At the start of the year, the David Hume mausoleum in Edinburgh, Scotland was seemingly used in some sort of ritual / art piece. These symbols were marked with chalk / hung on the gate using red tape, red candles were suspended with four nails through them and a painting of a naked woman holding a knife with a dead child was left on the site along with others that are not mentioned. Another important thing to note is that the red tape used in the hanging symbols was marked with ‘Antimetaphysical Front’ - which if you google, takes you to this website: https://antimetaphysicalism.com/ . The website features the same symbols and also some pretty grim paintings that match the description of the one left at the mausoleum. There are 4 paintings, each of which are catalogued by a SHA-256 hash.Does anyone know what this is all about / recognise this symbol? To me this whole thing seems very ona coded but equally (and more likely) is some edgy art project intentionally using fringe occult /extremist aesthetics. Any ideas?
>>42158951>david meume.
>>42158951stop this larp
>>42158951What the FUCK are these images? Not even gonna picrel these as they are disgusting and I'm not saving them.https://antimetaphysicalism.com/archive/The treatise seems like a larp tho. Has that hard to read quality that comes from AI slop.
>>42158951Website uses a proxy provider. Interesting.
>>42158951Hume has been completely refuted by modern science. Temporal logic is fundamental to how the neocortex works. The things that he said could only possibly be true for lower animals that completely lack a cerebral cortex. This reeks of Peter Theil tranny retardation.
>>42161366you've never even read hume you fucking moron and it's not science's job to "refute" philosophers
>>42161390His assertions regarding the nature of consciousness have been exhaustively proven false. Major breakthroughs in deriving the cortical learning algorithm and the function of the microcolumn/sheet structures in our neocortex completely refute everything he says about how the mind works.It could not be that your behavior and memories are determined in the way he asserts. As in it would be physically impossible given what we have determined to be true by studying how synapses are activating and neurons are interacting in the brain as memories are formed and things are consciously recognized from sensory perception.I do not need to read Hume. I can tell from the coles notes that his ideas were completely antiquated and silly. It amounts to magical thinking. Inductive reasoning is baked in to how our brains work at the most basic level, a huge chunk of the fatty blob in your head is essentially an inductive reasoning computer. It is in your DNA for your brain to work this way, as far as human science can tell. The wrinkly outer layer of your brain is maybe 60% inductive reasoning, then 40% deductive reasoning and interferometry. Memories are stored as an interference function and that is why they are non-local and you cannot remove specific memories by removing specific cells.You do not know what Jeff Hawkins has been up to since he sold out of Palm Pilot. Fuck Hume and fuck you.
>>42161607>I do not need to read Hume.okay, so you're gonna be one of those dumbfucks who just reads the blurbs you saw about an author and think that makes you informed enough to comment on himthe only one being refuted here is your ignorant ass
>>42158951>>42158951https://antimetaphysicalism.com/doctrine/metalanguage+100 cool points for linguistic analysis though. hardly ever see anyone writing linguistic logic statements.otherwise the rest of the site is either ai slop or crank literature.
