How could this film be such an accurate depiction of the Illuminati that Stanley Kubrick got killed for it if it wasn't an original work? The film was based on a novella from 1926 called Dream Story. It had already been adapted to film in 1969, and neither that version's director nor the original author were murdered.
>>41867382It’s publicly known he said to remove every trace of Judaism from it. It’s a Weimar era film, he was known to have blurted out “Hitler was right about everything”. Not even trying to go /pol/ with it, but the concept that this movie is about “the Illuminati” or anything of that nature is just absurd. It’s not remotely debatable what the modern allegory was.
>>41867415Hitler was rightTrump is literally HitlerSo Trump is right ,yes?And the Jews control him? LolI'm sooo emigrating to China because of you guys
>>41867415There's nothing in the book or original 1969 film about Jews though. You've obviously never seen it.
>>41867510>>41867415also>weimar era film>1969
>>41867452What in the Sam Hill are you babbling about? >>41867514I meant novel>>41867510My foreknowledge of the original works is entirely irrelevant when the directors modern rendition was blatantly and transparently on the nose with it, it was a modern allegory. Again, I did not put any of the words nor connotations into the public sphere, Kubrick and his associates did. So if you would like to claim this is, then please enlighten us to what he was REALLY making reference to. Did Kubrick purposefully remove all traces of Judaism from his work, make sure to make it a point of doing so, in order to shed light on the Bavarian Illuminati or the Jesuits? Perhaps the Skull and Bones!
>>41867382Picture related
Is Kubrick in the Epstein Files?
>>41867382Kubrick's version was about a sect that rapes KIDS, Epstein style, not only orgies. This was in the 90s, when no one cared about Epstein and others, so it would be absolutely shocking. Kubrick didn't accept to change it so they murdered him and made a cut version at last moment to release. That's the version that exists.This is why the ending of the movie is weird: it's a cut version that implies the idea of the marriage selling their daughter to the sect and maybe joining them. The wife ends it saying "we should fuck as soon as we get home" i.e. we should make a new kid in order to replace our daughter.
Kubrick was a Unix Programmer.Ask him about it .
>>41867382
>>41868958I believe it, especially from the entire Epstein thing. And with how nobody is moving to stop anyone or anything involving it, there must be a lot of these people in on it, like crabs in a bucket pulling eachother back in.
>>41867649fuck I can't find the thread
>>41867649All we have to do is to ask Tom and Nicole. Granted, there is a chance they won't tell, but if we kidnap them, deprive them of food, then maybe they can break and tell the truth
>>41867696who knows? But Epstein and his files ARE in the film, and it was 90s
>>41867514The book is about Wien's (Austria's capital)elites's degeneracy, and the then open secret about it among the Austrian population.So the other anon worded the phrase in a funny way, but is not far from truth.
>>41867382https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q0W-HLavtU&list=RD7Q0W-HLavtU&start_radio=1
