How do we know NDE's are evidence of anything? Yeah I would obviously really love to believe I will see my dead loved ones when I die. But perhaps that's why dying minds imagine they will.
>>41980759Died, saw some shit.several people report the same shit.we may never know
>>41980759Thats the funny thing, you don't
>>41980759I like to think the afterlife is more of a dream, no different from when you sleep only you don't have a body. Then again I’ve literally seen spirits before, twice when I was little once as an adult. Aside from some other weird phenomena Incant fully explain, I guess in the end we don’t know anything. But I at least know there’s something, even if I don’t fully understand it, there something. Does that ease your mind OP? I want to clarify I don't know the first two spirits but the third I saw as an adult looked like a older version of my sister that had passed, she ran at me and normally I’m very calm but it’s almost as if a uncontrollable fear took over my body and I freaked out, it was like my body had betrayed me. If there is the other side time clearly isn’t linear.
Evidence-proof distinction. They don't prove anything but they have obviously evidential value.
>>41980759I believe some but the world is full of retarded lonely morons that will say anything for attention.
>>41980759Some people who experience NDE's are shown information that they could have not known in any physical way.
>>41980759Test
>>41983403The argument NDEs make is that this life is the dream
>>41983596Cool. Now why does that mean afterlife and not psychic phenomena (like what remote viewers do) or tapping into akashic records? There’s literally a dozen other interpretations you can take to fit the evidence.
>>41985591All the stuff you listed are the same thing.
>>41980759You are shown things in a certain way that would make sense to you, because you have to have a reference point you would understand otherwise it would not make sense.
