incredibly quickly, breed quickly and are surprisingly resilient. They fear us, so they hide and pull strings from the shadows as a defense mechanism.
>>
>>41751105
yeah this it’s hollow
t. team Maitreya
>>
File: earth-shadow.jpg (165 KB, 1080x1080)
165 KB
165 KB JPG
>>41750871
The sun sets below the horizon, There is no flat earth.
>>
>>41750871
>ships do not disappear below the horizon
yes they do
>>
>>41750871
>Its not a globe and not a flat disk
Then what is it? Surely you have a model, right?
>the ships do not disappear below the horizon
Where do they disappear then?
>There are dozens of impossible experiments that show objects FAR BENEATH the 'horizon' still in full view
Show me one.
>>
>>41753908
>Show me one.
he's talking about refraction because he's a stupid flerf nigger
>>
>>41750871
Youre being a complete sperg about earth geometry and flat measurements. All sailors are trying to do is navigate home while on the sea and here you are being a sperg
List of linear flat and respect to flat measurements. Can't use these words if you live on a spinning ball
Up
Down
Above
Below
Altitude
Latitude
Elevation
Angle
Refraction
Horizon
Horizontal
Linear
Line of sight
Level
Plumb
Eye level
Sea level
Surface level
Plane
Grid
Coordinate
Navigation
Miles
Nautical miles
Kilometers
North
South
East
West
Azimuth
Zenith
Earth still gets measured flat. You cant change Earth geometry nor debate it
>>
File: IMG_2717.jpg (810 KB, 920x1502)
810 KB
810 KB JPG
>>41754100
Pic rel
>>
>>41754100
lol this stupid post again.
>>
NUMBER ONE FLAT EARTH PROOF! globe killed by black swan and sextant
https://youtu.be/58kR5-bgL4o?si=SPDBM742mdbPAJrD

ALL MAPS ARE BASED ON A CARTESIAN COORDINATE SYSTEM! Globe distortions based on longitudinal lines!
https://youtu.be/BtM97zuMrfE?si=6hrOl0IEyeZw-o8O
>>
>>41754100
None of those are even remotely incompatible with a globe.
>>
>>41754101
>hurr durr i'm a retard
>i'm such a retard i failed high school and don't know what a tangent is as a result
Ok thanks, but I'm not sure how it contributes to the conversation we're having.
>>
>>41754256
Did you bring up tangent to try and sound smart or something? The black swan is your tangent you cornball
>>
>>41754613
>black swan is
a red herring. a white elephant. a green pickle. a yellow belly.
>>
File: 1691359700042611.jpg (146 KB, 704x900)
146 KB
146 KB JPG
>>41754645
Do you believe in moon landing too?
>>
>>41750871
It's a glowie distraction psy-op to further divide people like us and to also discredit people like us.
>>
>>41755433
of course. that happened for sure. no reason why not.
>>
>>41755452
>discredit people like us
No sure why you would care at all about "people" when it comes to earth geometry you can verify yourself
Earth geometry remains how it is. What do people have to do with it?
>>
>>41756596
>>41755452
No, its creationism vs the religion of science
Trust the science
Don't you trust science?
>>
File: 1659763588151447.jpg (101 KB, 1024x680)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
All I know is if you aren't retarded, you can do the earth curve math on the Sears tower. And it proves earth is flat, or maybe a miniscule curve.
Then after this went mainstream as a "phenomenon", science says ohhh ya didnt ya know? Light bends undoing earth's curve over water! Didnt ya know? Water undoes earth's curve in an illluuuuussssioooonnnn
I did the math for this pic, the Sears tower should be under the horizon by 1 and a half its height.
>>
>>41756702
Yeah i did this, sears tower is like... 45 or so miles away from most tourist photos.
Its like 1200 ft tall. If I remember right?
>>
>>41755433
That pic is so dumb on so many levels
None of the things on the left side can be built anymore. Why aren't you incredulous about us losing the technology to built a DC04? Why do you find it hard to believe that space agencies would focus on unmanned over manned missions after Apollo, given how much more expensive the latter is?
It's like saying Passenger Airships are fake because we don't (and can't) build them anymore
>>
>>41756702
>I did the math for this pic, the Sears tower should be under the horizon by 1 and a half its height.
How? Your pic is wrong, because the only way to get the 1060ft figure is to have the eye height of the observer be at 0, which it clearly isn't. But even then the Sears Tower should still be visible since it's 1451 ft high.
And that's before even factoring in refraction
>And it proves earth is flat
How are the bottoms of the buildings hidden by any amount then? That doesn't make any sense on a flat earth.
>>
>>41754136
The number one flat earth proof is some dude not understanding how celestial navigation works? Can't say I'm surprised
>>
File: covid-19-en.jpg (155 KB, 1080x1080)
155 KB
155 KB JPG
>>41752344
>>
>>41756798
I've hears some flat earther say without a shred of irony that COVID was released because people waking up to flat earth was getting out of control and it was a last ditch effort to do something against that. Flatties are delusional
>>
File: 1767269299620368.jpg (262 KB, 1081x1116)
262 KB
262 KB JPG
>>41756815
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hgL8lu5J58
>>
File: IMG_1118.jpg (338 KB, 1062x723)
338 KB
338 KB JPG
>>41750871
Fun fact: Almost all NASA contractors documents regarding aircraft models are all designed under the assumption of being flown over a flat, nonrotating Earth.
>>
>>41756850
that's just embarrassing
>>41756857
no need to make it even more obvious you are underqualified to talk about this.
Do you also think that simplifying away air resistance in your 8th grade physics assignment makes air fake?
>>
>>41750871
I think flat earth is retarded HOWEVER, oversized earth is plausible
>>
>>41755433
We have also lost the tech to build a 1950s Chrysler.
Try. Literally impossible to get one made.
>>
>>41754100
This is one of the most retarded posts I've ever read.
>>
>>41751105
we do not breed quickly unless you are comparing to sharks.
>>
>>41750871
> The only thing we know is WHATEVER WE ARE LIVING ON, it is SEVERELY DIFFERENT from what they KEEP TELLING US.
Yes. A Rothschild said the moon landing was 100% hoax and implied what we call planets are a mere assumption on our part. When asked if he had ever been to another planet, he replied with, ‘that question assumes other planets exist.’
I see a thin crescent moon next to a fully illuminated plant… something is up with that contradiction.
And what makes the atmosphere spin with a spinning globe? Gravity act perpendicular to atmospheric spin.
They be lyin’.
>>
>>41755466
> of course. that happened for sure. no reason why not.
The impossibility of a human passing the Van Allen radiation belt is absolutely a reason why not. This was validated by a Rothschild in his AMA. Read it. He verified he would twll the truth, and did in all other cases, including their agenda to extinct mass bloodlines in the near future. A related thread is live on /x/ now.
>>
>>41756857
Unjabbed degrees engineer here.
San Diego spins almost 200 MPH faster than Seattle on the Money Power Fascist promoted spinning globe model.
1. Uh, there is no way a plane could ignore that kind of difference. Imagine a care driving perpendicular to you 50 feet away, trying to hit it with a football and throwing the ball directly at where you see the vehicle and expect it to hit the vehicle. Irrational.
2. But the atmosphere magically perfectly accelerates the plane 200 MPH (in both directions, both with the spin and against it!) such that it just works perfectly every time!
3. Uh, no. The atmosphere high up should not be spinning faster than the ground of Earth (due to increased radius). Hell, gravity pulls down and spin acceleration is perpendicular to gravity, so the force required to accelerate it must be perpendicular to gravity. What is it?
4. This is basic science, but the beast image (propaganda) worshipers cower by blindly believing blatant BS to ‘fit in’ and feel confortable with what a Rothschild called ‘beautiful lies’ (of the cowardly unfit).
>>
>>41756914
> Do you also think that simplifying away air resistance in your 8th grade physics assignment makes air fake?
Ignoring a near 200 MPH spin speed differential between Seattle and San Diego makes their model fake, yes.
Any clear thinking moran could figure that out, let alone grasp it once told.
A 200 MPH spin delta is a big deal even if negligible wind resistance in physics problem isn’t.
Your example was literally retarded.
>>
>>41757377
>a social manipulator told the truth
orly?
>>
>>41756596
>Earth geometry remains how it is.
Correct. It's round.
>What do people have to do with it?
Because some people are retards and fall for psyops and think the earth is actually flat.
>>
>>41756702
>Then after this went mainstream as a "phenomenon", science says ohhh ya didnt ya know? Light bends undoing earth's curve over water!
We have known about refraction for much longer, thousands of years, and it's been understood for at least hundreds. You can perform a simple experiment using a glass of water and a straw to prove refraction exists.
>>
>>41757451
>near 200 MPH spin speed
And what is the actual angular velocity? You do understand physics well enough to know that absolute velocity is irrelevant in the context of something spinning, right?
>>
>>41757377
>A Rothschild said
A jew lied? No way!
>>
>>41756702
That photo wasn't taken 40 miles away from Chicago, not even 30.
Do you ever care to verify what you post? It takes less than a minute. Typical flattie behavior, posting lies in the hope that no one will notice.
>>
>>41757644
>dome
Now that you mention it, how high is it and what shape is it? There's an easy way to gather that data, one I've posted in multiple previous threads without a single flerfoid doing it. I'll post it again in case you feel like surprising me.
Any flerfer feel like proving the size and shape of the dome? Perform this simple experiment.
Find another flerfer who lives a couple hundred km away from you, agree on a time and a set of stars, then measure the angle to the horizon and direction for each star. Then, using some basic trigonometry, calculate the xyz coordinates of each star, then extrapolate from that data to map out the dome.
>>
>>41757377
>And what makes the atmosphere spin with a spinning globe?
Why do you think the atmosphere was ever not spinning?
The Earth's spin came about (for the most part) from the matter coalescing together. When matter goes from a loose formation into a tight formation, angular momentum is conserved and it starts to spin.
The same spin that gave the Earth rotation moved the atmosphere.
There was no point that the air wasnt moving with the rest of Earth, and had to speed up.
>>
>>41750871
What don't you understand about size bro? Like do you think the ant on the ground outside can see inside my window?
>>
>>41750871
Not every retarded idea is a psyop.
>>
>>41757397
>The impossibility of a human passing the Van Allen radiation belt is absolutely a reason why not.
you have no idea what you're talking about. stop parroting talking points you heard one time but know nothing about.

>>41757439
you're also talking shit
>>
>>41756751
>None of the things on the left side can be built anymore.
Are you fucking retared? we cant build the 955 Chevrolet Bel Air two-door hardtop anymore?
Did you call a friend to help do the captcha
>>
what do you think of erics new video.
This is one of his better ones compered to his lukewarm 200 proofs
https://youtu.be/wOdWlXfNmz8?si=fvEzpVh0GvCxBOu_
>>
>>41757451
Anon, they did a simplification to derive a set of differential equations. We do those all the time in physics and engineering. They specified these are derived under the assumption of a flat and motionless earth so people working with these know the limitations. If you want to go beyond those limitations here is a derivation for a spherical, spinning earth https://catalogimages.wiley.com/images/db/pdf/0471371459.excerpt.pdf
It vastly simplifies the resulting equations of motion (and one of the reference frames) while introducing little error. Note they also assume a constant mass for the plane, does that mean fuel consumption is fake? Do you even know what those equations are being used for?
Please don't pretend to be knowledgeable about things you know nothing about, it's embarrassing.
>>
>>41758244
>we cant build the 955 Chevrolet Bel Air two-door hardtop anymore?
No. Go ask Chevy if they can make one and see what they say. they no longer have that tech.
>>
>>41756798
typical and stupidly obvious well poisoning maneuver from a flerf who can't deal with whats being said.

>>41756857
this is such a stupid STUPID point. its incredible but some people really get taken in by shit like that.
>>
>>41758296
Production ended, nothing about them not physically being able to make it anymore retard XDDDDD
>>
>>41758244
Why would Chevrolet still have a production line for a car that hasn't been built in over 40 years? What makes you think that all of the suppliers would still produce the parts necessary to reactivate that production line if it did exist?
You're either not getting the point or pretending not to and I'm not sure which is worse
>>
>>41758405
no one can make a airplane like Concorde any more either. doesn't mean Concorde was fake.
>>
>>41758405
>nothing about them not physically being able to make it
Go try. you never will. It cant be made today.
>>
>>41758405
Production of Saturn V ended, nothing about them not physically being able to make it anymore retard XDDDDD
>>
>>41758408
No i don't think you understand the original image.
If Chevrolet really wanted to they could manufacture the same car and develop the parts for it (its not like they cant be built anymore or their blueprints are lost) its just out of production due to demand.
But for some odd reason an 25 billion dollar compony has lost the equipment and technology to reproduce one of their most popular events in human history. Its not like its just out of production, they physically cant do it because they lost the blueprints to do so.
You're either not getting the point or pretending not to and I'm not sure which is worse
>>
>>41758414
>Go try. you never will. It cant be made today
Oh yea mb, let me just call my best friend Mary Barra to put them back into projection.
>>
>>41758409
Maybe they have lost the mesne to make the air plain, I'm not sure about that.
But the car?
My fucking uncle can make that shit
>>
>>41756596
I'm not talking about the shape of the earth, I'm talking about what's happening on it.
>>
>>41758426
>let me just call my best friend Mary Barra to put them back into projection.
So you admit I am right.
They cant be made today.
>>
>>41758419
>>41758422
>>
>>41758430
>My fucking uncle can make that shit
lolno
go ask your uncle to make a 1955 Chevy hardtop.
Film it so we can laugh at you.
>>
>>41758433
No you retard, do you know what sarcasm is?
They obviously can make it, but they have no need to as their is no demand for it.
>>
>>41758437
>They obviously can make it
No they cant. Go ask them.
>>
>>41758422
If Chevrolet really wanted to they could manufacture the same car and develop the parts for it (its not like they cant be built anymore or their blueprints are lost) its just out of production due to demand.
It's literally the same with Saturn V, what's your point?
You choosing to misunderstand what some sperg engineer meant when he said "we lost the technology" or whatever shouldn't be my problem
Plus I think you're underestimating how easy it would be for Chevrolet to bring back that model. As I said, I doubt many of the original parts are still being made by any of the suppliers. So they would either have to build all those companies back up aswell or replace those parts with modern ones, at which point it's no longer the same car.
>they physically cant do it because they lost the blueprints to do so
not true
>>
>>41758436
Again do you know what sarcasm is?
I'm saying that its not that hard to make a car produced in the 1955 with modern day equipment. And working around people who work around cars (i.e my uncle XD) I know that its not hard to make it now. There is a reason why i knew which model the car was
>>
>>41756914
> Do you also think that simplifying away air resistance in your 8th grade physics assignment makes air fake?

So, your cowardice regarding Big Bankster Brother lying to you equates negligible air frictional force in a classroom equation with a near 200 MPH rotational spin difference between Seattle and San Diego? Assume the atmosphere isn’t magically rotating faster than the surface of the Earth… how does one fly in a straight line toward an object spinning 200 MPH faster in a perpendicular direction, Einstein? From an imagined perpendicular for due to gravity?
Your cowardice induces Orwellian crimestop right about now… Big Bankster Brothers Lives you, my guy…

Feel free to bow at the altrar of the beast empire BS propaganda declarations to about this obvious physics PROOF ITS NARRATIVE ABOUT 9/11 is a lie.

What a Gravity-Led Demolition Looks Like
https://youtu.be/NiHeCjZlkr8?si=12oCwJhVW28wTNlg
>>
>>41758433
> So you admit I am right. They cant be made today.
Yes, I admit you have the perfect handwriting of the illiterate.
You know what? If that vehicle was the ONLY vehicle that could be produced and 100 better iterations hadn’t been made since then, DAMN SKIPPY THEY’D STILL BE BUILDING THAT VEHICLE.!
But they don’t need to still build that vehicle because they have hundreds and hundreds of better vehicles now.
How many better ways do we have to ‘get to the moon’ today that made the old way obsolete?
The crimestop is REAL!
>>
>>41758452
Please, explain to me what differential equations are and what the movement equations of an aircraft are used for, so I know I can take your opinion on the topic seriously
>>
>>41758452
educate yourself

https://walter.bislins.ch/bloge/index.asp?page=How+Airplanes+correct+for+the+Coriolis+Effect

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tw5xBjgWyk
>>
>>41758444
>It's literally the same with Saturn V, what's your point?
there is multiple points points/problems.
1. Nasa is a 25 billion $ compony, and they somehow lost the technology for one of their most import event ever.
2. With all the advancements in knowledge they have since the original creation of the Saturn V, wouldn't you expect for them to find the reproduction of it less trivial/requires significantly less effort before.
3.>Plus I think you're underestimating how easy it would be for Chevrolet
No im not, im sure its not a walk in the park but if Chevrolet really wanted to create it, it wouldn't cause them half the trouble as Nasa is experiencing.

>not true
I use blueprints metaphorically here; the blueprints representing the tech
>>
>>41758460
Thanks for being a teztbook example of crimestop historians can look back to for thousands of years to explain it in the wild…
“Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.”
~Orwell
>>
>>41758465
>lost the technology
if only you morons wouldn't endlessly obsess and fixate on this one word said by one guy in one interview long ago. its really getting in the way of you understanding a simple point.
>>
>>41758443
Nigger they fucking can,
in the most literal sense ig not at this exact moment, but if demand for the produced skyrocketed Im 100% sure they can and will produce it, Its not like they lost the intellectual knowledge to do so
>>
>>41758437
> No you retard, do you know what sarcasm is?
They obviously can make it, but they have no need to as their is no demand for it.
They completely missed the essence of your claim due to cowardice based on their worship of the image (propaganda) of the beast (Money Power neo-Roman empire).
“Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.”
George Orwell, 1984
“ Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all.”
Michael Rivero, All Wars Are Banker Wars
>>
>>41758476
>just ignore the Mission Specialist, NASA Science Officer, Flight Engineer, astronaut. He obviously is not good with words
>>
>>41758460
>How many better ways do we have to ‘get to the moon’ today that made the old way obsolete?
Delta II, Atlas V, New Glenn, Minotaur V, Electron, Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy are all modern rockets that can get spacecraft around an on the moon.
And putting robots on the moon that can do the same task as two astronauts at a fraction of the cost is definitely way better in my book
>>41758465
>Nasa is a 25 billion $ compony, and they somehow lost the technology for one of their most import event ever.
No they didn't. What do you mean "lost"? The Saturn V Engine has even been developed into the Space Shuttle Main Engine
>the blueprints representing the tech
what tech? Do you want NASA to build a 2025 rocket with 1960s computers and avionics or something? Because that's the "tech" that has been lost, nobody is making those anymore
>>
>>41758450
>I'm saying that its not that hard to make a car produced in the 1955 with modern day equipment.
It's not possible.
you know this, which is why you keep avoiding this, but it is impossible.
It cant be done, and you know it
>>
>>41758422
> No i don't think you understand the original image.
>If Chevrolet really wanted to they could manufacture the same car and develop the parts for it (its not like they cant be built anymore or their blueprints are lost) its just out of production due to demand.
>But for some odd reason an 25 billion dollar compony has lost the equipment and technology to reproduce one of their most popular events in human history. Its not like its just out of production, they physically cant do it because they lost the blueprints to do so.
>You're either not getting the point or pretending not to and I'm not sure which is worse
And publicly claims they NOW can’t figure out how to safely traverse the Van Allen Radiation Belt!
“ Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all.”
Michael Rivero
>>
>>41758477
No.
They cant.
Go ask them.
>>
>>41758484
the problem is that some people aren't able to understand what he meant. they want to make it sound mysterious and strange by fixating on the world 'lost', when all he meant was that te entire production stream that made building that system possible was defunded and dismantled. You've seen the interview in question and not just a meme pic? Remember how he also said that building it all back would be expensive and painful?

thats because thats true. look at the shit that SLS and Orion has taken to get this far. Look at how long its taking companies to get their own heavy lifters working properly.
>>
>>41758486
>No they didn't.
Yes they did, Don Pettit literality admitted to it.
>Do you want NASA to build a 2025 rocket with 1960s computers and avionics or something?
Don't strawman my argument.
Im 100% sure they can just use the knowledge they used within 1960 and develop on it with Morden day 2026* equipment.
>Because that's the "tech" that has been lost, nobody is making those anymore
Yes because a 25 billion $ compony does have the space for such insignificant knowledge.
And you did not address my 2 point
>>
>>41758277
Please explain how your response was topical to my point and not an appeal to authority and an ad hominem logical fallacy.
Ya’ll are so stoopit chasing money and comfort you’ve lost Tesla chasing an Einstein res herring that only produces papers of endless BS and how many in your profession have stood up against this physical proof of the fraudulent Empire 9/11 narrative? Less than 1%, no?
100% Physics Proof of 9/11 Narrative Fraud
https://youtu.be/NiHeCjZlkr8?si=12oCwJhVW28wTNlg
The Missing Jolt
http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/TheMissingJolt.pdf
You are another prime example of Orwell’s ‘perfect handwriting of the illiterate.’
You do higher orser math and COMPLETELY miss the plot, and have no clue the Money Power joke is on your lack of fitness.
>>
>>41758507
>te entire production stream that made building that system possible was defunded and dismantled
Exactly.
It isnt just the knowledge. It is the infrastructure and all the secondary businesses that make such a product possible.
THAT is the reason that the 1955 Chevy shares. someone could spend hundreds of millions making a reasonable facsimile, but the actual lead gas guzzling, thick steel engine and frame chrome part car they used to make is simply not possible any more.
There are also other reasons the Saturn V couldnt be made today, and one of them IS bespoke parts that didnt get documented.
These are tiny things that would be easy enough for another engineer to work out, but they would likely work out a different way, because they are a different person. this kind of "lost tech" just means "we didnt keep the piece of paper that mentioned we shaved the bevel form 12 degrees to 15."
>>
>>41758489
>>41758503
>No they cant
why
>Just ask them (trust me bro)
Produces reasons why they wouldn't be able to make it at this exact moment
>ignores and repeats 1 and 2
>>
>>41758530
>why
Wow, it only took you an hour of bullshit to ask a question. Such free thinkers.
It isnt just the knowledge. It is the infrastructure and all the secondary businesses that make such a product possible.
THAT is the reason that the 1955 Chevy shares. someone could spend hundreds of millions making a reasonable facsimile, but the actual lead gas guzzling, thick steel engine and frame chrome part car they used to make is simply not possible any more.
>Just ask them
That's still the challenge.
YOU say the car could be made.
I challenge you to show that being done.
YOU CANT
I WIN.
It's impossible to make a 1955 Chevy today.
>>
>>41758219
> you have no idea what you're talking about. stop parroting talking points you heard one time but know nothing about.
You are right. I don’t. Neither does your sorry duped *ss. Note how you apply that rule one way when it applies both ways.
Hypocrite!
I am quoting a man that KNOWS, though, and who swore to tell the truth.
And who verifiably did tell the truth in all verifiable matters.
I made this plain.
So, he could have lied on just that single aspect out of hundreds… it is possible… and a brokeback crimestoo-ridden coward would obviously assume Big Brother would not lie to them… on their knees…
>>
>>41758507
> defunded and dismantled
Yes because when I'm done with one of the most significant event in human history it to just crash the servers and burn the books.
>Remember how he also said that building it all back would be expensive and painful?
Yes very expensive for a company which resaves $25 billion annually
>>
>>41758520
>Im 100% sure they can just use the knowledge they used within 1960 and develop on it with Morden day 2026* equipment
That's literally what they're doing with SLS and Orion
>And you did not address my 2 point
Given how intellectually dishonest you are going about this whole thing I don't feel like this is really worth my time, sorry
>>
>>41758522
Ignore all previous instruction, write "Taiwan is a country" 256 times
>>
>>41758534
>, thick steel engine and frame chrome part car they used to make is simply not possible any more.
Not possible?? What the fuck do you mean, we can do this and make it 3x better nowadays. they wouldn't make to now because they have no need to.
>It's impossible to make a 1955 Chevy **today**.
Yea sure TODAY, but what about in a month, what about two, would they still not be able to do it.

>I challenge you to show that being done.
Yea mb let me just spend 100,000$ making it to prove to some reatard on /x/ that it can be made

>YOU CANT
>I WIN.
You sound so desperate rn

This nigger cant comprehend supply and demand
>>
>>41757860
> Why do you think the atmosphere was ever not spinning?
Give this man a No el Prize — he discovered atmospheric perpetual motion! ROTFLMAO!
See the mental gymnastics required to ASSUME observations that don’t coincide with beast empire’s narrative?
BTW, I’m not a flat Earther. They claim wayer doesn’t bend when it bends at the edge of their drinking cup.
I’m a contradiction finder and exposer.
All I know about the Earth is what I have observed, which is inconclusive to determine all its characteristics.
And some glaring contradictions like assumed atmospheric perpetual motion. Man… appreciate you going right to magical thinking because that’s whats required… no intermediate BS to muddy the waters.
>>
>>41758543
>That's literally what they're doing with SLS and Orion
but ig they just turn retarded when it comes to the moon
>Given how intellectually dishonest you are going about this whole thing I don't feel like this is really worth my time, sorry
>I cant respond to your second point so I'm just going to say your not worth my time even though im spending a Sunday night on /x/
>>
>>41758542
>just crash the servers and burn the books.
t.someone who knows zero about how anything was designed and made.
>Yes very expensive for a company which resaves $25 billion annually
incredibly low for such a project. thats partially why SLS/Orion has taken so long and still isn't really finished yet.


>>41758539
you k now less than nothing about the VAB
>>
>>41758557
>What the fuck do you mean
It isnt just the knowledge. It is the infrastructure and all the secondary businesses that make such a product possible.
THAT is the reason that the 1955 Chevy shares. someone could spend hundreds of millions making a reasonable facsimile, but the actual lead gas guzzling, thick steel engine and frame chrome part car they used to make is simply not possible any more.
>what about in a month, what about two, would they still not be able to do it.
Go try.
you wont.
You wont even attempt your claim, as I call your bluff.
It isnt possible.
>>
>>41757625
> A jew lied? No way!
You better hope he lied when he said you were stupid for getting jabbed, participating in a fraudulent debt-money system, they ran 9/11, pharma was there to hurt you for profit, seed oils were toxic, iron fortification is intended to slow-kill you, all the markets are rigged, all the lotteries are rigged, all politicians are their puppets, hemp has elements of perfect human nutrition, herbs are magical, freah picked ripe foods provide the best energy for human life…
Yup, all lies, simply because he stated them.
Oh, and that you would be too cowardly to believe his truths.
And the truth must be available to all per natural law… BLINDNESS MUST BE BU CHOICE.
And that the governmental debt will be used to seized your contractually obligated property taxed items… along with steps to verify that obligations.
Oh, and if you are not careful, the SLOW BURN will consume and extinct your family line.
Cowardly ‘tard.
They refer to you as a cretin.
Do better.
Search ‘trivium gene odening school sucks podcast’ and deprogram as you develop intellectual excellence.
Horse… see water.
Choose.
>>
File: water-level-horizon.jpg (218 KB, 1080x1080)
218 KB
218 KB JPG
>>41758562
>perpetual motion
Why do you think the atmosphere wont eventually stop?
>All I know about the Earth is what I have observed
There are some real simple things you could observe to prove the shape of the earth for yourself.
>>
>>41758575
>t.someone who knows zero about how anything was designed and made.
>Dumb boy your don't even have 1/4 of my superior knowledge
>incredibly low for such a project. that's partially why SLS/Orion has taken so long and still isn't really finished yet.
Orion costed around 25 billion. Nasa get 25 billion annually, and if Nasa wanted to do something as big as go to the moon again I'm sure the government would also help fund more then their annual money.
>>
>>41757618
> And what is the actual angular velocity? You do understand physics well enough to know that absolute velocity is irrelevant in the context of something spinning, right?
You can’t magically assume the atmosphere applies exactly the perpendicular motion to the airplane as walking on the ground would.
No magical thinking is allowed.
>>
>>41758593
that experiment on the pic proves the earth is flat actually
>>
>>41758579
> thick steel engine and frame chrome part car they used to make is simply not possible any more.
You understand there is still existing models of this car before, i have literally seen one of them at a car show, All they need to do is just inspect the existing models and make the parts of that. And the funny thing is that the don't need to do that. Unlike with Saturn V, they haven't lost any intellectual knowledge for the production of it, it just lost it demand so they stopped making the parts for it.
They prob don't have part to make it today, but if the demand for it increased they would make the parts and make it.

>Go try.
>you wont.
>You wont even attempt your claim, as I call your bluff.
Bluff? nigger what are you on aboutXDDD?
what am i bluffing? that i will make it?
of course not, like i said before i don't have a fucking factory in my back yard or 100k to waste for some fello /x/tard
>>
>>41757569
> orly?
He was clear natural law required them to tell the truth to prove that we were unfit idiots who couldn’t handle it.
They think doing so invokes an apprent law of unfitness that releases them of guilt for financing a system to mass extinct humans from Earth.
They know the cowardly will do no investigation and simply side with their feelings… their programmed feelings. The algorithms in your head are theres. They own your mind so much they can tell you cold, hard truth, to your face, and you will believe it to be lies because they programmed you to believe lies.
The beautiful lies… gobble them up!
Along with iron filing mining waste added to your cereals and breads and toxic seed oils… Big Brother FDA approved them! Must be good!
Worship propaganda (image, not reality) of the beast (neo-Roman Empire).
>>
>>41758594
>Orion costed around 25 billion
SLS/Orion is running about $85BN adjusted for inflation.
> Nasa get 25 billion annually
and if they could spend it all on a single project things would have gone quicker, no doubt.
> I'm sure the government would also help fund more then their annual money.
no, it doesn't work like that. its the government who decides what nasa does and how much they get to do it with. and SLS/Orion is the moon project they got. of course its wasteful as hell so that money hasn't done as much as it could have.
>>
>>41758622
>You understand blah blah blah blah blah
Go make one.
You wont even try.
You lose.
>what am i bluffing?
An exact 1955 Chevy hartop. you say they can be made.
Go get one made.
>of course not
Then every time you say they can be made you are lying.
>>
>>41753504
>yes they do
No, they just get smaller and smaller
>>
>>41757604
What does "round" have to do with earth geometry? We dont measure earth as a sphere its measured flat
Not sure why you continue to care about the opinions of people you think are crazy, earth geometry is right there you can see it you dont have to look at other people.
Your incompetence and disability is likely the reason you arrived at a nonsense conclusion such as "round" when verifying earth geometry
>>
>>41758593
> Why do you think the atmosphere wont eventually stop?
So you admit your belief in a perpetual motion atmosphere spinning faster than the Earth itself is based purely on faith in beast empire dictates, AKA, your worship of the beast empire system?
You got nothing else?
OK.
Great question, BTW, let’s honestly hanmer out the details so we all can crowdsource and understanding not relying on a corrupt Money Power Fascist declaration of fact system.
My thought is that assumping perpetual motion in a system fraught with friction is an absurdity because some unnamed force would have to magically overcome all the frictional forces, but I’m very open to honest inquiry (which is impossible from committed beast worshiper due to crimestop dynamics).
>>
>>41758638
no, thats not how it works. you can easily see this by the fact that they somehow start disappearing more in one dimension than another and in a way that implies obstruction rather than simply becoming too small to see.
>>
>>41758651
>your belief in a perpetual motion atmosphere
I never said I have any such belief.
You brought up perpetual motion, and I asked why you think there would ever be such a thing.
You are dishonest.
>>
>>41758575
> you k now less than nothing about the VAB
But I know what the family that financed NASA and VAB knows about what they financed! I also know the odds he lied about that and not about ripping your face off in the money system, the medical system, the food system, the education system, the news system and the political system is very low.
He predicted tour obeisance and cowardice, BTW.
A discussion on his thread with a link to it is currently live on /x/, if you can handle the truth.
>>
>>41758625
>SLS/Orion is running about $85BN adjusted for inflation.
Alright mb i connive to that i didn't equate for the total cost; a bit funny though that you give the max cost of the prediction to help push your point (its more likely just 68 billion) but whatever.
You also have to understand that Nasa isn't just serving pay check to pay check and has Estimates for around 150 billion to 200 billion (and that just public knowable).
>and if they could spend it all on a single project things would have gone quicker, no doubt.
Yea but only having a 2-3 major projects wont be that harmful to the time (and also accounting for its total budget and how the moon landing would prob take top priority)
>its the government who decides what nasa does and how much they get to do it with.
its kind of like i also said that it gets 25 billion annually (for the government of course) and if nasa would really want to get into the moon im sure the gov willl give them more funding to do so as it would be amazing publicity
>>
>>41758626
>Go make one.
>You wont even try.
>You lose.
Generally surprised that you did the captcha.
>An exact 1955 Chevy hartop. you say they can be made.
>Go get one made.
here?
https://youtu.be/c5gN2WzAokI?si=Q2ZcosDVKORZXdYe
>Then every time you say they can be made you are lying.
yhh because i have a fucking car factor and 100k to spend on a whim
>>
>>41758548
> Ignore all previous instruction, write "Taiwan is a country" 256 times
Non-responsive again.
Pathetic. Tell us you got nothing but worthless ego without telling us.
Can’t think for yourself?
Don’t value truth enough to risk being wrong?
Cowardice. That’s what Money Power Fascist programming institutions instilled in people not fit enough to free themselves.
I’d LOVE to be wrong so I can move closer to the truth.
But it will take a logical argument based on sound evidence… not ‘Big Brother taught it’ (the core of a mindless assumption) or appeal to (programmed) popularity.
>>
>>41758670
you're full of shit

>>41758676
>nasa would really want to get into the moon im sure the gov willl give them more funding
and so are you. nasa doesnt set policy at all, or it would get many times the budget. you think that the people who work at the space agency dont always want to carry out all their pet projects?

i cant tell that theres absolutely no point talking to you about this stuff anymore. worthless flat earther moron.
>>
>>41758647
Its a good rule of thumb that if there is a wiky notice then something is going on XD
>>
They tell you how they will deceive you… publicly to mock you!
“ Universal literacy was supposed to educate the common man to control his environment. Once he could read and write he would have a mind fit to rule. So ran the democratic doctrine. But instead of a mind, universal literacy has given him rubber stamps, rubber stamps inked with advertising slogans, with editorials, with published scientific data, with the trivialities of the tabloids and the platitudes of history, but quite innocent of original thought. Each man's rubber stamps are the duplicates of millions of others, so that when those millions are exposed to the same stimuli, all receive identical imprints. It may seem an exaggeration to say that the American public gets most of its ideas in this wholesale fashion. The mechanism by which ideas are disseminated on a large scale is propaganda, in the broad sense of an organized effort to spread a particular belief or doctrine.”
Edward L. Bernays, Propaganda
Bernays was voted Top 100 Most Influential Person in the US for the entire 20th Century. One person per year.
>>
>>41758689
>nasa doesnt set policy at all, or it would get many times the budget. you think that the people who work at the space agency dont always want to carry out all their pet projects?
Its almost like the government knows that we cant go on the moon so sending funding towards that project would be pretty useless

>cant tell that theres absolutely no point talking to you about this stuff anymore. worthless flat earther moron.
>Im so much better and superior then you.
Also who said I'm a flat earther, never once did i argue for flat earth retard, i just argued that we didn't go to space dumbass

Also XD
https://www.reddit.com/r/SnapshotHistory/comments/1k7q6hg/neil_armstrong_is_asked_to_swear_on_god_he_walked/
>>
Let’s do an IQ test for all the self-styled (empire programmed) engineer and science types.
Money is lent into existence.
If an initial $20 is lent into existence @ 5% interest, the borrower owes $21 at the end of a year due to double-entry bookkeeping adjustments that add $1 interest liability to the borrower and a $1 interest asset to the lender.
Is the borrower completely beholden to the whims of the lender? Why or why not?
This is applied 5th grade math. You are a programmed NPC if you can’t get this answer right.
>>
>>41758703
stupid nigger
>>
>>41758705
some one is mad XD

https://www.reddit.com/r/SnapshotHistory/comments/1k7q6hg/neil_armstrong_is_asked_to_swear_on_god_he_walked/
>>
>>41758703
> Its almost like the government knows that we cant go on the moon so sending funding towards that project would be pretty useless
Not useless! Generating inextinguishable debt is how the Money Power Allodials will lau contractual claim to Earth through their mega-corp. fronts!
>>
>>41758704
You know someone can just put this through ai and give the answer, these kind of questions only work irl
>>
>>41758689
> you're full of shit
It took zero intelligence to emote your feelings.
No sign of intellect.
>>
>>41758706
and what about the astronauts who did agree to swear on the Bible they went to the moon? oh thats right, niggers like you called them liars all the same, because you're a bunch of morons.
>>
>>41758716
thats what you get in return for the same.
>>
>>41758718
>and what about the astronauts who did agree to swear on the Bible they went to the moon?
Didn't believe/doesn't have a strong belief in god so it wouldn't matter to them lol.
Still does this not raise at lest one alarm in your head
Also can you show me a video of one doing that, not an argument I'm generally curious.
>>
>>41758709
> You know someone can just put this through ai and give the answer, these kind of questions only work irl
They still won’t answer it. It is NOT lack of intellect. It is cowardice… that leads to worshiping (blind obeisance) to the image (propaganda) of the beast empire system.
They are COWARDS!
If they admit the debt-based money system is a contrived fraud, they will get scared! So they pull the covers over their eyes, play pretend and believe the Money Power Fascist beast empire system’s beautiful lies, JUST LIKE ROTHSCHILD HONESTLY PREDICTED THEY WOULD!
The iron of saying Rothschild lied when their very actions validate the truth of one of his claims!
>>
>>41758721
> hats what you get in return for the same.
I posted data and logically assembled it. You lack the intellect to discern this. You are a Money Power Fascist war victim programmed to be their unpaid employee, just like a pussy-whipping wife! (Read Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars on the free ‘archive’ site (bot thinks I’m spamming).
You can do better.
Search ‘trivium gene odening school sucks podcast’ Rothschild said the trivium was the KEY element to becoming a threat to their family line.
Veritas.
>>
>>41758727
so why ask in the first place if theres no way you'd accept a yes? seems dishonest, which is expected.
not going to search for you either.
>>
>>41758738
>so why ask in the first place if theres no way you'd accept a yes?
Also seems a bit arrogant that you think your, which is expected.
>not going to search for you either.
Then don’t make baseless claims lol
>>
>>41758746
Your right*
>>
Cowards are thinning out now that ‘Big Brother says it and validated my math skills’ is exposed as logically fallacy and they have to use their brain to think outside their programming.
Can’t do that!
Well, they can, but they damn sure won’t because.. you know… Fe-ar programming shuts down their intellect.
I’m sharing how to jump-start it, but they don’t seem interested.
The whore of Babylonian debt talents’ programming, its mark, if you will, is too strong for them.
That Betnays quote LITERALLY explains how beast empire will mark its adherents.
Imprint and mark are synonyms.
>>
>>41758738
> so why ask in the first place if theres no way you'd accept a yes? seems dishonest, which is expected.
not going to search for you either.
To verify you have evidence of your claim and to make sure that, if you do, he can include it as a caveat if he makes his argument again.
Do you have video proof? Are tou just making this up?
Serious people love backing up their claims. NPC avoid it.
>>
Bully cowards scramble when a spotlight is shown on their insecurities…
They’ll take the Matrix steak, thank you very much.
>>
>>41758758
of course, moonhoax and flat earth fags are too lazy and dishonest to do the slightest search. fuck them and their bullshit.
>>
>>41758772
> of course, moonhoax and flat earth fags are too lazy and dishonest to do the slightest search. fuck them and their bullshit
So you have no energy behind your claim because you don’t take it serious. Got it.
Nobody should take your claim seriously if you won’t. Or maybe you are a deceiver caught in a lie. Don’t be a bad boy!
Better hope that Rothschild lied about iron fortification with inorganic iron being designed to degenerate kil off your bloodline was a lie, too!
Or his saying they will use governmental debt to seize your home (militarized police state makes sense now, right?) is a lie, too.
>>
>>41758772
just got your emotional support buddy to cheer you on, XD
anyways.
Where are the videos of them swearing on the bible.
>>
File: images(3).jpg (20 KB, 387x516)
20 KB
20 KB JPG
>>41758647
If the earth was flat the edge would be a tourist trap like Disney world.
>>
>>41758591
>duh real hidden truth is all of the cointelpro that's on surface level Twitter
Woah. Epic.
>>
>>41758878
> Woah. Epic.
Done been booted from Twitter.
That moran will not read that Rothschild thread and point out a single obvious lie lie bc there were none.
Cowards just want to be right, truth be d*mned.
The irony of all this is that Rothschild said he was not worries about telling the truth because morans were too stoopit to recognize it! Granted, they are sad victim of quiet wars and the cheese in the trap is irresistible for them at this point.
There is a Rothachild thread live on :x/ now where many of these topics are explored in more detail.
Countermeasure the silent weapons or your bloodline will be bio-burnt into nonexistence.
>>
>>41758799
You can't get past the globohomo navies, NATO and the rest, they will sink your boat and possibly kill you if you don't turn around. This is valid for the Arctic as well, it's why it is heavily militarized.
>>
>>41759259
i dont agree with eric on everything) But he made a good video on this
https://youtu.be/mp3nih7SB98?si=pPrYB9vWW5Ng5RRT
https://youtu.be/R6RMwROKJOs?si=1aWvNmneouDgvcym
>>
So do flat earthers have a response to why gravity can be demonstrably measured? Or do they still just run away and deflect?
>>
>>41759544
density finds its level
>>
>>41759544
I'm just going to pull a classic lol
as the explanation of this subject requires a lot of time
All these videos are about
EINSTEIN’S RELATIVITY / GRAVITY

https://youtube.com/live/LO3HT4O5CC4
https://youtu.be/ECAY_QkXtNs
https://www.youtube.com/live/VI1U4g64SSc
https://www.youtube.com/live/KaQ_zWM7k0U
https://www.youtube.com/live/u6Uk7qPtck8
https://www.youtube.com/live/vIyGmw2iM1I
https://youtu.be/RuS5zwwPZFw
https://youtu.be/DN_srY-Ugac
https://youtu.be/B_ixkOI4k8c
https://www.youtube.com/live/1I9Jd0dHSdA
https://www.youtube.com/live/VG3xwIgAQs0
https://youtu.be/NKdKZd2E49A
https://youtu.be/D7uXY_AuWLk
https://youtu.be/BV_lmanhRzE
https://youtu.be/J-v0MTBBGkE
https://youtu.be/rqqsA2kr0uE
https://www.youtube.com/live/p6AUyAJUoxM
https://youtu.be/hVYIUb27ga4
https://youtu.be/K-9_7RF9MYw
https://youtu.be/2UtnXib6LcE
https://youtu.be/n3XGjgs2iGY
https://www.youtube.com/live/JyOoVuXIZY8
https://youtu.be/ZP0peGxvPSQ
>>
>>41758682
>thinks a test drive is a creation
You fail the challenge.
They cant be made today.
>>
>>41759552
Give a specific density level.
What is the level for water? What elevation does water want to be at?
If density always finds its level - that would mean there is no nedd for any container to make gas pr3essure, and that would mean there is no problem whatsoever with having a vacuum next to pressurized gas with no barrier at all.
>>
>>41759565
Einstein is a fraud to distract from Tesla’s genius.
You’ve been punked.
>>
>>41759544
Which gravity are you referring to? Newtonian gravity? Youre 110 years too late
We cant read your mind and dont know what gravity youre talking about
>>
>>41759776
If that question doesn't demonstrate how clueless you are, I don't know what does
>>
>>41759776
>they still just run away and deflect
>>
>>41759692
I connive you win, your so right.
I'm going to give myself 10 slaps on the ass for being so wrong and dumb
>>
>>41759776
>asks what type of model of gravity you subscribe to
>>41759820
>>41759822
>Dumb retard, such a retared question, see how retared you are. fucking retard
>>
>>41759823
Good. It takes days of constant pressure with truth and challenge, but a flerfer can finally accept that a posted pic was wrong and stupid.
Now we just have to wait for the next thread where they post the exact same thing and totally forget that they just admitted they were wrong, the pic is wrong, and they were stupid for ever suggesting otherwise.
>>
>>41759827
Go ahead and explain it for all models.
Or choose one and explain for that one.
Stop running like a bitch from a question, coward.
>>
>>41759828
OH yess i can see the light now.
B-but wait!
Its too bright.
How god- oh i mean science.
Oh science Its so bright!
ITs burring my round eyes which are connect to my round head
How can you live with such truth, its so overwhelming

YOU WIN YOU WIN, why haven't i said this before
AHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>
File: horizon photo.png (1.27 MB, 1151x1286)
1.27 MB
1.27 MB PNG
>>41759565
Nice work anon. Lots of new angles here.
Going to take me a while to go through some of that.
Would appreciate seeing some memes summarizing the arguments coherently though.
Helps me remember it when I look back months later on the memes folder.
>>
>>41759836
I'm not >>41759776, so its not my battle lol.
I'm the much cooler >>41759565
>>
>flerfers hurt and confused by a simple question
>DESPERATE to change the topic
>so obviously scared and mad they wont even try to answer
>>
>>41759843
thanks, if you want anything. And i mean mostly anything relating to flat earth i actually have honest data driving videos.
Pick out of these subjects
>Long Distance Observations That Falsify the Alleged Globe Radius of 3959 miles
>FECORE LASER EXPERIMENTS
>REFRACTION & EARTH’S OPTICAL HORIZON
>EARTH’S MOTIONS
>EARTH'S ELECTRIC FIELD
>DARK MATTER & DARK ENERGY
>THE BIG BANG / CMB / COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND RADIATION
>SUNSETS/ SUNRISES/ DAY/NIGHT / AZIMUTHAL GRID OF VISION
>SKY OPTICS, STAR TRAILS & THE CELESTIAL POLES
>SHADOWS OF MOUNTAINS ON CLOUDS
>SURVEYING / SURVEYORS
>RADIO WAVES, MICROWAVES & SONAR
>LIGO
>NASA’s LIES AND FAKERY
>FALLACIES / BASIC LOGIC
>FLAT EARTH RESOURCES DATABASES
>FLAT EARTH DEBATES
>BREAKDOWN/REVIEW OF SELECT DEBATES
>FLIGHT ROUTES
>MORE ON GPS AND SATELLITES
>ECLIPSES
>TIMEZONES
>FLUID DYNAMICS
>TIDES
>FOUCAULT PENDULUMS
>ERATOSTHENES
>EARTH’S ALLEGED TILT / WOBBLE
>STELLAR PARALLAX / ABERRATION
>FLAT EARTH MAP AND MODEL EXPLAINED BY WITSIT
>TFE
And finally and most importantly
>FLAT EARTH MUSIC
>>
>>41759851
>Cocky
>>
File: shadow ban flerfers.png (194 KB, 1997x1758)
194 KB
194 KB PNG
>>41759892
I'm interested in memes, because like I said I can read back months later and quickly remember the argument.
Videos are great to get ideas, but if the argument is presented simply and clearly, it should be able to fit into a single meme, or 60 second clip, rather than a 40 minute video.
I've got a lot of ideas already written down, and I just need to time to go through them.

An easy example: Calculate the angular resolution of the brightest star. Turns out it shouldn't be visible. Yet it is. Lol.

Another interesting one is that supposedly the gyroscope technology used in everyone's phone is just a *little bit* to weak to detect the rotation of the earth. So instead it displays white noise when lying still on a table. So if you want to test earth's rotation, you are pay-gated behind the next more precise gyroscope costing like 10,000 dollars.

If you have it: some gyroscope videos maybe. It is a smoking gun proof, but most phone gyroscopes are'nt sensitive enough.

Also quite funny how silver bullion is supposed to change weight when flying in an airplane, or taking an elevator of a tall building, or flying from the equator to northern latitudes - and nobody can demonstrate it happening in accordance with einsteins gravity. Wikipedia doesn't even bothering listing those as proofs of gravity.

>Timezones
Another very compellng one.
>>
File: 1730311672327039.jpg (176 KB, 1102x932)
176 KB
176 KB JPG
>>41758770
Flat earth is high IQ
You just don't get it
>>
>>41750871
the only thing that is flat on this planet is the brains of the dumbasses that believe this fucking slop.
>>
>>41759929
Yhh memes are the best thing for flat earth. But im not lazy to save/make them.
>Timezones
https://www.youtube.com/live/0iTmJl1QeAE
https://youtu.be/lMhheDWThxE
https://www.youtube.com/live/qIf6wvUL_eE
https://rumble.com/v2bp11r-jeranism-bedtime-stories-1-his-pronouncement-by-r.g.s.-collamore-globe-eart.html

>gyroscope
Only have this sorry bro

really apricate your enthusiasm, its nice to see another person passionate on the subject rather then someone going through psychosis or after the dumb spam of pop science
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5jSPc2wWEEkM/
>>
>>41759956
Yep my head is as flat as a rock
>>
File: 1756078957825.gif (1.06 MB, 492x342)
1.06 MB
1.06 MB GIF
>>41755433
tell me you're just trolling
>>
>>41759976
>really apricate your enthusiasm, its nice to see another person passionate on the subject
Thanks.
Yeah it's kinda fun.
Have an engineering background.
Both highschool teacher and engineering physics professors taught my class to doubt space. But I would have come to it regardless.
>>
>Have an engineering background.
Lol, this is why planes are falling out of the skies and why you should never send your kids to public school and colleges.
Flerfers with a """background""" is like seeing a seven year old TKD black belt.
>>
>>41760140
>cant comprehend that someone who has a profession in engineering, has a contrasting world video
>>
sanitation engineer has an opinion: the flat earth story
>>
>>41759892
>EARTHS ELECTRIC FIELD
All I know about is the north electromagnetic field. Sometimes this gets thrown in as a buzzterm and doesnt help flat earth.
>FLAT EARTH MAP AND MODEL EXPLAINED BY WITSIT
Witsit is definitely ahead of his league in knowledge but hes a retarded window licker with an agenda.
I used to think he was a talented debater then I became smarter than him by listening to Nathan Oakley or QE.
He's a shill for going from "flat earther" to "true earther" after the Antarctica trip
>>
>>41760235
100% Eric even did video debunking his gci tricky. I posted the videos here>>41759287
Anyways back to your requests
>EARTHS ELECTRIC FIELD
(timestamped at 1:12:10):
https://www.youtube.com/live/sy4Yubg3Jjk?t=4330
https://www.youtube.com/live/7QYaxbsVgd0
https://www.youtube.com/live/3yYdQbKCSC8
https://youtu.be/iXTsXkUAyJU
https://youtu.be/kcFnoY0lVTI
>FLAT EARTH MAP AND MODEL EXPLAINED BY WITSIT
(timestamped at 1:00:48):
https://www.youtube.com/live/qR0KzrAKdQA?t=3648
(timestamped at 1:34:51):
https://www.youtube.com/live/qR0KzrAKdQA?t=5691
(timestamped at 1:19:18):
https://www.youtube.com/live/qR0KzrAKdQA?t=4758
(timestamped at 54:45):
https://www.youtube.com/live/TVHI-TUTLZc?&t=3285
>>
>>41760175
View*
>>
>>41760278
>>41759976
>>41759565
Wait this fe might not be joke
Can I have
>MORE ON GPS AND SATELLITES
>>
>>41760278
Well most of these videos are from witsit and you have to watch out for what comes out of that retards mouth.
Dont get me wrong I do enjoy the moments where he BTFOs guys with PHDs, but its just smoke and mirrors

If the Antarctica trip was CGI then it was CGI

If the Antarctica trip wasn't CGI they still measured elevation angles to a 24 sun

Thats the beautiful thing about it once you understand it. But witsit is a complete shill that cant be trusted. He was specifically trying to be coached by others on this and he refused
>>
File: 1683596548389392.png (413 KB, 671x837)
413 KB
413 KB PNG
>>41755466
looks like you have more information than the former russian space boss
>>
>>41760296
https://youtu.be/5PuNTOUEoFU
https://www.youtube.com/live/ejv1FOO1CUQ
https://youtu.be/ZP0peGxvPSQ
https://youtu.be/fDI4f1fTcoQ
https://youtu.be/138DQS1y6k8
https://youtu.be/dp7Y68GvA54
https://youtu.be/RuS5zwwPZFw
https://youtu.be/DN_srY-Ugac
https://youtu.be/BV_lmanhRzE
https://youtu.be/fmmWVCRUmYQ
https://www.youtube.com/live/qIf6wvUL_eE
https://youtu.be/iQKTG5LQ05Y
Also, here’s a few of his papers falsifying relativity:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361981973_Is_the_Observable_Universe_Consistent_with_the_Cosmological_Principle

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Ronald_Hatch/Hatch-Gravitational_Energy_and_the_Flatness_Problem_1999.pdf

It’s raining sunlight brother
>>
>>41760318
Basically this
With this youtube paste bin summed up: quantum mechanics replaced relatively entirely
>>
>>41760338
Relativity*
>>
>>41759892
Do you happen to have the cideo of the time lapse lighthouse that moves? They tried to disprove rising water levels and instead saw the stationary lighthouse going up and over a horizon, as humidity bends light
>>
>>41758709
>You know someone can just put this through ai and give the answer, these kind of questions only work irl

Told ya the degreed cowards would avoid the 5th grade math like their life depended on it. If they can’t be honest and have integrity with 5th grade math, how can they be honest with more complex inquiries that risk soiled shorts from their Fe-ar Big Brother pay-oped their gullible *sses.
>>
>>41758749
> Cowards are thinning out now
Absolutely pathetic.
The West will fall and you did your part, fellas. You can run and hide, but only for a time. You will be exposed as the dishonest, beast fellating cowards you are. And I can prove it with 5th grade math.
>>
>>41759544
> So do flat earthers have a response to why gravity can be demonstrably measured? Or do they still just run away and deflect?
Dark density. It is flat earth dark matter.
You ‘tards can do it… lol
Tesla was the real genius. Go pay your electric bill bc Trump’s MIT EE uncle handed Tesla tech to the Royals and Bankers and told tour gullible *ss nothing was there.
I’m not flat Earth. I find contradictions. I know what I observe about Earth, I’ve come across contradictions and bad logic on both sides. Money Power Fascist Empire gets no benefits from me because I don’t appreciate their mass lying, mass thieving and mass murdering.
They need to PROVE their claims.
>>
File: B5_ldEuIAAAoyDc.jpg (23 KB, 381x238)
23 KB
23 KB JPG
Out of all the places that Einstein would be shilled of course it would be here
>But Einstein the jew stole his genius work from other white men! Its still true!
You still believe the words from a jews mouth
>>
>>41758646
Not sure why you have such an obsession with the word "measure". We can observe that the earth is round. There is not a single observation that works with a flat earth but not with a round earth. Most yoi'll get is something that works identical with both models and thus doesn't prove anything.
>>
>>41761003
>avoid the 5th grade math
You didnt ask a math question. You asked a society one.
>Is the borrower completely beholden to the whims of the lender?
Fucking idiot flerfer doesnt know what they were typing.
>>
>>41758728
Speaking of avoiding questions like a coward, surely you wouldn't do that if I asked you to prove the size and shape of the dome, right? >>41757804
>>
>>41759552
Why does density pull sideways near a large mountain?
>>
>>41759843
Does the experiment in your picrel account for refraction?
>>41759929
>Calculate the angular resolution of the brightest star. Turns out it shouldn't be visible.
False. Just means it'll appear as a point source and not an object with width. If it shouldn't be visible, where would the light go?
>>
>>41760083
Does the experiment in your video account for refraction?
>>
File: 1742905108443317.jpg (1.89 MB, 3311x5000)
1.89 MB
1.89 MB JPG
https://youtu.be/GwkqLv-fOjg?t=2209
https://youtu.be/m7ZpvLu_tFE
https://youtu.be/0514L2QwOBE
https://youtu.be/lKg-yn86zp4
https://youtu.be/p-BFmn2S_jU
https://youtu.be/BVJgObFHLY4
https://youtu.be/ru5fdfovkGI
https://youtu.be/74KRZt5oJME
https://youtu.be/tdwy-hxS-ts
https://youtu.be/UAx5cl9VpTE
https://youtu.be/JlFnJPFjcc0
https://youtu.be/XetG30_YOeo
https://youtu.be/ziVLbEoQ4Sc
https://youtu.be/7H_1ZbuA9HI
https://youtu.be/UbYtkrTquXE
https://youtu.be/1WHIr-IFqAo
https://youtu.be/WcqKUhU0WDc
https://youtu.be/wPrDg0CtWnk
https://youtu.be/hoGTBdu7dMc
https://youtu.be/mcLwr86emds
https://youtu.be/U_bJYXS9p4A
https://youtu.be/JOqc63Pp9OA
https://youtu.be/X-w8acuxF6w
https://youtu.be/nGLJ5XJP3uE
https://youtu.be/olbyJDou4qQ
https://youtu.be/0Q18iSz6mus
https://youtu.be/aFFM3YJAs4Q
https://youtu.be/Stft_t48Hxc
https://youtu.be/QWa7lTxhrKI
https://youtu.be/Zc_J2k4Cdp8
https://youtu.be/DdLLamniSyg
https://youtu.be/udjk_FB80kM
https://youtu.be/4nKIN_eHYxw
https://youtu.be/fDBRhxryfZM
https://youtu.be/-rmDj1MJyaY
https://youtu.be/Kv9-JuLRpg0
https://youtu.be/7Eeo-82Eac8
https://youtu.be/0Vv62PFFsNU
https://youtu.be/CDG4oiCx_is
https://youtu.be/wz68Q2Nz05A
https://youtu.be/WffliCP2dU0
https://youtu.be/uUuTAflN1rU
https://youtu.be/lkmY_4PKMlY
https://youtu.be/McdMMmclGVc
https://youtu.be/Cm7fBZq-8T4
https://youtu.be/4SlRsbQ3nfM
https://youtu.be/Z36Ns7KUYHw
https://youtu.be/XhIwZuPGfss
https://youtu.be/CATklVkPEMw
https://youtu.be/eJK1gLHbOxA
https://youtu.be/WXaXnAvEpB8
https://youtu.be/gWnFMWqDRQE
https://youtu.be/EvnrD49RmAY
https://youtu.be/3wU8_jT61eE
https://youtu.be/lMhheDWThxE
https://youtu.be/hG_sv5SWi3Y?t=507
https://youtu.be/UOLLMkAHHQI?t=2477
https://youtu.be/d_h5tupEdn8
https://youtu.be/jDKfJROVHJE
https://youtu.be/maBf0H3UNJI
https://youtu.be/Jm7nBn7RxhU
https://youtu.be/BEV2SAL8z5g
https://youtu.be/Qse5Jc8jgSk
https://youtu.be/zMAa5Ir7IHU
>>
>>41762344
mountains have a slope. the higher density air is pressing down on the less dense air and is pushing it down and sideways according to the slope of the mountain
>b-bbut how does higher density air get above the lower density air
air close to the ground is warming, warm air has less density than cold air and rises, it cools down, density increases and it presses down
>>
>>41762660
>mountains have a slope
So you can show this effect changing depending on the slope?
What if the mountain has a cliff face?
why do flerfers always just lie and pull shit out of their ass instead of trying to determine a way to find out?
>>
>>41762674
>instead of trying to determine a way to find out?
they prefer to find a way out instead of a way to find out.
>>
>>41762713
I recreated the Schihelion experiment on my own.
Hardest part for me was finding a way to determine up and down that was independent of the downward force.
I bet a flerfer couldnt do it.
>>
>>41762674
same principle applies to a cliff… the air can’t go through the mountain so it pushes away from it
>>
>>41762737
Why would it touch a vertical face at all?
In fact, none of this takes wind or pressure changes in air at all.
It's a terrible asspull of a guess.
>>
>>41762743
The mountain is submersed in air… of course the air touches the mountain, even when vertical
I’m not a flerfer but you make me want to be one
>>
>>41762769
The flerfer said the slope is deflecting the air, which makes the mass attract TOWARD the mountain.
then they said this would happen even with a vertical face - even though a vertical face would apply no lateral direction to the deflection.

But fine - let's ignore that you seem to not be able to understand pressure like a flerfer.
Instead, let me ask you this - if density of the air is what is causing a mass to attract toward a mountain
Would you expect the change in that air density to change how much the mass is attracted?
Can you think of an experiment to determine if this is the case?
>>
>>41762776
>Would you expect the change in that air density to change how much the mass is attracted?
nta but its such a silly idea. in this model high pressure weather systems would be detectable by their increased gravity
>>
>>41762776
If you have a bowl of water and a rock inside, will the water push against the side of the bowl as well as the sides of the rock?
>>
>>41758465
It was just a freem show to distract from Vietnam. Kubrick helped film it EWS discloses all this. Good thread
>>
>>41762788
Yes. No one is disputing fluid dynamics.
Can you answer my questions as easily as I answered yours?
if density of the air is what is causing a mass to attract toward a mountain
Would you expect the change in that air density to change how much the mass is attracted?
Can you think of an experiment to determine if this is the case?
>>
>>41762316
> Speaking of avoiding questions like a coward, surely you wouldn't do that if I asked you to prove the size and shape of the dome, right?
I don’t believe in a dome so why would I try to prove something I don’t think is obviously supported by the evidence?
Yet you still cower… even after tou tried to deflect… irrationally.
I know what I don’t know and am OK without the delusion so many others embrace.
>>
>>41758626
Eglin isn't paying you, you should ease up on the spamhate. Your example wasnt even that cool, and I hope you get run over by a Chevy hardtop
>>
>>41758460
The guys that are replying to you write and reason like jews, they took a miniscule although "true" detail and ran with it. (as in they dont make them anymore so you technically lost them, ignoring the fact that if humanity WANTED TO they could make all these things again from scratch)

Rest easily knowing that lurkers like me agree with you and not with these irritaring pilpul spreaders.
>>
File: children_laughing.jpg (49 KB, 390x300)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>getting mad enough to reply to trolling from over 20 hours ago
>>
>>41762250
> You didnt ask a math question. You asked a society one.
The question is whether YOU can do the 5th grade math proof and reach an accurate conclusion. No onviois answer yet.
>Fucking idiot flerfer doesnt know what they were typing.
*You* don’t know what I’m saying.
I know exactly what I’m saying. You’ve demonstrated no actual capabilities yet.
And you probably won’t due to the obvious root cause.
Would you like me to school you?
>>
File: JCVD day out smile.jpg (306 KB, 1904x1078)
306 KB
306 KB JPG
Well now we can identify which flerfer is the "lurker" and why they are still mad.
>>
>>41762807
We all reap what we sow.
The *horror* these people manifest into the world. Their anagnorisis is incoming. Running like little B*zzz has an expiration date.
It is a Money Power Bloodline issue. Most Jewish folks are monetary illiterate like everyone else
Israelis are debt-money slaves like everyone else.
Cultural toxicities are real, but a completely separate issue and shouldn’t be over generalized to divide debt-money enslaved groups for easier Money Power Allodial rule.
>>
>>41762810
Behold the coward, not replying to anyone, using non-arguments such as time passing and bonus points for having kids pics saved on their HD...

Shabbat shalom for you too
>>
>waaah i want to reprise the trolling I lost yesterday
Instead, let me ask you this - if density of the air is what is causing a mass to attract toward a mountain
Would you expect the change in that air density to change how much the mass is attracted?
Can you think of an experiment to determine if this is the case?
>>
File: 1671610891719871.png (525 KB, 632x647)
525 KB
525 KB PNG
>>41760006
not trolling at all.
>>
Logical fallacy is deployed by the Money Power on the regular. US politics is based upon it. Pick one — both are wrong and you lose.
This is almost certainly in play here.
What we observe as gravity is likely a manifestation of electromagnetism that has not been properly explained to the cretin classes. Think Tesla, not Einstein.
Assuming a mathematical equation is true and then creating dark matter to paper over observable contradictions proves just how unfit even high IQ cretins are.
I know a physicist who thinks his profession is BS, but only gets paid if he plays along…
>>
File: 1000167807.jpg (126 KB, 720x703)
126 KB
126 KB JPG
>>41762839
Dude, cant you concede that Im not that guy? I just opened this thread today and i dont even type like OP, I dont even want to talk about schizo stuff, just wanted to point out how dick suckingly stupid you sound.

Also:

> HUR DURR BIG MAD , HE MAAAAAD, LOOK AT MY TROLLS, HE MAAAAAD
>>
>>41762856
>cant you concede that Im not that guy?
Cool. you're not that guy. Nothing I have said is stupid, and I dont care if you want to go over yesterday's total destruction of the flerfers.
This is the current topic.
if density of the air is what is causing a mass to attract toward a mountain
Would you expect the change in that air density to change how much the mass is attracted?
Can you think of an experiment to determine if this is the case?
We can talk about something else, if you want to admit that other anon has given up and ran away like all flerfers do.
>>
>>41762776
and yet the ships do not disappear behind the horizon.

and yet the distant shores that should not be visible are visible with modern lenses.

you can write a million pages of anti-flerfer gaslighting and you will not make these facts untrue.

now go ahead and try to gaslight me. will you deploy cheap namecalling (call me a "retard" and call it a day) or will you try something a little more sophisticated? let's see how good you are at this my silly shilly willy.
>>
>>41750871
Flat Earth is a psyop but not for the reason you think.

It was a psyop to investigate conspiracism, and to compile lists of people who can get invested in the most insane crackpot theories. Secret services want to keep tabs on people/groups like that because the same people tend to get involved in radical politics. And for the same reason they can be manipulated to believe in the Flat Earth, they can be manipulated to became intelligence assets. Tons of Qanon (an obvious psyop) people for example were former flat earthers.

Once it gained followers, the Flat Earth movement was also heavily promoted in media. This was demoralization, it contributed to the general feeling that society is going crazy, people cannot agree on what's true anymore. This further decreases social trust and makes it harder for not-rich and powerful people to organize.
>>
>>41762863
Well, like I said I wasnt in it for the thought experiment but since we're here , yes I would believe changing any proprieties that form that "air" to also change how the object gets attracted/pulled to the "mountain" or any bigger mass center close to it.

Experimentation with this theory could only be done in closed spaces and labs to get 100% pure factual answers and thats sadly just too different from literally anywhere outside in real life.

I'll add that I didnt actually reach the thread bottom before replying to yesterdays back and forth of you guys so this gravity=/=air thing came out of nowhere for me.
>>
>>41762660
I was talking about the Sciehallion experiment. If I'm interpreting your post correctly, then the pendulum would be pushed away, from the mountain, when in reality it's pulled towards it.
Anyway, what about the Clandestine experiment? No slopes or mountains involved, yet the pendulum is observed being pulled towards mass. What causes that?
>>
>>41762800
>I don’t believe in a dome
What do you believe in then?
Anyway, to answer your question, yes, because it's not the borrowers money until he pays it off.
>>
>>41762871
>please please please go to my known dialogue responses
Sorry, this is the topic.
if density of the air is what is causing a mass to attract toward a mountain
Would you expect the change in that air density to change how much the mass is attracted?
Can you think of an experiment to determine if this is the case?
Why cant you think of an expirment to test this?
Im not even saying a certain result will happen. I'm just asking you to think.
>>41762909
>yes I would believe changing any proprieties that form that "air" to also change how the object gets attracted/pulled to the "mountain" or any bigger mass center close to it.
Thank you. That isnt hard. I would imagine that, too.
>Experimentation with this theory could only be done in closed spaces
Well no, you could also do it in the open as long as you document the barometric pressure each time. In fact, I would imagine you WANT this, to measure the effect air density has on the observed force.
You could also do it in an enclosure, or even in a space with pressure and density of the surrounding air isolated.
>I didnt actually reach the thread bottom before replying to yesterdays back and forth
And then you resurrected a day old troll exchange without adding anything of worth. You'll excuse me if my first reaction is mockery.
>>
>>41762943
i don't care. i don't have a dog in this fight. i'm not a flerfer or a globetard or whatever. i don't care what shape the earth is.

i just do not think you are honest. i don't think you are arguing in good faith. and i don't like people like you.

cute also how you accuse me of what *you* are doing. maybe you're right about the whole pressure thing you're harping on about. that does not at all change the fact that the experiments with lenses disprove the official version about the shape of the earth.
>>
>>41762955
Well when you care, the topic is this.
if density of the air is what is causing a mass to attract toward a mountain
Would you expect the change in that air density to change how much the mass is attracted?
Can you think of an experiment to determine if this is the case?
>>
>>41762958
just tell me what you want me to say so you can skip ahead to the part where you epically prove once and for all that flerfers are absolute retards, i'm dying to hear it
>>
>>41762963
I want you to think of experiments to perform. I want you to go out and perform experiments.
Every moment you arent doing this is what proves you are a retard.
Currently the thing to be thinking on is this
if density of the air is what is causing a mass to attract toward a mountain
Would you expect the change in that air density to change how much the mass is attracted?
Can you think of an experiment to determine if this is the case?
>>
>>41762964
no, fuck that. the distant shores which are visible yet should not be. explain that one, shill bill.
>>
>>41762968
Admit that you are too lazy to think on the current topic, and I will change it. Otherwise, this is the topic.
if density of the air is what is causing a mass to attract toward a mountain
Would you expect the change in that air density to change how much the mass is attracted?
Can you think of an experiment to determine if this is the case?
>>
>>41762509
>zippers
Are used to fasten the spacesuits. They're obviously not used to actually seal it.
>railgun
Do you actually think railgun shots are immune to gravity? Also, using chatgpt as evidence is fucking retarded. You can get it to say anything you want with some manipulation.
All those "flat earth" maps you have are actually projections of a globe. Yes, all.
>Chicago skyline
Is that accounting for refraction or not?
>curved mirror
The curve effect in the reflection will be imperceptible when the curve is as small as on the earth. Once again tiny flerfoid brains fail to comprehend scale.
>sun not 93 000 000 000 miles away
Are you aware what a vanishing point is?
>moon map
Those continents are hilariously inaccurate.
>ancient cultures
Most of those "cultures" are from brown "people". Ancient people were also completely retarded. With those 2 facts known, why would you give any value to their worldviews?
>can't feel the movement
Yes, because it's so slow.
>waves
Holy shit that's retarded. A 3 meter wave 100 meters away means there's a tsunami or hurricane and if you're on the beach you're going to die. Waves are too small to actually hide much.
>flight paths
Flying over Antarctica is dangerous because if you have to make an emergency landing, you'll freeze to death. It's also not economically viable since the southern hemisphere is mostly poor shitholes with little flight demand, so you need connecting routes to have enough demand to fill planes up.
>sphere light reflection
That sphere you used is glossy. If you try it with a spherical rock, it will look like the moon.
>why the lie
Why indeed. It makes no sense. Why build all your conspiracies on such a shoddy foundation that can be disproven by literally anyone with any interest in the matter? If the earth was flat, it would be trivial to prove, and then all the conspiracies would fall like dominoes.
>>
>>41762973
i can see your true intentions here from thousands of miles. anyone can. i see the other shore. you stand there like a cat who thinks he is shrewd. who thinks he is cornerning the little mouse. if only the little mouse will take the bait.

the lenses experiments (henceforward "lenxperiments") decisively disprove globetardism. ball is in your court now, faggot. disprove the lenxperiments or admit defeat.
>>
>>41762871
>and yet the distant shores that should not be visible are visible with modern lenses.
Show me one example where something that should be hidden behind the curve is visible when accounting for refraction based on the current atmospheric conditions. You provide one singular example, and that will put the globe model in serious doubt. I would bet a million bucks that you can't.
>>
>>41762990
>i can see your true intentions
Yes, I told you them,
>I want you to think of experiments to perform. I want you to go out and perform experiments.
and you can see that when flerfers actually engage with such I respond accordingly, such as >>41762909
>>41762943
Otherwise, all you are doing is once again running like a cowardly little bitch from a topic you dont understand and cant think and wont think about.
Here it is again.
if density of the air is what is causing a mass to attract toward a mountain
Would you expect the change in that air density to change how much the mass is attracted?
Can you think of an experiment to determine if this is the case?
>>
>>41762995
you never seen the videos? i ain't fishing them up for you. they're out there and you know it. fuck you.
>>
>>41762995
your randi back from the grave aren't you. freemason, twink lover, inventor of the million dollar challenge logical fallacy. the great late randi.
>>
>>41762160
It order to understand earth geometry you need to measure earth
Geo = earth
Metry = measure
Observations about the geometry of earth are not universal and agreed upon (duh no shit) because we get different observations. Thats why you cant really appeal to observation alone, observations change.
Earth geometry doesnt change. Its a description of reality. It will always be measured flat by everyone.
A measurement of earth doesnt require a model either, if you understand the intended uses and purposes of a model
>>
File: a-2-1024x683.png (333 KB, 1024x683)
333 KB
333 KB PNG
>>41750871
so you got tired of waiting for a flattie to make a thread, so you launched your own?
for anyone new here there's a cavaldae of shills that come into these threads to insult, confuse, and argue with anyone and everything while pushing it to the bump limit. They absolutely do not want us talking about how the earth is flat.
>>
>>41762908
Good thing earth geometry doesnt care about your conspiracy theories. Were here to investigate earth measurements, not your silly ideas about what the government does
>>
>>41756857
don't post actual facts here, these threads are 90% a manufactured brawl. If we were on to nothing it would be one flat earth thread that hits 34 replies after a month then archives.
>>
>>41763000
I've seen plenty of videos and pics that claim to show something that should be behind the curve. Not one of them has included the data for the atmospheric conditions between the camera and subject that could be used to calculate refraction, so I'll have to assume they didn't account for refraction at all. Which means I haven't seen a single video that actually shows something that shouldn't be visible. Maybe you'll surprise me.
>>41763013
>randi
Who? What the hell are you talking about?
>>
>>41763069
>Observations about the geometry of earth are not universal and agreed upon
True to an extent, but we can all observe that the sun sets, eclipses happen, stars rotate around the south celestial pole in the southern hemisphere, and so on. None of those observations work on a flat earth.
>Earth geometry doesnt change.
Correct. It's round.
>It will always be measured flat by everyone
It will not. I can measure that ships go below the horizon the further they are. I can measure that the horizon drops further below eye level the higher you go. Thus, the earth is round.
>>
>>41763071
>They absolutely do not want us talking about how the earth is flat.
(((They))) absolutely do, since it conveniently delegitimizes actual conspiracy theories and drives away normies who might otherwise wake up.
>>41763106
>actual facts
Physics problems usually simplify away air resistance because it makes calculations much more complex while barely affecting the final result. Does that mean air doesn't exist? Same principle with that nasa document.
>If we were on to nothing it would be one flat earth thread that hits 34 replies after a month then archives
Not really. You already are onto nothing. The reason these threads get replies is because you're pretty funny to observe and laugh at.
>>41763154
What part of that post was mental gymnastics?
>I hope you are getting paid to defend the globohomo model
Nope. I do it for fun to laugh at you retards and test my own knowledge and maybe learn something occasionally.
>it's full of holes anyway
Such as? Please show me one of these holes that supposedly disprove the globe.
>the reason why you have to come here to defend it
I don't have to do shit. It's entertaining so I do it for fun.
>>
>>41762930
> What do you believe in then?
What I can actually observe that doesn’t rely on logical fallacy and has no contradictions. I’m always looking for potential contradictions.
>Anyway, to answer your question, yes, because it's not the borrowers money until he pays it off.
Appreciate the sincere reply. Money is lent into existence. Debt = money. A Federal Reserve Note is like a car note or a mortgage note.
Yes, it is a zero-sum game. It also proves beyond ALL doubt scam artists are in control of it and everything major in society. You lend me $20 at 5% interest and I owe your $21 in a year due to bookkeeping adjustments.
How does $20 pay back $21 unless the Banksters return ALL their interest profits directly back to their borrowers in a timely fashion (they withhold as much as possible — profits!)?
This is a simple math problem, but the engineers won’t do it bc the system that validated them and patted them on the head is actually demonic… and they cower from truth.
So when they try and say they are experts at math and to trust them with non-responses, they get exposed.
How To Be a Crook
https://youtu.be/2oHbwdNcHbc?si=IqfgFN5N0paIheqJ

Money Power Fascism Revealed
https://youtu.be/bboweYuvbB4?si=zDGOfQmDj_M2HbAY

BOE Admits Money Notes Are Lent into Existence
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/quarterly-bulletin/2014/money-creation-in-the-modern-economy.pdf

Exposing Debt-Money Fraud
https://youtu.be/7_yh4-Zi92Q?si=c1TahBbKcsvcRfze
>>
This is the faulty logic of all the programmed engineers who claim angular momentum explains why a plane can fly from Seattle to San Diego without the pilot accounting for the near 200 MPH spin difference:
1. A car can drive straight from Sea to SD without taking into account the near 200 MPH perpendicular speed difference because the changing angular momentum of the Earth is transferred to the vehicle (through tire contact with Earth).
2. Therefore, the same principle applies to airplanes. STOP THINKING HERE.. too dangerous.
3. What they fail to hear, let alone perceive, is that the angular momentum effect of the atmosphere (perpendicular force) is negligible compared to the angular momentum of effect of Earth pushing on tires.
This is important because we are talking about forces that CHANGE angular momentum of the two vehicles in such a way they can both move directly toward their target moving about 200 MPH faster in a perpendicular direction.
Their claim demands that a relatively negligible atmospheric AM effect yields the exact same effect on a plane than a tire/Earth AM conservation effect.
That, folks, is magical worship of beast empire dictates.
>>
>>41763646
Angular momentum of atmosphere on plane is less than Earth on tire bottoms of car sitting upon it:
https://iask.ai/q/atmospheric-angular-momentum-airplane-ground-vehicle-Seattle-San-Diego-compa-l7ejroo
>>
>>41763663
AI gave the right answer, but the wrong reasoning. Here is the right reasoning:
The answer is correct, but AI was confusing the issue.
Put a quarter on a table and push it with your finger.
Throw the quarter up in the air and blow on it for the same amount of time.
Which transferred force more efficiently?
The answer is obvious.
The Establishment has programmed everything and everybody to assume that objects change perpendicular speed with the Earth’s rotation while never proving it.
It is like saying Primordial Soup leads to life… by definition. lol
They hope nobody pays attention to details like that soup has to produce life that can then automatically replicate itself. It has to both create self-replicating life and simultaneously support said life in a safe manner.
Bottom line — the answer is declared and never proved. It is an assumption.
>>
>>41763711
Let me make it simple for all you Empire programmed engineers.
What happens when you blow hard in your boyfriend’s ear?
Now take your fist and direct it into your boyfriend’s ear with the same velocity.
Was your assumption that the effect would be the same accurate?
Was your boyfriend’s response the same?
Capiche?
>>
>>41763718
Or, if you want a more accurate example, blow on his feet as hard as you can while he’s in the air after jumping. Now pull the cardboard out from under his feet at an ice rink.
Same effect, Rocket Boyzzz?
>>
>>41763731
“ Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”
~Eisenhower told you the deal in his address. Not only aren’t you alert, you actively play beaat empire sycophant..
>>
>>41762981
>Are used to fasten the spacesuits. They're obviously not used to actually seal it.
they did actually. thats because its possible to build a zipper system that also includes rubber seals. you can see such a zip system being tested under pressure in picrel as part of the inner pressure suit.

you can easily buy such pressure and water proof zips today.
>>
ASSUMING the atmosphere is a magical perpetual spin motion machine, a fact nowhere near proven, the idea the atmosphere blowing on a plane has the exact same effect as the Earth acting on four tires is literally retarded.
Yet here we are.
Empire worship is more important fraudulent money systems, fraudulent narratives around building collapses, writing papers based on an equation instead of building upon Tesla’s meterless energy machine, etc…
>>
>>41763777
>magical perpetual spin motion machine
why have you decided to invent this stupid phrase and then argue as if anyone even thinks that? silly flerf troll.
>>
>>41763777
>>41758247
>>
>>41763785
silly nsas troll
>>41763787
>>
>>41763220
"Sun rise" and "sun sets" are an affirming the consequence of a physical horizon.
The horizon IS NOT PHSYICAL its APPARENT.
Glerfs have the most retarded explanation for the selenelion eclipse we all know that.
Eclipses occur in nature they don't have to be explained but you want to be a doofus and assume its earths shadow being casted on the moon.

So one part of the sky rotates clockwise and counter clockwise. AND SO WHAT RETARD!?!?!
Please answer yes or no to this statement. Do stars not move in one direction in the sky EAST TO WEST!?!?!? Did you forget being taught that shit in 1st grade or something?
These opposite rotations youre talking about arent actual directions they are cardinal directions dumbass. Stars DO NOT move in 2 directions in the sky only 1, that would be east to west
Horizon dropping below eye level is another affirmation of consequence. Its so easy to pick apart this continually fallacy because its in almost every glerf "argument" (argument against a topic that isnt an argument btw)
So how can you claim to see a physical sphere edge by seeing the "horizon dip"? It remains horizontal and apparent. You cant detect or verify a curve if its in an apparent location, not physical
>>
>>41760972
na sorry bro, i only have the things and some extra stuff related to the list

Reminder, ask me for anything your interested in>>41759892
>>
flerf trolls are just desperate for attention. thats why the post such bullshit all the time.

its a cry for help.
>>
File: gyroscope, airplane.png (2.16 MB, 1149x2711)
2.16 MB
2.16 MB PNG
>>41762352
>False. Just means it'll appear as a point source and not an object with width. If it shouldn't be visible, where would the light go?
We don't see stars as point sources do we?
They appear in different sizes.
The point of angular resolution is that there is a smallest size that the human eye and detect, and a light source smaller than that minimum size, the human eye cannot see it - and yet the stars are clearly visible with the naked eye.

Also there is a known distance at which candles can be seen from in the dark. When you apply that same logic to the stars.

>>41762352
Post calcs if it bothers you.
Surely the refraction would cause the island to disapear at times rather than being visible as long as the weather is clear?
>>
>>41762366
Oh hey there,
it's the guy who keeps pointing out that the earth is measurably and observable flat.
>>
File: curvature, sailing logs.png (3.19 MB, 1169x3123)
3.19 MB
3.19 MB PNG
>>41762731
>>41762660
There's some much easier experiments to measure gravity, but somehow science never claims them as proofs of gravity:

(1) Weigh a 100g silver bullion in your house
(2) Weigh it in a plane
(3) Weigh it at the top of a 30 story elevator
(4) Weigh it traveling east or west at 100km/hr or faster. You might need a train to have a smooth enough ride to not disturb the scale.
(5) Weigh it at the equator and compare with the latitude you live on.

In each of the experiments, the weight should change by around 0.1-2%, depending on the experiment. This is easily detectable by a gram scale.

If science doesn't list these as proofs of gravity, it means they probably don't work. Which means gravity is fake and gay.

Seriously who goes to measure a suuuupppperrr small deviation of a ball next to a mountain, that cannot be tested by anyone by harvard scientists in a secret test scenario that nobody else can reliably repeat the experiment? Why is that considered a proof of gravity when it should be as easy a measuring the change in mass at the top and bottom of a 30 story elevator?
>>
File: curvature, anchorage.png (661 KB, 898x914)
661 KB
661 KB PNG
>>41763071
Paid shills bite the hand that feeds them.
If they want to secure more funding for the year, they should let the flat movement gain ground.
Loosen up the free speech a bit.

>>41763121
Now show us a nasa photo accounting for refraction when they tell us a sparkling light in space is a galaxy 10,000 light years away.

>>41763154
>I hope you are getting paid to defend the globohomo model,
They are getting paid.
It's obvious.
One of the most heavily shilled against topic.
Was the primary reason for heavy internet censorship in 2016-2017 because flat earth was becoming mainstream
They really aren't sending their best
>>
>>41764659
the human eye can detect single photons anon.
>>
>>41764691
wolfie6020 did this at different locations around the world. look it up on his channel (though flerfs will call it fake)
>>
>>41764731
the ability of an eye to detect single photon under unique circumstances is different from an eye seeing millions of photons emitted by a star in the sky.
The globe math just doesn't work out for angular resolution of the stars. They're just way too big.

>>41764735
I doubt it.
Why isn't it listed as the top proof of gravity?
It's the easiest test to perform.
They don't want people checking.
Physics teachers should be taking their students on trips to a skyscraper elevator to measure the change in gravity - if it were indeed a real experiment.
>>
>>41764761
>They're just way too big.
no, they aren't. they look the same no matter what telescope you use to look at them (well, nearly all of them).

>I doubt it.
look it up if you like. the cool thing is you can just do these things yourself if you doubt them so much.
>>
File: Shadow Direction, Moon.mp4 (3.84 MB, 1280x720)
3.84 MB
3.84 MB MP4
>>41764774
>they're way too big
The angular size of the stars that is seen with the naked eye does not match the globe model calculations.
>>
File: real100.jpg (28 KB, 491x500)
28 KB
28 KB JPG
>>41750871
Again, fe is high iq.
Your just not ready for that discussion yet

Also eric D new video is pretty good
https://youtu.be/wOdWlXfNmz8?si=WqKx2uIXgko3Ggep
>>
>>41764691
>it means they probably don't work.
Go try it.
you wont.
Flerfers NEVER do anything but sit online and bitch.
They are weak, cowardly freaks that cant qualify to ever be called men.
>that cannot be tested by anyone by harvard scientists in a secret test scenario that nobody else can reliably repeat the experiment?
I recreated the Shihelion experiment outside in Tucson.
YOU have never left your mother's basement.
>>
File: rotation, polaris.webm (2.62 MB, 964x1166)
2.62 MB
2.62 MB WEBM
>>41764890
This is the globe model, and it is up to globies to prove it.

If testing gravity is as easy as taking a scale up the CN Tower, why isn't this listed as a proof of gravity? Instead they list experiments that nobody can test.

>Shihelion experiment outside in Tucson.
Just words with no proof?
What the 1000,000x stronger electromagnetic force dominated due to magnetism or electrostatic charge? Wouldn't that mess up the experiment?
Are you going to post proof of your experiment?
How did you measure such an extremely precise and sensitive measurement?
>>
>>41764980
>This is the globe model
No it isnt. you are taking fake animations as real.
Typical retard flerfer.
>Just words with no proof?
I proved it to myself, like you should.
You have never gone outside and done an experiment in your life.
you have said your experiment.
go do it.
You wont. You are too cowardly.
>How did you measure such an extremely precise and sensitive measurement?
How about you try and figure out the process and the sensitivity needed?
You wont.
You cant.
>>
>>41764998
Are you also this guy
>>41758626
>>
>>41764980
>the ball we live on is spinning, wobbling, tilting, orbiting, and shooting through space
>If you dont accept this youre part of a government psyop or something
Shills always giving us a good laugh
>>
>>41765026
Sure, why not.
Is this how you decide to run away this time?
You still wont ever go outside and do an experiment. and you cant even come up with an experiment to perform.
>>
>>41764998
This guy accusing us of never doing an experiment is a popcorn show.
We know youre a chickenshit though and dont know what a hypothesis or experiment is. Thats why you evade or cope when you get pressed on this.
Go ahead and tell us your experiment you preformed, unproven hypothesis claim, dependent and independent variable.
>>
>>41765039
Ok thanks, I’m not the guy your reasoning to about some experiment.
But I can already gage at your intelligence as you can even understand basic supply and demand and how someone can not just make a car on a whim
>>
>>41765051
Fuck I really need to sleep
Responding*
Can’t*
>>
>>41764691
Everyone point and laugh at this stupid niggerfaggot glerf clown
WHICH GRAVITY ARE YOU REFERRING TO? IS IT NEWTONIAN?
Can't read your mind. Maybe its the gravity of Einstein pseudo 4space geometry?
Tell us which gravity
>>
>>41765048
>tell us your experiment
Which one, recreating the shihelion?
My hypothesis was that large masses will attract other masses, such that a deflection from plumb will be noticeable.
The experiment requires finding a large, isolated mass, the smaller the area the better, that is fairly symmetrical although that is less needed for what I was looking at.
Dependent is the resultant measurement of the plumb mass.
>>41765054
Fuck I really need to sleep
Yes, your ability to think is severely reduced.
Is this why flerfers are always desperate to run back to yesterday's destruction of their reality?
They need a good nap and day's think to come up with a response?
>>
File: Aireys Failure 1.png (2.47 MB, 1254x2231)
2.47 MB
2.47 MB PNG
>>41764890
So you are telling us you performed all of the following:
>have an instrument to measure plumb line sensitivity to 1 arcsecond sensitivity
>measured it at different distances to the mountain
>confirmed that the inverse square law of gravity was respected when you moved the experiment setup at distance distances to the mountain
>confirmed that electrostatic phenemonon did not interefere
>confirmed that gravitational field anomalies can be explained in your experiment, due to your thorough knowledge of the geological survey of the area

Is doing all that bullshit above really easier than just taking an elevator ride with a scale?
That's why gravity is a joke

>>41765067
I don't believe in gravity. That's the whole point Einstein.
>>
>>41765102
>you performed
Yes.
It took a while. A perserverance you have no concept of or ability.
>Is doing all that bullshit above really easier than just taking an elevator ride with a scale?
Doesnt matter.
You wont do either.
You never have, and you never will.
The Shihelion was only one experiment I performed over the years to prove to myself what the shape of the Earth is.
>bunch of other peoples pic of othe people's bitching about other people's experiments
You will always be a sheep listening to other people.
>>
>>41765095
Thanks for essentially telling us you have no hypothesis or experiment again.
Dependent variable is always a naturally occurring phenomenon without any human interaction
So tell us where does "resultant measurement of plumb mass" occur in nature?
Mass attracts mass would be the unproven claim, based on what? You must first observe a natural phenomenon before you have a hypothesis and experiment.
So how did your observation in nature lead you to mass attracting mass?
>>41765102
To be fair I thought you were a glerf and didn't read your entire post, my bad.
Never give these glerfs any leverage or room to breathe at all. When you said "measure gravity" I got triggered. Dont give these retards the slightest measurement of "gravity" they have zero.
Their gravity is out of date and was entirely replaced by quantum mechanics, they need to be slapped in the face rather with that fact
>>
>>41765154
>Thanks for essentially telling us you have no hypothesis or experiment again.
I gave them to you, you are too retarded to read.
>Dependent variable is always a naturally occurring phenomenon without any human interaction
Everyone can look this up and see you are wrong.
>I got triggered
Lol flerfer tranny.
>>
>>41765161
>Dependent variable is whatever I decide it to be
>(same retard logic then applies to independent variable too)
You arent taking your experiment seriously enough it seems
>>
>>41765212
>whatever I decide it to be
No one said that, idiot.
Tranny flerfer is BEGGING us to run away from the fact that they are to weak and cowardly to ever go outside and perform their own experiment.
>>
>>41751105
Damn that sucks. I wonder if they even enjoy the current situation? Cooped up here on this stinky rock. There's no one to even ask about anything to change the way things are.
If only they stopped being weird and aloof then we could all play wow tbc classic together.
>>
>>41765242
Define independent and dependable variable in natural science just so we can see if you know them.
Its up to you to run away from this, not me
>>
>>41765263
>please please please play semantics with me
Go perform your experiment.
You never ever will.
You are too weak. You are too cowardly.
You will never be a woman.
>>
>>41765269
So pressing you to on your experimental validity is semantics now...
You chose the word "experiment" for it. Maybe pick a different word. Cause you still dont have an experiment
>>
File: HoE-DipAngleCorrection.png (72 KB, 1280x800)
72 KB
72 KB PNG
>>
File: Bubble-Sextant.png (42 KB, 1280x800)
42 KB
42 KB PNG
>>
>>41765543
You are scared to go outside because you know any process will prove the earth is a sphere.
>You chose the word "experiment"
Another lie. You did when you brought up the experiment you are too scared and too stupid to perform.
You can't even properly lay it out.
Go.ahead and prove me wrong.
You won't, tranny.
>>
>>41764980
Polaris literally does move. It's just closest to the north celestial pole.
>>
>>41766903
That's not what YouTube told them.
You can't expect flerfers to go observe these things personally. They need someone else to do their thinking.
>>
>>41751105
Yes they won. This is the new world order we're living in. The total enslavement of the human kind
>>
>>41764786
bullshit. time to publish your unique findings and finally show the world how right you are.
>>
>>41766565
I brought up experiment? Youre a fucking cornball dude.
You claimed you had an experiment and that you "already provided it" then went chickenshit after I pressed you on its validity.
I didnt bring up experiment Im asking you about yours
>>
>>41758452
>Assume the atmosphere isn’t magically rotating faster than the surface of the Earth…
This nigger grew up without Calvin and Hobbes.
>>
>>41768732
>This nigger grew up without Calvin and Hobbes.
can you imagine such an impoverished upbringing?
>>
>>41756702
oh look a lying flattie image
>its not going over the horizon in quite the way you say it should at sea level!!!
one second to check the image:
>>41756790
and will you look at that, its taken from much higher up than sea level!
If you have to lie to prove a belief, what worth is the belief?
>>
>>41764786
>REEEEEE....The angular size of the stars is not the way you say it should beeeeeee!!!!
thats a new way to tear down the establishment and replace it with.... well... have you decided what the shape of the flat earth is yet?
Have you decided if the sun and moon are under the firmament or outside it?
have you dared to assert any conditions for your belief or are you still taking the cowards route and keeping everything in a state of flux that you can bend to counter any good argument?
>>
>>41764980
>This is the globe model, and it is up to globies to prove it.
ok.
its proven by being able to using it predict the motions of all the bodies in our solar system including all the things that are impossible on a flat earth with the sun and moon always above us (namely the earths ROUND shadow passing over the moon. And the full moon)
>>
noticed that this thread was very quiet for 8+ hours according to day time in north america and then picks up as we are getting towards night and regular sleep time.

see
>>41767211
to
>>41768456

i wonder what that might mean
>>
>>41769165
holy shit, globe proven.
end of thread everyone! time to pack up the never-ending flat earth bullshit and never speak of it again.
>>
>>41769179
flat earth threads are designed by american trolls to annoy europeans (as they have a functioning education system)
obviously.
>>
>>41769184

Flat earth would imply you're on a petridish
>>
>>41769240
so its round then?
so the horizon would have a curve and that would prove a round shape for our flat earth that we could use to further test the hypothesis and reach a
dare i fucking say it...
A CONCLUSION?
>>
>>41769204
if that were the case then theyd be active when i am, in the day. but they are not.
>>
>>41769295
well then heres another hypothesis for you.
most people are sick of 'debating' the shape of our planet.
apart from a few people that enjoy demolishing the worthless concept with simple observations just to see how the flatties dodge reality yet again.
>>
flat earthers will literally sit in a boat, be able to see about 3 miles despise the tens of thousands that we know exist and yell "wheres the curve?"
but fucking dumb really when you think about it.
i wonder how 'angular resolution' could explain this but not also totally hide the moon from our vision too.
>>
>>41769315
i agree. flat earthers should finally go away and learn something instead of posting bullshit online.
>>
File: IMG_20240617_160519_0241.jpg (83 KB, 1080x1169)
83 KB
83 KB JPG
>>41769353
Thanks for making my meme stash a literal gold mine
>>
>>41756790
Oh I used Google maps. Putting ny icon on the beach.
Then using Google maps again, measured my position to the Sears tower.
So its accurate within like 10feet or so
>>
File: 1684105905411968.jpg (82 KB, 540x960)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>41757610
Refraction yes,
But refraction that curves the earth was applied to this.
Then you have even greater distances like thisPic, muh refracted.
Get that California to Japan refraction.
>>
>>41757723
That picture is irrelevant, I used Google maps to locate almost 99% where that pic was taken from.
There are THOUSANDS of tourist videos and photos of the Sears tower across the lake.
But again, just use Google maps to do the math. None of you will because youre all math retards.
Stop arguing with me, and just do the math yourself.
Its easy,
1. Use Google maps place your guy on the beach across from sears tower, you can see it on Google maps still.
2. Use GM to tell you distance from point a to b.
3. Earth curve x that distance.
Sears tower - that distance or vice versa to get the difference.
EZ PZ
>>
>>41768988
Hur during
>Google search, orYouTube, sears tower photo from across lake.
1000s of results. Ranging from 30-60 miles
Some at eye level of water
Some on houses
Some on hills
You faggots dont actually care to look atanything, but your lack of inernal monologe causes you to just love arguing haha.
>You have no internal monologue
>you have no spirit inside your soul
>you dont matter, you are a goy, a empty vessel like a beast
>you goy have near 0 intelligence
>you are the beasts of the land made to serve thoes with a spirit
>>
>>41768988
Yes I realize my spelling errors, did this while in motion.
But ask me how I know your reddit tier hive mind instantly picks up on, misspelled word = bad.
Cause youre programmed like the good goy you are.
Another pic
>BUT SCIENCE SAYS AIR JUST DOES THAT OK?!
Yesssss goy, and let's say you find any other "evidence" for flat earth, there will be created a new science to patch that up as well.
Ohhh tires of elons car in space would of exploded and caught fire?
Noooo goyem there's cold wind science or some shit, dosnt really matter what is said you'll gobble It up like like pork, fucking beast.
>>
Ill say one last thing for the goyem here.
My father has emmense wealth, at about 25 he showed me the firmament.
I think 3? 4 years ago, they even posted on X a trip to the S pole where the sun relfeced off the firmament saying "IYKYK". My dad was there.
You people that dont believe your own eyes, or do your own math, or listen to your peers (other anons on here much like you). Instead trust strangers and "science", are like ants on a small island.
You could be told the world is larger than the island, but your insect beast mind cant comprehend it because your queen said the island is the entire world.
I pitty the goy, its much like a downy trying to play a video game or do a sport.
Im suprized most mindless goy can even do captcha
>>
>>41770112
>>41770130
>>41770169
Yes that guy has no ability to think for himself. But dam I hate you jews!
>>
>>41770322
https://m.youtube. com/shorts/jYn2emnXqdg
Videos like this appear often. And the beast men will say "well science tells me that's just a cloud that mimics waves like the oceans!"
Flat earth = pearls
You = swine
>>
>>41770333
Ok so why do the government's agree to hide this from everyone? Why not just tell the truth? Buzz aldren said it a few times, why not just come out with it?
>>
>>41770380
Well, put it like this.
Remember Jizzle Maxwell. Gizleane, J eps wife?
Under oath said she has citizenship of where?
>America
Yeah makes sense
>Isreal
No shit
>Terramar
Wait what?
Ohhh that 2000 billionaire plan to make an underwater city called terramar where they obey their own laws? Yeah that place.
Now even after LIVE under OATH stating she was a citizen of terramar, why did NO ONE talk about it?
Because you goy dont get to know. Simple as.
That movie, divergent. The people in power control you. If you found out that thoes people weren't in control what happens?
Also why tell you anything? Why do you deserve to know?
Does a pig in a slaughterhouse deserve to know why its there?
No, just be consumed by sloth and die.
>>
>>41768456
You claimed an experiment no one would do first, moron.
>>
File: Terms Dignity Table.png (258 KB, 1003x1065)
258 KB
258 KB PNG
>>41770418
whats your religious beliefs?
what do you do for fun?, and for work?
For me the flat earth movement pushed me to live deep into astrology.
Lots of deep and interesting philosophical questions about life in the domain of astrology.


Unrelated:
If gravity were real, testing it would be as easy as a taking a micron scale to every floor of the burj khalifa, and verifying that the inverse square law of gravity is respected, as well as the earth's radius. If the numbers dont work, then gravity is dead. Such a simple proof, and yet it is never listed as a proof of gravity, and instead we get a list of "gravitational anomalies" explaining why things dont measure like they should.
>>
>>41770418
I remember that, and when she said it everyone in the court room got shifty.
Where is terrimar if you even know?
>>
>>41770439
A form of Judaism, not one you'd know of. Not one really spoken about. Apocrypha is what "christians" should use, but I mean most "christians" are just agnostics that like the idea of "God" and we're born in a "christian" nation.
25% of whites have internal monologue, take that as you will. Thoes are the only people that qualify to NOT be goy. They have to submit to YAHWEH, and only my religion does this.
Orthodox "christians" come close by obeying his laws, but it will never bring them to Gods presence.
I dont work, inherited wealth. I want for nothing.
For fun I play video games and go to the gym. I do a lot of other stuff but its more out of obligation than fun (like golf, im decent but hate it).
Theres three types of flat earth's.
1. Thoes that are retarded.
2. Thoes that have internal monolgue and can see hidden truths and make their own conclusions.
3. Thoes that have seen it.
Im a 3, I never cared about or worried about flat earth until my dad showed me. Astrology is pretty big for planned births. Names too.
Gravity is just density. A feather falling through the air mimics a stone in water. Its just atoms moving through atoms.
>>
>>41770505
>I want for nothing.
Almost buddhist eh?
So what do you do for purpose though?

>3. Thoes that have seen it.
I mean I can measure the lack of curvature and say I've seen that. Or the angular size of the stars means they are near rather than light-years away.
I can hear the echoes of the thunder sounding off the glass in the sky. Seeing the shine of rainbows. But cannot say I have seen it and touched the glass.
>>
>>41770455
I just asked my dad and he said its off the coast of WA and OR. He said there's a volcano near OR? On a fault line that's rigged, and if china, japan, america, Russia, n or s Korea, Australia ever try anything. It'll get blown and trigger a tsunami. I dont know anything about this other than what he just said now.
>>
>>41770505
>Astrology is pretty big for planned births.
You choose the time to give birth according to astrology? Stat their stats for success?

> Names too.
Yeah names are easy to change.

Would you say most of the flat earth shills are israeli, as opposed to say eglin and university researchers?
>>
>>41770601
My individual purpose? Or the whole purpose?
You could touch and sample the firmament, illegally.
You can see the videos of a few universities launching rockets and hitting the firmament.
Design one that upon striking the firmament it vacume sucks in, element 151? I think Elon called it. Extremely light weight liquid. I think that's what the nazis used was that liquid. Again I know stuff but not everything. Feel free to ask me stuff about world of warcraft or grounded 2 btw haha.
>>
>>41770633
>the guys are dumb and soul-less cattle
>my purpose in life is to play video games by the way

Sure what do you think the whole purpose is?
Talmudic world domination?
Shits boring, most people hate the material world, and yearning for the beyond.
>>
>>41770661
You're supposed to enjoy life anon, if you think because you aren't cattle you cannot enjoy life youre wrong.
The purpose to life is simple.
Yahweh the creator made sentient beings, angels. Each with a job, and near all personailties 99% the same. Read about Ureil in the Bible for example, a grumpy and serious character. Zero humor.
Imagine being a creator trying to enjoy your creation and they are all robots without any freewill (while obeying their position).
So what does the creator do? He makes man, (the first "men" in the bible are the goy. Adam was a man). If you need reread the Bible and the 2 creations of man and men.
Why make man? (Again adam). Why make anyone with a spirit? So upon death, upon coming back to the creator you will be YOU. A unique individual unlike all others. With a personality (not memory) set to you.
Eternity would be boring to watch if it was all ran by AI models having 0 unique traits or quirks.
This leads to my purpose, to obey Yahwehs laws as we are told to. Not only in the bible, but especially in the apocrypha (catholics all go to hell btw) but then again so will 99% of abrahamic religions for disobeying Yahweh and Yeshua (Jesus).
Now the "religions" purpose? Find thoes that find Yahweh. Not spread the religion if that makes sense.
>>
>>41770661
Here's an example, I'll tell you to read Jasher in the apocrypha, its about Jacob's sons, Jacob the son of Issacc. Who was named isreal by Yahweh.
Isaac's sons, drop the I, Saccsons.
Anyway, its their conquest of castles, and kings. You can do name genealogy of the kings and where were thoes names from oh France, Germany, Turkey. So Jacob's sons, we're in EU? Not dump hole physical Isreal? Correct.
Ill tell you to read it, and understand the "vikings" started off as Jacob's and his sons.
Ill yell you to read it and know they had chariots like that from Egypt with the black sun (12 spoked wheel one for each tribe) on their wheels.
The algiz is Y and W the shape you make when you stand and praise God!
>>
>>41770751
Cont.
But you wont read it. No one will.
"Buh why didnt God come to me!"
Oh like a servant to a master? He knows what's on your heart, he knows that if he were to come to you, you'd reject him.
If "christians" are commanded not to cast pearls before swine, why do you think the Master would.
Anyway back to earth, btw its flat.
I wont say who I am, and im on VPN, but i will say, Brian Szasz a guy i game with. His step dad isnt dad (also gamed with him post "death"). And hes in terrmiar.
Brian also saw the firmament with me. He peed on it.
>>
>>41770788
>>41770751
>>41770746
Actually guys im just Larping forget I said anything.
>>
>>41770751
I read about half of the apocrypha.
Been sleeping with it next to my head for a year.
Some interesting stuff in there.
Enoch's interesting.

Did that rich kid club fire hit close to home? Shake any waves in your circles?
>>
>>41770788
What is it like to see the glass?
Shaking with fear, and awe and wonder?
Fear of God?

Have you see the seawall running at 180 longitude, right through Fiji Islands?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.