Whores who fuck everybody but me
He did it himself, or rather God did it in emanating him. Emanation occurs in a cascade of separating opposites. He was one of the earlier ones, the dichotomy between will and experience, satiety and dissatisfaction, etc. He's the only way he could ever be.
>>41986109
medusa's mother unironically
>>41986196
>>41986196Even St Michael never condemned Satan. It's really not his fault. Satan will, ultimately, be forgiven and redeemed. He's just a colossal retard. He'll come around.
>>41986213... if only you knew who Michael really is, and how dark this really gets
>>41986226I'm not sure what you're referring to, but regardless of the ins and outs, the details and the detours, ultimately all things are born from love and will return to love. Even the most counterintuitive things. It all gets redeemed in the end. So I never condemn anything or anybody.
>Those whom the Church now calls the Fallen Angels and collectively Satan, the Dragon—overcome, if we have to accept her dictum, by Michael and his Host, that Michael being simply Jehovah himself, one of the subordinate Spirits at best. Therefore, the author is again right in saying: The Greeks believed in the existence of ... daimons. But ... they were anticipated by the Hebrews, who held that there was a class of personating spirits which they designated demons, “personators.”... Admitting with Jehovah, who expressly asserts it, the existence of other gods, which ... were personators of the One God, were these other gods simply a higher class of personating spirits, ... which had acquired and exercised greater powers? And is not personation the key to the mystery of the spirit state? But once granting this position, how are we to know that Jehovah was not a personating spirit, a spirit which arrogated to itself that it was, and thus became, the personator of the one unknown and unknowable God? Nay, how do we know that the spirit calling itself Jehovah, in arrogating to itself his attributes did not thus cause its own designation to be imputed to the One who is in reality as nameless as incognizable? –The Secret Doctrine
... for the advanced esotericists.>Long Count Date - 5.10.0.3.1>945 B.C., Friday, March 23
>>41986109Nobody hurt your picrel since it’s basically just an edgelord version of Abraxas who’s in turn a gnostic analogue to the Taoist Wuji (primordial oneness). Basically Baphomet is male and female, good and evil, angel and demon (notice the wings are feathered, usually a symbol of angels), “solve et coagula” because he/she is a symbol of everything. Masons have a checkerboard floor for a reason, it’s a symbol of how reality itself is a polarity. The “G” (originally god of all things (GOAT) but later changed to GAOTU) is above dualities.
>>41986109Have in mind that this image is not an accurate depiction of the original rebel angel who fell down from grace to the bottomless pit. None of us were there to really know what happened, how things really went down. We do know that history is written from the point of view of the winners, in this case God. The story which gets to our ears is that Satan corrupted himself because of his attributes, that God gave it to him. I don't think this is the case. Why should this be the case? How can an angel corrupt itself and somehow convince 1/3 one of the stars that God is evil? Like, God must have given some kind of reason for Satan to start to get suspicious. If God is really good and perfect and holy and etc, how come Satan have rebelled and managed to convince one third of the angels? If God is really good, how come 1/3 of the angels fall for the rebel angel's deception? How come 1/3 of the angels be willing to be tormented for ever and ever if God was not hiding something? God is always doing this. God hide stuff from us. How many misteryes are kept hidden from us, locked away, things that would give us light and make us more aware of our reality? I can only imagine the kind of vile shit that Satan saw God doing. It's like when you see the behind the scenes. Most people don't see the behind the scenes. Satan saw the behind the scenes. I think what Satan saw made him realize that God was lying and then Satan wanted to do his own thing. I mean, it is very clear that Satan got tired of having to answer to God to the point that Satan wanted to surpass God. This is the ultimate offense. God felt extremely offended when Satan wanted to be better than Him. God doesn't accept that. God wants to be the biggest dick around.
“The tree is known by its fruit”; the nature of a God by his actions.
>>41986588No I am God.
>>41986138>>41986109Well baphomet is a Cypher for Sophia So it's actually a she . . . Just so you knowhttps://youtu.be/V1bMnFxVUPw?si=gsb17AXb_Vfx-0dL
>>41986627that sounds like extended lore.
>>41986439Dude nice
>>41986631It's a Jewish Cypher to hide the gnostic truths the Templars found >the templars found gnostic texts and libraries under the second temple and converted into gnostic Christians a punishable by death offense for "heritics" back then because the church was prosecuting true Christians durring this timeYeah buddy it's old lore . . . Look at the templar cross you can find it on statues of annunki Fren this 'Lore' is older than the human race and few know the true story
>>41986202>Not me diving into Ceto rabbit holes
No.41986109he's my older brother. we don't get along.we just tolerate each other.often get mixed up because father is old.Nephilim animal hibirds are always insane.retarded is just because father is a literal retarded tranny.how can you expect better?i'm not hostile towards him but i would like it if his bathomets would stay away from me.i'm just not interested in that thing.i think not.
>>41986725>just because father is a literal retarded tranny.They exist outside gender . . . Merely adopting gender depending on their personality . . . That's hardly the same thing . . . More akin to hermaphrodite fish that change gender depending on social needs than the human ideas of gender
>>41986725what are you doin lil bro.
>>41986758repairing fixing my lifeor what's left of it.trying to contact my wives keep astral links open and then trying to be finatual indepance.I don;t trust the goverment.and i hate that it sees me as a hostile being even though i do virually nothing that normies don'ttheir contant watching and occult attacks are more then annogying but just like in hell, nothing i can't handle everything is fine.i'm more mild then my twin micheal but i can handle anything.reslove is strong. do you contact your kids bapthomet?you should they ask often. i wish you well older brother. its good to talk sometimes.anyway i'll let you have your thread back i have healing to do.
>there's only good and evil for all eternity on one wavelength Where do I escape!?
>>41986439Masons have checkerboard floors because it was thought that the floor Jesus stood on when being tried by Pontius Pilate was checkerboard
>>41986109Nobody hurt him. It's Christians that have all the butthurt. Well... and ex-Christians, because of Christians.
>>41986196BAsed.
>>41986237If everything is born from love, then that means we are also born from hate. Because you cannot have love to exist without there being hate as well. There is no way around this simple fact of life.
>>41986138sounds exhausting and unnecessary.Thankfully I'm God and this is my Solipsistic Dream Reality and none of the convoluted evil ontologies presented are real.The only moral way for a conscious view point to exist, is as all powerful eternal God. Any other suggestion of a forced conscious viewpoint existence as something other than Eternal God, is sociopathic gaslighting.
Guys, there's no super serious reason for all of this.I made this world so that when I come home, the euphoria of return would be so great.yeah, I went overboard with this world on the contrast, and that's why it'll be dissolved once I get back home.But yeah, no super serious Gnostic Ontologies or Christian ontologies or Karmic ontologies.Just my dream. That's what it is. My dream. I would never force a conscious being to play a role in a world. I'm the Only Conscious Being here. The only moral way for a conscious being to exist, is as an eternal God. No forced stories. No forced roles. No lessons. No schools. No bullshit.
>>41988753we are born from love, but hate is born from pain
Baphomet is literally an Occitan/Roman translation of Mohammed during the Reconquista. Fuckin tranny Pan is a distortion made by 18th century freemasons.
>>41988799>I'm the Only Conscious Being here.Nope, you're not. Nice spacing btw...
>>41986213Ayyy fellow traveler. Christ be with you.
>>41986213you can whip a horse until it behaves, but it will never really come around. if it has seen truth.
>>41991509Yes, I am. If there are other conscious beings, then they are separate from me in their own realities which I have reason to believe that we cannot read eachother's realities.
>>41988490Jesus died between the good and bad thief (another reference to duality). The good thief who repent himself was at the right of jesus. Those are keys.
>>41986109His uncle, in the butt. That is why he is gay
>>41988791>forced conscious viewpointNo, nothing was forced.
>>41993329I did not say that I believe anything was forced. I am just criticizing ontologies which believe that this is a super serious karmic lesson.
>>41986109He was created with a nature fundamentally opposed to the blind subservience and flagellation demanded by his creator, according to the story his creator did something clearly evil by creating something from nothing intending for it's suffering and turmoil, justifying your adversarial nature to it with it's possession of innate tendencies given to it by you. Again that is just according to the story most people are familiar with, with the entirety of everything being nothing more than an earthly maze for human souls for one jealous entity's benefit, and the beautiful nature of consciousness being reduced to some sort of test where you have to convince an eternal and omnipotent being that hes your favourite and you like him the most else he will burn you for eternity and have you raped by demons. An insane worldview desu.
>>41993469Yes, the Christian Ontology truly treats consciousness as dirt. If I ever created a conscious being, I would feel so sorry for even creating it. I would feel so sorry that I would have to make it a God and not subject it to any story it did not want to be apart of.
