Anonymous
Just my two cents 04/14/26(Tue)16:49:11 No.42250526

File: image_proxy.jpg (586 KB, 1339x1744)

586 KB JPG

Just my two cents Anonymous 04/14/26(Tue)16:49:11 No.42250526

If a solipsist went looking for answers to their questions, they cannot ever be sure of what someone else says to them, they only confirm what they already know or are inclined to believe. Since any information given by another person is just a programmed part of the show, or mirage that is reality. Lets say if I were solipsistic, how would anybody be able to convince me solipsism isn't real, since the belief entails that nobody else exists, and everything you think is real is actually programmed? Even the prospects of physical arm against me would need to start from you thinking that im a conscious being, because Solipsism is an exclusively first person concept (i don't "exist" from your perspective as any other thing but a collection of sensations coming across your senses being aware of this body, and so is the other way around; which also made me think, what would be the difference between a very convincing hypnagogic illusion responsive to my senses and the reality i live? If all it takes is recognizing that they are illusions to dispel them, why the baseline reality wouldn't be the same?).

Solipsism cannot be disproven technically as the theory is entirely based on assuming itself to be true. It is akin to attempting to try and prove the sky is blue while stuck in an underground cavern, the framework needs to change first. Also, if solipsism is true, how is it possible to be surprised or discover entirely new concepts? The entire argument is that we cannot prove or disprove other people's subjective experiences. Not REALLY. As far as I know, I am TRULY just talking to myself. An all-knowing mind, talking to itself.