[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/x/ - Paranormal

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


If the sun is behind the earth in this photo, then how is it day time light on the side facing the camera? This should only be possible if the sun were behind the camera.
>>
>>42200303
if you zoom in there are stars visible, this should also not be possible. Can anyone use a night sky tracker to see if the star pattern is even real? This shit looks so fake
>>
>>42200303
is the bright dot at bottom right supposed to be the sun?
>>
>>42200303
wouldnt it look like this?
>>
>>42200303
Also if you look at a map, Spain's clearly ABOVE Africa, not below it. Are we supposed to believe that NASA flipped the entire planet upside down just for a photo-op, and somehow nobody noticed?
>>
that shit is even faker than the 60s moon landing, and that is saying a lot
>>
>>42200303
Good point. So much is off about this photo. I mean it just looks straight up CGI photoshop. But why not wait until NA or EU is shown and take a pic of that? That would be way cooler and gain more views and clicks instead of a pic with mostly ocean.

The lighting point should be the end all. If in fact the Sun is behind Earth then you can't explain what we are seeing, period. One would think that NASA would not make such a rookie mistake though so I think there's more to it. Have to check sources and the mainstream explanations first
>>
>>42200303
They used a flash lamp.
>>
File: 1774655698749239.jpg (199 KB, 1168x1280)
199 KB
199 KB JPG
>>42200303
Because its a CG/AI image. Its apparent even to a trogdolyte that something is way off with that photo.
NASA already airbrushes Devon Island orange and calls it "Mars" for gubment gibs.
Space as you know it is utterly fake and gay; theres no other reason to concoct such elaborate frauds like this.
>>
>>42201416
dumb
if there was anything powerful enough to illuminate the whole side of a planet for a photo we would've seen it flash from the surface, not to mention it'd be basically a super weapon and on all modern battlefields to blind the enemy with
>>
File: original.jpg (2.15 MB, 4096x2731)
2.15 MB
2.15 MB JPG
>>42200303
They (stupidly) polished the photo to look better. Like in adobe darkroom. Picrel looks like the "before" image.
>>
File: earthlight.jpg (57 KB, 1200x800)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>42201460
This is the moon during a solar eclipse, lit by earth's reflection.
>>
>>42201460
I can't stop but think that it looks like cardboard with a circle cut out rather than a floating sphere. Is it just me?
>>
Fake Photo Interstellar travel is impossible because God put up a barrier you need to have a high spiritual level to travel to other worlds
>>
File: GawkviZXcAEAWyW.jpg (228 KB, 941x968)
228 KB
228 KB JPG
>>42201480
Fake image. The moon is not present during an eclipse. It's the black sun causing it.
>>
>>42201657
I...I...didn't know there were crazies and shills on /x/, this is a lot to take in.
>>
>>42201664
>I...I...didn't know there were crazies and shills on /x/
First day here?
>>
>>42201669
>First day here?
First day for a lot of things, God just beamed me here from Jupiter to set things straight.
>>
>>42200303
>how is it day time light
It's not. Notice how all the cities are lit up in the Iberian Peninsula?
Do cities usually have all the lights on during the day?
>>
Dude >>42200303 is the same as >>42200335 just with the exposure turned up.
Look how in Iberia and along the african coast all the lights are on. It's clearly night. If this were the daytime side of the earth they probably wouldn't be able to expose for the earth and the stars at the same time.
Does nobody know how cameras work?
>>
>>42200303
it was full moon shining at the earth
>>
>>42201481
yes anon, a sphere will in fact look like a circle in a 2D image, good job



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.