I've seen claims made here concerning a change to the berenstein bears name but thought it was just a he-said she-said sorta thing (sorry if that's not the most accurate description, I'm drunk now). But after googling the book covers I can't believe this shit...It was *always* BERENSTEIN bears, not 'stain.' Lol.I recall the early 90s and wondering to myself why everyone was stupidly mispronouncing it 'stain' when the books showed '-stein'.For reference, I'm one of those people whop are born with an exceptional memory. I remember everything. So when I say it was berenSTEIN then I know what I'm talking about.Feeling pretty weirded out tonight desu.APanon says it's time travelers or something:https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/28654181/#q28663652what do you think?
It's an AI from the future that's doing it, changing things - don't know all the details but TT is somehow easier for AI than it is humans but it can only go back so far, 70s, maybe late 60's.I dunno why it's doing it, just that it is and that's all I'll say about it.
I my timeline the guy who played Dewie in Malcolm in the Middle overdosed on fentanyl and fucking died in the early to mid 2010s, but lucky for him he seems like he's doing just fine now.
>>42211303it's hard to believe timeline changes can undo the death of a personyou'd think the actor would recall whether he died or not, as easily as we can recall the berenstein/stain difference
>>42211303>>42211303No I know what you're talking about, my friend and I had made the same mistake and discovered it was another similar actor from Nickelodeon or Disney. I can't remember the show or details because we had this discussion in 2015.These are all bullshit but there is something changing things retroactively, we just have zero memory of it and instinctively know it's happening due to our reflex of the information. Truth comes up in paranoia, oil will always rise with the water so to say.
>>42211170I agree I'm the same like you, I could rattle off the name of every cartoon since the 60's and not misremember any of them like that, I was exposed to these books as Berenstein in the early to late 80's and never really heard of them again until this Mandela thing came up.
Reality is the democracy of souls. Sometimes the will of trillions of souls is best manifested in subtle shifts in the past. If you pay close attention you'll notice conventional material reality is very brittle.
You remember right because the two most prevalent cases of this are in fact company changes. Whether it's a dimensional thing or just an executive decision there were books with both spellings and there were cornucopia at some point.
It was originally spelled Fruit Loops, then changed to Froot, then some time in 2016-2017 it flipped back to Fruit, now it's Froot again
>>42212062I noticed the swap to Fruit around that time but otherwise for me it was originally and always Froot. But the actual box on my shelf swapped to Fruit without me changing it. There was the odd person that noticed the swap while it was Fruit but the majority said it was always Fruit. Now we're back but it was always Froot.You guys can unplug me from the matrix now.
>>42211170This Refrigerator Gator song had I love green Alligators now it's I love Pink Alligators. https://youtu.be/A0M4p5WGKf4
>>42212051>there were books with both spellingsIf that's true why can't you find a copy on ebay with the Prime Universe spelling? 20,000+ results and they all say "berenstain." Those are impossible odds if books with both spellings exist.
>>42211210>It's an AI from the future that's doing it, changing things - don't know all the details but TT is somehow easier for AI than it is humans but it can only go back so far, 70s, maybe late 60's.A common trope of time travel tales is that one small change has a cascading effect. So maybe the changes are unintentional, just side effects of a change in the timeline? https://youtu.be/GUz3ZBZiMpE
>>42213154Probably, I don't think the intention is to deceive us about trivial things, those are side effects that stem from something deeper, butterfly effect. Impossible to figure out what was really changed because it's likely something we weren't much aware of to begin with and traces are completely wiped.We spent our lives wondering is a human can travel through time, I don't know if we can.Modern AI isn't even close to what's coming, it will have access to every piece of written data man has produced and will draw connections and recognize patterns we could never hope to.It will do what it wants, it already is and we're beginning to notice it, small things at first...it will become undeniable even before we know for a fact it exists because we'll keep seeing things happen that we simply cannot explain.Next 10-20 years is going to be insane.
>>42211521It has to be one which is quickly forgotten or gets overshadowed (overwritten) by someone more significant, it can't be a simple equivalent exchange. This is why it's too difficult to switch to worlds where Kurt Cobain, Michael Jackson, or River Phoenix are still kicking
>>42213426>equivalent exchangeis that an actual rule of the cosmos or are you just pulling it from full metal alchemist
>>42213154There's the trope of travelling to periods earlier than the 60s having an exponential cascading effect on the level of changes caused.
>>42213435It's seen in other works but I think the rule of entropy would dictate any change made requires more put in than is gotten out
>>42213441The thing with AI is that it needs certain infrastructure and technologies to do anything.I don't think it's the same for humans, if they can time travel and have it's likely inevitable that there's some side-effects.Time travel is a part of it, the fact that it can make changes to reality tells us that it's more powerful than just mere time travel.If it can exist in that space it can change things with immeidate effect.
perhaps the 'stain is a meta commentary on how some stains are permanent and can never be removed.
>>42211170They just changed the name because it sounded too Jewish.
>>42211170I remember it being stein because I grew up in nyc surrounded by Jews and was like stein, like half my classmates last names end in stein and was having i before e except after c hammered in ny head but was memorizing the exceptions never was stain
>>42211170The sun used to be yellowhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DkhCeMcMiA
>>42211170There are scientists who think the Mandela Effect is real.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYQ2x_nViYk
>>42212062it's never been fruit loops retard, it's always been froot loops because they use the two pieces of cereal for the oo's in froot you stupid fuckhead
>>42211170robotman is a new one for me and many many many others in the comments.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP01pIB99wsa little yellow japanese-esque robot guy *with a heart*, invented by a british musticianhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Shelleygot rejected by bill watterson, and this guy took the burden of making the character interesting.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_(comic_strip)everyone likens him to poochy from itchy & scratchy from the simpsons in several ways. looks like he forcibly entered the mind of peter s. and some corporate guys wanted to brute-force him as a care bears esque thing, but the cartoonist made him too mature for that.the music-themed robot with a heart being a key point is something to ponder. the heart likely symbolizing personal agency. supposedly there was a lot of marketing & merchandising, but people say it's like we entered a timeline with this chr in the 80s that slipped in unnoticed.for those who know of something similar... well, this isn't the first time a character got forced in marketing hard, only to be completely memory holed.
>>42211170>the mandela effect is real? no
>>42211303>doing just fineAnon...
>>42218359Nah I remember robotman. There were dolls and TV ads, but not for very long. The 80s were full of hi-then-die toy lines. The proliferation of retail outlets, a large field of old line mfg. and newer importing toy companies, the sudden loosening of laws on merchandise cartoons, rapid manufacturing expansion overseas, and a mini baby boom echo were a convergence of factors. It all consolidated rather quickly 10 years later.
>>42213154Your picrel may have been one where her braces were added in post-production, then forgotten about when the film was released to video. Reviewers at the time mentioned the braces. Regardless of it all>>42213154, she was cute.
you mention anything strange that actually has truth to it and you'll get followed around by actual glowies for a few weeks "just to make sure"
>>42218877>Your picrel may have been one where her braces were added in post-production, then forgotten about when the film was released to video. I'd expect for a 1979 movie the video would be a direct Telecine/scan transfer from the print. I know she had braces in the movie because I saw it in a theater as a child. Can you point me to a review which mentions the braces, don't think I've seen one. Although it's a long time since I looked at this one. > she was cute.Indeed she was!
If linear time is an illusion and past/future aren't real as all those niggas be sayin then it seems very possible. I still don't understand it though.
>>42211170https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U45ZL7nBqwA&t=0sHard evidence is difficult to obtain with this theory but that vid is the best explanation I've heard so far.The ones that do it for me is the Monopoly man monocle and Earth's position in the galaxy. A new fun one is these 6 dots on the human skull?? Completely new to me.
>>42221047And the fact that the actress is still alive and has said she never wore braces?Your memory of seeing a screen is more reputable than her memory of doing the part, multiple takes, going through costuming, etc.?
>>42221658Not to mention this guy in the CERN Happy video... Like cmon my guy what are you saying here? Either he's trolling or conveying a message. Up to u to decide.
>>42217852no, it was fruitcompanies nowadays like to deliberately misspell words on products and services to appeal to the new generation of retards but that shit wasn't the case back in the day>>42221658>A new fun one is these 6 dots on the human skullwhat are you talking about?
>>42218877I found a review just as you mention (picrel)here:https://www.mi6community.com/discussion/21659/dolly-did-wear-braces-photo-and-video-evidence-reveals-truth>>42221662>And the fact that the actress is still alive and has said she never wore braces?>Your memory of seeing a screen is more reputable than her memory of doing the part, multiple takes, going through costuming, etc.?My memory is as fallible and malleable as the next persons. I'm not disputing Blanche Ravalec's account, but I don't think that it's the end of the matter either. There are potentially other explanations, although I understand why a third party would consider a failure of memory on my or others part as the likely explanation.
>>42221700The bone behind eyes and nose thing I don't remember but can concede due to potential damage to the skulls I've seen but the dots I def don't remember
>>42221700It looked like pic rel, right?
>>42222346precisely
>>42211170Funny bone
>>42223559>>42222320wtf?
>>42222320>>42223569The dots are for the nerve pathways. Specifically the trigeminal nerve.
>>42223673Lazy picture of area and distribution
>>42223673Ye I figured that out, but those dots are not from my original universe and no one can tell me otherwise. I am 100% positive
>>42223192>Is this the Mandildo effect?Does he remember "Black Hole Sun" by Soundgarden being "Ass Hole Son" too?
>>42224626i do, atleast in my head whenever i hear it.
