Ok hear me out. If we are in a simulation I may have figured out which one. I was watching a vid and someone said a computer language is called cubic. Because of the cube root of the word cubic I got curious so I looked it up and this is what I found.I found something called "esoteric programming language" and it tests the boundaries of the sim. Makes sense - see the limits of the simulation. And maybe that's what humanity tries to do to escape this cycle, because well, it's programmed in there. We're constantly trying to test the boundaries of this sim because we're literally programmed to do so. But the obstacle is that we're manipulated by HORN-logic based semantics. Out of all the names for that logic it really had to be 'horn'? lolEverything about reality is about cycles and SYNChronicities. A common phrase we use like if we are good at something we would say "I'm programmed for this" or "I'm not WIRED for that" or "I can't COMPUTE". Laws of physics are just the formulas to the sim. Our brain is the computer. Double slit experiment. Apple makes computers and well, u know, atom and eve. We ate the apple.................. But in Snow White they tell us the apple is poisoned xD. People always say "return to the SOURCE", maybe because the esolang is manipulating us with their HORN-based language so we must return back to the source outside of this esolang. I mean the #3 cube one in the pic is LITERALLY our reality. VER BATEM EXACTLY OUR REALITY.And cpu memory is also called memory like us humans. And then I thought of RAM Random Access Memory - and maybe that is when we tap into the SOURCE. We got random access temporarily and pulled that out. That's what artists say all the time. Interesting thought.And then obv the whole Saturn time cube thing and holy shit does this not all add up? We're in a sim guys and it's a 3D virtual reality esolang program.
>its like compootah!
>>42243849TLDR basically lmao. But a computer running a 3D virtual reality esolang sim :P
We are in a sumim but it's not a computer but God's mind
Patches, DLCs, updates, are all just timeline shifts xD. Every new patch is a new timeline xD. And Mandela effect is the old version before some new shit was patched in
Yo come on I'm cooking with this one
>>42243806The notion that reality might be a simulation is widely discussed, and this is the most compelling analysis I’ve come across. I especially appreciated how you connected the different ideas. Although it may not be provable to everyone’s satisfaction, it’s equally difficult to completely disprove. Well done.
>>42243875This. That's the answer gg we solved the simulation. Maybe that's why its the 'END TIMES' and we're onto the next level or the next esolang with harder variables - because we woke up. Or because we didn't wake up therefore "RESET" and start over... This thread is fucking me up right now lolNow what? kekw
Good mix and balance between schizo and mind blowing. I like
>>42243806>And then I thought of RAM Random Access Memory - and maybe that is when we tap into the SOURCE.More like we cannot get true randomness from the system itself. See how much effort programmers put into getting useful random numbers. They have to get it from outside their computer.
>>42244063Bro, fags like Plato have been talking about it already. Just using different concepts but the finality is the same.Simulation is just the latest fad because some have watched that movie made by bros who became sisters. It speaks to the masses but God do the people who talk about it are retards or intellectually limited. At least it's like a shittest allowing to sift through fags like OP who rely on basic common knowledge and those that look a little further. Still, I'm Pickle Neo!
>>42244533Glad you brought this up. I thought the same thing! I knew it was difficult to program true randomness. Maybe nothing is random? Gg muh free will. Or what you said :P>>42244537The parallels are astonishing and to experience the unveiling of it as I researched was mind blowing. Giving evidence relax
>>42244552forgot name. What happens now? We all have to wake up or what? Can you truly escape the sim? What's the source of the source?
>>42244552>The parallels are astonishingConfirmation bias. Once again Plato was talking about the very same things millenia in the past.Baby just put together their first computah and now has to link existence to its components and inner workings because he heard it being a popular retard trend.
>>42244560Fair enough. Nothing to see here, keep working. Maybe this sim is better than the original sim. What did Plato say about leaving the sim? Standard ascension & return to mommy stuff?
>>42244621>What did Plato say about leaving the simCave allegory.
>>42243806We’re all nervous systems. Everything you experience: Meaning, Identity, Reality texture, Symbols, Value, Narrative, Self. All of it is mediated by electrochemical patterning inside a biological prediction engine. No nervous system, no world. Which makes reality, in a very literal sense, a controlled hallucination constrained by sensory input. Your brain is not “seeing reality.” It is generating a model that best explains incoming signals. That’s standard cognitive science, not mysticism. Please learn that maps don't begin out there. They begin with you. If you want to understand the universe one must first understand themself for that is where the important half of the universe lives.
>>42243806As someone who actually knows shit about programming, I couldn't finish this post due to the terminal dose of retardation I contracted reading it.First off, programming languages (including cubic) are made by humans. Why would the simulation be running on a language invented inside the simulation?Second, an esolang is basically just a meme language. Something that's purposefully different and not really used. It has no relation to the actual meaning of the word esoteric.That's about as far as I got before I had to stop reading.
el
>>42243806you are actually fucking insane lol>t.computerscientist
>>42244741You aren't completely wrong, understanding the constructive role of the nervous system is vital, but much of your narrative falls into dualistic thinking. A hallucination is defined against a stable world, calling perception a hallucination implies there is an independent "objective" God's eye view. Perception is a mode of participation in the world, not a degraded model of some "objective" view.The nervous system isn't an isolated brain in the vat: it is always situated within a body, and that body is situated within the world. Cognition is distributed across brain, body, and environment. Maps don't begin "out there" or "in you," but emerge from ongoing engagement with the world. Similarly self-knowledge is not epistemically primary, self and world are mutually defining.
>>42244552>Glad you brought this up. I thought the same thing! I knew it was difficult to program true randomness. Maybe nothing is random? Gg muh free will. Or what you said :PIt's a tricky subject. In the end, maybe only God can be le heckin' random!Funny seeing cooders seethe in the thread tho.
>>42243806How many fucking times do we have to make a big deal out of some autist solving a rubiks cube
>>42248366>A hallucination is defined against a stable worldYes, we can only perceive a fraction of reality. Our material world is stable and that is the hallucination.>calling perception a hallucination implies there is an independent "objective" God's eye viewPrecisely. That's why many people who have OBEs or awakenings often end up believing in a higher power.We can prove easily that there is more to reality than our senses give out. IR, UV light, infrasounds, ultrasounds, microscopic lifeforms to say some we can scientifically prove.>within a body, and that body is situated within the worldAnd the senses you're given to have of this body are limited by said body. So your body is an hallucination. And I've just told you that your sensible appreciation of the world is a hallucination.>maps not in or out but poof magicThat's just retarded anon. Things emerge from our heads tripping the fuck out over the overflow of info we get from the outside. It's not a set interaction, it's an hallucination resulting from out limitations.>epistemicallyKnowledge is a hallucination.
