https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSoxioQtwZcVcFC85TxEEiirgfXwhfswhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEMXp1HlzUs I have William Lilly, Oner Doser, John Frawley, and Manilius books for analysis. I want to look at the 12k year timespan between when the solar system transits the galactic current and galactic dust sheet. since we could, and should, in principle take into account moons of each planet in astrological calculations, the galactic dust sheet and the cataclysm it causes seems another good thing to include...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShY-QAuuuC8where we are at is on a 12k years or so cycle, the next coming up around 2040 or so. vidrel has discussions about what the "splash" looks like when the sun hits the dust sheet, making a few days of darkness and "black sun" conditions before the sun starts ejecting the absorbed dust after it finishes falling into the core of the sun, then fusioning whatever it can before ejecting the rest.from a horary and analytical perspective with astrology, how to go about analyzing this? my first guess is to look at the 12k year cycle and start subdividing it into harmonics until getting down to the 12 months of the year, orbit ratios on our planet, ephemeral data and such. I've earned a paycheck with programming and mathematics before and have the time and interest to get into astrology for a specific reason. my plan is to do a sequential chart graph at some interval spanning several decades into the future and look for some sort of common event among most, if not all, possible qeurents and queries since the transit of the solar system through the galactic sheet is by evidence a cataclysm and therefore should show up cleanly around 2040 and also 12k years back...
Based. I hope the bong magician anon visits too
>>42224205ditto. check out vidrel. at least they have data to prove it, and it makes sense to view religions in the sense that their cataclysm stories line up, the typical bullshit you know.the trend analysis for astrology should at least show some big events around that time frame. I mean, our planets are in orbital ratios between each other and have been stable as such for eons, short a few milliseconds in a few places. it should make some sort of sense that since each moon in our planet has a orbital period ratio below it's orbital parent, then the solar system probably has a ratio against it's orbit period to the galactic center.I don't know exactly where to start, the books I have are cool and all, but I think getting some charts and stuff made mathematically is the way to go. besides, someone has probably already done the analysis.
>oscillation caused by the local cloud in orbit around sirius
Putting the cart before the horse, eh?You know theres software already for astrology/astronomy, right? Astronomers have already calculated for thousands of yearsReally what you need is only interpretation but even then, why bother with such a time scale? You wont live that long. No, but i get it. We men have always wanted to know the future even if we wont live to see it...Ah, sorry, i just read the last part of your post. Yes, its all done, been done actually, long before our time, even. William lilly is good. Really we should start by learning the classics
>>42221751>12000 Years CycleBased, I also had a "revelation" about such a cycle with periods of a 1000 years related to the signs and their planets, that may be part of periods of years that are multiples of 12.Anyway since this thread is about horary can I post the charts I made asking about my existential crises and ask for opinions?
>>42226163>can I post the charts I madeyou sure as fuck can, but only if we exchange. picrel is my natal, what's your take? bibliomancy anon and I chatted about it a while back and he ran it through the esoteribot he made and it barfed out a good analysis, but boilerplate. the reason I ask is that I have met other bucket/basket Saggitarians, and especially the left handed ones, and we are some sort of group who all knows each other already. I don't know how to explain it really. in any case, if you can relate what you know about people with a chart like that, cool. I am reading through all the mechanical and mathematical parts about how to do precision astrology, but all the more literary and implicit analysis stuff like the houses and such are still foreign territory.what about your existential crises? I'll try apprentice level analysis.
>>42225603>Yes, its all done, been done actually, long before our time, even.yeah, thanks anon. but wherrrrrre can I find that? I am at the point of using a carrot peeler on my eyeballs to carve out some sort of magic sigil or somesuch to find where these supposed analyses were put to paper. for example, William Lilly having charted the Fire of Londonhttps://www.astro.com/astrowiki/en/William_Lilly#The_Great_Fire_of_London,_1666https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_DxE2AAAAMAAJ_2what Lilly describes as a laborious process of making a series of charts at some interval, say 1 hour, for the course of some future date, would still be limited in the sense that you would still need to be performing a differential trend analysis, which is more or less what analytical astrology is. my imagination has a line graph such that the sag line oscillates with some periodicity and some waveform, then superimposed on it could be a Libra line such that for every inflection point, minima, maxima, crossing points, etc... all refer to well defined situations like trines, ascendants, etc... in that way, having the daemons in the computer do all the work to make a similar analysis such that all signs are analyzed in parallel, all future dates are analyzed to the hour, etc...there surely must be instances where all/most/some of the zodiacal signs either reach a common maximum, minimum, inflection, or other somesuch correlation. hell, just plotting sag/lib will eventually have such poisson clumps, but then when and where do the criteria exist such that maybe 10 or so zodical signs reach some sort of correlation alignment?
>>42226355Mars on ASC and chiron on IC both probably very significant things
>>>/pol/532846720
>>42229874I for one feel lucky and grateful to be able to have such a comfortable front row seat, reasonable lodging, decent food, and with enough life experience such that if I am able to survive the inexplicable conditions by yet another wild stroke of luckyou fuckin hear me Eglinos?wild stroke of luck that I get invited either down to the tunnels under St Louis or down to Antarctica where the continuity of government remote base is at. like Mount Weather, but in Antarctica. failing that, my entertainment rectangle and all you anons are at least making the end times at least a little bit amusing. or maybe I get recruited into the babymaking factories to repopulate the Earth. I'll make sure to bring some of you anons with me.
>>42230143<333
>>42226393>but wherrrrrre can I find that?Probably not in western astrology.... remember william lilly himself said horary astrology came from the arabs...
