The best argument for there being some kind of cover-up is simply this:Why doesn't the US military want to put a base on the moon anymore?Apparently the military was drawing up plans for a moon base before any human even set foot (allegedly) on the moon. Am I supposed to believe that they just suddenly don't care anymore?>they don't need to, earth orbit is enough for missile deploymentIn the 50's they concluded that no near Earth-orbit surveillance would be sufficient to detect things placed in orbit between Earth and the moon. The only way would be to setup detection equipment on the moon itself.Did they suddenly stop fearing that another country would put missiles in high orbit?I'm not sure whether this means they simply can't get there (thus the moon landing was faked), or if it means that they've already established a base and want to downplay the importance of going to the moon.But the one thing I don't believe for a second is that they simply stopped caring.
No living thing can safely go beyond low earth orbit. They die quickly. The moon landings were fake as fuck.
>>41803602>Why doesn't the US military want to put a base on the moon anymore?As you point out, there's plenty of claims and theories in UFO and SSP circles that they secretly do have a base.>In the 50's they concluded that no near Earth-orbit surveillance would be sufficient to detect things placed in orbit between Earth and the moonTechnology has evolved considerably since then, military technology especially so.The reason the interest died down is because technological advance has made the strategic benefits that they once thought were best fulfilled by a moon base achievable with cheaper, faster, more efficient, more easily sustained programs and platforms.
>>41803717>The reason the interest died down is because technological advance has made the strategic benefits that they once thought were best fulfilled by a moon base achievable with cheaper, faster, more efficient, more easily sustained programs and platforms.But what's so suspicious about it all is the complete 180. If they really just lost interest you'd expect that interest would die down slowly, and the conversation would have still been on the table.But what do we see instead? That they basically went quiet after NASA was formed, that they conveniently "lost" all the original moon landing footage, that they conveniently "lost" ALL the telemetry data of the moon landings, that they conveniently "lost" the rocket technology saying that they literally can't go back to the moon today (how often does technology just regress like this?) and NASA today even says they don't think they can get humans through the van allen radiation belt?That pattern of events sounds a lot more like a project "going black", and trying to scrub every public link to it, rather than a military power losing interest in an entirely new arena over night.
>>41803602How come they can see the surface of Mars but dont know whats in the deep oceans?
Occam's razor: No moon base because we never went to the moon. Shrimple as
