I have been tasked with convincing three people that a very obvious technological construct they saw was something mundane. I have never done this before and I'm very pressed for time. Has anyone else here been involved in something like this? How should I go about it?
>>42266411Pretty sure the standard MO is to just fucking lie with a straight face and hope they understand what it means that you showed up at allIf they clearly don’t get it or resist, you escalate to threats. If they don’t believe you, tell them something you’re not supposed to know and wig them out. 99.999% of people would/will shut the fuck up with this method. That’s why the play hasn’t changed for many hundreds of years kek
The key imo is to understand the audience, and combine things they think understand very well with things they do not.i.e. "WEATHER" and "BALLOONS"combining the complicated (weather) with the trivial (balloons)
>>42266411Just say it was a weather balloon and threaten their family.
