[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/x/ - Paranormal

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


I'm 100% sure there was a video on YouTube of a documental reuniting multiple engineers from around the world explaining why the 911 isn't physically possible, it was around 2015 and it was called "No planes" or something like that, it was completely deleted from Earth's existence, I know I'm not crazy and I'm not making shit up
>>
You're saying it was CGI?
>>
>>42146276
Projections from where exactly? How do they work? Do they project sound as well?
>>
>>42146162
A woman write a book on it
Physicist
>>
>>42146290
Bombs and/or DEW
>>
then what did everyone see and record on their camcorders? my parents witnessed both planes hit, first one they were crossing a street in soho, second one from their office window watching the horrors unfold. so again… what is it you are suggesting they all saw? and how would that work from every angle?
cuz look… the whole day is sus. I would buy unmanned planes, bombs and dew was used. But you gotta give some better explanation about how there were no planes at all. I know dozens of people who saw it with their eyes, I am from nyc.
there is a collation of engineers who claim and use their science to say it was bombs esp building 7. But I’ve never once seen any engineers say there were no planes and I’ve watched A LOT of 9/11 docs since it happened.
>>
>>42146646
Yeah I'm on unmanned flight or simultaneous plane then energy weapons or detonation
Makes no sense to use exaggerated plane attacks with movie level supplementive explosives to implement airport security upgrades and the patriot act bullshit, but not even use a plane - to me
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (16 KB, 480x360)
16 KB
16 KB JPG
>>42146162
This is a bad take designed to muddy the waters and distract from the real story.

https://odysee.com/@SouloftheLost:c/dtg4MrnFDP9t:a
>>
>>42146646
>>42146820

I guess the planes were holographic or something. I mean if a bird BTFO of a plane, and it is nowhere as tough as steel, then how could they slice through steel like that, plus the towers were plane crash resistant, so they say. I even heard that most if not all the victims were fake as the towers were mostly empty, supposedly.
>>
>>42146924
I agree
It's all very weird
I just dunno how much they could realistically fake

Armoured plane? Controlled detonation of that floor so the plane would go through Hollywood style?

I'm just unsure how effective a hologram could be in broad daylight
>>
>>42146162
>>42146290
>>42146335
Why is it harder to believer there were real planes used as mass weapons? It's easy to use groups of people with a belief system as a weapon for your own intentions than early CGI for mass testing.

Those planes were fully loaded with fuel and people and whatever else they might've wanted to sneak onto there for the ritual of a new century.
>>
>>42147264
Because they went through the building
Look at the construction photos of the twin towers
A plane is not going through that shit
It was like 4" of steel per beam on all sides and a plane is basically a floating wafer with jets comparably.

That's why I said armoured plane or some Hollywood demo type situation for the plane to go through
>>
>>42146162

there was a group of architects that had come together to prove 9/11 wasn't fake but they weren't claiming that there were no planes, they were saying that planes were unsufficient to do the level of damage described, and that the damage and footage is indicative of a controlled demolition.
>>
>>42146330
>A woman write a book on it
This is a fantastic way to disclose the truth while making sure nobody ever reads it
>>
>>42146924
>>42147138
>>42146646
The reason some liken to no planes/drones are twofold
First I actually need help I cant find. News station has camera focus on both towers, 1 has been hit. They turn camera right, zoom out, zoom back in turn back to tower and from stage right a "plane" (edited in) is timed to the explosion E team setup weeks prior(?) Either way the shape looks same size, and edited in many have said this. I hope that description can bring out who has the clip.
The second is it very well may have been a drone/advanced technology to visualize a plane. No civilians were not taken by muzzies with box cutters and no experience flying. That's a bad hollywood script. 9/11 comission never finished investigation cause of heart attack guns killing witnesses and by 2009 we had muh economy to think about. It was the centuries ritual, a 100 years of terror. Terror in tv terror at home terror while you sleep.
>>
>>42147571
Ah, wrote*
But yeah still
I agree
>>
>>42146924
I personally know people who were in the towers and escaped. It was empty of jews but not empty
>>
>>42148294
my dad works at nintendo too



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.