[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/x/ - Paranormal


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: unknown object reentry.png (191 KB, 715x976)
191 KB
191 KB PNG
There was scheduled for today April 9th for a UFO to enter the atmosphere.

Has anybody here seen evidence of a possible alien arrival or are you able to identify what this was?
>>
It may be that it (they) have not arrived yet, we are waiting for confirmation.
>>
>>42229826
Just because it doesn't have a SpaceTrack name doesn't mean it's an UFO. The 2025-009F designation means it's been identified for a while.
>>
According to Gem:

That satellite designation (2025-009F) refers to an object from a SpaceX Falcon 9 launch that took place on January 14, 2025. While the primary mission of that launch was a Starlink batch (Group 7-35), "Object F" (NORAD ID 62614) was one of the secondary pieces of hardware—specifically, a Starlink satellite from that cluster.

Reentry Status: April 9, 2026
The satellite did indeed complete its orbital decay yesterday. Here are the specifics:
Official Status: Decayed. The satellite is no longer in orbit.
Reentry Time: It reentered the Earth's atmosphere on April 9, 2026, roughly between 04:00 and 10:00 UTC.
Location: Current orbital models suggest the final plunge occurred over the South Pacific Ocean. This is a standard "graveyard" area for reentering debris to ensure safety.
Outcome: As a Starlink satellite, it was designed to be 100% demisable. This means it likely burned up completely in the upper atmosphere due to the intense friction and heat of reentry, leaving no significant debris to reach the ground.
>>
>>42229866
I should note that I didn't give it the NORAD ID ("Cat no" on that pic), just the "designation" (COSPAR ID), so it successfully looked up the object, it's thus unlikely to be hallucinating.
>>
>>42229866
ok thanks anon, I had not been able to confirm what it was yet, now I have only to worry about fengyun 1c debris this week.

Have any insights about
>1998-067xx reentry next week?
>>
>>42229826
wow
what a long list of nothing ever happens
>>
they shall stop infesting the nightsky with their pinky blinkies and stiffy snifflers



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.