If you truly believe that humans come from animals or that we were once animals then you are supporting the Satanic agenda Science is not the absolute truth it is merely a theory evolution is a lie a fallacy the truth can only be found with God not in the absolutist Masonic and Satanic global elite
>>42226429>Satanic agenda SciencePfff, I am a scientist, not some deranged desert cultist. :p
>>42226454Why are you here then?
>>42226470Same could be asked of OP. Shouldn't he be dumping his thread on /sci/?
>>42226429lmao calm down schizoEvolution is just observable reality:Your DNA is ~98.8% identical to a chimp's, with the exact same broken vitamin C gene and endogenous retroviruses inserted at the exact same spots in the genome. That's not coincidence, that's common ancestry.Fossil record is full of transitional forms (Tiktaalik, Archaeopteryx, whale legs, etc.).We've literally watched it happen in real time: Lenski's E. coli, peppered moths, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, Darwin's finches."It's just a theory" is midwit cope. In science "theory" means a framework that explains facts, like germ theory or gravity theory. It isn't a wild guess. Plenty of Christians (Catholics, most Protestants, etc.) accept theistic evolution — God using natural processes is not "Satanic." The idea that the entire scientific community is a Masonic globalist plot is pure /x/ LARPing with zero evidence. Darwin was a 19th-century naturalist, not a Bilderberg attendee.If your God is the God of truth, why are you scared of evidence? Reality isn't a conspiracy, it's just reality.
>>42226532Whatever you want keep believing we went to the Moon God bless you
the definition of animal is your body being composed of animal cells, that's not "satanic" it's just science
>>42226470Curiosity? ^^>>42226477The "quality" would just fit, right.
>>42226429>If you truly believe that humans come from animals or that we were once animalsHumans are STILL animals.The ones like you that dont properly think are called two-legged animals, not humans.
>>42226429Evolution is a irrefutable fact with plenty of evidence to support the theoryHere, have some evidence
>>42227727have you ever SEEN one of these so-called 'chromosomes', anon? Or are you just basing your belief in them on pictures and stories put out by 'scientists'?
>>42226429I don't buy into it. But isn't the existence of diff species evolution? Like all the types of dogs and shit. What's that if not evolution? I think the 'magic' aspect of evolution is if you think a dog and evolve into a cat. sheep to horse. monkey to human. This is where they try to sell u :P
>>42226429I love the picture like OP posted because it's actual retard bait.It's meant to be an abstract representation of us evolving but being retarded and unable to think in theoreticals they take it completely literal and it throws them completely off.>>42227779>I don't buy into itHow do you explain why you look similar to both of your parents? And how can you recognise that different species (though you meant breeds) is proof and not "buy into it"?You're falling for the retard bait. They don't say that a dog can evolve into a cat, evolution says that at one point they had a common ancestor that looked neither like dog or cat and then was selectively bred over hundreds of thousands of years by survival of the fittest and brought the animals we have today.
>>42227833Because I, me personally, sometimes have to go w gut feeling and intuition. How can I prove something and observe evolution per the scientific method if I have to observe for millions of years? As the scientific method states - observe WITH ALL 5 SENSES. Kind of wild to include that in the foundation of scientific verification and science itself tho. They are really all-inning that the ppl who made this shit are so certain there are only 5 senses. What if we had 6 senses and just didn't know? Now the whole system is fucked. Do we ever know everything? Obviously not. Therefore, the system is prob fucked lol galaxy brain
There never was a theory of evolution just a religion of evolution
>>42226470A gentleman may embrace a doctrine without necessarily wearing the garb that goes with it, and he may wear the garb without necessarily comprehending the doctrine.
>>42228133Ahhh yess yesss Mr. Confucius... A warrior may represent the courage without bearing the armor, and he may bear the armor without possessing the courage
>>42226429What if the masonic invented the Bible and God?
>>42226429>humans come from animalsIf humans didn't originate from animals then explain their animal and warlike tribal behavior genius?
I find it hard to believe that God created the world and all the animals on the spot. It just sounds something out of elder scrolls or some fairy tale.
>>42228509There's no beginning or end or else nothing at all makes sense (something came from nothing). If no beginning and end, that also does not make sense. Go figure. Human brain limitation
>>42228497Animals aren't smart enough to go to war. When's the last time you saw a moose or whatever with a bazooka?
>>42228611Monkeys go to war with each other. Bears attack each other for territory.
>>42228620not real wars. just fights between individuals or small groups. You and your buddies getting into a barfight isn't a war either.
>>42226429you sound like a faggot boomer. a theory on a scientic ground isn't the same a theory lets say philosophy, a scientic "theory" is a very palpable fact, is just called theory because semantics, but is used in everything wich is very much proven but under investigation
>>42229059Really? so Quantum theory is Quantum Fact ? Big bang fact? Why haven't they got rid of the theory yet? the theory of evolution? lmk
>>42229067>quibbling over semanticsGerm theory, theory of gravity, theory of evolution- they'd all be false no matter what you called them. The words don't actually matter.
>>42229387We on the same page. Except idk anything about germ theory so don't crucify me for that (to any random smart ass bot lol).I build a 10 story apt building, but for the foundation I'm going to use something that is theorized to hold up the building. Can go tits up can go tits down. How is that proven fact that the building will hold up again? Common sense. I think I get what you're saying tho. Like if we continue to advance then every theory will get replaced with a new theory? Sure maybe. But how are we going to start on step 1 KNOWING the foundation is a theory. Its one thing to build the foundation and the building then figure out later you can do it better next time or whatever then to just be like fuck it this foundation may fall but lets try anyways. And then gaslight anyone who questions if the foundation will fall or not. It's dishonest to me. I guess this is more about intent?
https://blog.alor.org/is-evolution-satanic-by-james-reedhttps://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/christnewstoday/2022/03/pastor-jimmy-evans-discusses-end-times-in-sermon-calls-evolution-satanic.html
