/x/ - Isn't it funny that none of the older images of Ea - Paranormal

Anonymous

04/05/26(Sun)00:25:33 No.42205066

File: AP26093499359031-1775242604.jpg (272 KB, 1920x1440)

Anonymous 04/05/26(Sun)00:25:33 No.42205066 Archived

Isn't it funny that none of the older images of Earth have a visible atmosphere around the planet, and now all of a sudden there is one?
Oh and look, we can suddenly see stars now. You couldn't see stars in the past apparently.

Not sure which improvement we owe this to more.
Our ability to _actually_ go into space beyond low Earth orbit for the first time, or our AI image generation technology? Which do you think it is? Tell me in the comments.

Anonymous
04/05/26(Sun)00:29:11 No.42205076

Anonymous 04/05/26(Sun)00:29:11 No.42205076

>>42205066
>photo of night side of earth
>wide aperture
>long exposure
>digital brightness amplification
All discussed in the other thread.

Anonymous
04/05/26(Sun)00:42:54 No.42205107

Anonymous 04/05/26(Sun)00:42:54 No.42205107

>>42205066
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Airglow_from_space
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d9/Earthrise_over_Compton_crater_-LRO_full_res.jpg
?

Anonymous
04/05/26(Sun)00:52:18 No.42205130

Anonymous 04/05/26(Sun)00:52:18 No.42205130

>>42205107
First one is all low earth orbit.
Second one has no atmosphere visible at the edges.

Anonymous
04/05/26(Sun)00:55:38 No.42205144

Anonymous 04/05/26(Sun)00:55:38 No.42205144

i think thats the space debris they talk about.

Anonymous
04/05/26(Sun)06:40:52 No.42206332

Anonymous 04/05/26(Sun)06:40:52 No.42206332

>>42205107
Second pic literally looks like CGI, LOL do NASA fanboys really buy this?