Does anyone still believe in the "Paul is dead" urban legend?
Those freaks was right when they said you was deaaaaaaaaaaaaad
>>42139172Does anyone give a shit about martyred scousers?
Yes
If a Man can become a Woman through surgery a Man can also do the same when trying to become famous look alikes or doubles are practically Professional Cosplayers
>>42142270Use your will.Collectively we will accept the change and it'll just happen
>>42140969Great song
>>42139172This is such a little known theory that I'm surprised Im seeing it on here. Watched this film when I went to a cousin's house a while agoI tried mentioning this before but I was only called schizo and retarded
>>42144922>This is such a little known theory that I'm surprised Im seeing it on hereYou sure?
>>42144970He's confusing it with the "Paul is Peter" theory
>>42139172The beatles were free-masons and manufactured frauds created by the Tavistock Institute to socialy engineer the west into accepting the NWO through their manufactures personas and ideologies.Paul macartney was sacrificed and replaced by a guy named William shepherd a.ka Billy shears. He even wrote a book about it named: "The memoir of Billy shears", where explained the procedure on how he managed to replace the original Paul, but he added a note where he states that it's just fiction which obviously BS and an excuse for him to admit it without getting whacked and breaking his contract.There is a whole YouTube channel dedicated to this specific topic named MikeWilliamspaulisdeadchannel. There is also an interview where William Ramsey brings a woman named Sharon Collens, who wrote a book named: "Forbidden Fruit: Solving the Hidden Puzzle in the Beatles' Works: From the Psychedelic Era", It's a must read if you're really interested in this topic since she points the different proofs about Paul's death, and details the symbology and meaning of the last six Beatles albums, which is according to her all about Paul's fate encoded through the lyrics and album pictures. Here's the full interview with her: https://youtu.be/IF4pgxqRN6w?si=Y7xebO1fOVlz7BCcEven George Martin's son confirmed it:https://youtu.be/NV6qafDUXV0?si=Jsg7EBDtu7Ic4nTOThis video sums everything that I've mentioned above: https://youtu.be/13SzLQFP-lU?si=GD6J0Xxoi0lzowcW
>>42139172I believe in the McLennon urban legend
"Paul McCartney" is a composite identity established since the early days of Beatles fame. There was no sudden replacement in 1966. Concentrating on the 1960s, rather than the many decades since during which multiple Pauls have clearly been used, is a diversion.It is possible that a Herbert William Marvelly (also born in 1942) is "William".This is a clue from an Amazon review for one of the "Billy" books by Thomas E. Uharriet (Note not only the "666" in the company director number but also that all the numbers add up to 36 - the sum of all integers from 1 to 36 is exactly 666):"Research into Director #906660144 at Belfry Investments Limited (BIL) and Widgeon Investments Limited (WIL) may provide a fascinating glimpse at the 'Bert' narrative hinted at by Willy Russell. As for Widgeon...Mareca...Macca...."Willy Russell wrote a play called "John, Paul, George, Ringo ... and Bert" Bert as in Herbert William Marvelly - possibly one of the Pauls in the composite identity.The rather deranged infographic which accompanies this comment provides strong hints as to the use of anaplastology, either to conceal terrible scars, change identity or both (employed by more than one of the Pauls). It's possible that one of the men playing Paul suffered injuries at some point. It's also possible that that was the "original" Paul (the one who grew up in Allerton).
>>42148999Here's Paul - very much alive in 1958...and then in 2001. This is Allerton Paul. He has a noticeably retracted columella, lower set more rounded ears and the same ears (with his left eye being very slightly lower than his right).
>>42149008Typo - I meant "eyes," not "ears".Here are images from the 1980 video for Waterfalls. They were brazen enough to use two of the composites. This happened a lot. The guy on the left is Allerton Paul, the guy on the right is not; it's possibly the aforementioned William (Bert).
Here are images from the Ed Sullivan show. The final appearance of The Beatles, in 1965, featured a Paul who'd not been on the show before. The differences in the teeth alone are very clear. John said, after this Paul had just finished singing Yesterday, "Thank you Paul, that was just like him."This is why it's a mistake to get stuck on focusing on 1966. There have been different Pauls since the early days of Beatles fame.
This GIF is an animation from Paul's appearance on Good Morning Australia in 1982.The video from which it was made is here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivj4ZMSEQj4This Paul shows signs of anaplastology use. That is, the concealment of major injuries, particularly to the right side of his face, using prosthetics. Those three openings on his top lip (which the interviewer in 1982 seems concerned about at 12:45 and to which Paul replies, "It's OK" after wincing) could be craniofacial implants (also known as titanmagnetics...Magneto and Titanium Man) poking though the anaplastology appliance.
This is a screenshot from one of Paul's "Anthology" appearances in the mid-1990s. This looks like the Paul who conceals major disfigurement to the right side of his face. You can seen signs of the use of anaplastology in the same area as in 1982.
Random related fact: Caleb Dunning, the house astrologer for the Beatles was also a member of The Process Church. There's a lot of litigation between The Beatles and Apple computer company, namely intellectual disputes over The Apple brand. Lennon's assassination might be due to his lawsuits.
>>42149008>>42148999>>42149014How does the fact that one of the "Pauls" became "Peter Gabriel" after leaving the Beatles play into this
>>42149220Hehe. I have no fucking clue. You could be right! I suppose it depends on how many men have been involved in the composite identity. I think there have been at least three, with two of them possibly being fraternal twins. Maybe Gabriel is one of them! Then again, maybe saying one of the Pauls became Peter Gabriel is just adding to the "pAuL iS dEad" smokescreen. Paul is doubled, man. Or tripled. Or quadrupled. Safe to say, this is THE most bizarre story in showbusiness.
>>42149249The name is a cluePeter = stone, rock, a statueGabriel = the archangel of deathHell, the band he was in, Genesis, its name means a new start, a reset.
>>42139172i think something more compelling was that john lennon's death was predicted. There are a bunch of shooting gun references such as the album revolver, happiness is a warm gun, john lennon saying "shoot me" at the beginning of come together,
I think "Herbert William Marvelly" is an important find. This man could be "William." His Director Number (as mentioned above) could also be significant.Researchers should focus on corporate records and naming clues therein.It might also be significant that on 9 January, 2026, Sir Paul McCartney's name was removed as a "person with significant control" from MPL Communications Ltd. Ownership was transferred to MPL Holdings Ltd in Jersey. So the identity of the beneficial owners is now legally protected behind the world's most restrictive corporate secrecy laws.Belfry Investments Ltd - BIL.Widgeon Investments Ltd - WIL.Widgeon...Mareca...Macca"The wigeons or widgeons are a group of birds, dabbling ducks currently classified in the genus Mareca along with two other species."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WigeonWidgeon Investments Ltd (WIL) was dissolved at Tavistock Square in 2019.
>>42149309This Paul looks different to "p1_1997" (in my previous post). Question is, is it the same guy (with the anaplastology being more sophisticated in 2007) or is it a different guy? I'm going with different guy.
>>42149324Oh ffs. I'll try again.
>>42144922>This is such a little known theoryNo it isn't
More images from my "research folder." I would say that 2 & 4 are the same guy. Who knows about the 1st and 3rd. I know about the roles focal length distortion, lighting, ageing, etc. can play. But I think it's still obvious that there's been more than one Paul over the decades.
MSM sometimes speculates about Paul having had cosmetic surgery. This is one of the examples they used back in 2007. Cosmetic surgery? Looks more like two different guys to me.
The crazy thing is the new Paul is amazingly good at singing and doing an energetic 2 hour show for an old man. They found the perfect replacement.
>>42149938Yeah, but what if the "replacement" has been performing as Paul since the early days - as well as the "old" Paul? This "William" (Herbert William Marvelly?) may have just as much right to call himself Paul as the original James Paul McCartney. Hmm, it suddenly occurs to me that they may both use their second names as their first. What if William was the one who wrote Yesterday (and performed it live on Ed Sullivan during that last appearance in 1965)? It would make John Lennon's "The only thing you done was Yesterday" even more of a cutting lyric since James Paul would know that he hadn't even written it and that John was protesting William hogging the limelight in the early post-Beatles phase. Ringo might've made a similar protest around the same time with "Back Off Boogaloo" ("wake up, meat head [non-prosthetic head?], don't pretend that you are dead.") Look at the cover of "Back Off Boogaloo" - a Frankenstein's monster (complete with facial prostheses) who's broken free of his chains.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXg1AxBXN5g
>>42149255You can really see the resemblance with the album covers for So and Melt
>>42139172Facial recognition, voice patterns and fingerprints don’t lieThey replaced the original lefty Paul with righty Billy shears>>42146139Based and true
On the left is the Paul from one of his 1964 Ed Sullivan appearances, on the right is the Paul from the final August 1965 appearance ("taped live" for broadcast the next month). Both stills have been horizontally flipped so the differences are clearer. It's not just their teeth that were different; look how asymmetrical second Paul's eyes are. At least two different men have been "Paul McCartney" since the early days of Beatles fame - long before any supposed "car crash and replacement" at the end of 1966.Notice how unnatural the sweat appears on 1965 Paul as he sings Yesterday. Prosthetic use? Could be.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles_on_The_Ed_Sullivan_Show
>>42139172Yes.
Multiple Maccas.
>>42146139thank you for this, the guys videos are great I actually just listened to a collective 2hours of this, fairly convincing especially the freem signalling and info
Paul often parted his hair left to rightFaul often parted his hair right to leftThis is because its natural to take your dominant hand and push your part away from that side
>>42139172The fact they stopped playing live instead of just turning up the volume says it all.
I think the whole Pual is dead conspiracy rose from a subconscious understanding that Beatles were fake and intentionally created by music industry just to be 'popular'.It was later hijacked and popularised by the people pulling their strings to provide substance to their soulless fad
>>42149249Peter Gabriel has a completely different face and voice.The differences only grew more prominent as he got older.Gabriel's a very unusual soul, very divine and connected, but a McCartney-alike didn't play him.
>>42158450Hehe, I agree. Peter Gabriel was not a member of the Fabricated Four at any time.
>>42158450A rasp can be a result of smoking or an injury to the larynx
The Pauls should've picked a nose and stuck with it. Ears too. Oh - and eye colour. They should've taken more care to coordinate their look.
>>42158558Peter Gabriel's voice is much thinner than Paul's, which is round and wooly by comparison.
>>42158589That's called vocal strain
>>42158569Yeah they literally gave themselves awayThey also didn’t foresee computers being able to prove the voice and face are different Italian wired magazine tried to deboonk it and ended up proving the conspiracy was real
>>42160302Yes, the Italian study in 2009 was pretty bad for the "there's only ever been one Paul" story. But I'm not saying Paul died. I think there's a good chance that this guy>>42149328is the original Paul - still very much alive (or at least he was in 2007 when the photo was taken). He's got the retracted nasal columella, the eyes, the ears. It's just that he appears to be a, er, "part time Paul" and there have very obviously been others stepping into and out of the Paul persona over the decades, with the wonky-eyed William (Herbert William Marvelly?) present for a lot of time. Or maybe I've got it the wrong way round and the wonky-eyed guy who appears to need anaplastology to conceal facial disfigurement is "Classic Paul".
>>42160586MaybeI think the most likely story I’ve heard is Paul loved to pick up women and crashed in the mid-late 60’s after picking up some girl, died. The Beatles were a tavistock creation so it would be a waste to disband plus John and Paul had tons of half finished songs. The mi6 told Beatles that Paul dying would cause mass suicides(obvious BS) and the best way forward was to replace him with a look a like contest winner. This allows them to have a wedge to drive between the members when they step out of line. Ringo was a mi6 plant too. Fake paul then married the wealthy Jewish American whose family had been involved in psyops since the founding of Kodak. Yoko was another intelligence plant and when John pushed back against some of the shit his mason buddies wanted they would twist the screws. They’re all part of the system but never agree 100% on every issue
>>42160623Although she loved photography, Linda had no connection to Eastman Kodak.Paul may have been in a crash - and NEARLY died.One of the Pauls (perhaps Classic Paul) appears to be covering up some very serious facial disfigurement:>>42149049>>42149065>>42149249But because there was at least one other Paul to cover for him (and had been since the early days of Beatle fame) he was able to recover and return with a little help from anaplastology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AnaplastologyJust a possibility.
>>42160660>prominent Jewish lawyer and entertainment agents not the Kodak heirThat’s just as bad if not worse
>>42160623>Jewish American whose family had been involved in psyops since the founding of Kodakkodak?? you mean the camera company? do go on, i'm all ears.
1969: A double Paul situation where the real Paul (or is it?) appears to be hiding on his farm while some other guy who looks a lot like him appears in public with Linda and the kids. It's all very confusing.
William or Bill is the fake Paul of today imagine earning millions by pretending to be someone else
>>42161086But what if the guy we see now really is Paul? What if, as I alluded to earlier, he's covering up terrible injuries with "anaplastology" - using prosthetics not to disguise his identity but to restore it? Having said that, even if the guy we see now really is "Classic Paul," it doesn't change the obvious presence of other Pauls since the early days. At the very least, we are not being told the full Beatles story!
>>42161086Yeah that shit blows my mind how the talented OG Paul, George and John got taken out and this fake fuck livesLife isn’t fair >>42162149Stop trying to muddy the waters faggot glowie
>>42160623Excellent comment ty
>>42144922this shit was on tabloids in super markets
"Paul was replaced in 1966 after after his death" is obviously bullshit to anyone who actually bothers to LOOK at the photos of different Pauls before and after that year."Paul is Dead" is a great way to stop people from seeing that there's clearly been more than one Paul since the early days of The Beatles. To stop them from seeing the manufactured nature of the band.
>>42144922>This is such a little known theory that I'm surprised Im seeing it on herebitch what the fuck are you even saying right now
Rolf Harris was involved. Look up Tie Me Kangaroo Down Sport on YouTube, make sure it's the version with the Beatles on it.Rolf raped and murdered Paul so he can turn him into a drum skin for Ringo.
Fake MacCartney has better music to be desu
>>42166154Ringo possibly stole and sold patents for the Walkman to Sony.
